[java] Unit testing with Spring Security

My company has been evaluating Spring MVC to determine if we should use it in one of our next projects. So far I love what I've seen, and right now I'm taking a look at the Spring Security module to determine if it's something we can/should use.

Our security requirements are pretty basic; a user just needs to be able to provide a username and password to be able to access certain parts of the site (such as to get info about their account); and there are a handful of pages on the site (FAQs, Support, etc) where an anonymous user should be given access.

In the prototype I've been creating, I have been storing a "LoginCredentials" object (which just contains username and password) in Session for an authenticated user; some of the controllers check to see if this object is in session to get a reference to the logged-in username, for example. I'm looking to replace this home-grown logic with Spring Security instead, which would have the nice benefit of removing any sort of "how do we track logged in users?" and "how do we authenticate users?" from my controller/business code.

It seems like Spring Security provides a (per-thread) "context" object to be able to access the username/principal info from anywhere in your app...

Object principal = SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication().getPrincipal();

... which seems very un-Spring like as this object is a (global) singleton, in a way.

My question is this: if this is the standard way to access information about the authenticated user in Spring Security, what is the accepted way to inject an Authentication object into the SecurityContext so that it is available for my unit tests when the unit tests require an authenticated user?

Do I need to wire this up in the initialization method of each test case?

protected void setUp() throws Exception {
    ...
    SecurityContextHolder.getContext().setAuthentication(
        new UsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken(testUser.getLogin(), testUser.getPassword()));
    ...
}

This seems overly verbose. Is there an easier way?

The SecurityContextHolder object itself seems very un-Spring-like...

Without answering the question about how to create and inject Authentication objects, Spring Security 4.0 provides some welcome alternatives when it comes to testing. The @WithMockUser annotation enables the developer to specify a mock user (with optional authorities, username, password and roles) in a neat way:

@Test
@WithMockUser(username = "admin", authorities = { "ADMIN", "USER" })
public void getMessageWithMockUserCustomAuthorities() {
    String message = messageService.getMessage();
    ...
}

There is also the option to use @WithUserDetails to emulate a UserDetails returned from the UserDetailsService, e.g.

@Test
@WithUserDetails("customUsername")
public void getMessageWithUserDetailsCustomUsername() {
    String message = messageService.getMessage();
    ...
}

More details can be found in the @WithMockUser and the @WithUserDetails chapters in the Spring Security reference docs (from which the above examples were copied)

Just do it the usual way and then insert it using SecurityContextHolder.setContext() in your test class, for example:

Controller:

Authentication a = SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication();

Test:

Authentication authentication = Mockito.mock(Authentication.class);
// Mockito.whens() for your authorization object
SecurityContext securityContext = Mockito.mock(SecurityContext.class);
Mockito.when(securityContext.getAuthentication()).thenReturn(authentication);
SecurityContextHolder.setContext(securityContext);

You are quite right to be concerned - static method calls are particularly problematic for unit testing as you cannot easily mock your dependencies. What I am going to show you is how to let the Spring IoC container do the dirty work for you, leaving you with neat, testable code. SecurityContextHolder is a framework class and while it may be ok for your low-level security code to be tied to it, you probably want to expose a neater interface to your UI components (i.e. controllers).

cliff.meyers mentioned one way around it - create your own "principal" type and inject an instance into consumers. The Spring <aop:scoped-proxy/> tag introduced in 2.x combined with a request scope bean definition, and the factory-method support may be the ticket to the most readable code.

It could work like following:

public class MyUserDetails implements UserDetails {
    // this is your custom UserDetails implementation to serve as a principal
    // implement the Spring methods and add your own methods as appropriate
}

public class MyUserHolder {
    public static MyUserDetails getUserDetails() {
        Authentication a = SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication();
        if (a == null) {
            return null;
        } else {
            return (MyUserDetails) a.getPrincipal();
        }
    }
}

public class MyUserAwareController {        
    MyUserDetails currentUser;

    public void setCurrentUser(MyUserDetails currentUser) { 
        this.currentUser = currentUser;
    }

    // controller code
}

Nothing complicated so far, right? In fact you probably had to do most of this already. Next, in your bean context define a request-scoped bean to hold the principal:

<bean id="userDetails" class="MyUserHolder" factory-method="getUserDetails" scope="request">
    <aop:scoped-proxy/>
</bean>

<bean id="controller" class="MyUserAwareController">
    <property name="currentUser" ref="userDetails"/>
    <!-- other props -->
</bean>

Thanks to the magic of the aop:scoped-proxy tag, the static method getUserDetails will be called every time a new HTTP request comes in and any references to the currentUser property will be resolved correctly. Now unit testing becomes trivial:

protected void setUp() {
    // existing init code

    MyUserDetails user = new MyUserDetails();
    // set up user as you wish
    controller.setCurrentUser(user);
}

Hope this helps!

