What is the difference between private and protected members in C++ classes?
I understand from best practice conventions that variables and functions which are not called outside the class should be made private—but looking at my MFC project, MFC seems to favor protected.
What's the difference and which should I use?
private is preferred for member data. Members in C++ classes are private by default.
public is preferred for member functions, though it is a matter of opinion. At least some methods must be accessible. public is accessible to all. It is the most flexible option and least safe. Anybody can use them, and anybody can misuse them.
private is not accessible at all. Nobody can use them outside the class, and nobody can misuse them. Not even in derived classes.
protected is a compromise because it can be used in derived classes. When you derive from a class, you have a good understanding of the base class, and you are careful not to misuse these members.
MFC is a C++ wrapper for Windows API, it prefers public and protected. Classes generated by Visual Studio wizard have an ugly mix of protected, public, and private members. But there is some logic to MFC classes themselves.
Members such as SetWindowText are public because you often need to access these members.
Members such as OnLButtonDown, handle notifications received by the window. They should not be accessed, therefore they are protected. You can still access them in the derived class to override these functions.
Some members have to do threads and message loops, they should not be accessed or override, so they are declared as private
In C++ structures, members are public by default. Structures are usually used for data only, not methods, therefore public declaration is considered safe.
Protected members can be accessed from derived classes. Private ones can't.
class Base {
private:
int MyPrivateInt;
protected:
int MyProtectedInt;
public:
int MyPublicInt;
};
class Derived : Base
{
public:
int foo1() { return MyPrivateInt;} // Won't compile!
int foo2() { return MyProtectedInt;} // OK
int foo3() { return MyPublicInt;} // OK
};??
class Unrelated
{
private:
Base B;
public:
int foo1() { return B.MyPrivateInt;} // Won't compile!
int foo2() { return B.MyProtectedInt;} // Won't compile
int foo3() { return B.MyPublicInt;} // OK
};
In terms of "best practice", it depends. If there's even a faint possibility that someone might want to derive a new class from your existing one and need access to internal members, make them Protected, not Private. If they're private, your class may become difficult to inherit from easily.
Private: It is an access specifier. By default the instance (member) variables or the methods of a class in c++/java are private. During inheritance, the code and the data are always inherited but is not accessible outside the class. We can declare our data members as private so that no one can make direct changes to our member variables and we can provide public getters and setters in order to change our private members. And this concept is always applied in the business rule.
Protected: It is also an access specifier. In C++, the protected members are accessible within the class and to the inherited class but not outside the class. In Java, the protected members are accessible within the class, to the inherited class as well as to all the classes within the same package.
A protected nonstatic base class member can be accessed by members and friends of any classes derived from that base class by using one of the following:
private and protected access modifiers are one and same only that protected members of the base class can be accessed outside the scope of the base class in the child(derived)class. It also applies the same to inheritance . But with the private modifier the members of the base class can only be accessed in the scope or code of the base class and its friend functions only''''
Attributes and methods marked as protected are -- unlike private ones -- still visible in subclasses.
Unless you don't want to use or provide the possibility to override the method in possible subclasses, I'd make them private.
Protected members can be accessed from derived classes. Private ones can't.
class Base {
private:
int MyPrivateInt;
protected:
int MyProtectedInt;
public:
int MyPublicInt;
};
class Derived : Base
{
public:
int foo1() { return MyPrivateInt;} // Won't compile!
int foo2() { return MyProtectedInt;} // OK
int foo3() { return MyPublicInt;} // OK
};??
class Unrelated
{
private:
Base B;
public:
int foo1() { return B.MyPrivateInt;} // Won't compile!
int foo2() { return B.MyProtectedInt;} // Won't compile
int foo3() { return B.MyPublicInt;} // OK
};
In terms of "best practice", it depends. If there's even a faint possibility that someone might want to derive a new class from your existing one and need access to internal members, make them Protected, not Private. If they're private, your class may become difficult to inherit from easily.
Attributes and methods marked as protected are -- unlike private ones -- still visible in subclasses.
Unless you don't want to use or provide the possibility to override the method in possible subclasses, I'd make them private.
Sure take a look at the Protected Member Variables question. It is recommended to use private as a default (just like C++ classses do) to reduce coupling. Protected member variables are most always a bad idea, protected member functions can be used for e.g. the Template Method pattern.
