I have a string in Bash:
string="My string"
How can I test if it contains another string?
if [ $string ?? 'foo' ]; then
echo "It's there!"
fi
Where ?? is my unknown operator. Do I use echo and grep?
if echo "$string" | grep 'foo'; then
echo "It's there!"
fi
That looks a bit clumsy.
The accepted answer is best, but since there's more than one way to do it, here's another solution:
if [ "$string" != "${string/foo/}" ]; then
echo "It's there!"
fi
${var/search/replace} is $var with the first instance of search replaced by replace, if it is found (it doesn't change $var). If you try to replace foo by nothing, and the string has changed, then obviously foo was found.
msg="message"
function check {
echo $msg | egrep [abc] 1> /dev/null
if [ $? -ne 1 ];
then
echo "found"
else
echo "not found"
fi
}
check
This will find any occurance of a or b or c
The generic needle haystack example is following with variables
#!/bin/bash
needle="a_needle"
haystack="a_needle another_needle a_third_needle"
if [[ $haystack == *"$needle"* ]]; then
echo "needle found"
else
echo "needle NOT found"
fi
You should remember that shell scripting is less of a language and more of a collection of commands. Instinctively you think that this "language" requires you to follow an if with a [ or a [[. Both of those are just commands that return an exit status indicating success or failure (just like every other command). For that reason I'd use grep, and not the [ command.
Just do:
if grep -q foo <<<"$string"; then
echo "It's there"
fi
Now that you are thinking of if as testing the exit status of the command that follows it (complete with semi-colon), why not reconsider the source of the string you are testing?
## Instead of this
filetype="$(file -b "$1")"
if grep -q "tar archive" <<<"$filetype"; then
#...
## Simply do this
if file -b "$1" | grep -q "tar archive"; then
#...
The -q option makes grep not output anything, as we only want the return code. <<< makes the shell expand the next word and use it as the input to the command, a one-line version of the << here document (I'm not sure whether this is standard or a Bashism).
stringContain variants (compatible or case independent)As these Stack Overflow answers tell mostly about Bash, I've posted a case independent Bash function at the very bottom of this post...
Anyway, there is my
As there are already a lot of answers using Bash-specific features, there is a way working under poorer-featured shells, like BusyBox:
[ -z "${string##*$reqsubstr*}" ]
In practice, this could give:
string='echo "My string"'
for reqsubstr in 'o "M' 'alt' 'str';do
if [ -z "${string##*$reqsubstr*}" ] ;then
echo "String '$string' contain substring: '$reqsubstr'."
else
echo "String '$string' don't contain substring: '$reqsubstr'."
fi
done
This was tested under Bash, Dash, KornShell (ksh) and ash (BusyBox), and the result is always:
String 'echo "My string"' contain substring: 'o "M'.
String 'echo "My string"' don't contain substring: 'alt'.
String 'echo "My string"' contain substring: 'str'.
As asked by @EeroAaltonen here is a version of the same demo, tested under the same shells:
myfunc() {
reqsubstr="$1"
shift
string="$@"
if [ -z "${string##*$reqsubstr*}" ] ;then
echo "String '$string' contain substring: '$reqsubstr'.";
else
echo "String '$string' don't contain substring: '$reqsubstr'."
fi
}
Then:
$ myfunc 'o "M' 'echo "My String"'
String 'echo "My String"' contain substring 'o "M'.
$ myfunc 'alt' 'echo "My String"'
String 'echo "My String"' don't contain substring 'alt'.
Notice: you have to escape or double enclose quotes and/or double quotes:
$ myfunc 'o "M' echo "My String"
String 'echo My String' don't contain substring: 'o "M'.
$ myfunc 'o "M' echo \"My String\"
String 'echo "My String"' contain substring: 'o "M'.
