Which equals operator vs should be used in JavaScript comparisons

Question

I m using JSLint to go through JavaScript  and it s returning many suggestions to replace     two equals signs  with      three equals signs  when doing things like comparing idSele UNVEHtype value length    0 inside of an if statement   Is there a performance benefit to replacing    with        Any performance improvement would be welcomed as many comparison operators exist   If no type conversion takes place  would there be a performance gain over

User · Answer

The equal comparison operator    is confusing and should be avoided    If you HAVE TO live with it  then remember the following 3 things     It is not transitive   a    b  and  b    c  does not lead to  a    c  It s mutually exclusive to its negation   a    b  and  a    b  always hold opposite Boolean values  with all a and b  In case of doubt  learn by heart the following truth table    EQUAL OPERATOR TRUTH TABLE IN JAVASCRIPT   Each row in the table is a set of 3 mutually  equal  values  meaning that any 2 values among them are equal using the equal    sign       STRANGE  note that any two values on the first column are not equal in that sense                 0    false      Any two values among these 3 ones are equal with the    operator  0          0    false      Also a set of 3 equal values  note that only 0 and false are repeated   t         0    false      -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --   r         0    false      -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --   n         0    false      -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --   t r n     0    false      -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --  null    undefined     These two  default  values are not-equal to any of the listed values above NaN                   NaN is not equal to any thing  even to itself

User · Answer

Yes  It does matter       operator in javascript checks value as well as type where as    operator just checks the value  does type conversion if required      You can easily test it  Paste following code in an HTML file and open it in browser   lt script gt   function onPageLoad         var x    5       var y   5      alert x     5        lt  script gt    lt  head gt    lt body onload  onPageLoad     gt    You will get  false  in alert  Now modify the onPageLoad   method to alert x    5   you will get true

User · Answer

Javascript execution flow diagram for strict equality   Comparison          Javascript execution flow diagram for non strict equality   comparison

User · Answer

The problem is that you might easily get into trouble since JavaScript have a lot of implicit conversions meaning     var x   0  var isTrue   x    null  var isFalse   x     null    Which pretty soon becomes a problem  The best sample of why implicit conversion is  evil  can be taken from this code in MFC   C   which actually will compile due to an implicit conversion from CString to HANDLE which is a pointer typedef type     CString x  delete x    Which obviously during runtime does very undefined things     Google for implicit conversions in C   and STL to get some of the arguments against it

User · Answer

Yes  there is a big difference between equality    and identity     operators  Usually the identity operator performs faster  because no types conversion is done  But if the values are of the same type  you ll see no difference  Check my post The legend of JavaScript equality operator  which explains the details  including the types conversion  amp  comparison algorithms  with a lot of examples

User · Answer

The     operator is called a strict comparison operator  it does differ from the    operator   Lets take 2 vars a and b   For  a    b  to evaluate to true a and b need to be the same value   In the case of  a     b  a and b must be the same value and also the same type for it to evaluate to true     Take the following example  var a   1  var b    1    if  a    b    evaluates to true as a and b are both 1       alert  a    b       if  a     b    evaluates to false as a is not the same type as b       alert  a     b        In summary  using the    operator might evaluate to true in situations where you do not want it to so using the     operator would be safer     In the 90  usage scenario it won t matter which one you use  but it is handy to know the difference when you get some unexpected behaviour one day

User · Answer

Using the    operator  Equality   true    1    true  because  true  is converted to 1 and then compared  2     2     true  because  2  is converted to 2 and then compared   Using the     operator  Identity   true     1    false  2      2     false   This is because the equality operator    does type coercion  meaning that the interpreter implicitly tries to convert the values before comparing   On the other hand  the identity operator     does not do type coercion  and thus does not convert the values when comparing  and is therefore faster  as according to This JS benchmark test  as it skips one step

User · Answer

A simple example is   2     2   - gt  true  values are SAME because of type conversion   2      2   - gt  false  values are NOT SAME because of no type conversion

User · Answer

The     operator is called a strict comparison operator  it does differ from the    operator   Lets take 2 vars a and b   For  a    b  to evaluate to true a and b need to be the same value   In the case of  a     b  a and b must be the same value and also the same type for it to evaluate to true     Take the following example  var a   1  var b    1    if  a    b    evaluates to true as a and b are both 1       alert  a    b       if  a     b    evaluates to false as a is not the same type as b       alert  a     b        In summary  using the    operator might evaluate to true in situations where you do not want it to so using the     operator would be safer     In the 90  usage scenario it won t matter which one you use  but it is handy to know the difference when you get some unexpected behaviour one day

User · Answer

Equality comparison    Operator     Returns true  when both operands are equal  The operands are converted to the same type before being compared    gt  gt  gt  1    1 true  gt  gt  gt  1    2 false  gt  gt  gt  1     1  true   Equality and type comparison    Operator      Returns true if both operands are equal and of the same type  It s generally  better and safer if you compare this way  because there s no behind-the-scenes type conversions    gt  gt  gt  1      1  false  gt  gt  gt  1     1 true

User · Answer

cares if the objects are the same  Therefore  new String  Hello world        Hello world  returns false  However     does not care about if the objects are the same  it just simply converts one argument into the other s type  if conversion is not possible  return false  Then new String  Hello world       Hello world  returns true instead of false

User · Answer

It s a strict check test   It s a good thing especially if you re checking between 0 and false and null    For example  if you have    a   0    Then    a  0    a  NULL   a  false    All returns true and you may not want this  Let s suppose you have a function that can return the 0th index of an array or false on failure  If you check with      false  you can get a confusing result   So with the same thing as above  but a strict test    a   0    a   0     returns true  a   NULL     returns false  a   false     returns false

User · Answer

I tested this in Firefox with Firebug using code like this   x000D   x000D  console time  testEquality    var n   0  while  true      n      if  n    100000      break    console timeEnd  testEquality    x000D   x000D   x000D   and  x000D   x000D  console time  testTypeEquality    var n   0  while  true      n      if  n     100000      break    console timeEnd  testTypeEquality    x000D   x000D   x000D   My results  tested five times each and averaged       115 2      114 4  So I d say that the miniscule difference  this is over 100000 iterations  remember  is negligible  Performance isn t a reason to do      Type safety  well  as safe as you re going to get in JavaScript   and code quality is

User · Answer

The javascript is a weakly typed language i e  without any data-types as there in C c   eg  int  boolean  float etc  thus a variable can hold any type of value  that why these special comparison operators are there  Eg  var i   20 var j    20     if we apply comparison operators these variables result will be  i  j   result is true   or   j    i  result is false   for that we need a special comparison operators which checks for the value as well as for the data type of the variable  if we do  i   j   result is false

User · Answer

In a typical script there will be no performance difference  More important may be the fact that thousand       is 1 nbsp KB heavier than thousand         JavaScript profilers can tell you if there is a performance difference in your case   But personally I would do what JSLint suggests  This recommendation is there not because of performance issues  but because type coercion means    t r n     0  is true

User · Answer

One unmentioned reason to use     - is in the case that you are co-existing with   cross-compiling to from coffee-script  From The Little Book on CoffeeScript     The weak equality comparison in JavaScript has some confusing behavior and is often the source of confusing bugs  The solution is to instead use the strict equality operator  which consists of three equal signs       It works exactly like the normal equality operator  but without any type coercion  It s recommended to always use the strict equality operator  and explicitly convert types if needs be   If you are regularly converting to and from coffee-script  you should just use       In fact  the coffee-script compiler will force you to     CoffeeScript solves this by simply replacing all weak comparisons with strict ones  in other words converting all    comparators into      You can t do a a weak equality comparison in CoffeeScript  and you should explicitly convert types before comparing them if necessary

User · Answer

From the core javascript reference         Returns true if the operands are strictly equal  see above    with no type conversion

User · Answer

There is unlikely to be any performance difference between the two operations in your usage  There is no type-conversion to be done because both parameters are already the same type  Both operations will have a type comparison followed by a value comparison

