I've been searching a lot but couldn't find a solution. How do you deal with a DateTime that should be able to contain an uninitialized value (equivalent to null)? I have a class which might have a DateTime property value set or not. I was thinking of initializing the property holder to DateTime.MinValue, which then could easily be checked. I guess this is a quite common question, how do you do that?
Following way works as well
myClass.PublishDate = toPublish ? DateTime.Now : (DateTime?)null;
Please note that property PublishDate should be DateTime?
It is worth pointing out that, while a DateTime
variable cannot be null
, it still can be compared to null
without a compiler error:
DateTime date;
...
if(date == null) // <-- will never be 'true'
...
Just be warned - When using a Nullable its obviously no longer a 'pure' datetime object, as such you cannot access the DateTime members directly. I'll try and explain.
By using Nullable<> you're basically wrapping DateTime in a container (thank you generics) of which is nullable - obviously its purpose. This container has its own properties which you can call that will provide access to the aforementioned DateTime object; after using the correct property - in this case Nullable.Value - you then have access to the standard DateTime members, properties etc.
So - now the issue comes to mind as to the best way to access the DateTime object. There are a few ways, number 1 is by FAR the best and 2 is "dude why".
Using the Nullable.Value property,
DateTime date = myNullableObject.Value.ToUniversalTime(); //Works
DateTime date = myNullableObject.ToUniversalTime(); //Not a datetime object, fails
Converting the nullable object to datetime using Convert.ToDateTime(),
DateTime date = Convert.ToDateTime(myNullableObject).ToUniversalTime(); //works but why...
Although the answer is well documented at this point, I believe the usage of Nullable was probably worth posting about. Sorry if you disagree.
edit: Removed a third option as it was a bit overly specific and case dependent.
I always set the time to DateTime.MinValue
. This way I do not get any NullErrorException and I can compare it to a date that I know isn't set.
I'd consider using a nullable types.
DateTime? myDate
instead of DateTime myDate
.
I'd consider using a nullable types.
DateTime? myDate
instead of DateTime myDate
.
If you're using .NET 2.0 (or later) you can use the nullable type:
DateTime? dt = null;
or
Nullable<DateTime> dt = null;
then later:
dt = new DateTime();
And you can check the value with:
if (dt.HasValue)
{
// Do something with dt.Value
}
Or you can use it like:
DateTime dt2 = dt ?? DateTime.MinValue;
You can read more here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/b3h38hb0.aspx
Following way works as well
myClass.PublishDate = toPublish ? DateTime.Now : (DateTime?)null;
Please note that property PublishDate should be DateTime?
You can use a nullable class.
DateTime? date = new DateTime?();
DateTime? MyDateTime{get;set;}
MyDateTime = (dr["f1"] == DBNull.Value) ? (DateTime?)null : ((DateTime)dr["f1"]);
Although everyone has already given you the answer , I'll mention a way which makes it easy to pass a datetime into a function
[ERROR:cannot convert system.datetime? to system.datetime]
DateTime? dt = null;
DateTime dte = Convert.ToDateTime(dt);
Now you may pass dte inside the function without any issues.
If you're using .NET 2.0 (or later) you can use the nullable type:
DateTime? dt = null;
or
Nullable<DateTime> dt = null;
then later:
dt = new DateTime();
And you can check the value with:
if (dt.HasValue)
{
// Do something with dt.Value
}
Or you can use it like:
DateTime dt2 = dt ?? DateTime.MinValue;
You can read more here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/b3h38hb0.aspx
You can set the DateTime to Nullable. By default DateTime is not nullable. You can make it nullable in a couple of ways. Using a question mark after the type DateTime? myTime or using the generic style Nullable.
DateTime? nullDate = null;
or
DateTime? nullDate;
I'd consider using a nullable types.
DateTime? myDate
instead of DateTime myDate
.
You can use a nullable class.
DateTime? date = new DateTime?();
You can use a nullable DateTime for this.
Nullable<DateTime> myDateTime;
or the same thing written like this:
DateTime? myDateTime;
You can use a nullable class.
DateTime? date = new DateTime?();
If you're using .NET 2.0 (or later) you can use the nullable type:
DateTime? dt = null;
or
Nullable<DateTime> dt = null;
then later:
dt = new DateTime();
And you can check the value with:
if (dt.HasValue)
{
// Do something with dt.Value
}
Or you can use it like:
DateTime dt2 = dt ?? DateTime.MinValue;
You can read more here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/b3h38hb0.aspx
I'd consider using a nullable types.