This was tested under BusyBox, Dash, and, of course Bash:
stringContain() { [ -z "${2##*$1*}" ]; }
Then now:
$ if stringContain 'o "M3' 'echo "My String"';then echo yes;else echo no;fi
no
$ if stringContain 'o "M' 'echo "My String"';then echo yes;else echo no;fi
yes
... Or if the submitted string could be empty, as pointed out by @Sjlver, the function would become:
stringContain() { [ -z "${2##*$1*}" ] && [ -z "$1" -o -n "$2" ]; }
or as suggested by Adrian Günter's comment, avoiding -o switches:
stringContain() { [ -z "${2##*$1*}" ] && { [ -z "$1" ] || [ -n "$2" ];};}
And inverting the tests to make them potentially quicker:
stringContain() { [ -z "$1" ] || { [ -z "${2##*$1*}" ] && [ -n "$2" ];};}
With empty strings:
$ if stringContain '' ''; then echo yes; else echo no; fi
yes
$ if stringContain 'o "M' ''; then echo yes; else echo no; fi
no
For testing strings without care of case, simply convert each string to lower case:
stringContain() {
local _lc=${2,,}
[ -z "$1" ] || { [ -z "${_lc##*${1,,}*}" ] && [ -n "$2" ] ;} ;}
Check:
stringContain 'o "M3' 'echo "my string"' && echo yes || echo no
no
stringContain 'o "My' 'echo "my string"' && echo yes || echo no
yes
if stringContain '' ''; then echo yes; else echo no; fi
yes
if stringContain 'o "M' ''; then echo yes; else echo no; fi
no
So there are lots of useful solutions to the question - but which is fastest / uses the fewest resources?
Repeated tests using this frame:
/usr/bin/time bash -c 'a=two;b=onetwothree; x=100000; while [ $x -gt 0 ]; do TEST ; x=$(($x-1)); done'
Replacing TEST each time:
[[ $b =~ $a ]] 2.92 user 0.06 system 0:02.99 elapsed 99% CPU
[ "${b/$a//}" = "$b" ] 3.16 user 0.07 system 0:03.25 elapsed 99% CPU
[[ $b == *$a* ]] 1.85 user 0.04 system 0:01.90 elapsed 99% CPU
case $b in *$a):;;esac 1.80 user 0.02 system 0:01.83 elapsed 99% CPU
doContain $a $b 4.27 user 0.11 system 0:04.41 elapsed 99%CPU
(doContain was in F. Houri's answer)
And for giggles:
echo $b|grep -q $a 12.68 user 30.86 system 3:42.40 elapsed 19% CPU !ouch!
So the simple substitution option predictably wins whether in an extended test or a case. The case is portable.
Piping out to 100000 greps is predictably painful! The old rule about using external utilities without need holds true.
One is:
[ $(expr $mystring : ".*${search}.*") -ne 0 ] && echo 'yes' || echo 'no'
The accepted answer is best, but since there's more than one way to do it, here's another solution:
if [ "$string" != "${string/foo/}" ]; then
echo "It's there!"
fi
${var/search/replace} is $var with the first instance of search replaced by replace, if it is found (it doesn't change $var). If you try to replace foo by nothing, and the string has changed, then obviously foo was found.
Since the POSIX/BusyBox question is closed without providing the right answer (IMHO), I'll post an answer here.
The shortest possible answer is:
[ ${_string_##*$_substring_*} ] || echo Substring found!
or
[ "${_string_##*$_substring_*}" ] || echo 'Substring found!'
Note that the double hash is obligatory with some shells (ash). Above will evaluate [ stringvalue ] when the substring is not found. It returns no error. When the substring is found the result is empty and it evaluates [ ]. This will throw error code 1 since the string is completely substituted (due to *).
The shortest more common syntax:
[ -z "${_string_##*$_substring_*}" ] && echo 'Substring found!'
or
[ -n "${_string_##*$_substring_*}" ] || echo 'Substring found!'
Another one:
[ "${_string_##$_substring_}" != "$_string_" ] && echo 'Substring found!'
or
[ "${_string_##$_substring_}" = "$_string_" ] || echo 'Substring found!'
Note the single equal sign!
You should remember that shell scripting is less of a language and more of a collection of commands. Instinctively you think that this "language" requires you to follow an if with a [ or a [[. Both of those are just commands that return an exit status indicating success or failure (just like every other command). For that reason I'd use grep, and not the [ command.
Just do:
if grep -q foo <<<"$string"; then
echo "It's there"
fi
Now that you are thinking of if as testing the exit status of the command that follows it (complete with semi-colon), why not reconsider the source of the string you are testing?
## Instead of this
filetype="$(file -b "$1")"
if grep -q "tar archive" <<<"$filetype"; then
#...
## Simply do this
if file -b "$1" | grep -q "tar archive"; then
#...
The -q option makes grep not output anything, as we only want the return code. <<< makes the shell expand the next word and use it as the input to the command, a one-line version of the << here document (I'm not sure whether this is standard or a Bashism).