User · Answer

An interesting pictorial representation of the equality comparison between    and         Source  http   dorey github io JavaScript-Equality-Table     var1     var2     When using     for JavaScript equality testing  everything is as is  Nothing gets converted before being evaluated        var1    var2     When using    for JavaScript equality testing  some   funky conversions take place         Moral of the story        Use     unless you fully understand the   conversions that take place with

User · Answer

In the answers here  I didn t read anything about what equal means  Some will say that     means equal and of the same type  but that s not really true  It actually means that both operands reference the same object  or in case of value types  have the same value  So  let s take the following code  var a    1 2 3   var b    1 2 3   var c   a   var ab eq    a     b      false  even though a and b are the same type  var ac eq    a     c      true  The same here  var a     x  1  y  2    var b     x  1  y  2    var c   a   var ab eq    a     b      false  even though a and b are the same type  var ac eq    a     c      true  Or even  var a        var b        var c   a   var ab eq    a     b      false  even though a and b are the same type  var ac eq    a     c      true  This behavior is not always obvious  There s more to the story than being equal and being of the same type  The rule is  For value types  numbers   a     b returns true if a and b have the same value and are of the same type For reference types  a     b returns true if a and b reference the exact same object For strings  a     b returns true if a and b are both strings and contain the exact same characters  Strings  the special case    Strings are not value types  but in Javascript they behave like value types  so they will be  quot equal quot  when the characters in the string are the same and when they are of the same length  as explained in the third rule  Now it becomes interesting  var a    quot 12 quot     quot 3 quot   var b    quot 123 quot    alert a     b      returns true  because strings behave like value types  But how about this   var a   new String  quot 123 quot    var b    quot 123 quot    alert a     b      returns false     but they are equal and of the same type   I thought strings behave like value types  Well  it depends who you ask    In this case a and b are not the same type  a is of type Object  while b is of type string  Just remember that creating a string object using the String constructor creates something of type Object that behaves as a string most of the time

User · Answer

In PHP and JavaScript  it is a strict equality operator  Which means  it will compare both type and values

User · Answer

The problem is that you might easily get into trouble since JavaScript have a lot of implicit conversions meaning     var x   0  var isTrue   x    null  var isFalse   x     null    Which pretty soon becomes a problem  The best sample of why implicit conversion is  evil  can be taken from this code in MFC   C   which actually will compile due to an implicit conversion from CString to HANDLE which is a pointer typedef type     CString x  delete x    Which obviously during runtime does very undefined things     Google for implicit conversions in C   and STL to get some of the arguments against it

User · Answer

I tested this in Firefox with Firebug using code like this   x000D   x000D  console time  testEquality    var n   0  while  true      n      if  n    100000      break    console timeEnd  testEquality    x000D   x000D   x000D   and  x000D   x000D  console time  testTypeEquality    var n   0  while  true      n      if  n     100000      break    console timeEnd  testTypeEquality    x000D   x000D   x000D   My results  tested five times each and averaged       115 2      114 4  So I d say that the miniscule difference  this is over 100000 iterations  remember  is negligible  Performance isn t a reason to do      Type safety  well  as safe as you re going to get in JavaScript   and code quality is

User · Answer

var a   new String  123    var b    123    alert a     b      returns false     but they are equal and of the same type    Saw this in one of the answers  a and b are not really the same type in this case  if you will check typeof a   you will get  object  and typeof b  is  string

User · Answer

Strict equality is for the most part better  The fact that Javascript is a loosely typed language needs to be in the front of your mind constantly as you work with it  As long as the data structure is the same there really is no reason as to not use strict equality  with regular equality you often have an implicit conversion of values that happens automatically  this can have far-reaching effects on your code  It is very easy to have problems with this conversion seeing as they happen automatically   With strict equality there is no automatic implicit conversion as the values must already be of the correct data structure

User · Answer

Using the    operator  Equality   true    1    true  because  true  is converted to 1 and then compared  2     2     true  because  2  is converted to 2 and then compared   Using the     operator  Identity   true     1    false  2      2     false   This is because the equality operator    does type coercion  meaning that the interpreter implicitly tries to convert the values before comparing   On the other hand  the identity operator     does not do type coercion  and thus does not convert the values when comparing  and is therefore faster  as according to This JS benchmark test  as it skips one step

User · Answer

There is unlikely to be any performance difference between the two operations in your usage  There is no type-conversion to be done because both parameters are already the same type  Both operations will have a type comparison followed by a value comparison

User · Answer

As a rule of thumb  I would generally use     instead of     and     instead of       Reasons are explained in in the answers above and also Douglas Crockford is pretty clear about it  JavaScript  The Good Parts    However there is one single exception     null is an efficient way to check for  is null or undefined    if  value    null           value is either null or undefined     For example jQuery 1 9 1 uses this pattern 43 times  and  the JSHint syntax checker even provides the eqnull relaxing option for this reason   From the jQuery style guide      Strict equality checks       should be used in favor of     The only   exception is when checking for undefined and null by way of null      Check for both undefined and null values  for some important reason   undefOrNull    null

User · Answer

One unmentioned reason to use     - is in the case that you are co-existing with   cross-compiling to from coffee-script  From The Little Book on CoffeeScript     The weak equality comparison in JavaScript has some confusing behavior and is often the source of confusing bugs  The solution is to instead use the strict equality operator  which consists of three equal signs       It works exactly like the normal equality operator  but without any type coercion  It s recommended to always use the strict equality operator  and explicitly convert types if needs be   If you are regularly converting to and from coffee-script  you should just use       In fact  the coffee-script compiler will force you to     CoffeeScript solves this by simply replacing all weak comparisons with strict ones  in other words converting all    comparators into      You can t do a a weak equality comparison in CoffeeScript  and you should explicitly convert types before comparing them if necessary

User · Answer

The problem is that you might easily get into trouble since JavaScript have a lot of implicit conversions meaning     var x   0  var isTrue   x    null  var isFalse   x     null    Which pretty soon becomes a problem  The best sample of why implicit conversion is  evil  can be taken from this code in MFC   C   which actually will compile due to an implicit conversion from CString to HANDLE which is a pointer typedef type     CString x  delete x    Which obviously during runtime does very undefined things     Google for implicit conversions in C   and STL to get some of the arguments against it

User · Answer

Javascript execution flow diagram for strict equality   Comparison          Javascript execution flow diagram for non strict equality   comparison

User · Answer

Different s Between                      operator Used to just assign the value      operator Used to just compares the values not datatype       operator Used to Compare the values as well as datatype

User · Answer

Different s Between                      operator Used to just assign the value      operator Used to just compares the values not datatype       operator Used to Compare the values as well as datatype

User · Answer

JavaScript     vs       0  false      true 0   false     false  because they are of a different type 1   1         true  auto type coercion 1    1        false  because they are of a different type

User · Answer

The strict equality operator       behaves identically to the abstract equality operator      except no type conversion is done  and the types must be the same to be considered equal   Reference  Javascript Tutorial  Comparison Operators  The    operator will compare for equality after doing any necessary type conversions   The     operator will not do the conversion  so if two values are not the same type     will simply return false  Both are equally quick   To quote Douglas Crockford s excellent JavaScript  The Good Parts      JavaScript has two sets of equality operators      and      and their evil twins    and      The good ones work the way you would expect   If the two operands are of the same type and have the same value  then     produces true and     produces false   The evil twins do the right thing when the operands are of the same type  but if they are of different types  they attempt to coerce the values   the rules by which they do that are complicated and unmemorable   These are some of the interesting cases          0               false 0                      true 0     0                true  false     false        false false     0            true  false    undefined     false false    null          false null    undefined      true     t r n      0        true         The lack of transitivity is alarming   My advice is to never use the evil twins   Instead  always use     and       All of the comparisons just shown produce false with the     operator      Update   A good point was brought up by  Casebash in the comments and in  Phillipe Laybaert s answer concerning objects   For objects     and     act consistently with one another  except in a special case    var a    1 2 3   var b    1 2 3    var c     x  1  y  2    var d     x  1  y  2     var e    text   var f    te     xt    a    b               false a     b              false  c    d               false c     d              false  e    f               true e     f              true   The special case is when you compare a primitive with an object that evaluates to the same primitive  due to its toString or valueOf method  For example  consider the comparison of a string primitive with a string object created using the String constructor    abc     new String  abc         true  abc      new String  abc        false   Here the    operator is checking the values of the two objects and returning true  but the     is seeing that they re not the same type and returning false   Which one is correct   That really depends on what you re trying to compare   My advice is to bypass the question entirely and just don t use the String constructor to create string objects from string literals   Reference http   www ecma-international org ecma-262 5 1  sec-11 9 3