DateTime? myDate
instead of DateTime myDate
.
If you're using .NET 2.0 (or later) you can use the nullable type:
DateTime? dt = null;
or
Nullable<DateTime> dt = null;
then later:
dt = new DateTime();
And you can check the value with:
if (dt.HasValue)
{
// Do something with dt.Value
}
Or you can use it like:
DateTime dt2 = dt ?? DateTime.MinValue;
You can read more here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/b3h38hb0.aspx
Just be warned - When using a Nullable its obviously no longer a 'pure' datetime object, as such you cannot access the DateTime members directly. I'll try and explain.
By using Nullable<> you're basically wrapping DateTime in a container (thank you generics) of which is nullable - obviously its purpose. This container has its own properties which you can call that will provide access to the aforementioned DateTime object; after using the correct property - in this case Nullable.Value - you then have access to the standard DateTime members, properties etc.
So - now the issue comes to mind as to the best way to access the DateTime object. There are a few ways, number 1 is by FAR the best and 2 is "dude why".
Using the Nullable.Value property,
DateTime date = myNullableObject.Value.ToUniversalTime(); //Works
DateTime date = myNullableObject.ToUniversalTime(); //Not a datetime object, fails
Converting the nullable object to datetime using Convert.ToDateTime(),
DateTime date = Convert.ToDateTime(myNullableObject).ToUniversalTime(); //works but why...
Although the answer is well documented at this point, I believe the usage of Nullable was probably worth posting about. Sorry if you disagree.
edit: Removed a third option as it was a bit overly specific and case dependent.
You can use a nullable class.
DateTime? date = new DateTime?();
You can set the DateTime to Nullable. By default DateTime is not nullable. You can make it nullable in a couple of ways. Using a question mark after the type DateTime? myTime or using the generic style Nullable.
DateTime? nullDate = null;
or
DateTime? nullDate;
Given the nature of a date/time data type it cannot contain a null
value, i.e. it needs to contain a value, it cannot be blank or contain nothing. If you mark a date/time variable as nullable
then only can you assign a null value to it. So what you are looking to do is one of two things (there might be more but I can only think of two):
Assign a minimum date/time value to your variable if you don't have a value for it. You can assign a maximum date/time value as well - whichever way suits you. Just make sure that you are consistent site-wide when checking your date/time values. Decide on using min
or max
and stick with it.
Mark your date/time variable as nullable
. This way you can set your date/time variable to null
if you don't have a variable to it.
Let me demonstrate my first point using an example. The DateTime
variable type cannot be set to null, it needs a value, in this case I am going to set it to the DateTime
's minimum value if there is no value.
My scenario is that I have a BlogPost
class. It has many different fields/properties but I chose only to use two for this example. DatePublished
is when the post was published to the website and has to contain a date/time value. DateModified
is when a post is modified, so it doesn't have to contain a value, but can contain a value.
public class BlogPost : Entity
{
public DateTime DateModified { get; set; }
public DateTime DatePublished { get; set; }
}
Using ADO.NET
to get the data from the database (assign DateTime.MinValue
is there is no value):
BlogPost blogPost = new BlogPost();
blogPost.DateModified = sqlDataReader.IsDBNull(0) ? DateTime.MinValue : sqlDataReader.GetFieldValue<DateTime>(0);
blogPost.DatePublished = sqlDataReader.GetFieldValue<DateTime>(1);
You can accomplish my second point by marking the DateModified
field as nullable
. Now you can set it to null
if there is no value for it:
public DateTime? DateModified { get; set; }
Using ADO.NET
to get the data from the database, it will look a bit different to the way it was done above (assigning null
instead of DateTime.MinValue
):
BlogPost blogPost = new BlogPost();
blogPost.DateModified = sqlDataReader.IsDBNull(0) ? (DateTime?)null : sqlDataReader.GetFieldValue<DateTime>(0);
blogPost.DatePublished = sqlDataReader.GetFieldValue<DateTime>(1);
I hope this helps to clear up any confusion. Given that my response is about 8 years later you are probably an expert C# programmer by now :)
If you are, sometimes, expecting null you could use something like this:
var orderResults = Repository.GetOrders(id, (DateTime?)model.DateFrom, (DateTime?)model.DateTo)
In your repository use null-able datetime.
public Orders[] GetOrders(string id, DateTime? dateFrom, DateTime? dateTo){...}
Although everyone has already given you the answer , I'll mention a way which makes it easy to pass a datetime into a function
[ERROR:cannot convert system.datetime? to system.datetime]
DateTime? dt = null;
DateTime dte = Convert.ToDateTime(dt);
Now you may pass dte inside the function without any issues.