One is:
[ $(expr $mystring : ".*${search}.*") -ne 0 ] && echo 'yes' || echo 'no'
If you prefer the regex approach:
string='My string';
if [[ $string =~ "My" ]]; then
echo "It's there!"
fi
I like sed.
substr="foo"
nonsub="$(echo "$string" | sed "s/$substr//")"
hassub=0 ; [ "$string" != "$nonsub" ] && hassub=1
Edit, Logic:
Use sed to remove instance of substring from string
If new string differs from old string, substring exists
I am not sure about using an if statement, but you can get a similar effect with a case statement:
case "$string" in
*foo*)
# Do stuff
;;
esac
You should remember that shell scripting is less of a language and more of a collection of commands. Instinctively you think that this "language" requires you to follow an if with a [ or a [[. Both of those are just commands that return an exit status indicating success or failure (just like every other command). For that reason I'd use grep, and not the [ command.
Just do:
if grep -q foo <<<"$string"; then
echo "It's there"
fi
Now that you are thinking of if as testing the exit status of the command that follows it (complete with semi-colon), why not reconsider the source of the string you are testing?
## Instead of this
filetype="$(file -b "$1")"
if grep -q "tar archive" <<<"$filetype"; then
#...
## Simply do this
if file -b "$1" | grep -q "tar archive"; then
#...
The -q option makes grep not output anything, as we only want the return code. <<< makes the shell expand the next word and use it as the input to the command, a one-line version of the << here document (I'm not sure whether this is standard or a Bashism).
If you prefer the regex approach:
string='My string';
if [[ $string =~ "My" ]]; then
echo "It's there!"
fi
I like sed.
substr="foo"
nonsub="$(echo "$string" | sed "s/$substr//")"
hassub=0 ; [ "$string" != "$nonsub" ] && hassub=1
Edit, Logic:
Use sed to remove instance of substring from string
If new string differs from old string, substring exists
The generic needle haystack example is following with variables
#!/bin/bash
needle="a_needle"
haystack="a_needle another_needle a_third_needle"
if [[ $haystack == *"$needle"* ]]; then
echo "needle found"
else
echo "needle NOT found"
fi
I found to need this functionality quite frequently, so I'm using a home-made shell function in my .bashrc like this which allows me to reuse it as often as I need to, with an easy to remember name:
function stringinstring()
{
case "$2" in
*"$1"*)
return 0
;;
esac
return 1
}
To test if $string1 (say, abc) is contained in $string2 (say, 123abcABC) I just need to run stringinstring "$string1" "$string2" and check for the return value, for example
stringinstring "$str1" "$str2" && echo YES || echo NO
Try oobash.
It is an OO-style string library for Bash 4. It has support for German umlauts. It is written in Bash.
Many functions are available: -base64Decode, -base64Encode, -capitalize, -center, -charAt, -concat, -contains, -count, -endsWith, -equals, -equalsIgnoreCase, -reverse, -hashCode, -indexOf, -isAlnum, -isAlpha, -isAscii, -isDigit, -isEmpty, -isHexDigit, -isLowerCase, -isSpace, -isPrintable, -isUpperCase, -isVisible, -lastIndexOf, -length, -matches, -replaceAll, -replaceFirst, -startsWith, -substring, -swapCase, -toLowerCase, -toString, -toUpperCase, -trim, and -zfill.
Look at the contains example:
[Desktop]$ String a testXccc
[Desktop]$ a.contains tX
true
[Desktop]$ a.contains XtX
false
This also works:
if printf -- '%s' "$haystack" | egrep -q -- "$needle"
then
printf "Found needle in haystack"
fi
And the negative test is:
if ! printf -- '%s' "$haystack" | egrep -q -- "$needle"
then
echo "Did not find needle in haystack"
fi
I suppose this style is a bit more classic -- less dependent upon features of Bash shell.
The -- argument is pure POSIX paranoia, used to protected against input strings similar to options, such as --abc or -a.
Note: In a tight loop this code will be much slower than using internal Bash shell features, as one (or two) separate processes will be created and connected via pipes.
So there are lots of useful solutions to the question - but which is fastest / uses the fewest resources?
Repeated tests using this frame:
/usr/bin/time bash -c 'a=two;b=onetwothree; x=100000; while [ $x -gt 0 ]; do TEST ; x=$(($x-1)); done'
Replacing TEST each time:
[[ $b =~ $a ]] 2.92 user 0.06 system 0:02.99 elapsed 99% CPU
[ "${b/$a//}" = "$b" ] 3.16 user 0.07 system 0:03.25 elapsed 99% CPU
[[ $b == *$a* ]] 1.85 user 0.04 system 0:01.90 elapsed 99% CPU
case $b in *$a):;;esac 1.80 user 0.02 system 0:01.83 elapsed 99% CPU
doContain $a $b 4.27 user 0.11 system 0:04.41 elapsed 99%CPU
(doContain was in F. Houri's answer)
And for giggles:
echo $b|grep -q $a 12.68 user 30.86 system 3:42.40 elapsed 19% CPU !ouch!