User · Answer

Simply      means comparison between operands with type conversion   amp       means comparison between operands without type conversion  Type conversion in javaScript means javaScript automatically convert any other data types to string data types   For example   123   123      will return true  because JS convert integer 123 to string  123                 as we used      operator   123    123    will return false  because JS do not convert integer 123 to string                 123  as we used       operator

User · Answer

In a typical script there will be no performance difference  More important may be the fact that thousand       is 1 nbsp KB heavier than thousand         JavaScript profilers can tell you if there is a performance difference in your case   But personally I would do what JSLint suggests  This recommendation is there not because of performance issues  but because type coercion means    t r n     0  is true

User · Answer

operator  checks the values as well as the types of the variables for equality      operator just checks the value of the variables for equality

User · Answer

The strict equality operator       behaves identically to the abstract equality operator      except no type conversion is done  and the types must be the same to be considered equal   Reference  Javascript Tutorial  Comparison Operators  The    operator will compare for equality after doing any necessary type conversions   The     operator will not do the conversion  so if two values are not the same type     will simply return false  Both are equally quick   To quote Douglas Crockford s excellent JavaScript  The Good Parts      JavaScript has two sets of equality operators      and      and their evil twins    and      The good ones work the way you would expect   If the two operands are of the same type and have the same value  then     produces true and     produces false   The evil twins do the right thing when the operands are of the same type  but if they are of different types  they attempt to coerce the values   the rules by which they do that are complicated and unmemorable   These are some of the interesting cases          0               false 0                      true 0     0                true  false     false        false false     0            true  false    undefined     false false    null          false null    undefined      true     t r n      0        true         The lack of transitivity is alarming   My advice is to never use the evil twins   Instead  always use     and       All of the comparisons just shown produce false with the     operator      Update   A good point was brought up by  Casebash in the comments and in  Phillipe Laybaert s answer concerning objects   For objects     and     act consistently with one another  except in a special case    var a    1 2 3   var b    1 2 3    var c     x  1  y  2    var d     x  1  y  2     var e    text   var f    te     xt    a    b               false a     b              false  c    d               false c     d              false  e    f               true e     f              true   The special case is when you compare a primitive with an object that evaluates to the same primitive  due to its toString or valueOf method  For example  consider the comparison of a string primitive with a string object created using the String constructor    abc     new String  abc         true  abc      new String  abc        false   Here the    operator is checking the values of the two objects and returning true  but the     is seeing that they re not the same type and returning false   Which one is correct   That really depends on what you re trying to compare   My advice is to bypass the question entirely and just don t use the String constructor to create string objects from string literals   Reference http   www ecma-international org ecma-262 5 1  sec-11 9 3

User · Answer

Why    is so unpredictable   What do you get when you compare an empty string    with the number zero 0   true  Yep  that s right according to    an empty string and the number zero are the same time   And it doesn t end there  here s another one    0     false    true   Things get really weird with arrays    1     true    true       false    true         false    true  0     false    true   Then weirder with strings   1 2 3      1 2 3     true - REALLY     r n t     0    true - Come on    It get s worse   When is equal not equal   let A          empty string let B   0      zero let C    0     zero string  A    B    true - ok     B    C    true - so far so good    A    C      FALSE   - Plot twist    Let me say that again    A    B   amp  amp   B    C     true  A    C       FALSE     And this is just the crazy stuff you get with primitives   It s a whole new level of crazy when you use    with objects   At this point your probably wondering     Why does this happen   Well it s because unlike  triple equals        which just checks if two values are the same      does a whole bunch of other stuff   It has special handling for functions  special handling for nulls  undefined  strings  you name it   It get s pretty wacky   In fact  if you tried to write a function that does what    does it would look something like this   function isEqual x  y       if      were a function     if typeof y     typeof x  return y     x         treat null and undefined the same     var xIsNothing    y     undefined      y     null       var yIsNothing    x     undefined      x     null        if xIsNothing    yIsNothing  return  xIsNothing  amp  amp  yIsNothing        if typeof y      function     typeof x      function                if either value is a string             convert the function into a string and compare         if typeof x      string                 return x     y toString              else if typeof y      string                 return x toString       y                     return false             if typeof x      object   x   toPrimitive x       if typeof y      object   y   toPrimitive y       if typeof y     typeof x  return y     x          convert x and y into numbers if they are not already use the     trick     if typeof x      number   x    x      if typeof y      number   y    y         actually the real      is even more complicated than this  especially in ES6     return x     y     function toPrimitive obj        var value   obj valueOf        if obj     value  return value      return obj toString        So what does this mean   It means    is complicated   Because it s complicated it s hard to know what s going to happen when you use it   Which means you could end up with bugs   So the moral of the story is     Make your life less complicated   Use     instead of      The End

User · Answer

Yes  It does matter       operator in javascript checks value as well as type where as    operator just checks the value  does type conversion if required      You can easily test it  Paste following code in an HTML file and open it in browser   lt script gt   function onPageLoad         var x    5       var y   5      alert x     5        lt  script gt    lt  head gt    lt body onload  onPageLoad     gt    You will get  false  in alert  Now modify the onPageLoad   method to alert x    5   you will get true

User · Answer

The reason it suggest to replace    with     is that the     operator is more reliable than     In our context reliable means     also goes for type checking  Considering the best programming practices we should always choose more reliable feature over less reliable one  Again whenever we think about exactly equal to operator most of the time  we are by default consider the type should be same  As     provides the same  we should go for it

User · Answer

The top 2 answers both mentioned    means equality and     means identity  Unfortunately  this statement is incorrect    If both operands of    are objects  then they are compared to see if they are the same object  If both operands point to the same object  then the equal operator returns true  Otherwise  the two are not equal    var a    1  2  3     var b    1  2  3     console log a    b      false   console log a     b     false     In the code above  both    and     get false because a and b are not the same objects   That s to say  if both operands of    are objects     behaves same as      which also means identity  The essential difference of this two operators is about type conversion     has conversion before it checks equality  but     does not

User · Answer

The     operator is called a strict comparison operator  it does differ from the    operator   Lets take 2 vars a and b   For  a    b  to evaluate to true a and b need to be the same value   In the case of  a     b  a and b must be the same value and also the same type for it to evaluate to true     Take the following example  var a   1  var b    1    if  a    b    evaluates to true as a and b are both 1       alert  a    b       if  a     b    evaluates to false as a is not the same type as b       alert  a     b        In summary  using the    operator might evaluate to true in situations where you do not want it to so using the     operator would be safer     In the 90  usage scenario it won t matter which one you use  but it is handy to know the difference when you get some unexpected behaviour one day

User · Answer

var a   new String  123    var b    123    alert a     b      returns false     but they are equal and of the same type    Saw this in one of the answers  a and b are not really the same type in this case  if you will check typeof a   you will get  object  and typeof b  is  string

User · Answer

The dilemma of  Should I use    or     in JavaScript comparison  is equal or analogous to a question of   Should I use a  spoon  or a  fork  for eating    The only reasonable answer to this question is that    You should use Dynamic Type comparison e g     for loose Type comparisons   You should use Static Type comparison e g      for strong Type comparisons     That s because they are not the same  They don t have the same purpose and are not meant to be used for the same purpose   Of course both  forks  and  spoons  are meant for  eating   but you will chose to use them accordingly to what you ve been served to eat   Meaning  you ll resolve to using a  spoon  i e      for having a  soup   and   or the  fork  i e       for picking    Asking if it is better to use a  fork  or a  spoon  for  eating  - is equall to asking if it is better to use a static       versus dynamic      eq   op  in JS  Both questions are equally wrong and reflect a very narrow or shallow understanding of the subject in question