Since no public member function is needed to fetch and update protected members in the derived class, this increases the efficiency of code and reduces the amount of code we need to write. However, programmer of the derived class is supposed to be aware of what he is doing.
It all depends on what you want to do, and what you want the derived classes to be able to see.
class A
{
private:
int _privInt = 0;
int privFunc(){return 0;}
virtual int privVirtFunc(){return 0;}
protected:
int _protInt = 0;
int protFunc(){return 0;}
public:
int _publInt = 0;
int publFunc()
{
return privVirtFunc();
}
};
class B : public A
{
private:
virtual int privVirtFunc(){return 1;}
public:
void func()
{
_privInt = 1; // wont work
_protInt = 1; // will work
_publInt = 1; // will work
privFunc(); // wont work
privVirtFunc(); // wont work
protFunc(); // will work
publFunc(); // will return 1 since it's overridden in this class
}
}
Attributes and methods marked as protected are -- unlike private ones -- still visible in subclasses.
Unless you don't want to use or provide the possibility to override the method in possible subclasses, I'd make them private.
The reason that MFC favors protected, is because it is a framework. You probably want to subclass the MFC classes and in that case a protected interface is needed to access methods that are not visible to general use of the class.
Private : Accessible by class member functions & friend function or friend class. For C++ class this is default access specifier.
Protected: Accessible by class member functions, friend function or friend class & derived classes.
Refer this link for more detail.
Sure take a look at the Protected Member Variables question. It is recommended to use private as a default (just like C++ classses do) to reduce coupling. Protected member variables are most always a bad idea, protected member functions can be used for e.g. the Template Method pattern.
private = accessible by the mothership (base class) only (ie only my parent can go into my parent's bedroom)
protected = accessible by mothership (base class), and her daughters (ie only my parent can go into my parent's bedroom, but gave son/daughter permission to walk into parent's bedroom)
public = accessible by mothership (base class), daughter, and everyone else (ie only my parent can go into my parent's bedroom, but it's a house party - mi casa su casa)
Public members of a class A are accessible for all and everyone.
Protected members of a class A are not accessible outside of A's code, but is accessible from the code of any class derived from A.
Private members of a class A are not accessible outside of A's code, or from the code of any class derived from A.
So, in the end, choosing between protected or private is answering the following questions: How much trust are you willing to put into the programmer of the derived class?
By default, assume the derived class is not to be trusted, and make your members private. If you have a very good reason to give free access of the mother class' internals to its derived classes, then you can make them protected.
Private member can be accessed only in same class where it has declared where as protected member can be accessed in class where it is declared along with the classes which are inherited by it .
Private: It is an access specifier. By default the instance (member) variables or the methods of a class in c++/java are private. During inheritance, the code and the data are always inherited but is not accessible outside the class. We can declare our data members as private so that no one can make direct changes to our member variables and we can provide public getters and setters in order to change our private members. And this concept is always applied in the business rule.
Protected: It is also an access specifier. In C++, the protected members are accessible within the class and to the inherited class but not outside the class. In Java, the protected members are accessible within the class, to the inherited class as well as to all the classes within the same package.
Public members of a class A are accessible for all and everyone.
Protected members of a class A are not accessible outside of A's code, but is accessible from the code of any class derived from A.
Private members of a class A are not accessible outside of A's code, or from the code of any class derived from A.
So, in the end, choosing between protected or private is answering the following questions: How much trust are you willing to put into the programmer of the derived class?
By default, assume the derived class is not to be trusted, and make your members private. If you have a very good reason to give free access of the mother class' internals to its derived classes, then you can make them protected.
The reason that MFC favors protected, is because it is a framework. You probably want to subclass the MFC classes and in that case a protected interface is needed to access methods that are not visible to general use of the class.
private members are only accessible from within the class, protected members are accessible in the class and derived classes. It's a feature of inheritance in OO languages.
You can have private, protected and public inheritance in C++, which will determine what derived classes can access in the inheritance hierarchy. C# for example only has public inheritance.
