I have a nested list of data. Its length is 132 and each item is a list of length 20. Is there a quick way to convert this structure into a data frame that has 132 rows and 20 columns of data?
Here is some sample data to work with:
l <- replicate(
132,
as.list(sample(letters, 20)),
simplify = FALSE
)
The answer is
You can use the plyr package.
For example a nested list of the form
l <- list(a = list(var.1 = 1, var.2 = 2, var.3 = 3)
, b = list(var.1 = 4, var.2 = 5, var.3 = 6)
, c = list(var.1 = 7, var.2 = 8, var.3 = 9)
, d = list(var.1 = 10, var.2 = 11, var.3 = 12)
)
has now a length of 4 and each list in l contains another list of the length 3.
Now you can run
library (plyr)
df <- ldply (l, data.frame)
and should get the same result as in the answer @Marek and @nico.
A short (but perhaps not the fastest) way to do this would be to use base r, since a data frame is just a list of equal length vectors. Thus the conversion between your input list and a 30 x 132 data.frame would be:
df <- data.frame(l)
From there we can transpose it to a 132 x 30 matrix, and convert it back to a dataframe:
new_df <- data.frame(t(df))
As a one-liner:
new_df <- data.frame(t(data.frame(l)))
The rownames will be pretty annoying to look at, but you could always rename those with
rownames(new_df) <- 1:nrow(new_df)
Depending on the structure of your lists there are some tidyverse options that work nicely with unequal length lists:
l <- list(a = list(var.1 = 1, var.2 = 2, var.3 = 3)
, b = list(var.1 = 4, var.2 = 5)
, c = list(var.1 = 7, var.3 = 9)
, d = list(var.1 = 10, var.2 = 11, var.3 = NA))
df <- dplyr::bind_rows(l)
df <- purrr::map_df(l, dplyr::bind_rows)
df <- purrr::map_df(l, ~.x)
# all create the same data frame:
# A tibble: 4 x 3
var.1 var.2 var.3
<dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
1 1 2 3
2 4 5 NA
3 7 NA 9
4 10 11 NA
You can also mix vectors and data frames:
library(dplyr)
bind_rows(
list(a = 1, b = 2),
data_frame(a = 3:4, b = 5:6),
c(a = 7)
)
# A tibble: 4 x 2
a b
<dbl> <dbl>
1 1 2
2 3 5
3 4 6
4 7 NA
This is what finally worked for me:
do.call("rbind", lapply(S1, as.data.frame))
l <- replicate(10,list(sample(letters, 20)))
a <-lapply(l[1:10],data.frame)
do.call("cbind", a)
How about using map_ function together with a for loop? Here is my solution:
list_to_df <- function(list_to_convert) {
tmp_data_frame <- data.frame()
for (i in 1:length(list_to_convert)) {
tmp <- map_dfr(list_to_convert[[i]], data.frame)
tmp_data_frame <- rbind(tmp_data_frame, tmp)
}
return(tmp_data_frame)
}
where map_dfr convert each of the list element into a data.frame and then rbind union them altogether.
In your case, I guess it would be:
converted_list <- list_to_df(l)
assume your list is called L,
data.frame(Reduce(rbind, L))
The package data.table has the function rbindlist which is a superfast implementation of do.call(rbind, list(...)).
It can take a list of lists, data.frames or data.tables as input.
library(data.table)
ll <- list(a = list(var.1 = 1, var.2 = 2, var.3 = 3)
, b = list(var.1 = 4, var.2 = 5, var.3 = 6)
, c = list(var.1 = 7, var.2 = 8, var.3 = 9)
, d = list(var.1 = 10, var.2 = 11, var.3 = 12)
)
DT <- rbindlist(ll)
This returns a data.table inherits from data.frame.
If you really want to convert back to a data.frame use as.data.frame(DT)
Every solution I have found seems to only apply when every object in a list has the same length. I needed to convert a list to a data.frame when the length of the objects in the list were of unequal length. Below is the base R solution I came up with. It no doubt is very inefficient, but it does seem to work.
