I have two tables, movies and categories, and I get an ordered list by categoryID first and then by Name.
The movie table has three columns ID, Name and CategoryID. The category table has two columns ID and Name.
I tried something like the following, but it didn't work.
var movies = _db.Movies.OrderBy( m => { m.CategoryID, m.Name })
This question is related to
linq
sql-order-by
use the following line on your DataContext to log the SQL activity on the DataContext to the console - then you can see exactly what your linq statements are requesting from the database:
_db.Log = Console.Out
The following LINQ statements:
var movies = from row in _db.Movies
orderby row.CategoryID, row.Name
select row;
AND
var movies = _db.Movies.OrderBy(m => m.CategoryID).ThenBy(m => m.Name);
produce the following SQL:
SELECT [t0].ID, [t0].[Name], [t0].CategoryID
FROM [dbo].[Movies] as [t0]
ORDER BY [t0].CategoryID, [t0].[Name]
Whereas, repeating an OrderBy in Linq, appears to reverse the resulting SQL output:
var movies = from row in _db.Movies
orderby row.CategoryID
orderby row.Name
select row;
AND
var movies = _db.Movies.OrderBy(m => m.CategoryID).OrderBy(m => m.Name);
produce the following SQL (Name and CategoryId are switched):
SELECT [t0].ID, [t0].[Name], [t0].CategoryID
FROM [dbo].[Movies] as [t0]
ORDER BY [t0].[Name], [t0].CategoryID
If use generic repository
> lstModule = _ModuleRepository.GetAll().OrderBy(x => new { x.Level,
> x.Rank}).ToList();
else
> _db.Module.Where(x=> ......).OrderBy(x => new { x.Level, x.Rank}).ToList();
Add "new":
var movies = _db.Movies.OrderBy( m => new { m.CategoryID, m.Name })
That works on my box. It does return something that can be used to sort. It returns an object with two values.
Similar, but different to sorting by a combined column, as follows.
var movies = _db.Movies.OrderBy( m => (m.CategoryID.ToString() + m.Name))
I have created some extension methods (below) so you don't have to worry if an IQueryable is already ordered or not. If you want to order by multiple properties just do it as follows:
// We do not have to care if the queryable is already sorted or not.
// The order of the Smart* calls defines the order priority
queryable.SmartOrderBy(i => i.Property1).SmartOrderByDescending(i => i.Property2);
This is especially helpful if you create the ordering dynamically, f.e. from a list of properties to sort.
public static class IQueryableExtension
{
public static bool IsOrdered<T>(this IQueryable<T> queryable) {
if(queryable == null) {
throw new ArgumentNullException("queryable");
}
return queryable.Expression.Type == typeof(IOrderedQueryable<T>);
}
public static IQueryable<T> SmartOrderBy<T, TKey>(this IQueryable<T> queryable, Expression<Func<T, TKey>> keySelector) {
if(queryable.IsOrdered()) {
var orderedQuery = queryable as IOrderedQueryable<T>;
return orderedQuery.ThenBy(keySelector);
} else {
return queryable.OrderBy(keySelector);
}
}
public static IQueryable<T> SmartOrderByDescending<T, TKey>(this IQueryable<T> queryable, Expression<Func<T, TKey>> keySelector) {
if(queryable.IsOrdered()) {
var orderedQuery = queryable as IOrderedQueryable<T>;
return orderedQuery.ThenByDescending(keySelector);
} else {
return queryable.OrderByDescending(keySelector);
}
}
}
Add "new":
var movies = _db.Movies.OrderBy( m => new { m.CategoryID, m.Name })
That works on my box. It does return something that can be used to sort. It returns an object with two values.
Similar, but different to sorting by a combined column, as follows.
var movies = _db.Movies.OrderBy( m => (m.CategoryID.ToString() + m.Name))
There is at least one more way to do this using LINQ, although not the easiest.
You can do it by using the OrberBy() method that uses an IComparer. First you need to
implement an IComparer for the Movie class like this:
public class MovieComparer : IComparer<Movie>
{
public int Compare(Movie x, Movie y)
{
if (x.CategoryId == y.CategoryId)
{
return x.Name.CompareTo(y.Name);
}
else
{
return x.CategoryId.CompareTo(y.CategoryId);
}
}
}
Then you can order the movies with the following syntax:
var movies = _db.Movies.OrderBy(item => item, new MovieComparer());
If you need to switch the ordering to descending for one of the items just switch the x and y inside the Compare()
method of the MovieComparer accordingly.