So the simple substitution option predictably wins whether in an extended test or a case. The case is portable.
Piping out to 100000 greps is predictably painful! The old rule about using external utilities without need holds true.
case $string in (*foo*)
# Do stuff
esac
This is the same answer as https://stackoverflow.com/a/229585/11267590. But simple style and also POSIX Compliant.
I use this function (one dependency not included but obvious). It passes the tests shown below. If the function returns a value > 0 then the string was found. You could just as easily return 1 or 0 instead.
function str_instr {
# Return position of ```str``` within ```string```.
# >>> str_instr "str" "string"
# str: String to search for.
# string: String to search.
typeset str string x
# Behavior here is not the same in bash vs ksh unless we escape special characters.
str="$(str_escape_special_characters "${1}")"
string="${2}"
x="${string%%$str*}"
if [[ "${x}" != "${string}" ]]; then
echo "${#x} + 1" | bc -l
else
echo 0
fi
}
function test_str_instr {
str_instr "(" "'foo@host (dev,web)'" | assert_eq 11
str_instr ")" "'foo@host (dev,web)'" | assert_eq 19
str_instr "[" "'foo@host [dev,web]'" | assert_eq 11
str_instr "]" "'foo@host [dev,web]'" | assert_eq 19
str_instr "a" "abc" | assert_eq 1
str_instr "z" "abc" | assert_eq 0
str_instr "Eggs" "Green Eggs And Ham" | assert_eq 7
str_instr "a" "" | assert_eq 0
str_instr "" "" | assert_eq 0
str_instr " " "Green Eggs" | assert_eq 6
str_instr " " " Green " | assert_eq 1
}
My .bash_profile file and how I used grep:
If the PATH environment variable includes my two bin directories, don't append them,
# .bash_profile
# Get the aliases and functions
if [ -f ~/.bashrc ]; then
. ~/.bashrc
fi
U=~/.local.bin:~/bin
if ! echo "$PATH" | grep -q "home"; then
export PATH=$PATH:${U}
fi
Bash 4+ examples. Note: not using quotes will cause issues when words contain spaces, etc. Always quote in Bash, IMO.
Here are some examples Bash 4+:
Example 1, check for 'yes' in string (case insensitive):
if [[ "${str,,}" == *"yes"* ]] ;then
Example 2, check for 'yes' in string (case insensitive):
if [[ "$(echo "$str" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]')" == *"yes"* ]] ;then
Example 3, check for 'yes' in string (case sensitive):
if [[ "${str}" == *"yes"* ]] ;then
Example 4, check for 'yes' in string (case sensitive):
if [[ "${str}" =~ "yes" ]] ;then
Example 5, exact match (case sensitive):
if [[ "${str}" == "yes" ]] ;then
Example 6, exact match (case insensitive):
if [[ "${str,,}" == "yes" ]] ;then
Example 7, exact match:
if [ "$a" = "$b" ] ;then
Example 8, wildcard match .ext (case insensitive):
if echo "$a" | egrep -iq "\.(mp[3-4]|txt|css|jpg|png)" ; then
Enjoy.
Extension of the question answered here How do you tell if a string contains another string in POSIX sh?:
This solution works with special characters:
# contains(string, substring)
#
# Returns 0 if the specified string contains the specified substring,
# otherwise returns 1.
contains() {
string="$1"
substring="$2"
if echo "$string" | $(type -p ggrep grep | head -1) -F -- "$substring" >/dev/null; then
return 0 # $substring is in $string
else
return 1 # $substring is not in $string
fi
}
contains "abcd" "e" || echo "abcd does not contain e"
contains "abcd" "ab" && echo "abcd contains ab"
contains "abcd" "bc" && echo "abcd contains bc"
contains "abcd" "cd" && echo "abcd contains cd"
contains "abcd" "abcd" && echo "abcd contains abcd"
contains "" "" && echo "empty string contains empty string"
contains "a" "" && echo "a contains empty string"
contains "" "a" || echo "empty string does not contain a"
contains "abcd efgh" "cd ef" && echo "abcd efgh contains cd ef"
contains "abcd efgh" " " && echo "abcd efgh contains a space"
contains "abcd [efg] hij" "[efg]" && echo "abcd [efg] hij contains [efg]"
contains "abcd [efg] hij" "[effg]" || echo "abcd [efg] hij does not contain [effg]"
contains "abcd *efg* hij" "*efg*" && echo "abcd *efg* hij contains *efg*"
contains "abcd *efg* hij" "d *efg* h" && echo "abcd *efg* hij contains d *efg* h"
contains "abcd *efg* hij" "*effg*" || echo "abcd *efg* hij does not contain *effg*"
I am not sure about using an if statement, but you can get a similar effect with a case statement:
case "$string" in
*foo*)
# Do stuff
;;
esac
As Paul mentioned in his performance comparison:
if echo "abcdefg" | grep -q "bcdef"; then
echo "String contains is true."