A protected nonstatic base class member can be accessed by members and friends of any classes derived from that base class by using one of the following:
Protected members can be accessed from derived classes. Private ones can't.
class Base {
private:
int MyPrivateInt;
protected:
int MyProtectedInt;
public:
int MyPublicInt;
};
class Derived : Base
{
public:
int foo1() { return MyPrivateInt;} // Won't compile!
int foo2() { return MyProtectedInt;} // OK
int foo3() { return MyPublicInt;} // OK
};??
class Unrelated
{
private:
Base B;
public:
int foo1() { return B.MyPrivateInt;} // Won't compile!
int foo2() { return B.MyProtectedInt;} // Won't compile
int foo3() { return B.MyPublicInt;} // OK
};
In terms of "best practice", it depends. If there's even a faint possibility that someone might want to derive a new class from your existing one and need access to internal members, make them Protected, not Private. If they're private, your class may become difficult to inherit from easily.
private and protected access modifiers are one and same only that protected members of the base class can be accessed outside the scope of the base class in the child(derived)class. It also applies the same to inheritance . But with the private modifier the members of the base class can only be accessed in the scope or code of the base class and its friend functions only''''
Protected members can only be accessed by descendants of the class, and by code in the same module. Private members can only be accessed by the class they're declared in, and by code in the same module.
Of course friend functions throw this out the window, but oh well.
It all depends on what you want to do, and what you want the derived classes to be able to see.
class A
{
private:
int _privInt = 0;
int privFunc(){return 0;}
virtual int privVirtFunc(){return 0;}
protected:
int _protInt = 0;
int protFunc(){return 0;}
public:
int _publInt = 0;
int publFunc()
{
return privVirtFunc();
}
};
class B : public A
{
private:
virtual int privVirtFunc(){return 1;}
public:
void func()
{
_privInt = 1; // wont work
_protInt = 1; // will work
_publInt = 1; // will work
privFunc(); // wont work
privVirtFunc(); // wont work
protFunc(); // will work
publFunc(); // will return 1 since it's overridden in this class
}
}
Private member can be accessed only in same class where it has declared where as protected member can be accessed in class where it is declared along with the classes which are inherited by it .
Public members of a class A are accessible for all and everyone.
Protected members of a class A are not accessible outside of A's code, but is accessible from the code of any class derived from A.
Private members of a class A are not accessible outside of A's code, or from the code of any class derived from A.
So, in the end, choosing between protected or private is answering the following questions: How much trust are you willing to put into the programmer of the derived class?
By default, assume the derived class is not to be trusted, and make your members private. If you have a very good reason to give free access of the mother class' internals to its derived classes, then you can make them protected.
It all depends on what you want to do, and what you want the derived classes to be able to see.
class A
{
private:
int _privInt = 0;
int privFunc(){return 0;}
virtual int privVirtFunc(){return 0;}
protected:
int _protInt = 0;
int protFunc(){return 0;}
public:
int _publInt = 0;
int publFunc()
{
return privVirtFunc();
}
};
class B : public A
{
private:
virtual int privVirtFunc(){return 1;}
public:
void func()
{
_privInt = 1; // wont work
_protInt = 1; // will work
_publInt = 1; // will work
privFunc(); // wont work
privVirtFunc(); // wont work
protFunc(); // will work
publFunc(); // will return 1 since it's overridden in this class
}
}
Protected members can be accessed from derived classes. Private ones can't.
class Base {
private:
int MyPrivateInt;
protected:
int MyProtectedInt;
public:
int MyPublicInt;
};
class Derived : Base
{
public:
int foo1() { return MyPrivateInt;} // Won't compile!
int foo2() { return MyProtectedInt;} // OK
int foo3() { return MyPublicInt;} // OK
};??
class Unrelated
{
private:
Base B;
public:
int foo1() { return B.MyPrivateInt;} // Won't compile!
int foo2() { return B.MyProtectedInt;} // Won't compile
int foo3() { return B.MyPublicInt;} // OK
};
In terms of "best practice", it depends. If there's even a faint possibility that someone might want to derive a new class from your existing one and need access to internal members, make them Protected, not Private. If they're private, your class may become difficult to inherit from easily.
Protected members can only be accessed by descendants of the class, and by code in the same module. Private members can only be accessed by the class they're declared in, and by code in the same module.
Of course friend functions throw this out the window, but oh well.