I would take a look at Spring's abstract test classes and mock objects which are talked about here. They provide a powerful way of auto-wiring your Spring managed objects making unit and integration testing easier.

Personally I would just use Powermock along with Mockito or Easymock to mock the static SecurityContextHolder.getSecurityContext() in your unit/integration test e.g.

@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
@PrepareForTest(SecurityContextHolder.class)
public class YourTestCase {

    @Mock SecurityContext mockSecurityContext;

    @Test
    public void testMethodThatCallsStaticMethod() {
        // Set mock behaviour/expectations on the mockSecurityContext
        when(mockSecurityContext.getAuthentication()).thenReturn(...)
        ...
        // Tell mockito to use Powermock to mock the SecurityContextHolder
        PowerMockito.mockStatic(SecurityContextHolder.class);

        // use Mockito to set up your expectation on SecurityContextHolder.getSecurityContext()
        Mockito.when(SecurityContextHolder.getSecurityContext()).thenReturn(mockSecurityContext);
        ...
    }
}

Admittedly there is quite a bit of boiler plate code here i.e. mock an Authentication object, mock a SecurityContext to return the Authentication and finally mock the SecurityContextHolder to get the SecurityContext, however its very flexible and allows you to unit test for scenarios like null Authentication objects etc. without having to change your (non test) code

General

In the meantime (since version 3.2, in the year 2013, thanks to SEC-2298) the authentication can be injected into MVC methods using the annotation @AuthenticationPrincipal:

@Controller
class Controller {
  @RequestMapping("/somewhere")
  public void doStuff(@AuthenticationPrincipal UserDetails myUser) {
  }
}

Tests

In your unit test you can obviously call this Method directly. In integration tests using org.springframework.test.web.servlet.MockMvc you can use org.springframework.security.test.web.servlet.request.SecurityMockMvcRequestPostProcessors.user() to inject the user like this:

mockMvc.perform(get("/somewhere").with(user(myUserDetails)));

This will however just directly fill the SecurityContext. If you want to make sure that the user is loaded from a session in your test, you can use this:

mockMvc.perform(get("/somewhere").with(sessionUser(myUserDetails)));
/* ... */
private static RequestPostProcessor sessionUser(final UserDetails userDetails) {
    return new RequestPostProcessor() {
        @Override
        public MockHttpServletRequest postProcessRequest(final MockHttpServletRequest request) {
            final SecurityContext securityContext = new SecurityContextImpl();
            securityContext.setAuthentication(
                new UsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken(userDetails, null, userDetails.getAuthorities())
            );
            request.getSession().setAttribute(
                HttpSessionSecurityContextRepository.SPRING_SECURITY_CONTEXT_KEY, securityContext
            );
            return request;
        }
    };
}

Authentication is a property of a thread in server environment in the same way as it is a property of a process in OS. Having a bean instance for accessing authentication information would be inconvenient configuration and wiring overhead without any benefit.

Regarding test authentication there are several ways how you can make your life easier. My favourite is to make a custom annotation @Authenticated and test execution listener, which manages it. Check DirtiesContextTestExecutionListener for inspiration.

You are quite right to be concerned - static method calls are particularly problematic for unit testing as you cannot easily mock your dependencies. What I am going to show you is how to let the Spring IoC container do the dirty work for you, leaving you with neat, testable code. SecurityContextHolder is a framework class and while it may be ok for your low-level security code to be tied to it, you probably want to expose a neater interface to your UI components (i.e. controllers).

cliff.meyers mentioned one way around it - create your own "principal" type and inject an instance into consumers. The Spring <aop:scoped-proxy/> tag introduced in 2.x combined with a request scope bean definition, and the factory-method support may be the ticket to the most readable code.