else
echo "String contains is not true."
fi
This is POSIX compliant like the 'case "$string" in' the answer provided by Marcus, but it is slightly easier to read than the case statement answer. Also note that this will be much much slower than using a case statement. As Paul pointed out, don't use it in a loop.
How about this:
text=" <tag>bmnmn</tag> "
if [[ "$text" =~ "<tag>" ]]; then
echo "matched"
else
echo "not matched"
fi
As Paul mentioned in his performance comparison:
if echo "abcdefg" | grep -q "bcdef"; then
echo "String contains is true."
else
echo "String contains is not true."
fi
This is POSIX compliant like the 'case "$string" in' the answer provided by Marcus, but it is slightly easier to read than the case statement answer. Also note that this will be much much slower than using a case statement. As Paul pointed out, don't use it in a loop.
[[ $string == *foo* ]] && echo "It's there" || echo "Couldn't find"
You should remember that shell scripting is less of a language and more of a collection of commands. Instinctively you think that this "language" requires you to follow an if with a [ or a [[. Both of those are just commands that return an exit status indicating success or failure (just like every other command). For that reason I'd use grep, and not the [ command.
Just do:
if grep -q foo <<<"$string"; then
echo "It's there"
fi
Now that you are thinking of if as testing the exit status of the command that follows it (complete with semi-colon), why not reconsider the source of the string you are testing?
## Instead of this
filetype="$(file -b "$1")"
if grep -q "tar archive" <<<"$filetype"; then
#...
## Simply do this
if file -b "$1" | grep -q "tar archive"; then
#...
The -q option makes grep not output anything, as we only want the return code. <<< makes the shell expand the next word and use it as the input to the command, a one-line version of the << here document (I'm not sure whether this is standard or a Bashism).
The accepted answer is best, but since there's more than one way to do it, here's another solution:
if [ "$string" != "${string/foo/}" ]; then
echo "It's there!"
fi
${var/search/replace} is $var with the first instance of search replaced by replace, if it is found (it doesn't change $var). If you try to replace foo by nothing, and the string has changed, then obviously foo was found.
If you prefer the regex approach:
string='My string';
if [[ $string =~ "My" ]]; then
echo "It's there!"
fi
I use this function (one dependency not included but obvious). It passes the tests shown below. If the function returns a value > 0 then the string was found. You could just as easily return 1 or 0 instead.
function str_instr {
# Return position of ```str``` within ```string```.
# >>> str_instr "str" "string"
# str: String to search for.
# string: String to search.
typeset str string x
# Behavior here is not the same in bash vs ksh unless we escape special characters.
str="$(str_escape_special_characters "${1}")"
string="${2}"
x="${string%%$str*}"
if [[ "${x}" != "${string}" ]]; then
echo "${#x} + 1" | bc -l
else
echo 0
fi
}
function test_str_instr {
str_instr "(" "'foo@host (dev,web)'" | assert_eq 11
str_instr ")" "'foo@host (dev,web)'" | assert_eq 19
str_instr "[" "'foo@host [dev,web]'" | assert_eq 11
str_instr "]" "'foo@host [dev,web]'" | assert_eq 19
str_instr "a" "abc" | assert_eq 1
str_instr "z" "abc" | assert_eq 0
str_instr "Eggs" "Green Eggs And Ham" | assert_eq 7
str_instr "a" "" | assert_eq 0
str_instr "" "" | assert_eq 0
str_instr " " "Green Eggs" | assert_eq 6
str_instr " " " Green " | assert_eq 1
}
grep -q is useful for this purpose.