User · Answer

In JavaScript it means of the same value and type   For example   4     4     will return true   but  4      4     will return false

User · Answer

Operators     vs        1    true      gt     true true    true      gt     true 1     true      gt     false true     true      gt     true

User · Answer

Using the    operator  Equality   true    1    true  because  true  is converted to 1 and then compared  2     2     true  because  2  is converted to 2 and then compared   Using the     operator  Identity   true     1    false  2      2     false   This is because the equality operator    does type coercion  meaning that the interpreter implicitly tries to convert the values before comparing   On the other hand  the identity operator     does not do type coercion  and thus does not convert the values when comparing  and is therefore faster  as according to This JS benchmark test  as it skips one step

User · Answer

In JavaScript it means of the same value and type   For example   4     4     will return true   but  4      4     will return false

User · Answer

There is unlikely to be any performance difference between the two operations in your usage  There is no type-conversion to be done because both parameters are already the same type  Both operations will have a type comparison followed by a value comparison

User · Answer

First  some terminology about Javascript string equals  Double equals is officially known as the abstract equality comparison operator while triple equals is termed the strict equality comparison operator  The difference between them can be summed up as follows  Abstract equality will attempt to resolve the data types via type coercion before making a comparison  Strict equality will return false if the types are different  Consider the following example   console log 3     3       true console log 3      3       false  console log 3     3       true console log 3      3       false    Using two equal signs returns true because the string    3    is converted to the number 3 before the comparison is made  Three equal signs sees that the types are different and returns false  Here   s another   console log true     1       true console log true      1       false console log true     1       true console log true      1       false   Again  the abstract equality comparison performs a type conversion  In this case both the boolean true and the string    1    are converted to the number 1 and the result is true  Strict equality returns false   If you understand that you are well on your way to distinguishing between    and      However  there   s some scenarios where the behavior of these operators is non intuitive  Let   s take a look at some more examples   console log undefined    null      true console log undefined     null      false  Undefined and null are distinct types and are not interchangeable  console log undefined    null      true      console log undefined     null      false  Undefined and null are distinct types and are not interchangeable   console log true     true       false  A string will not be converted to a boolean and vice versa  console log true      true       false console log true     true       false  A string will not be converted to a boolean and vice versa  console log true      true       false   The example below is interesting because it illustrates that string literals are different from string objects   console log  This is a string      new String  This is a string         true console log  This is a string       new String  This is a string         false console log  This is a string      new String  This is a string         true console log  This is a string       new String  This is a string         false

User · Answer

Why    is so unpredictable   What do you get when you compare an empty string    with the number zero 0   true  Yep  that s right according to    an empty string and the number zero are the same time   And it doesn t end there  here s another one    0     false    true   Things get really weird with arrays    1     true    true       false    true         false    true  0     false    true   Then weirder with strings   1 2 3      1 2 3     true - REALLY     r n t     0    true - Come on    It get s worse   When is equal not equal   let A          empty string let B   0      zero let C    0     zero string  A    B    true - ok     B    C    true - so far so good    A    C      FALSE   - Plot twist    Let me say that again    A    B   amp  amp   B    C     true  A    C       FALSE     And this is just the crazy stuff you get with primitives   It s a whole new level of crazy when you use    with objects   At this point your probably wondering     Why does this happen   Well it s because unlike  triple equals        which just checks if two values are the same      does a whole bunch of other stuff   It has special handling for functions  special handling for nulls  undefined  strings  you name it   It get s pretty wacky   In fact  if you tried to write a function that does what    does it would look something like this   function isEqual x  y       if      were a function     if typeof y     typeof x  return y     x         treat null and undefined the same     var xIsNothing    y     undefined      y     null       var yIsNothing    x     undefined      x     null        if xIsNothing    yIsNothing  return  xIsNothing  amp  amp  yIsNothing        if typeof y      function     typeof x      function                if either value is a string             convert the function into a string and compare         if typeof x      string                 return x     y toString              else if typeof y      string                 return x toString       y                     return false             if typeof x      object   x   toPrimitive x       if typeof y      object   y   toPrimitive y       if typeof y     typeof x  return y     x          convert x and y into numbers if they are not already use the     trick     if typeof x      number   x    x      if typeof y      number   y    y         actually the real      is even more complicated than this  especially in ES6     return x     y     function toPrimitive obj        var value   obj valueOf        if obj     value  return value      return obj toString        So what does this mean   It means    is complicated   Because it s complicated it s hard to know what s going to happen when you use it   Which means you could end up with bugs   So the moral of the story is     Make your life less complicated   Use     instead of      The End

User · Answer

It s a strict check test   It s a good thing especially if you re checking between 0 and false and null    For example  if you have    a   0    Then    a  0    a  NULL   a  false    All returns true and you may not want this  Let s suppose you have a function that can return the 0th index of an array or false on failure  If you check with      false  you can get a confusing result   So with the same thing as above  but a strict test    a   0    a   0     returns true  a   NULL     returns false  a   false     returns false

User · Answer

Here is a handy comparison table that shows the conversions that happen and the differences between    and       As the conclusion states       Use three equals unless you fully understand the conversions that take   place for two-equals     http   dorey github io JavaScript-Equality-Table

User · Answer

Let me add this counsel  If in doubt  read the specification  ECMA-262 is the specification for a scripting language of which JavaScript is a dialect  Of course in practice it matters more how the most important browsers behave than an esoteric definition of how something is supposed to be handled  But it is helpful to understand why new String  quot a quot        quot a quot   Please let me explain how to read the specification to clarify this question  I see that in this very old topic nobody had an answer for the very strange effect  So  if you can read a specification  this will help you in your profession tremendously  It is an acquired skill  So  let s continue  Searching the PDF file for     brings me to page 56 of the specification  11 9 4  The Strict Equals Operator          and after wading through the specificationalese I find   11 9 6 The Strict Equality Comparison Algorithm The comparison x     y  where x and y are values  produces true or false  Such a comparison is performed as follows      1  If Type x  is different from Type y   return false      2  If Type x  is Undefined  return true      3  If Type x  is Null  return true      4  If Type x  is not Number  go to step 11      5  If x is NaN  return false      6  If y is NaN  return false      7  If x is the same number value as y  return true      8  If x is  0 and y is -0  return true      9  If x is -0 and y is  0  return true      10  Return false      11  If Type x  is String  then return true if x and y are exactly the same sequence of characters  same length and same characters in corresponding positions   otherwise  return false      12  If Type x  is Boolean  return true if x and y are both true or both false  otherwise  return false      13  Return true if x and y refer to the same object or if they refer to objects joined to each other  see 13 1 2   Otherwise  return false   Interesting is step 11  Yes  strings are treated as value types  But this does not explain why new String  quot a quot        quot a quot   Do we have a browser not conforming to ECMA-262  Not so fast  Let s check the types of the operands  Try it out for yourself by wrapping them in typeof    I find that new String  quot a quot   is an object  and step 1 is used  return false if the types are different  If you wonder why new String  quot a quot   does not return a string  how about some exercise reading a specification  Have fun   Aidiakapi wrote this in a comment below   From the specification 11 2 2 The new Operator  If Type constructor  is not Object  throw a TypeError exception  With other words  if String wouldn t be of type Object it couldn t be used with the new operator   new always returns an Object  even for String constructors  too  And alas  The value semantics for strings  see step 11  is lost  And this finally means  new String  quot a quot        quot a quot

User · Answer

checks same sides are equal in type as well as value   Example   1      1    will return  quot false quot  because  string  is not a  number   Common example  0           will be  quot true quot   but it s very common to want this check to be  quot false quot   Another common example  null    undefined    returns  quot true quot   but in most cases a distinction is necessary   Many times an untyped check would be handy because you do not care if the value is either undefined  null  0  or  quot  quot

User · Answer

1     1       gt     true define  true      true       gt  false undefined compare the type of variable  Case 1 if true      true      echo  true   else   echo  false undefined    Ans  - false undefined because case 1 is check data type also with       Case 2 if 1     1      echo  true define   else   echo  false undefined    Ans  - true define undefined because case 2 is not check data type with