It could work like following:

public class MyUserDetails implements UserDetails {
    // this is your custom UserDetails implementation to serve as a principal
    // implement the Spring methods and add your own methods as appropriate
}

public class MyUserHolder {
    public static MyUserDetails getUserDetails() {
        Authentication a = SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication();
        if (a == null) {
            return null;
        } else {
            return (MyUserDetails) a.getPrincipal();
        }
    }
}

public class MyUserAwareController {        
    MyUserDetails currentUser;

    public void setCurrentUser(MyUserDetails currentUser) { 
        this.currentUser = currentUser;
    }

    // controller code
}

Nothing complicated so far, right? In fact you probably had to do most of this already. Next, in your bean context define a request-scoped bean to hold the principal:

<bean id="userDetails" class="MyUserHolder" factory-method="getUserDetails" scope="request">
    <aop:scoped-proxy/>
</bean>

<bean id="controller" class="MyUserAwareController">
    <property name="currentUser" ref="userDetails"/>
    <!-- other props -->
</bean>

Thanks to the magic of the aop:scoped-proxy tag, the static method getUserDetails will be called every time a new HTTP request comes in and any references to the currentUser property will be resolved correctly. Now unit testing becomes trivial:

protected void setUp() {
    // existing init code

    MyUserDetails user = new MyUserDetails();
    // set up user as you wish
    controller.setCurrentUser(user);
}

Hope this helps!

You are quite right to be concerned - static method calls are particularly problematic for unit testing as you cannot easily mock your dependencies. What I am going to show you is how to let the Spring IoC container do the dirty work for you, leaving you with neat, testable code. SecurityContextHolder is a framework class and while it may be ok for your low-level security code to be tied to it, you probably want to expose a neater interface to your UI components (i.e. controllers).

cliff.meyers mentioned one way around it - create your own "principal" type and inject an instance into consumers. The Spring <aop:scoped-proxy/> tag introduced in 2.x combined with a request scope bean definition, and the factory-method support may be the ticket to the most readable code.

It could work like following:

public class MyUserDetails implements UserDetails {
    // this is your custom UserDetails implementation to serve as a principal
    // implement the Spring methods and add your own methods as appropriate
}

public class MyUserHolder {
    public static MyUserDetails getUserDetails() {
        Authentication a = SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication();
        if (a == null) {
            return null;
        } else {
            return (MyUserDetails) a.getPrincipal();
        }
    }
}

public class MyUserAwareController {        
    MyUserDetails currentUser;

    public void setCurrentUser(MyUserDetails currentUser) { 
        this.currentUser = currentUser;
    }

    // controller code
}

Nothing complicated so far, right? In fact you probably had to do most of this already. Next, in your bean context define a request-scoped bean to hold the principal:

<bean id="userDetails" class="MyUserHolder" factory-method="getUserDetails" scope="request">
    <aop:scoped-proxy/>
</bean>

<bean id="controller" class="MyUserAwareController">
    <property name="currentUser" ref="userDetails"/>
    <!-- other props -->
</bean>

Thanks to the magic of the aop:scoped-proxy tag, the static method getUserDetails will be called every time a new HTTP request comes in and any references to the currentUser property will be resolved correctly. Now unit testing becomes trivial:

protected void setUp() {
    // existing init code

    MyUserDetails user = new MyUserDetails();
    // set up user as you wish
    controller.setCurrentUser(user);
}

Hope this helps!

Personally I would just use Powermock along with Mockito or Easymock to mock the static SecurityContextHolder.getSecurityContext() in your unit/integration test e.g.

@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
@PrepareForTest(SecurityContextHolder.class)
public class YourTestCase {

    @Mock SecurityContext mockSecurityContext;

    @Test
    public void testMethodThatCallsStaticMethod() {
        // Set mock behaviour/expectations on the mockSecurityContext
        when(mockSecurityContext.getAuthentication()).thenReturn(...)
        ...
        // Tell mockito to use Powermock to mock the SecurityContextHolder
        PowerMockito.mockStatic(SecurityContextHolder.class);

        // use Mockito to set up your expectation on SecurityContextHolder.getSecurityContext()
        Mockito.when(SecurityContextHolder.getSecurityContext()).thenReturn(mockSecurityContext);
        ...
    }
}

Admittedly there is quite a bit of boiler plate code here i.e. mock an Authentication object, mock a SecurityContext to return the Authentication and finally mock the SecurityContextHolder to get the SecurityContext, however its very flexible and allows you to unit test for scenarios like null Authentication objects etc. without having to change your (non test) code

I would take a look at Spring's abstract test classes and mock objects which are talked about here. They provide a powerful way of auto-wiring your Spring managed objects making unit and integration testing easier.

I asked the same question myself over here, and just posted an answer that I recently found. Short answer is: inject a SecurityContext, and refer to SecurityContextHolder only in your Spring config to obtain the SecurityContext

I would take a look at Spring's abstract test classes and mock objects which are talked about here. They provide a powerful way of auto-wiring your Spring managed objects making unit and integration testing easier.