It all depends on what you want to do, and what you want the derived classes to be able to see.
class A
{
private:
int _privInt = 0;
int privFunc(){return 0;}
virtual int privVirtFunc(){return 0;}
protected:
int _protInt = 0;
int protFunc(){return 0;}
public:
int _publInt = 0;
int publFunc()
{
return privVirtFunc();
}
};
class B : public A
{
private:
virtual int privVirtFunc(){return 1;}
public:
void func()
{
_privInt = 1; // wont work
_protInt = 1; // will work
_publInt = 1; // will work
privFunc(); // wont work
privVirtFunc(); // wont work
protFunc(); // will work
publFunc(); // will return 1 since it's overridden in this class
}
}
Private : Accessible by class member functions & friend function or friend class. For C++ class this is default access specifier.
Protected: Accessible by class member functions, friend function or friend class & derived classes.
Refer this link for more detail.
Since no public member function is needed to fetch and update protected members in the derived class, this increases the efficiency of code and reduces the amount of code we need to write. However, programmer of the derived class is supposed to be aware of what he is doing.
Protected members can only be accessed by descendants of the class, and by code in the same module. Private members can only be accessed by the class they're declared in, and by code in the same module.
Of course friend functions throw this out the window, but oh well.
private = accessible by the mothership (base class) only (ie only my parent can go into my parent's bedroom)
protected = accessible by mothership (base class), and her daughters (ie only my parent can go into my parent's bedroom, but gave son/daughter permission to walk into parent's bedroom)
public = accessible by mothership (base class), daughter, and everyone else (ie only my parent can go into my parent's bedroom, but it's a house party - mi casa su casa)
Public members of a class A are accessible for all and everyone.
Protected members of a class A are not accessible outside of A's code, but is accessible from the code of any class derived from A.
Private members of a class A are not accessible outside of A's code, or from the code of any class derived from A.
So, in the end, choosing between protected or private is answering the following questions: How much trust are you willing to put into the programmer of the derived class?
By default, assume the derived class is not to be trusted, and make your members private. If you have a very good reason to give free access of the mother class' internals to its derived classes, then you can make them protected.
Sure take a look at the Protected Member Variables question. It is recommended to use private as a default (just like C++ classses do) to reduce coupling. Protected member variables are most always a bad idea, protected member functions can be used for e.g. the Template Method pattern.
Attributes and methods marked as protected are -- unlike private ones -- still visible in subclasses.
Unless you don't want to use or provide the possibility to override the method in possible subclasses, I'd make them private.
Protected members can only be accessed by descendants of the class, and by code in the same module. Private members can only be accessed by the class they're declared in, and by code in the same module.
Of course friend functions throw this out the window, but oh well.
The reason that MFC favors protected, is because it is a framework. You probably want to subclass the MFC classes and in that case a protected interface is needed to access methods that are not visible to general use of the class.
Sure take a look at the Protected Member Variables question. It is recommended to use private as a default (just like C++ classses do) to reduce coupling. Protected member variables are most always a bad idea, protected member functions can be used for e.g. the Template Method pattern.
private is preferred for member data. Members in C++ classes are private by default.
public is preferred for member functions, though it is a matter of opinion. At least some methods must be accessible. public is accessible to all. It is the most flexible option and least safe. Anybody can use them, and anybody can misuse them.
private is not accessible at all. Nobody can use them outside the class, and nobody can misuse them. Not even in derived classes.
protected is a compromise because it can be used in derived classes. When you derive from a class, you have a good understanding of the base class, and you are careful not to misuse these members.
MFC is a C++ wrapper for Windows API, it prefers public and protected. Classes generated by Visual Studio wizard have an ugly mix of protected, public, and private members. But there is some logic to MFC classes themselves.
Members such as SetWindowText are public because you often need to access these members.
Members such as OnLButtonDown, handle notifications received by the window. They should not be accessed, therefore they are protected. You can still access them in the derived class to override these functions.
Some members have to do threads and message loops, they should not be accessed or override, so they are declared as private
In C++ structures, members are public by default. Structures are usually used for data only, not methods, therefore public declaration is considered safe.
The reason that MFC favors protected, is because it is a framework. You probably want to subclass the MFC classes and in that case a protected interface is needed to access methods that are not visible to general use of the class.
private members are only accessible from within the class, protected members are accessible in the class and derived classes. It's a feature of inheritance in OO languages.
You can have private, protected and public inheritance in C++, which will determine what derived classes can access in the inheritance hierarchy. C# for example only has public inheritance.
Source: Stackoverflow.com