x1 <- c(2, 13)
x2 <- c(2, 4, 6, 9, 11, 13)
x3 <- c(1, 1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5, 5, 6, 7, 7, 8, 9, 9, 10, 11, 11, 12, 13, 13)
my.results <- list(x1, x2, x3)
# identify length of each list
my.lengths <- unlist(lapply(my.results, function (x) { length(unlist(x))}))
my.lengths
#[1] 2 6 20
# create a vector of values in all lists
my.values <- as.numeric(unlist(c(do.call(rbind, lapply(my.results, as.data.frame)))))
my.values
#[1] 2 13 2 4 6 9 11 13 1 1 2 3 3 4 5 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 10 11 11 12 13 13
my.matrix <- matrix(NA, nrow = max(my.lengths), ncol = length(my.lengths))
my.cumsum <- cumsum(my.lengths)
mm <- 1
for(i in 1:length(my.lengths)) {
my.matrix[1:my.lengths[i],i] <- my.values[mm:my.cumsum[i]]
mm <- my.cumsum[i]+1
}
my.df <- as.data.frame(my.matrix)
my.df
# V1 V2 V3
#1 2 2 1
#2 13 4 1
#3 NA 6 2
#4 NA 9 3
#5 NA 11 3
#6 NA 13 4
#7 NA NA 5
#8 NA NA 5
#9 NA NA 6
#10 NA NA 7
#11 NA NA 7
#12 NA NA 8
#13 NA NA 9
#14 NA NA 9
#15 NA NA 10
#16 NA NA 11
#17 NA NA 11
#18 NA NA 12
#19 NA NA 13
#20 NA NA 13
Fixing the sample data so it matches the original description 'each item is a list of length 20'
mylistlist <- replicate(
132,
as.list(sample(letters, 20)),
simplify = FALSE
)
we can convert it to a data frame like this:
data.frame(t(sapply(mylistlist,c)))
sapply converts it to a matrix.
data.frame converts the matrix to a data frame.
resulting in:
Reshape2 yields the same output as the plyr example above:
library(reshape2)
l <- list(a = list(var.1 = 1, var.2 = 2, var.3 = 3)
, b = list(var.1 = 4, var.2 = 5, var.3 = 6)
, c = list(var.1 = 7, var.2 = 8, var.3 = 9)
, d = list(var.1 = 10, var.2 = 11, var.3 = 12)
)
l <- melt(l)
dcast(l, L1 ~ L2)
yields:
L1 var.1 var.2 var.3
1 a 1 2 3
2 b 4 5 6
3 c 7 8 9
4 d 10 11 12
If you were almost out of pixels you could do this all in 1 line w/ recast().
Try collapse::unlist2d (shorthand for 'unlist to data.frame'):
l <- replicate(
132,
list(sample(letters, 20)),
simplify = FALSE
)
library(collapse)
head(unlist2d(l))
.id.1 .id.2 V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 V10 V11 V12 V13 V14 V15 V16 V17 V18 V19 V20
1 1 1 e x b d s p a c k z q m u l h n r t o y
2 2 1 r t i k m b h n s e p f o c x l g v a j
3 3 1 t r v z a u c o w f m b d g p q y e n k
4 4 1 x i e p f d q k h b j s z a t v y l m n
5 5 1 d z k y a p b h c v f m u l n q e i w j
6 6 1 l f s u o v p z q e r c h n a t m k y x
head(unlist2d(l, idcols = FALSE))
V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 V10 V11 V12 V13 V14 V15 V16 V17 V18 V19 V20
1 e x b d s p a c k z q m u l h n r t o y
2 r t i k m b h n s e p f o c x l g v a j
3 t r v z a u c o w f m b d g p q y e n k
4 x i e p f d q k h b j s z a t v y l m n
5 d z k y a p b h c v f m u l n q e i w j
6 l f s u o v p z q e r c h n a t m k y x
Extending on @Marek's answer: if you want to avoid strings to be turned into factors and efficiency is not a concern try
do.call(rbind, lapply(your_list, data.frame, stringsAsFactors=FALSE))
The following simple command worked for me:
myDf <- as.data.frame(myList)
Reference (Quora answer)
> myList <- list(a = c(1, 2, 3), b = c(4, 5, 6))
> myList
$a
[1] 1 2 3
$b
[1] 4 5 6
> myDf <- as.data.frame(myList)
a b
1 1 4
2 2 5
3 3 6
> class(myDf)
[1] "data.frame"
But this will fail if it’s not obvious how to convert the list to a data frame:
> myList <- list(a = c(1, 2, 3), b = c(4, 5, 6, 7))
> myDf <- as.data.frame(myList)
Error in (function (..., row.names = NULL, check.rows = FALSE, check.names = TRUE, :
arguments imply differing number of rows: 3, 4
Note: The answer is toward the title of the question and may skips some details of the question
For the general case of deeply nested lists with 3 or more levels like the ones obtained from a nested JSON:
{
"2015": {
"spain": {"population": 43, "GNP": 9},
"sweden": {"population": 7, "GNP": 6}},
"2016": {
"spain": {"population": 45, "GNP": 10},
"sweden": {"population": 9, "GNP": 8}}
}
consider the approach of melt() to convert the nested list to a tall format first:
myjson <- jsonlite:fromJSON(file("test.json"))
tall <- reshape2::melt(myjson)[, c("L1", "L2", "L3", "value")]
L1 L2 L3 value
1 2015 spain population 43
2 2015 spain GNP 9
3 2015 sweden population 7
4 2015 sweden GNP 6
5 2016 spain population 45
6 2016 spain GNP 10
7 2016 sweden population 9
8 2016 sweden GNP 8
followed by dcast() then to wide again into a tidy dataset where each variable forms a a column and each observation forms a row:
wide <- reshape2::dcast(tall, L1+L2~L3)
# left side of the formula defines the rows/observations and the
# right side defines the variables/measurements
L1 L2 GNP population
1 2015 spain 9 43
2 2015 sweden 6 7
3 2016 spain 10 45
4 2016 sweden 8 9
More answers, along with timings in the answer to this question: What is the most efficient way to cast a list as a data frame?