Just do it the usual way and then insert it using SecurityContextHolder.setContext() in your test class, for example:

Controller:

Authentication a = SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication();

Test:

Authentication authentication = Mockito.mock(Authentication.class);
// Mockito.whens() for your authorization object
SecurityContext securityContext = Mockito.mock(SecurityContext.class);
Mockito.when(securityContext.getAuthentication()).thenReturn(authentication);
SecurityContextHolder.setContext(securityContext);

I asked the same question myself over here, and just posted an answer that I recently found. Short answer is: inject a SecurityContext, and refer to SecurityContextHolder only in your Spring config to obtain the SecurityContext

Authentication is a property of a thread in server environment in the same way as it is a property of a process in OS. Having a bean instance for accessing authentication information would be inconvenient configuration and wiring overhead without any benefit.

Regarding test authentication there are several ways how you can make your life easier. My favourite is to make a custom annotation @Authenticated and test execution listener, which manages it. Check DirtiesContextTestExecutionListener for inspiration.

General

In the meantime (since version 3.2, in the year 2013, thanks to SEC-2298) the authentication can be injected into MVC methods using the annotation @AuthenticationPrincipal:

@Controller
class Controller {
  @RequestMapping("/somewhere")
  public void doStuff(@AuthenticationPrincipal UserDetails myUser) {
  }
}

Tests

In your unit test you can obviously call this Method directly. In integration tests using org.springframework.test.web.servlet.MockMvc you can use org.springframework.security.test.web.servlet.request.SecurityMockMvcRequestPostProcessors.user() to inject the user like this:

mockMvc.perform(get("/somewhere").with(user(myUserDetails)));

This will however just directly fill the SecurityContext. If you want to make sure that the user is loaded from a session in your test, you can use this:

mockMvc.perform(get("/somewhere").with(sessionUser(myUserDetails)));
/* ... */
private static RequestPostProcessor sessionUser(final UserDetails userDetails) {
    return new RequestPostProcessor() {
        @Override
        public MockHttpServletRequest postProcessRequest(final MockHttpServletRequest request) {
            final SecurityContext securityContext = new SecurityContextImpl();
            securityContext.setAuthentication(
                new UsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken(userDetails, null, userDetails.getAuthorities())
            );
            request.getSession().setAttribute(
                HttpSessionSecurityContextRepository.SPRING_SECURITY_CONTEXT_KEY, securityContext
            );
            return request;
        }
    };
}

Using a static in this case is the best way to write secure code.

Yes, statics are generally bad - generally, but in this case, the static is what you want. Since the security context associates a Principal with the currently running thread, the most secure code would access the static from the thread as directly as possible. Hiding the access behind a wrapper class that is injected provides an attacker with more points to attack. They wouldn't need access to the code (which they would have a hard time changing if the jar was signed), they just need a way to override the configuration, which can be done at runtime or slipping some XML onto the classpath. Even using annotation injection would be overridable with external XML. Such XML could inject the running system with a rogue principal.

Without answering the question about how to create and inject Authentication objects, Spring Security 4.0 provides some welcome alternatives when it comes to testing. The @WithMockUser annotation enables the developer to specify a mock user (with optional authorities, username, password and roles) in a neat way:

@Test
@WithMockUser(username = "admin", authorities = { "ADMIN", "USER" })
public void getMessageWithMockUserCustomAuthorities() {
    String message = messageService.getMessage();
    ...
}

There is also the option to use @WithUserDetails to emulate a UserDetails returned from the UserDetailsService, e.g.

@Test
@WithUserDetails("customUsername")
public void getMessageWithUserDetailsCustomUsername() {
    String message = messageService.getMessage();
    ...
}

More details can be found in the @WithMockUser and the @WithUserDetails chapters in the Spring Security reference docs (from which the above examples were copied)

I would take a look at Spring's abstract test classes and mock objects which are talked about here. They provide a powerful way of auto-wiring your Spring managed objects making unit and integration testing easier.

You are quite right to be concerned - static method calls are particularly problematic for unit testing as you cannot easily mock your dependencies. What I am going to show you is how to let the Spring IoC container do the dirty work for you, leaving you with neat, testable code. SecurityContextHolder is a framework class and while it may be ok for your low-level security code to be tied to it, you probably want to expose a neater interface to your UI components (i.e. controllers).

cliff.meyers mentioned one way around it - create your own "principal" type and inject an instance into consumers. The Spring <aop:scoped-proxy/> tag introduced in 2.x combined with a request scope bean definition, and the factory-method support may be the ticket to the most readable code.

