[ruby] What is Ruby's double-colon `::`?

What is this double-colon ::? E.g. Foo::Bar.

I found a definition:

The :: is a unary operator that allows: constants, instance methods and class methods defined within a class or module, to be accessed from anywhere outside the class or module.

What good is scope (private, protected) if you can just use :: to expose anything?

Adding to previous answers, it is valid Ruby to use :: to access instance methods. All the following are valid:

MyClass::new::instance_method
MyClass::new.instance_method
MyClass.new::instance_method
MyClass.new.instance_method

_{As per best practices I believe only the last one is recommended.}

It is all about preventing definitions from clashing with other code linked in to your project. It means you can keep things separate.

For example you can have one method called "run" in your code and you will still be able to call your method rather than the "run" method that has been defined in some other library that you have linked in.

module Amimal
      module Herbivorous
            EATER="plants" 
      end
end

Amimal::Herbivorous::EATER => "plants"

:: Is used to create a scope . In order to access Constant EATER from 2 modules we need to scope the modules to reach up to the constant

:: Lets you access a constant, module, or class defined inside another class or module. It is used to provide namespaces so that method and class names don't conflict with other classes by different authors.

When you see ActiveRecord::Base in Rails it means that Rails has something like

module ActiveRecord
  class Base
  end
end

i.e. a class called Base inside a module ActiveRecord which is then referenced as ActiveRecord::Base (you can find this in the Rails source in activerecord-n.n.n/lib/active_record/base.rb)

A common use of :: is to access constants defined in modules e.g.

module Math
  PI = 3.141 # ...
end

puts Math::PI

The :: operator does not allow you to bypass visibility of methods marked private or protected.

Ruby on rails uses :: for namespace resolution.

class User < ActiveRecord::Base

  VIDEOS_COUNT = 10
  Languages = { "English" => "en", "Spanish" => "es", "Mandarin Chinese" => "cn"}

end

To use it :

User::VIDEOS_COUNT
User::Languages
User::Languages.values_at("Spanish") => "en"

Also, other usage is : When using nested routes

OmniauthCallbacksController is defined under users.

And routed as:

devise_for :users, controllers: {omniauth_callbacks: "users/omniauth_callbacks"}


class Users::OmniauthCallbacksController < Devise::OmniauthCallbacksController

end

No, it is not to access every method, it is a "resolution" operator, that is, you use it to resolve the scope (or location you can say) of a constant/static symbol.

For example in the first of your line, Rails use it to find the Base class inside the ActiveRecord.Module, in your second one it is used to locate the class method (static) of the Routes class, etc, etc.

It is not used to expose anything, its used to "locate" stuff around your scopes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scope_resolution_operator

This simple example illustrates it:

MR_COUNT = 0        # constant defined on main Object class
module Foo
  MR_COUNT = 0
  ::MR_COUNT = 1    # set global count to 1
  MR_COUNT = 2      # set local count to 2
end

puts MR_COUNT       # this is the global constant: 1
puts Foo::MR_COUNT  # this is the local constant: 2

Taken from http://www.tutorialspoint.com/ruby/ruby_operators.htm

What good is scope (private, protected) if you can just use :: to expose anything?

In Ruby, everything is exposed and everything can be modified from anywhere else.

If you're worried about the fact that classes can be changed from outside the "class definition", then Ruby probably isn't for you.

On the other hand, if you're frustrated by Java's classes being locked down, then Ruby is probably what you're looking for.

Surprisingly, all 10 answers here say the same thing. The '::' is a namespace resolution operator, and yes it is true. But there is one gotcha that you have to realize about the namespace resolution operator when it comes to the constant lookup algorithm. As Matz delineates in his book, 'The Ruby Programming Language', constant lookup has multiple steps. First, it searches a constant in the lexical scope where the constant is referenced. If it does not find the constant within the lexical scope, it then searches the inheritance hierarchy. Because of this constant lookup algorithm, below we get the expected results:

module A
  module B
      PI = 3.14
      module C
        class E
          PI = 3.15
        end
        class F < E
          def get_pi
            puts PI
          end
        end
      end
  end
end
f = A::B::C::F.new
f.get_pi
> 3.14

While F inherits from E, the B module is within the lexical scope of F. Consequently, F instances will refer to the constant PI defined in the module B. Now if module B did not define PI, then F instances will refer to the PI constant defined in the superclass E.

But what if we were to use '::' rather than nesting modules? Would we get the same result? No!

By using the namespace resolution operator when defining nested modules, the nested modules and classes are no longer within the lexical scope of their outer modules. As you can see below, PI defined in A::B is not in the lexical scope of A::B::C::D and thus we get uninitialized constant when trying to refer to PI in the get_pi instance method:

module A
end

module A::B
  PI = 3.14
end

module A::B::C
  class D
    def get_pi
      puts PI
    end
  end
end
d = A::B::C::D.new
d.get_pi
NameError: uninitialized constant A::B::C::D::PI
Did you mean?  A::B::PI