How to append one array to another without comparing their keys?
$a = array( 'a', 'b' );
$b = array( 'c', 'd' );
At the end it should be: Array( [0]=>a [1]=>b [2]=>c [3]=>d )
If I use something like [] or array_push, it will cause one of these results:
Array( [0]=>a [1]=>b [2]=>Array( [0]=>c [1]=>d ) )
//or
Array( [0]=>c [1]=>d )
It just should be something, doing this, but in a more elegant way:
foreach ( $b AS $var )
$a[] = $var;
For big array, is better to concatenate without array_merge, for avoid a memory copy.
$array1 = array_fill(0,50000,'aa');
$array2 = array_fill(0,100,'bb');
// Test 1 (array_merge)
$start = microtime(true);
$r1 = array_merge($array1, $array2);
echo sprintf("Test 1: %.06f\n", microtime(true) - $start);
// Test2 (avoid copy)
$start = microtime(true);
foreach ($array2 as $v) {
$array1[] = $v;
}
echo sprintf("Test 2: %.06f\n", microtime(true) - $start);
// Test 1: 0.004963
// Test 2: 0.000038
Since PHP 7.4 you can use the ... operator. This is also known as the splat operator in other languages, including Ruby.
$parts = ['apple', 'pear'];
$fruits = ['banana', 'orange', ...$parts, 'watermelon'];
var_dump($fruits);
Output
array(5) {
[0]=>
string(6) "banana"
[1]=>
string(6) "orange"
[2]=>
string(5) "apple"
[3]=>
string(4) "pear"
[4]=>
string(10) "watermelon"
}
Splat operator should have better performance than array_merge. That’s not only because the splat operator is a language structure while array_merge is a function, but also because compile time optimization can be performant for constant arrays.
Moreover, we can use the splat operator syntax everywhere in the array, as normal elements can be added before or after the splat operator.
$arr1 = [1, 2, 3];
$arr2 = [4, 5, 6];
$arr3 = [...$arr1, ...$arr2];
$arr4 = [...$arr1, ...$arr3, 7, 8, 9];
How about this:
$appended = $a + $b;
Following on from answer's by bstoney and Snark I did some tests on the various methods:
// Test 1 (array_merge)
$array1 = $array2 = array_fill(0, 50000, 'aa');
$start = microtime(true);
$array1 = array_merge($array1, $array2);
echo sprintf("Test 1: %.06f\n", microtime(true) - $start);
// Test2 (foreach)
$array1 = $array2 = array_fill(0, 50000, 'aa');
$start = microtime(true);
foreach ($array2 as $v) {
$array1[] = $v;
}
echo sprintf("Test 2: %.06f\n", microtime(true) - $start);
// Test 3 (... token)
// PHP 5.6+ and produces error if $array2 is empty
$array1 = $array2 = array_fill(0, 50000, 'aa');
$start = microtime(true);
array_push($array1, ...$array2);
echo sprintf("Test 3: %.06f\n", microtime(true) - $start);
Which produces:
Test 1: 0.002717
Test 2: 0.006922
Test 3: 0.004744
ORIGINAL: I believe as of PHP 7, method 3 is a significantly better alternative due to the way foreach loops now act, which is to make a copy of the array being iterated over.
Whilst method 3 isn't strictly an answer to the criteria of 'not array_push' in the question, it is one line and the most high performance in all respects, I think the question was asked before the ... syntax was an option.
UPDATE 25/03/2020: I've updated the test which was flawed as the variables weren't reset. Interestingly (or confusingly) the results now show as test 1 being the fastest, where it was the slowest, having gone from 0.008392 to 0.002717! This can only be down to PHP updates, as this wouldn't have been affected by the testing flaw.
So, the saga continues, I will start using array_merge from now on!
Why not use
$appended = array_merge($a,$b);
Why don't you want to use this, the correct, built-in method.
It's a pretty old post, but I want to add something about appending one array to another:
If
you can use array functions like this:
array_merge(array_values($array), array_values($appendArray));
array_merge doesn't merge numeric keys so it appends all values of $appendArray. While using native php functions instead of a foreach-loop, it should be faster on arrays with a lot of elements.