Using non-lambda, query-syntax LINQ, you can do this:
var movies = from row in _db.Movies
orderby row.Category, row.Name
select row;
[EDIT to address comment] To control the sort order, use the keywords ascending (which is the default and therefore not particularly useful) or descending, like so:
var movies = from row in _db.Movies
orderby row.Category descending, row.Name
select row;
There is at least one more way to do this using LINQ, although not the easiest.
You can do it by using the OrberBy() method that uses an IComparer. First you need to
implement an IComparer for the Movie class like this:
public class MovieComparer : IComparer<Movie>
{
public int Compare(Movie x, Movie y)
{
if (x.CategoryId == y.CategoryId)
{
return x.Name.CompareTo(y.Name);
}
else
{
return x.CategoryId.CompareTo(y.CategoryId);
}
}
}
Then you can order the movies with the following syntax:
var movies = _db.Movies.OrderBy(item => item, new MovieComparer());
If you need to switch the ordering to descending for one of the items just switch the x and y inside the Compare()
method of the MovieComparer accordingly.
I have created some extension methods (below) so you don't have to worry if an IQueryable is already ordered or not. If you want to order by multiple properties just do it as follows:
// We do not have to care if the queryable is already sorted or not.
// The order of the Smart* calls defines the order priority
queryable.SmartOrderBy(i => i.Property1).SmartOrderByDescending(i => i.Property2);
This is especially helpful if you create the ordering dynamically, f.e. from a list of properties to sort.
public static class IQueryableExtension
{
public static bool IsOrdered<T>(this IQueryable<T> queryable) {
if(queryable == null) {
throw new ArgumentNullException("queryable");
}
return queryable.Expression.Type == typeof(IOrderedQueryable<T>);
}
public static IQueryable<T> SmartOrderBy<T, TKey>(this IQueryable<T> queryable, Expression<Func<T, TKey>> keySelector) {
if(queryable.IsOrdered()) {
var orderedQuery = queryable as IOrderedQueryable<T>;
return orderedQuery.ThenBy(keySelector);
} else {
return queryable.OrderBy(keySelector);
}
}
public static IQueryable<T> SmartOrderByDescending<T, TKey>(this IQueryable<T> queryable, Expression<Func<T, TKey>> keySelector) {
if(queryable.IsOrdered()) {
var orderedQuery = queryable as IOrderedQueryable<T>;
return orderedQuery.ThenByDescending(keySelector);
} else {
return queryable.OrderByDescending(keySelector);
}
}
}
If use generic repository
> lstModule = _ModuleRepository.GetAll().OrderBy(x => new { x.Level,
> x.Rank}).ToList();
else
> _db.Module.Where(x=> ......).OrderBy(x => new { x.Level, x.Rank}).ToList();
use the following line on your DataContext to log the SQL activity on the DataContext to the console - then you can see exactly what your linq statements are requesting from the database:
_db.Log = Console.Out
The following LINQ statements:
var movies = from row in _db.Movies
orderby row.CategoryID, row.Name
select row;
AND
var movies = _db.Movies.OrderBy(m => m.CategoryID).ThenBy(m => m.Name);
produce the following SQL:
SELECT [t0].ID, [t0].[Name], [t0].CategoryID
FROM [dbo].[Movies] as [t0]
ORDER BY [t0].CategoryID, [t0].[Name]
Whereas, repeating an OrderBy in Linq, appears to reverse the resulting SQL output:
var movies = from row in _db.Movies
orderby row.CategoryID
orderby row.Name
select row;
AND
var movies = _db.Movies.OrderBy(m => m.CategoryID).OrderBy(m => m.Name);
produce the following SQL (Name and CategoryId are switched):
SELECT [t0].ID, [t0].[Name], [t0].CategoryID
FROM [dbo].[Movies] as [t0]
ORDER BY [t0].[Name], [t0].CategoryID
Source: Stackoverflow.com