The quickest way, that doesn't produce a dataframe with lists rather than vectors for columns appears to be (from Martin Morgan's answer):
l <- list(list(col1="a",col2=1),list(col1="b",col2=2))
f = function(x) function(i) unlist(lapply(x, `[[`, i), use.names=FALSE)
as.data.frame(Map(f(l), names(l[[1]])))
For a paralleled (multicore, multisession, etc) solution using purrr family of solutions, use:
library (furrr)
plan(multisession) # see below to see which other plan() is the more efficient
myTibble <- future_map_dfc(l, ~.x)
Where l is the list.
To benchmark the most efficient plan() you can use:
library(tictoc)
plan(sequential) # reference time
# plan(multisession) # benchamark plan() goes here. See ?plan().
tic()
myTibble <- future_map_dfc(l, ~.x)
toc()
This method uses a tidyverse package (purrr).
The list:
x <- as.list(mtcars)
Converting it into a data frame (a tibble more specifically):
library(purrr)
map_df(x, ~.x)
With rbind
do.call(rbind.data.frame, your_list)
Edit: Previous version return data.frame of list's instead of vectors (as @IanSudbery pointed out in comments).
Sometimes your data may be a list of lists of vectors of the same length.
lolov = list(list(c(1,2,3),c(4,5,6)), list(c(7,8,9),c(10,11,12),c(13,14,15)) )
(The inner vectors could also be lists, but I'm simplifying to make this easier to read).
Then you can make the following modification. Remember that you can unlist one level at a time:
lov = unlist(lolov, recursive = FALSE )
> lov
[[1]]
[1] 1 2 3
[[2]]
[1] 4 5 6
[[3]]
[1] 7 8 9
[[4]]
[1] 10 11 12
[[5]]
[1] 13 14 15
Now use your favorite method mentioned in the other answers:
library(plyr)
>ldply(lov)
V1 V2 V3
1 1 2 3
2 4 5 6
3 7 8 9
4 10 11 12
5 13 14 15
The tibble package has a function enframe() that solves this problem by coercing nested list objects to nested tibble ("tidy" data frame) objects. Here's a brief example from R for Data Science:
x <- list(
a = 1:5,
b = 3:4,
c = 5:6
)
df <- enframe(x)
df
#> # A tibble: 3 × 2
#> name value
#> <chr> <list>
#> 1 a <int [5]>
#> 2 b <int [2]>
#> 3 c <int [2]>
Since you have several nests in your list, l, you can use the unlist(recursive = FALSE) to remove unnecessary nesting to get just a single hierarchical list and then pass to enframe(). I use tidyr::unnest() to unnest the output into a single level "tidy" data frame, which has your two columns (one for the group name and one for the observations with the groups value). If you want columns that make wide, you can add a column using add_column() that just repeats the order of the values 132 times. Then just spread() the values.
library(tidyverse)
l <- replicate(
132,
list(sample(letters, 20)),
simplify = FALSE
)
l_tib <- l %>%
unlist(recursive = FALSE) %>%
enframe() %>%
unnest()
l_tib
#> # A tibble: 2,640 x 2
#> name value
#> <int> <chr>
#> 1 1 d
#> 2 1 z
#> 3 1 l
#> 4 1 b
#> 5 1 i
#> 6 1 j
#> 7 1 g
#> 8 1 w
#> 9 1 r
#> 10 1 p
#> # ... with 2,630 more rows
l_tib_spread <- l_tib %>%
add_column(index = rep(1:20, 132)) %>%
spread(key = index, value = value)
l_tib_spread
#> # A tibble: 132 x 21
#> name `1` `2` `3` `4` `5` `6` `7` `8` `9` `10` `11`
#> * <int> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr>
#> 1 1 d z l b i j g w r p y
#> 2 2 w s h r i k d u a f j
#> 3 3 r v q s m u j p f a i
#> 4 4 o y x n p i f m h l t
#> 5 5 p w v d k a l r j q n
#> 6 6 i k w o c n m b v e q
#> 7 7 c d m i u o e z v g p
#> 8 8 f s e o p n k x c z h
#> 9 9 d g o h x i c y t f j
#> 10 10 y r f k d o b u i x s
#> # ... with 122 more rows, and 9 more variables: `12` <chr>, `13` <chr>,
#> # `14` <chr>, `15` <chr>, `16` <chr>, `17` <chr>, `18` <chr>,
#> # `19` <chr>, `20` <chr>
Source: Stackoverflow.com