Since there are several methods presented here, I wanted to figure out which one was fastest. Using Ruby 1.9.3p362:
irb(main):001:0> require 'benchmark'
=> true
irb(main):002:0> Benchmark.realtime { 1.upto(10000000) { "foobar"[/\Afoo/] }}
=> 12.477248
irb(main):003:0> Benchmark.realtime { 1.upto(10000000) { "foobar" =~ /\Afoo/ }}
=> 9.593959
irb(main):004:0> Benchmark.realtime { 1.upto(10000000) { "foobar"["foo"] }}
=> 9.086909
irb(main):005:0> Benchmark.realtime { 1.upto(10000000) { "foobar".start_with?("foo") }}
=> 6.973697
So it looks like start_with?
ist the fastest of the bunch.
Updated results with Ruby 2.2.2p95 and a newer machine:
require 'benchmark'
Benchmark.bm do |x|
x.report('regex[]') { 10000000.times { "foobar"[/\Afoo/] }}
x.report('regex') { 10000000.times { "foobar" =~ /\Afoo/ }}
x.report('[]') { 10000000.times { "foobar"["foo"] }}
x.report('start_with') { 10000000.times { "foobar".start_with?("foo") }}
end
user system total real
regex[] 4.020000 0.000000 4.020000 ( 4.024469)
regex 3.160000 0.000000 3.160000 ( 3.159543)
[] 2.930000 0.000000 2.930000 ( 2.931889)
start_with 2.010000 0.000000 2.010000 ( 2.008162)