Why use SurfaceView and not the classic View class...
One main reason is that SurfaceView can rapidly render the screen.
In simple words a SV is more capable of managing the timing and render animations.
To have a better understanding what is a SurfaceView we must compare it with the View class.
What is the difference... check this simple explanation in the video
https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=eltlqsHSG30
Well with the View we have one major problem....the timing of rendering animations.
Normally the onDraw() is called from the Android run-time system.
So, when Android run-time system calls onDraw() then the application cant control
the timing of display, and this is important for animation. We have a gap of timing
between the application (our game) and the Android run-time system.
The SV it can call the onDraw() by a dedicated Thread.
Thus: the application controls the timing. So we can display the next bitmap image of the animation.
updated 05/09/2014
OK. We have official document now. It talked all I have mentioned, in a better way.
Read more detailed here.
Yes, the main difference is surfaceView can be updated on the background thread. However, there are more you might care.
surfaceView has dedicate surface buffer while all the view shares one surface buffer that is allocated by ViewRoot. In another word, surfaceView cost more resources.
surfaceView cannot be hardware accelerated (as of JB4.2) while 95% operations on normal View are HW accelerated using openGL ES.
More work should be done to create your customized surfaceView. You need to listener to the surfaceCreated/Destroy Event, create an render thread, more importantly, synchronized the render thread and main thread. However, to customize the View, all you need to do is override onDraw method.
view.invalidate in the UI thread or view.postInvalid in other thread to indicate to the framework that the view should be updated. However, the view won't be updated immediately but wait until next VSYNC event arrived. The easy approach to understand VSYNC is to consider it is as a timer that fire up every 16ms for a 60fps screen. In Android, all the normal view update (and display actually but I won't talk it today), is synchronized with VSYNC to achieve better smoothness. Now,back to the surfaceView, you can render it anytime as you wish. However, I can hardly tell if it is an advantage, since the display is also synchronized with VSYNC, as stated previously.One of the main differences between surfaceview and view is that to refresh the screen for a normal view we have to call invalidate method from the same thread where the view is defined. But even if we call invalidate, the refreshing does not happen immediately. It occurs only after the next arrival of the VSYNC signal. VSYNC signal is a kernel generated signal which happens every 16.6 ms or this is also known as 60 frame per second. So if we want more control over the refreshing of the screen (for example for very fast moving animation), we should not use normal view class.
On the other hand in case of surfaceview, we can refresh the screen as fast as we want and we can do it from a background thread. So refreshing of the surfaceview really does not depend upon VSYNC, and this is very useful if we want to do high speed animation. I have few training videos and example application which explain all these things nicely. Please have a look at the following training videos.
The main difference is that SurfaceView can be drawn on by background theads but Views can't.
SurfaceViews use more resources though so you don't want to use them unless you have to.
A few things I've noted:
For more information (and a great usage example) refer to the LunarLander project in the SDK 's examples section.
A SurfaceView is a custom view in Android that can be used to drawn inside it.
The main difference between a View and a SurfaceView is that a View is drawn in the
UI Thread, which is used for all the user interaction.
If you want to update the UI rapidly enough and render a good amount of information in
it, a SurfaceView is a better choice.
But there are a few technical insides to the SurfaceView:
1. They are not hardware accelerated.
2. Normal views are rendered when you call the methods invalidate or postInvalidate(), but this does not mean the view will be
immediately updated (A VSYNC will be sent, and the OS decides when
it gets updated. The SurfaceView can be immediately updated.
3. A SurfaceView has an allocated surface buffer, so it is more costly
Source: Stackoverflow.com