The same using awk:
string="unix-bash 2389"
character="@"
printf '%s' "$string" | awk -vc="$character" '{ if (gsub(c, "")) { print "Found" } else { print "Not Found" } }'
Output:
Not Found
string="unix-bash 2389"
character="-"
printf '%s' "$string" | awk -vc="$character" '{ if (gsub(c, "")) { print "Found" } else { print "Not Found" } }'
Output:
Found
Original source: http://unstableme.blogspot.com/2008/06/bash-search-letter-in-string-awk.html
The accepted answer is best, but since there's more than one way to do it, here's another solution:
if [ "$string" != "${string/foo/}" ]; then
echo "It's there!"
fi
${var/search/replace} is $var with the first instance of search replaced by replace, if it is found (it doesn't change $var). If you try to replace foo by nothing, and the string has changed, then obviously foo was found.
I found to need this functionality quite frequently, so I'm using a home-made shell function in my .bashrc like this which allows me to reuse it as often as I need to, with an easy to remember name:
function stringinstring()
{
case "$2" in
*"$1"*)
return 0
;;
esac
return 1
}
To test if $string1 (say, abc) is contained in $string2 (say, 123abcABC) I just need to run stringinstring "$string1" "$string2" and check for the return value, for example
stringinstring "$str1" "$str2" && echo YES || echo NO
grep -q is useful for this purpose.
The same using awk:
string="unix-bash 2389"
character="@"
printf '%s' "$string" | awk -vc="$character" '{ if (gsub(c, "")) { print "Found" } else { print "Not Found" } }'
Output:
Not Found
string="unix-bash 2389"
character="-"
printf '%s' "$string" | awk -vc="$character" '{ if (gsub(c, "")) { print "Found" } else { print "Not Found" } }'
Output:
Found
Original source: http://unstableme.blogspot.com/2008/06/bash-search-letter-in-string-awk.html
This Stack Overflow answer was the only one to trap space and dash characters:
# For null cmd arguments checking
to_check=' -t'
space_n_dash_chars=' -'
[[ $to_check == *"$space_n_dash_chars"* ]] && echo found
Try oobash.
It is an OO-style string library for Bash 4. It has support for German umlauts. It is written in Bash.
Many functions are available: -base64Decode, -base64Encode, -capitalize, -center, -charAt, -concat, -contains, -count, -endsWith, -equals, -equalsIgnoreCase, -reverse, -hashCode, -indexOf, -isAlnum, -isAlpha, -isAscii, -isDigit, -isEmpty, -isHexDigit, -isLowerCase, -isSpace, -isPrintable, -isUpperCase, -isVisible, -lastIndexOf, -length, -matches, -replaceAll, -replaceFirst, -startsWith, -substring, -swapCase, -toLowerCase, -toString, -toUpperCase, -trim, and -zfill.
Look at the contains example:
[Desktop]$ String a testXccc
[Desktop]$ a.contains tX
true
[Desktop]$ a.contains XtX
false
[[ $string == *foo* ]] && echo "It's there" || echo "Couldn't find"
This Stack Overflow answer was the only one to trap space and dash characters:
# For null cmd arguments checking
to_check=' -t'
space_n_dash_chars=' -'
[[ $to_check == *"$space_n_dash_chars"* ]] && echo found
Bash 4+ examples. Note: not using quotes will cause issues when words contain spaces, etc. Always quote in Bash, IMO.
Here are some examples Bash 4+:
Example 1, check for 'yes' in string (case insensitive):
if [[ "${str,,}" == *"yes"* ]] ;then
Example 2, check for 'yes' in string (case insensitive):
if [[ "$(echo "$str" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]')" == *"yes"* ]] ;then
Example 3, check for 'yes' in string (case sensitive):
if [[ "${str}" == *"yes"* ]] ;then
Example 4, check for 'yes' in string (case sensitive):
if [[ "${str}" =~ "yes" ]] ;then
Example 5, exact match (case sensitive):
if [[ "${str}" == "yes" ]] ;then
Example 6, exact match (case insensitive):
if [[ "${str,,}" == "yes" ]] ;then
Example 7, exact match:
if [ "$a" = "$b" ] ;then
Example 8, wildcard match .ext (case insensitive):
if echo "$a" | egrep -iq "\.(mp[3-4]|txt|css|jpg|png)" ; then
Enjoy.
grep -q is useful for this purpose.