Addition 2019-12-13: Since PHP 7.4, there is the possibility to append or prepend arrays the Array Spread Operator way:
$a = [3, 4];
$b = [1, 2, ...$a];
As before, keys can be an issue with this new feature:
$a = ['a' => 3, 'b' => 4];
$b = ['c' => 1, 'a' => 2, ...$a];
"Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Cannot unpack array with string keys"
$a = [3 => 3, 4 => 4];
$b = [1 => 1, 4 => 2, ...$a];
array(4) { [1]=> int(1) [4]=> int(2) [5]=> int(3) [6]=> int(4) }
$a = [1 => 1, 2 => 2];
$b = [...$a, 3 => 3, 1 => 4];
array(3) { [0]=> int(1) [1]=> int(4) [3]=> int(3) }
if you want to merge empty array with existing new value. You must initialize it first.
$products = array();
//just example
for($brand_id=1;$brand_id<=3;$brand_id++){
array_merge($products,getByBrand($brand_id));
}
// it will create empty array
print_r($a);
//check if array of products is empty
for($brand_id=1;$brand_id<=3;$brand_id++){
if(empty($products)){
$products = getByBrand($brand_id);
}else{
array_merge($products,getByBrand($brand_id));
}
}
// it will create array of products
Hope its help.
<?php
// Example 1 [Merging associative arrays. When two or more arrays have same key
// then the last array key value overrides the others one]
$array1 = array("a" => "JAVA", "b" => "ASP");
$array2 = array("c" => "C", "b" => "PHP");
echo " <br> Example 1 Output: <br>";
print_r(array_merge($array1,$array2));
// Example 2 [When you want to merge arrays having integer keys and
//want to reset integer keys to start from 0 then use array_merge() function]
$array3 =array(5 => "CSS",6 => "CSS3");
$array4 =array(8 => "JAVASCRIPT",9 => "HTML");
echo " <br> Example 2 Output: <br>";
print_r(array_merge($array3,$array4));
// Example 3 [When you want to merge arrays having integer keys and
// want to retain integer keys as it is then use PLUS (+) operator to merge arrays]
$array5 =array(5 => "CSS",6 => "CSS3");
$array6 =array(8 => "JAVASCRIPT",9 => "HTML");
echo " <br> Example 3 Output: <br>";
print_r($array5+$array6);
// Example 4 [When single array pass to array_merge having integer keys
// then the array return by array_merge have integer keys starting from 0]
$array7 =array(3 => "CSS",4 => "CSS3");
echo " <br> Example 4 Output: <br>";
print_r(array_merge($array7));
?>
Output:
Example 1 Output:
Array
(
[a] => JAVA
[b] => PHP
[c] => C
)
Example 2 Output:
Array
(
[0] => CSS
[1] => CSS3
[2] => JAVASCRIPT
[3] => HTML
)
Example 3 Output:
Array
(
[5] => CSS
[6] => CSS3
[8] => JAVASCRIPT
[9] => HTML
)
Example 4 Output:
Array
(
[0] => CSS
[1] => CSS3
)
foreach loop is faster than array_merge to append values to an existing array, so choose the loop instead if you want to add an array to the end of another.
// Create an array of arrays
$chars = [];
for ($i = 0; $i < 15000; $i++) {
$chars[] = array_fill(0, 10, 'a');
}
// test array_merge
$new = [];
$start = microtime(TRUE);
foreach ($chars as $splitArray) {
$new = array_merge($new, $splitArray);
}
echo microtime(true) - $start; // => 14.61776 sec
// test foreach
$new = [];
$start = microtime(TRUE);
foreach ($chars as $splitArray) {
foreach ($splitArray as $value) {
$new[] = $value;
}
}
echo microtime(true) - $start; // => 0.00900101 sec
// ==> 1600 times faster
Before PHP7 you can use:
array_splice($a, count($a), 0, $b);
array_splice() operates with reference to array (1st argument) and puts array (4th argument) values in place of list of values started from 2nd argument and number of 3rd argument. When we set 2nd argument as end of source array and 3rd as zero we append 4th argument values to 1st argument
Another way to do this in PHP 5.6+ would be to use the ... token
$a = array('a', 'b');
$b = array('c', 'd');
array_push($a, ...$b);
// $a is now equals to array('a','b','c','d');
This will also work with any Traversable
$a = array('a', 'b');
$b = new ArrayIterator(array('c', 'd'));
array_push($a, ...$b);
// $a is now equals to array('a','b','c','d');
A warning though:
$b is an empty array or not traversable e.g. not an array$b is not traversable Source: Stackoverflow.com