User · Answer

In the answers here  I didn t read anything about what equal means  Some will say that     means equal and of the same type  but that s not really true  It actually means that both operands reference the same object  or in case of value types  have the same value  So  let s take the following code  var a    1 2 3   var b    1 2 3   var c   a   var ab eq    a     b      false  even though a and b are the same type  var ac eq    a     c      true  The same here  var a     x  1  y  2    var b     x  1  y  2    var c   a   var ab eq    a     b      false  even though a and b are the same type  var ac eq    a     c      true  Or even  var a        var b        var c   a   var ab eq    a     b      false  even though a and b are the same type  var ac eq    a     c      true  This behavior is not always obvious  There s more to the story than being equal and being of the same type  The rule is  For value types  numbers   a     b returns true if a and b have the same value and are of the same type For reference types  a     b returns true if a and b reference the exact same object For strings  a     b returns true if a and b are both strings and contain the exact same characters  Strings  the special case    Strings are not value types  but in Javascript they behave like value types  so they will be  quot equal quot  when the characters in the string are the same and when they are of the same length  as explained in the third rule  Now it becomes interesting  var a    quot 12 quot     quot 3 quot   var b    quot 123 quot    alert a     b      returns true  because strings behave like value types  But how about this   var a   new String  quot 123 quot    var b    quot 123 quot    alert a     b      returns false     but they are equal and of the same type   I thought strings behave like value types  Well  it depends who you ask    In this case a and b are not the same type  a is of type Object  while b is of type string  Just remember that creating a string object using the String constructor creates something of type Object that behaves as a string most of the time

User · Answer

Operators     vs        1    true      gt     true true    true      gt     true 1     true      gt     false true     true      gt     true

User · Answer

Here is a handy comparison table that shows the conversions that happen and the differences between    and       As the conclusion states       Use three equals unless you fully understand the conversions that take   place for two-equals     http   dorey github io JavaScript-Equality-Table

User · Answer

The problem is that you might easily get into trouble since JavaScript have a lot of implicit conversions meaning     var x   0  var isTrue   x    null  var isFalse   x     null    Which pretty soon becomes a problem  The best sample of why implicit conversion is  evil  can be taken from this code in MFC   C   which actually will compile due to an implicit conversion from CString to HANDLE which is a pointer typedef type     CString x  delete x    Which obviously during runtime does very undefined things     Google for implicit conversions in C   and STL to get some of the arguments against it

User · Answer

null and undefined are nothingness  that is   var a  var b   null    Here a and b do not have values  Whereas  0  false and    are all values  One thing common beween all these are that they are all falsy values  which means they all satisfy falsy conditions   So  the 0  false and    together form a sub-group  And on other hand  null  amp  undefined form the second sub-group  Check the comparisons in the below image  null and undefined would equal  The other three would equal to each other  But  they all are treated as falsy conditions in JavaScript     This is same as any object  like     arrays  etc    non-empty string  amp  Boolean true are all truthy conditions  But  they are all not equal

User · Answer

A simple example is   2     2   - gt  true  values are SAME because of type conversion   2      2   - gt  false  values are NOT SAME because of no type conversion

User · Answer

In a typical script there will be no performance difference  More important may be the fact that thousand       is 1 nbsp KB heavier than thousand         JavaScript profilers can tell you if there is a performance difference in your case   But personally I would do what JSLint suggests  This recommendation is there not because of performance issues  but because type coercion means    t r n     0  is true

User · Answer

operator just compares the values not datatype      operator compare the values with comparison of its datatype  eg   1     quot 1 quot    true  1      quot 1 quot    false  This operator   quot     quot   used in languages which performs automatic type cast eg  PHP  Javascript  quot     quot  operator helps to prevent unexpected comparison caused by automatic typecast

User · Answer

An interesting pictorial representation of the equality comparison between    and         Source  http   dorey github io JavaScript-Equality-Table     var1     var2     When using     for JavaScript equality testing  everything is as is  Nothing gets converted before being evaluated        var1    var2     When using    for JavaScript equality testing  some   funky conversions take place         Moral of the story        Use     unless you fully understand the   conversions that take place with

User · Answer

The strict equality operator       behaves identically to the abstract equality operator      except no type conversion is done  and the types must be the same to be considered equal   Reference  Javascript Tutorial  Comparison Operators  The    operator will compare for equality after doing any necessary type conversions   The     operator will not do the conversion  so if two values are not the same type     will simply return false  Both are equally quick   To quote Douglas Crockford s excellent JavaScript  The Good Parts      JavaScript has two sets of equality operators      and      and their evil twins    and      The good ones work the way you would expect   If the two operands are of the same type and have the same value  then     produces true and     produces false   The evil twins do the right thing when the operands are of the same type  but if they are of different types  they attempt to coerce the values   the rules by which they do that are complicated and unmemorable   These are some of the interesting cases          0               false 0                      true 0     0                true  false     false        false false     0            true  false    undefined     false false    null          false null    undefined      true     t r n      0        true         The lack of transitivity is alarming   My advice is to never use the evil twins   Instead  always use     and       All of the comparisons just shown produce false with the     operator      Update   A good point was brought up by  Casebash in the comments and in  Phillipe Laybaert s answer concerning objects   For objects     and     act consistently with one another  except in a special case    var a    1 2 3   var b    1 2 3    var c     x  1  y  2    var d     x  1  y  2     var e    text   var f    te     xt    a    b               false a     b              false  c    d               false c     d              false  e    f               true e     f              true   The special case is when you compare a primitive with an object that evaluates to the same primitive  due to its toString or valueOf method  For example  consider the comparison of a string primitive with a string object created using the String constructor    abc     new String  abc         true  abc      new String  abc        false   Here the    operator is checking the values of the two objects and returning true  but the     is seeing that they re not the same type and returning false   Which one is correct   That really depends on what you re trying to compare   My advice is to bypass the question entirely and just don t use the String constructor to create string objects from string literals   Reference http   www ecma-international org ecma-262 5 1  sec-11 9 3

User · Answer

My reasoning process using emacs org-mode and node js to run a test     use                0    false    false    undefined   null      t r n                    x    f     t       f         f           f      f               0                x     t       f         f           f      f              false                   x       f         f           f      t               false                          x         f           f      f              undefined                                 x           t      f              null                                                  x      f                 t r n                                                     x                  use                0    false    false    undefined   null      t r n                    x    f     f       f         f           f      f               0                x     f       f         f           f      f              false                   x       f         f           f      f               false                          x         f           f      f              undefined                                 x           f      f              null                                                  x      f                 t r n                                                     x              My test script below  run   node xxx js  var rowItems         0   false   false   undefined  null     t r n    var colItems   rowItems  for var i   0  i  lt  rowItems length  i          for  var j   0  j  lt  colItems length  j              var r    rowItems i      colItems j     true   false          console log rowItems i            colItems j          r          i         gt       j

User · Answer

cares if the objects are the same  Therefore  new String  Hello world        Hello world  returns false  However     does not care about if the objects are the same  it just simply converts one argument into the other s type  if conversion is not possible  return false  Then new String  Hello world       Hello world  returns true instead of false

User · Answer

operator just compares the values not datatype      operator compare the values with comparison of its datatype  eg   1     quot 1 quot    true  1      quot 1 quot    false  This operator   quot     quot   used in languages which performs automatic type cast eg  PHP  Javascript  quot     quot  operator helps to prevent unexpected comparison caused by automatic typecast

User · Answer

always use       and you will avoid thousand of mistakes  nowadays using triple equality is more preferable by different style guides  because it compares taking into account type of operands

User · Answer

1     1       gt     true define  true      true       gt  false undefined compare the type of variable  Case 1 if true      true      echo  true   else   echo  false undefined    Ans  - false undefined because case 1 is check data type also with       Case 2 if 1     1      echo  true define   else   echo  false undefined    Ans  - true define undefined because case 2 is not check data type with