The same using awk:
string="unix-bash 2389"
character="@"
printf '%s' "$string" | awk -vc="$character" '{ if (gsub(c, "")) { print "Found" } else { print "Not Found" } }'
Output:
Not Found
string="unix-bash 2389"
character="-"
printf '%s' "$string" | awk -vc="$character" '{ if (gsub(c, "")) { print "Found" } else { print "Not Found" } }'
Output:
Found
Original source: http://unstableme.blogspot.com/2008/06/bash-search-letter-in-string-awk.html
I am not sure about using an if statement, but you can get a similar effect with a case statement:
case "$string" in
*foo*)
# Do stuff
;;
esac
msg="message"
function check {
echo $msg | egrep [abc] 1> /dev/null
if [ $? -ne 1 ];
then
echo "found"
else
echo "not found"
fi
}
check
This will find any occurance of a or b or c
case $string in (*foo*)
# Do stuff
esac
This is the same answer as https://stackoverflow.com/a/229585/11267590. But simple style and also POSIX Compliant.
grep -q is useful for this purpose.
The same using awk:
string="unix-bash 2389"
character="@"
printf '%s' "$string" | awk -vc="$character" '{ if (gsub(c, "")) { print "Found" } else { print "Not Found" } }'
Output:
Not Found
string="unix-bash 2389"
character="-"
printf '%s' "$string" | awk -vc="$character" '{ if (gsub(c, "")) { print "Found" } else { print "Not Found" } }'
Output:
Found
Original source: http://unstableme.blogspot.com/2008/06/bash-search-letter-in-string-awk.html
My .bash_profile file and how I used grep:
If the PATH environment variable includes my two bin directories, don't append them,
# .bash_profile
# Get the aliases and functions
if [ -f ~/.bashrc ]; then
. ~/.bashrc
fi
U=~/.local.bin:~/bin
if ! echo "$PATH" | grep -q "home"; then
export PATH=$PATH:${U}
fi
This also works:
if printf -- '%s' "$haystack" | egrep -q -- "$needle"
then
printf "Found needle in haystack"
fi
And the negative test is:
if ! printf -- '%s' "$haystack" | egrep -q -- "$needle"
then
echo "Did not find needle in haystack"
fi
I suppose this style is a bit more classic -- less dependent upon features of Bash shell.
The -- argument is pure POSIX paranoia, used to protected against input strings similar to options, such as --abc or -a.
Note: In a tight loop this code will be much slower than using internal Bash shell features, as one (or two) separate processes will be created and connected via pipes.
Since the POSIX/BusyBox question is closed without providing the right answer (IMHO), I'll post an answer here.
The shortest possible answer is:
[ ${_string_##*$_substring_*} ] || echo Substring found!
or
[ "${_string_##*$_substring_*}" ] || echo 'Substring found!'
Note that the double hash is obligatory with some shells (ash). Above will evaluate [ stringvalue ] when the substring is not found. It returns no error. When the substring is found the result is empty and it evaluates [ ]. This will throw error code 1 since the string is completely substituted (due to *).
The shortest more common syntax:
[ -z "${_string_##*$_substring_*}" ] && echo 'Substring found!'
or
[ -n "${_string_##*$_substring_*}" ] || echo 'Substring found!'
Another one:
[ "${_string_##$_substring_}" != "$_string_" ] && echo 'Substring found!'
or
[ "${_string_##$_substring_}" = "$_string_" ] || echo 'Substring found!'
Note the single equal sign!
Exact word match:
string='My long string'
exactSearch='long'
if grep -E -q "\b${exactSearch}\b" <<<${string} >/dev/null 2>&1
then
echo "It's there"
fi
stringContain variants (compatible or case independent)As these Stack Overflow answers tell mostly about Bash, I've posted a case independent Bash function at the very bottom of this post...
Anyway, there is my
As there are already a lot of answers using Bash-specific features, there is a way working under poorer-featured shells, like BusyBox:
[ -z "${string##*$reqsubstr*}" ]
In practice, this could give:
string='echo "My string"'
for reqsubstr in 'o "M' 'alt' 'str';do
if [ -z "${string##*$reqsubstr*}" ] ;then
echo "String '$string' contain substring: '$reqsubstr'."
else
echo "String '$string' don't contain substring: '$reqsubstr'."
fi
done
This was tested under Bash, Dash, KornShell (ksh) and ash (BusyBox), and the result is always:
String 'echo "My string"' contain substring: 'o "M'.
String 'echo "My string"' don't contain substring: 'alt'.
String 'echo "My string"' contain substring: 'str'.