I always set the time to DateTime.MinValue
. This way I do not get any NullErrorException and I can compare it to a date that I know isn't set.
If you are, sometimes, expecting null you could use something like this:
var orderResults = Repository.GetOrders(id, (DateTime?)model.DateFrom, (DateTime?)model.DateTo)
In your repository use null-able datetime.
public Orders[] GetOrders(string id, DateTime? dateFrom, DateTime? dateTo){...}
Given the nature of a date/time data type it cannot contain a null
value, i.e. it needs to contain a value, it cannot be blank or contain nothing. If you mark a date/time variable as nullable
then only can you assign a null value to it. So what you are looking to do is one of two things (there might be more but I can only think of two):
Assign a minimum date/time value to your variable if you don't have a value for it. You can assign a maximum date/time value as well - whichever way suits you. Just make sure that you are consistent site-wide when checking your date/time values. Decide on using min
or max
and stick with it.
Mark your date/time variable as nullable
. This way you can set your date/time variable to null
if you don't have a variable to it.
Let me demonstrate my first point using an example. The DateTime
variable type cannot be set to null, it needs a value, in this case I am going to set it to the DateTime
's minimum value if there is no value.
My scenario is that I have a BlogPost
class. It has many different fields/properties but I chose only to use two for this example. DatePublished
is when the post was published to the website and has to contain a date/time value. DateModified
is when a post is modified, so it doesn't have to contain a value, but can contain a value.
public class BlogPost : Entity
{
public DateTime DateModified { get; set; }
public DateTime DatePublished { get; set; }
}
Using ADO.NET
to get the data from the database (assign DateTime.MinValue
is there is no value):
BlogPost blogPost = new BlogPost();
blogPost.DateModified = sqlDataReader.IsDBNull(0) ? DateTime.MinValue : sqlDataReader.GetFieldValue<DateTime>(0);
blogPost.DatePublished = sqlDataReader.GetFieldValue<DateTime>(1);
You can accomplish my second point by marking the DateModified
field as nullable
. Now you can set it to null
if there is no value for it:
public DateTime? DateModified { get; set; }
Using ADO.NET
to get the data from the database, it will look a bit different to the way it was done above (assigning null
instead of DateTime.MinValue
):
BlogPost blogPost = new BlogPost();
blogPost.DateModified = sqlDataReader.IsDBNull(0) ? (DateTime?)null : sqlDataReader.GetFieldValue<DateTime>(0);
blogPost.DatePublished = sqlDataReader.GetFieldValue<DateTime>(1);
I hope this helps to clear up any confusion. Given that my response is about 8 years later you are probably an expert C# programmer by now :)
I had the same problem as I had to give Null as a parameter for DateTime while performing Unit test for Throws ArgumentNullException.It worked in my case using the following option:
Assert.Throws<ArgumentNullException>(()=>sut.StartingDate = DateTime.Parse(null));
You can use a nullable DateTime for this.
Nullable<DateTime> myDateTime;
or the same thing written like this:
DateTime? myDateTime;
I had the same problem as I had to give Null as a parameter for DateTime while performing Unit test for Throws ArgumentNullException.It worked in my case using the following option:
Assert.Throws<ArgumentNullException>(()=>sut.StartingDate = DateTime.Parse(null));
It is worth pointing out that, while a DateTime
variable cannot be null
, it still can be compared to null
without a compiler error:
DateTime date;
...
if(date == null) // <-- will never be 'true'
...
I always set the time to DateTime.MinValue
. This way I do not get any NullErrorException and I can compare it to a date that I know isn't set.
You can set the DateTime to Nullable. By default DateTime is not nullable. You can make it nullable in a couple of ways. Using a question mark after the type DateTime? myTime or using the generic style Nullable.
DateTime? nullDate = null;
or
DateTime? nullDate;
DateTime? MyDateTime{get;set;}
MyDateTime = (dr["f1"] == DBNull.Value) ? (DateTime?)null : ((DateTime)dr["f1"]);
You can use a nullable DateTime for this.
Nullable<DateTime> myDateTime;
or the same thing written like this:
DateTime? myDateTime;
Source: Stackoverflow.com