User · Answer

I tested this in Firefox with Firebug using code like this   x000D   x000D  console time  testEquality    var n   0  while  true      n      if  n    100000      break    console timeEnd  testEquality    x000D   x000D   x000D   and  x000D   x000D  console time  testTypeEquality    var n   0  while  true      n      if  n     100000      break    console timeEnd  testTypeEquality    x000D   x000D   x000D   My results  tested five times each and averaged       115 2      114 4  So I d say that the miniscule difference  this is over 100000 iterations  remember  is negligible  Performance isn t a reason to do      Type safety  well  as safe as you re going to get in JavaScript   and code quality is

User · Answer

checks same sides are equal in type as well as value   Example   1      1    will return  quot false quot  because  string  is not a  number   Common example  0           will be  quot true quot   but it s very common to want this check to be  quot false quot   Another common example  null    undefined    returns  quot true quot   but in most cases a distinction is necessary   Many times an untyped check would be handy because you do not care if the value is either undefined  null  0  or  quot  quot

User · Answer

The equal comparison operator    is confusing and should be avoided    If you HAVE TO live with it  then remember the following 3 things     It is not transitive   a    b  and  b    c  does not lead to  a    c  It s mutually exclusive to its negation   a    b  and  a    b  always hold opposite Boolean values  with all a and b  In case of doubt  learn by heart the following truth table    EQUAL OPERATOR TRUTH TABLE IN JAVASCRIPT   Each row in the table is a set of 3 mutually  equal  values  meaning that any 2 values among them are equal using the equal    sign       STRANGE  note that any two values on the first column are not equal in that sense                 0    false      Any two values among these 3 ones are equal with the    operator  0          0    false      Also a set of 3 equal values  note that only 0 and false are repeated   t         0    false      -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --   r         0    false      -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --   n         0    false      -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --   t r n     0    false      -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --  null    undefined     These two  default  values are not-equal to any of the listed values above NaN                   NaN is not equal to any thing  even to itself

User · Answer

I tested this in Firefox with Firebug using code like this   x000D   x000D  console time  testEquality    var n   0  while  true      n      if  n    100000      break    console timeEnd  testEquality    x000D   x000D   x000D   and  x000D   x000D  console time  testTypeEquality    var n   0  while  true      n      if  n     100000      break    console timeEnd  testTypeEquality    x000D   x000D   x000D   My results  tested five times each and averaged       115 2      114 4  So I d say that the miniscule difference  this is over 100000 iterations  remember  is negligible  Performance isn t a reason to do      Type safety  well  as safe as you re going to get in JavaScript   and code quality is

User · Answer

The reason it suggest to replace    with     is that the     operator is more reliable than     In our context reliable means     also goes for type checking  Considering the best programming practices we should always choose more reliable feature over less reliable one  Again whenever we think about exactly equal to operator most of the time  we are by default consider the type should be same  As     provides the same  we should go for it

User · Answer

Javascript is loosely typed just like php is   var x    20   var y  20   if  x   y     false   This will always give you a false because even though the values of the variables are the same  the data types are not  One is string the the other is int  If x  y   true   This however just checks if the content is the same  regardless of the data types     I dont want to say the values are equal because a string value cannot be equal to an int value logically

User · Answer

In PHP and JavaScript  it is a strict equality operator  Which means  it will compare both type and values

User · Answer

operator  checks the values as well as the types of the variables for equality      operator just checks the value of the variables for equality

User · Answer

First  some terminology about Javascript string equals  Double equals is officially known as the abstract equality comparison operator while triple equals is termed the strict equality comparison operator  The difference between them can be summed up as follows  Abstract equality will attempt to resolve the data types via type coercion before making a comparison  Strict equality will return false if the types are different  Consider the following example   console log 3     3       true console log 3      3       false  console log 3     3       true console log 3      3       false    Using two equal signs returns true because the string    3    is converted to the number 3 before the comparison is made  Three equal signs sees that the types are different and returns false  Here   s another   console log true     1       true console log true      1       false console log true     1       true console log true      1       false   Again  the abstract equality comparison performs a type conversion  In this case both the boolean true and the string    1    are converted to the number 1 and the result is true  Strict equality returns false   If you understand that you are well on your way to distinguishing between    and      However  there   s some scenarios where the behavior of these operators is non intuitive  Let   s take a look at some more examples   console log undefined    null      true console log undefined     null      false  Undefined and null are distinct types and are not interchangeable  console log undefined    null      true      console log undefined     null      false  Undefined and null are distinct types and are not interchangeable   console log true     true       false  A string will not be converted to a boolean and vice versa  console log true      true       false console log true     true       false  A string will not be converted to a boolean and vice versa  console log true      true       false   The example below is interesting because it illustrates that string literals are different from string objects   console log  This is a string      new String  This is a string         true console log  This is a string       new String  This is a string         false console log  This is a string      new String  This is a string         true console log  This is a string       new String  This is a string         false

User · Answer

JavaScript has both strict and type   converting comparisons  A strict comparison  e g        is only true if the operands are of the same type  The more commonly used abstract comparison  e g      converts the operands to the same Type before making the comparison    The equality      operator converts the operands if they are not of the same type  then applies strict comparison  If either operand is a number or a boolean  the operands are converted to numbers if possible  else if either operand is a string  the string operand is converted to a number if possible  If both operands are objects  then JavaScript compares internal references which are equal when operands refer to the same object in memory   Syntax   x    y  Examples   3    3        true  3     3      true 3     3       true  The identity strict equality      operator returns true if the operands are strictly equal  see above  with no type conversion   Syntax   x     y  Examples   3     3      true   For reference  Comparison operators  Mozilla Developer Network

User · Answer

Let me add this counsel  If in doubt  read the specification  ECMA-262 is the specification for a scripting language of which JavaScript is a dialect  Of course in practice it matters more how the most important browsers behave than an esoteric definition of how something is supposed to be handled  But it is helpful to understand why new String  quot a quot        quot a quot   Please let me explain how to read the specification to clarify this question  I see that in this very old topic nobody had an answer for the very strange effect  So  if you can read a specification  this will help you in your profession tremendously  It is an acquired skill  So  let s continue  Searching the PDF file for     brings me to page 56 of the specification  11 9 4  The Strict Equals Operator          and after wading through the specificationalese I find   11 9 6 The Strict Equality Comparison Algorithm The comparison x     y  where x and y are values  produces true or false  Such a comparison is performed as follows      1  If Type x  is different from Type y   return false      2  If Type x  is Undefined  return true      3  If Type x  is Null  return true      4  If Type x  is not Number  go to step 11      5  If x is NaN  return false      6  If y is NaN  return false      7  If x is the same number value as y  return true      8  If x is  0 and y is -0  return true      9  If x is -0 and y is  0  return true      10  Return false      11  If Type x  is String  then return true if x and y are exactly the same sequence of characters  same length and same characters in corresponding positions   otherwise  return false      12  If Type x  is Boolean  return true if x and y are both true or both false  otherwise  return false      13  Return true if x and y refer to the same object or if they refer to objects joined to each other  see 13 1 2   Otherwise  return false   Interesting is step 11  Yes  strings are treated as value types  But this does not explain why new String  quot a quot        quot a quot   Do we have a browser not conforming to ECMA-262  Not so fast  Let s check the types of the operands  Try it out for yourself by wrapping them in typeof    I find that new String  quot a quot   is an object  and step 1 is used  return false if the types are different  If you wonder why new String  quot a quot   does not return a string  how about some exercise reading a specification  Have fun   Aidiakapi wrote this in a comment below   From the specification 11 2 2 The new Operator  If Type constructor  is not Object  throw a TypeError exception  With other words  if String wouldn t be of type Object it couldn t be used with the new operator   new always returns an Object  even for String constructors  too  And alas  The value semantics for strings  see step 11  is lost  And this finally means  new String  quot a quot        quot a quot

User · Answer

In a typical script there will be no performance difference  More important may be the fact that thousand       is 1 nbsp KB heavier than thousand         JavaScript profilers can tell you if there is a performance difference in your case   But personally I would do what JSLint suggests  This recommendation is there not because of performance issues  but because type coercion means    t r n     0  is true