As asked by @EeroAaltonen here is a version of the same demo, tested under the same shells:
myfunc() {
reqsubstr="$1"
shift
string="$@"
if [ -z "${string##*$reqsubstr*}" ] ;then
echo "String '$string' contain substring: '$reqsubstr'.";
else
echo "String '$string' don't contain substring: '$reqsubstr'."
fi
}
Then:
$ myfunc 'o "M' 'echo "My String"'
String 'echo "My String"' contain substring 'o "M'.
$ myfunc 'alt' 'echo "My String"'
String 'echo "My String"' don't contain substring 'alt'.
Notice: you have to escape or double enclose quotes and/or double quotes:
$ myfunc 'o "M' echo "My String"
String 'echo My String' don't contain substring: 'o "M'.
$ myfunc 'o "M' echo \"My String\"
String 'echo "My String"' contain substring: 'o "M'.
This was tested under BusyBox, Dash, and, of course Bash:
stringContain() { [ -z "${2##*$1*}" ]; }
Then now:
$ if stringContain 'o "M3' 'echo "My String"';then echo yes;else echo no;fi
no
$ if stringContain 'o "M' 'echo "My String"';then echo yes;else echo no;fi
yes
... Or if the submitted string could be empty, as pointed out by @Sjlver, the function would become:
stringContain() { [ -z "${2##*$1*}" ] && [ -z "$1" -o -n "$2" ]; }
or as suggested by Adrian Günter's comment, avoiding -o switches:
stringContain() { [ -z "${2##*$1*}" ] && { [ -z "$1" ] || [ -n "$2" ];};}
And inverting the tests to make them potentially quicker:
stringContain() { [ -z "$1" ] || { [ -z "${2##*$1*}" ] && [ -n "$2" ];};}
With empty strings:
$ if stringContain '' ''; then echo yes; else echo no; fi
yes
$ if stringContain 'o "M' ''; then echo yes; else echo no; fi
no
For testing strings without care of case, simply convert each string to lower case:
stringContain() {
local _lc=${2,,}
[ -z "$1" ] || { [ -z "${_lc##*${1,,}*}" ] && [ -n "$2" ] ;} ;}
Check:
stringContain 'o "M3' 'echo "my string"' && echo yes || echo no
no
stringContain 'o "My' 'echo "my string"' && echo yes || echo no
yes
if stringContain '' ''; then echo yes; else echo no; fi
yes
if stringContain 'o "M' ''; then echo yes; else echo no; fi
no
How about this:
text=" <tag>bmnmn</tag> "
if [[ "$text" =~ "<tag>" ]]; then
echo "matched"
else
echo "not matched"
fi
Extension of the question answered here How do you tell if a string contains another string in POSIX sh?:
This solution works with special characters:
# contains(string, substring)
#
# Returns 0 if the specified string contains the specified substring,
# otherwise returns 1.
contains() {
string="$1"
substring="$2"
if echo "$string" | $(type -p ggrep grep | head -1) -F -- "$substring" >/dev/null; then
return 0 # $substring is in $string
else
return 1 # $substring is not in $string
fi
}
contains "abcd" "e" || echo "abcd does not contain e"
contains "abcd" "ab" && echo "abcd contains ab"
contains "abcd" "bc" && echo "abcd contains bc"
contains "abcd" "cd" && echo "abcd contains cd"
contains "abcd" "abcd" && echo "abcd contains abcd"
contains "" "" && echo "empty string contains empty string"
contains "a" "" && echo "a contains empty string"
contains "" "a" || echo "empty string does not contain a"
contains "abcd efgh" "cd ef" && echo "abcd efgh contains cd ef"
contains "abcd efgh" " " && echo "abcd efgh contains a space"
contains "abcd [efg] hij" "[efg]" && echo "abcd [efg] hij contains [efg]"
contains "abcd [efg] hij" "[effg]" || echo "abcd [efg] hij does not contain [effg]"
contains "abcd *efg* hij" "*efg*" && echo "abcd *efg* hij contains *efg*"
contains "abcd *efg* hij" "d *efg* h" && echo "abcd *efg* hij contains d *efg* h"
contains "abcd *efg* hij" "*effg*" || echo "abcd *efg* hij does not contain *effg*"
If you prefer the regex approach:
string='My string';
if [[ $string =~ "My" ]]; then
echo "It's there!"
fi
Exact word match:
string='My long string'
exactSearch='long'
if grep -E -q "\b${exactSearch}\b" <<<${string} >/dev/null 2>&1
then
echo "It's there"
fi
I am not sure about using an if statement, but you can get a similar effect with a case statement:
case "$string" in
*foo*)
# Do stuff
;;
esac
Source: Stackoverflow.com