It could work like following:

public class MyUserDetails implements UserDetails {
    // this is your custom UserDetails implementation to serve as a principal
    // implement the Spring methods and add your own methods as appropriate
}

public class MyUserHolder {
    public static MyUserDetails getUserDetails() {
        Authentication a = SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication();
        if (a == null) {
            return null;
        } else {
            return (MyUserDetails) a.getPrincipal();
        }
    }
}

public class MyUserAwareController {        
    MyUserDetails currentUser;

    public void setCurrentUser(MyUserDetails currentUser) { 
        this.currentUser = currentUser;
    }

    // controller code
}

Nothing complicated so far, right? In fact you probably had to do most of this already. Next, in your bean context define a request-scoped bean to hold the principal:

<bean id="userDetails" class="MyUserHolder" factory-method="getUserDetails" scope="request">
    <aop:scoped-proxy/>
</bean>

<bean id="controller" class="MyUserAwareController">
    <property name="currentUser" ref="userDetails"/>
    <!-- other props -->
</bean>

Thanks to the magic of the aop:scoped-proxy tag, the static method getUserDetails will be called every time a new HTTP request comes in and any references to the currentUser property will be resolved correctly. Now unit testing becomes trivial:

protected void setUp() {
    // existing init code

    MyUserDetails user = new MyUserDetails();
    // set up user as you wish
    controller.setCurrentUser(user);
}

Hope this helps!

After quite a lot of work I was able to reproduce the desired behavior. I had emulated the login through MockMvc. It is too heavy for most unit tests but helpful for integration tests.

Of course I am willing to see those new features in Spring Security 4.0 that will make our testing easier.

package [myPackage]

import static org.junit.Assert.*;

import javax.inject.Inject;
import javax.servlet.http.HttpSession;

import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.experimental.runners.Enclosed;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.mock.web.MockHttpServletRequest;
import org.springframework.security.core.context.SecurityContext;
import org.springframework.security.core.context.SecurityContextHolder;
import org.springframework.security.web.FilterChainProxy;
import org.springframework.security.web.context.HttpSessionSecurityContextRepository;
import org.springframework.test.context.ContextConfiguration;
import org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringJUnit4ClassRunner;
import org.springframework.test.context.web.WebAppConfiguration;
import org.springframework.test.web.servlet.MockMvc;
import org.springframework.test.web.servlet.setup.MockMvcBuilders;
import org.springframework.web.context.WebApplicationContext;

import static org.springframework.test.web.servlet.request.MockMvcRequestBuilders.*;
import static org.springframework.test.web.servlet.result.MockMvcResultMatchers.*;
import static org.springframework.test.web.servlet.result.MockMvcResultHandlers.print;

@ContextConfiguration(locations={[my config file locations]})
@WebAppConfiguration
@RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
public static class getUserConfigurationTester{

    private MockMvc mockMvc;

    @Autowired
    private FilterChainProxy springSecurityFilterChain;

    @Autowired
    private MockHttpServletRequest request;

    @Autowired
    private WebApplicationContext webappContext;

    @Before  
    public void init() {  
        mockMvc = MockMvcBuilders.webAppContextSetup(webappContext)
                    .addFilters(springSecurityFilterChain)
                    .build();
    }  


    @Test
    public void testTwoReads() throws Exception{                        

    HttpSession session  = mockMvc.perform(post("/j_spring_security_check")
                        .param("j_username", "admin_001")
                        .param("j_password", "secret007"))
                        .andDo(print())
                        .andExpect(status().isMovedTemporarily())
                        .andExpect(redirectedUrl("/index"))
                        .andReturn()
                        .getRequest()
                        .getSession();

    request.setSession(session);

    SecurityContext securityContext = (SecurityContext)   session.getAttribute(HttpSessionSecurityContextRepository.SPRING_SECURITY_CONTEXT_KEY);

    SecurityContextHolder.setContext(securityContext);

        // Your test goes here. User is logged with 
}

Using a static in this case is the best way to write secure code.

Yes, statics are generally bad - generally, but in this case, the static is what you want. Since the security context associates a Principal with the currently running thread, the most secure code would access the static from the thread as directly as possible. Hiding the access behind a wrapper class that is injected provides an attacker with more points to attack. They wouldn't need access to the code (which they would have a hard time changing if the jar was signed), they just need a way to override the configuration, which can be done at runtime or slipping some XML onto the classpath. Even using annotation injection would be overridable with external XML. Such XML could inject the running system with a rogue principal.