User · Answer

Using the    operator  Equality   true    1    true  because  true  is converted to 1 and then compared  2     2     true  because  2  is converted to 2 and then compared   Using the     operator  Identity   true     1    false  2      2     false   This is because the equality operator    does type coercion  meaning that the interpreter implicitly tries to convert the values before comparing   On the other hand  the identity operator     does not do type coercion  and thus does not convert the values when comparing  and is therefore faster  as according to This JS benchmark test  as it skips one step

User · Answer

There is unlikely to be any performance difference between the two operations in your usage  There is no type-conversion to be done because both parameters are already the same type  Both operations will have a type comparison followed by a value comparison

User · Answer

JavaScript     vs       0  false      true 0   false     false  because they are of a different type 1   1         true  auto type coercion 1    1        false  because they are of a different type

User · Answer

It means equality without type coercion type coercion means JavaScript do not automatically convert any other data types to string data types   0  false      true although they are different types  0   false     false as they are different types  2   2       true different types one is string and another is integer but              javaScript convert 2 to string by using    operator   2    2     false because by using     operator  javaScript do not convert             integer to string   2   2     true because both have same value and same types

User · Answer

If you are making a web application or a secured page you should always use  only when possible         because it will will check if it is the same content and if it is the same type   so when someone enters   var check   1  if check     1           someone continued with a string instead of number  most of the time useless for your webapp  most of the time entered by a user who does not now what he is doing  this will sometimes let your app crash   or even worse it is a hacker searching for weaknesses in your webapp      but with  var check   1  if check     1          some continued with a number  no string  for your script   else       alert  please enter a real number        a hacker will never get deeper in the system to find bugs and hack your app or your users  my point it is that the         will add more security to your scripts  of course you can also check if the entered number is valid  is a string  etc   with other if statements inside the first example  but this is for at least me more easier to understand and use  The reason I posted this is that the word  more secure  or  security  has never been said in this conversation  if you look at iCloud com it uses 2019 times     and 1308 times     this also means that you sometimes have the use    instead of     because it will otherwise block your function  but as said in the begin you should use     as much as possible

User · Answer

Use     if you want to compare couple of things in JavaScript  it s called strict equality  it means this will return true if only both type and value are the same  so there wouldn t be any unwanted type correction for you  if you using     you basically don t care about the type and in many cases you could face issues with loose equality comparison    Strict equality using         Strict equality compares two values for equality  Neither value is   implicitly converted to some other value before being compared  If the   values have different types  the values are considered unequal    Otherwise  if the values have the same type and are not numbers    they re considered equal if they have the same value  Finally  if both   values are numbers  they re considered equal if they re both not NaN   and are the same value  or if one is  0 and one is -0    var num   0  var obj   new String  0    var str    0    console log num     num      true console log obj     obj      true console log str     str      true  console log num     obj      false console log num     str      false console log obj     str      false console log null     undefined      false console log obj     null      false console log obj     undefined      false   Loose equality using        Loose equality compares two values for equality  after converting both   values to a common type   After conversions  one or both sides may   undergo conversions   the final equality comparison is performed   exactly as     performs it   Loose equality is symmetric  A    B   always has identical semantics to B    A for any values of A and B    except for the order of applied conversions     var num   0  var obj   new String  0    var str    0    console log num    num      true console log obj    obj      true console log str    str      true  console log num    obj      true console log num    str      true console log obj    str      true console log null    undefined      true     both false  except in rare cases console log obj    null   console log obj    undefined

User · Answer

Use     if you want to compare couple of things in JavaScript  it s called strict equality  it means this will return true if only both type and value are the same  so there wouldn t be any unwanted type correction for you  if you using     you basically don t care about the type and in many cases you could face issues with loose equality comparison    Strict equality using         Strict equality compares two values for equality  Neither value is   implicitly converted to some other value before being compared  If the   values have different types  the values are considered unequal    Otherwise  if the values have the same type and are not numbers    they re considered equal if they have the same value  Finally  if both   values are numbers  they re considered equal if they re both not NaN   and are the same value  or if one is  0 and one is -0    var num   0  var obj   new String  0    var str    0    console log num     num      true console log obj     obj      true console log str     str      true  console log num     obj      false console log num     str      false console log obj     str      false console log null     undefined      false console log obj     null      false console log obj     undefined      false   Loose equality using        Loose equality compares two values for equality  after converting both   values to a common type   After conversions  one or both sides may   undergo conversions   the final equality comparison is performed   exactly as     performs it   Loose equality is symmetric  A    B   always has identical semantics to B    A for any values of A and B    except for the order of applied conversions     var num   0  var obj   new String  0    var str    0    console log num    num      true console log obj    obj      true console log str    str      true  console log num    obj      true console log num    str      true console log obj    str      true console log null    undefined      true     both false  except in rare cases console log obj    null   console log obj    undefined

User · Answer

Simply      means comparison between operands with type conversion   amp       means comparison between operands without type conversion  Type conversion in javaScript means javaScript automatically convert any other data types to string data types   For example   123   123      will return true  because JS convert integer 123 to string  123                 as we used      operator   123    123    will return false  because JS do not convert integer 123 to string                 123  as we used       operator

User · Answer

My reasoning process using emacs org-mode and node js to run a test     use                0    false    false    undefined   null      t r n                    x    f     t       f         f           f      f               0                x     t       f         f           f      f              false                   x       f         f           f      t               false                          x         f           f      f              undefined                                 x           t      f              null                                                  x      f                 t r n                                                     x                  use                0    false    false    undefined   null      t r n                    x    f     f       f         f           f      f               0                x     f       f         f           f      f              false                   x       f         f           f      f               false                          x         f           f      f              undefined                                 x           f      f              null                                                  x      f                 t r n                                                     x              My test script below  run   node xxx js  var rowItems         0   false   false   undefined  null     t r n    var colItems   rowItems  for var i   0  i  lt  rowItems length  i          for  var j   0  j  lt  colItems length  j              var r    rowItems i      colItems j     true   false          console log rowItems i            colItems j          r          i         gt       j

User · Answer

Javascript is loosely typed just like php is   var x    20   var y  20   if  x   y     false   This will always give you a false because even though the values of the variables are the same  the data types are not  One is string the the other is int  If x  y   true   This however just checks if the content is the same  regardless of the data types     I dont want to say the values are equal because a string value cannot be equal to an int value logically

User · Answer

The javascript is a weakly typed language i e  without any data-types as there in C c   eg  int  boolean  float etc  thus a variable can hold any type of value  that why these special comparison operators are there  Eg  var i   20 var j    20     if we apply comparison operators these variables result will be  i  j   result is true   or   j    i  result is false   for that we need a special comparison operators which checks for the value as well as for the data type of the variable  if we do  i   j   result is false

User · Answer

The strict equality operator       behaves identically to the abstract equality operator      except no type conversion is done  and the types must be the same to be considered equal   Reference  Javascript Tutorial  Comparison Operators  The    operator will compare for equality after doing any necessary type conversions   The     operator will not do the conversion  so if two values are not the same type     will simply return false  Both are equally quick   To quote Douglas Crockford s excellent JavaScript  The Good Parts      JavaScript has two sets of equality operators      and      and their evil twins    and      The good ones work the way you would expect   If the two operands are of the same type and have the same value  then     produces true and     produces false   The evil twins do the right thing when the operands are of the same type  but if they are of different types  they attempt to coerce the values   the rules by which they do that are complicated and unmemorable   These are some of the interesting cases          0               false 0                      true 0     0                true  false     false        false false     0            true  false    undefined     false false    null          false null    undefined      true     t r n      0        true         The lack of transitivity is alarming   My advice is to never use the evil twins   Instead  always use     and       All of the comparisons just shown produce false with the     operator      Update   A good point was brought up by  Casebash in the comments and in  Phillipe Laybaert s answer concerning objects   For objects     and     act consistently with one another  except in a special case    var a    1 2 3   var b    1 2 3    var c     x  1  y  2    var d     x  1  y  2     var e    text   var f    te     xt    a    b               false a     b              false  c    d               false c     d              false  e    f               true e     f              true   The special case is when you compare a primitive with an object that evaluates to the same primitive  due to its toString or valueOf method  For example  consider the comparison of a string primitive with a string object created using the String constructor    abc     new String  abc         true  abc      new String  abc        false   Here the    operator is checking the values of the two objects and returning true  but the     is seeing that they re not the same type and returning false   Which one is correct   That really depends on what you re trying to compare   My advice is to bypass the question entirely and just don t use the String constructor to create string objects from string literals   Reference http   www ecma-international org ecma-262 5 1  sec-11 9 3

