I wanted to make this post because I'm an undergrad CS student and more and more we use OpenDSA and other open source textbooks. It seems like from the top rated answer that the way height and depth is being taught has changed from one generation to the next, and I'm posting this so everyone is aware that this discrepancy now exists and hopefully won't cause bugs in any programs! Thanks.
From the OpenDSA Data Structures & Algos book:
If n1, n2,...,nk is a sequence of nodes in the tree such that ni is the parent of ni+1 for 1<=i<k, then this sequence is called a path from n1 to nk. The length of the path is k-1. If there is a path from node R to node M, then R is an ancestor of M, and M is a descendant of R. Thus, all nodes in the tree are descendants of the root of the tree, while the root is the ancestor of all nodes. The depth of a node M in the tree is the length of the path from the root of the tree to M. The height of a tree is one more than the depth of the deepest node in the tree. All nodes of depth d are at level d in the tree. The root is the only node at level 0, and its depth is 0.
Figure 7.2.1: A binary tree. Node A is the root. Nodes B and C are A's children. Nodes B and D together form a subtree. Node B has two children: Its left child is the empty tree and its right child is D. Nodes A, C, and E are ancestors of G. Nodes D, E, and F make up level 2 of the tree; node A is at level 0. The edges from A to C to E to G form a path of length 3. Nodes D, G, H, and I are leaves. Nodes A, B, C, E, and F are internal nodes. The depth of I is 3. The height of this tree is 4.