User · Answer

always use       and you will avoid thousand of mistakes  nowadays using triple equality is more preferable by different style guides  because it compares taking into account type of operands

User · Answer

The     operator is called a strict comparison operator  it does differ from the    operator   Lets take 2 vars a and b   For  a    b  to evaluate to true a and b need to be the same value   In the case of  a     b  a and b must be the same value and also the same type for it to evaluate to true     Take the following example  var a   1  var b    1    if  a    b    evaluates to true as a and b are both 1       alert  a    b       if  a     b    evaluates to false as a is not the same type as b       alert  a     b        In summary  using the    operator might evaluate to true in situations where you do not want it to so using the     operator would be safer     In the 90  usage scenario it won t matter which one you use  but it is handy to know the difference when you get some unexpected behaviour one day

User · Answer

It means equality without type coercion type coercion means JavaScript do not automatically convert any other data types to string data types   0  false      true although they are different types  0   false     false as they are different types  2   2       true different types one is string and another is integer but              javaScript convert 2 to string by using    operator   2    2     false because by using     operator  javaScript do not convert             integer to string   2   2     true because both have same value and same types

User · Answer

JavaScript has both strict and type   converting comparisons  A strict comparison  e g        is only true if the operands are of the same type  The more commonly used abstract comparison  e g      converts the operands to the same Type before making the comparison    The equality      operator converts the operands if they are not of the same type  then applies strict comparison  If either operand is a number or a boolean  the operands are converted to numbers if possible  else if either operand is a string  the string operand is converted to a number if possible  If both operands are objects  then JavaScript compares internal references which are equal when operands refer to the same object in memory   Syntax   x    y  Examples   3    3        true  3     3      true 3     3       true  The identity strict equality      operator returns true if the operands are strictly equal  see above  with no type conversion   Syntax   x     y  Examples   3     3      true   For reference  Comparison operators  Mozilla Developer Network

User · Answer

JSLint sometimes gives you unrealistic reasons to modify stuff      has exactly the same performance as    if the types are already the same    It is faster only when the types are not the same  in which case it does not try to convert types but directly returns a false   So  IMHO  JSLint maybe used to write new code  but useless over-optimizing should be avoided at all costs    Meaning  there is no reason to change    to     in a check like if  a     test   when you know it for a fact that a can only be a String    Modifying a lot of code that way wastes developers  and reviewers  time and achieves nothing

User · Answer

Equality comparison    Operator     Returns true  when both operands are equal  The operands are converted to the same type before being compared    gt  gt  gt  1    1 true  gt  gt  gt  1    2 false  gt  gt  gt  1     1  true   Equality and type comparison    Operator      Returns true if both operands are equal and of the same type  It s generally  better and safer if you compare this way  because there s no behind-the-scenes type conversions    gt  gt  gt  1      1  false  gt  gt  gt  1     1 true

User · Answer

As a rule of thumb  I would generally use     instead of     and     instead of       Reasons are explained in in the answers above and also Douglas Crockford is pretty clear about it  JavaScript  The Good Parts    However there is one single exception     null is an efficient way to check for  is null or undefined    if  value    null           value is either null or undefined     For example jQuery 1 9 1 uses this pattern 43 times  and  the JSHint syntax checker even provides the eqnull relaxing option for this reason   From the jQuery style guide      Strict equality checks       should be used in favor of     The only   exception is when checking for undefined and null by way of null      Check for both undefined and null values  for some important reason   undefOrNull    null

User · Answer

null and undefined are nothingness  that is   var a  var b   null    Here a and b do not have values  Whereas  0  false and    are all values  One thing common beween all these are that they are all falsy values  which means they all satisfy falsy conditions   So  the 0  false and    together form a sub-group  And on other hand  null  amp  undefined form the second sub-group  Check the comparisons in the below image  null and undefined would equal  The other three would equal to each other  But  they all are treated as falsy conditions in JavaScript     This is same as any object  like     arrays  etc    non-empty string  amp  Boolean true are all truthy conditions  But  they are all not equal

User · Answer

The top 2 answers both mentioned    means equality and     means identity  Unfortunately  this statement is incorrect    If both operands of    are objects  then they are compared to see if they are the same object  If both operands point to the same object  then the equal operator returns true  Otherwise  the two are not equal    var a    1  2  3     var b    1  2  3     console log a    b      false   console log a     b     false     In the code above  both    and     get false because a and b are not the same objects   That s to say  if both operands of    are objects     behaves same as      which also means identity  The essential difference of this two operators is about type conversion     has conversion before it checks equality  but     does not

User · Answer

Yes  there is a big difference between equality    and identity     operators  Usually the identity operator performs faster  because no types conversion is done  But if the values are of the same type  you ll see no difference  Check my post The legend of JavaScript equality operator  which explains the details  including the types conversion  amp  comparison algorithms  with a lot of examples

User · Answer

From the core javascript reference         Returns true if the operands are strictly equal  see above    with no type conversion

User · Answer

JSLint sometimes gives you unrealistic reasons to modify stuff      has exactly the same performance as    if the types are already the same    It is faster only when the types are not the same  in which case it does not try to convert types but directly returns a false   So  IMHO  JSLint maybe used to write new code  but useless over-optimizing should be avoided at all costs    Meaning  there is no reason to change    to     in a check like if  a     test   when you know it for a fact that a can only be a String    Modifying a lot of code that way wastes developers  and reviewers  time and achieves nothing

User · Answer

Strict equality is for the most part better  The fact that Javascript is a loosely typed language needs to be in the front of your mind constantly as you work with it  As long as the data structure is the same there really is no reason as to not use strict equality  with regular equality you often have an implicit conversion of values that happens automatically  this can have far-reaching effects on your code  It is very easy to have problems with this conversion seeing as they happen automatically   With strict equality there is no automatic implicit conversion as the values must already be of the correct data structure

User · Answer

The dilemma of  Should I use    or     in JavaScript comparison  is equal or analogous to a question of   Should I use a  spoon  or a  fork  for eating    The only reasonable answer to this question is that    You should use Dynamic Type comparison e g     for loose Type comparisons   You should use Static Type comparison e g      for strong Type comparisons     That s because they are not the same  They don t have the same purpose and are not meant to be used for the same purpose   Of course both  forks  and  spoons  are meant for  eating   but you will chose to use them accordingly to what you ve been served to eat   Meaning  you ll resolve to using a  spoon  i e      for having a  soup   and   or the  fork  i e       for picking    Asking if it is better to use a  fork  or a  spoon  for  eating  - is equall to asking if it is better to use a static       versus dynamic      eq   op  in JS  Both questions are equally wrong and reflect a very narrow or shallow understanding of the subject in question

User · Answer

If you are making a web application or a secured page you should always use  only when possible         because it will will check if it is the same content and if it is the same type   so when someone enters   var check   1  if check     1           someone continued with a string instead of number  most of the time useless for your webapp  most of the time entered by a user who does not now what he is doing  this will sometimes let your app crash   or even worse it is a hacker searching for weaknesses in your webapp      but with  var check   1  if check     1          some continued with a number  no string  for your script   else       alert  please enter a real number        a hacker will never get deeper in the system to find bugs and hack your app or your users  my point it is that the         will add more security to your scripts  of course you can also check if the entered number is valid  is a string  etc   with other if statements inside the first example  but this is for at least me more easier to understand and use  The reason I posted this is that the word  more secure  or  security  has never been said in this conversation  if you look at iCloud com it uses 2019 times     and 1308 times     this also means that you sometimes have the use    instead of     because it will otherwise block your function  but as said in the begin you should use     as much as possible

[javascript] Which equals operator (== vs ===) should be used in JavaScript comparisons?

Examples related to javascript

Examples related to operators

Examples related to equality

Examples related to equality-operator

Examples related to identity-operator