[c#] Check if Key Exists in NameValueCollection

Is there a quick and simple way to check if a key exists in a NameValueCollection without looping through it?

Looking for something like Dictionary.ContainsKey() or similar.

There are many ways to solve this of course. Just wondering if someone can help scratch my brain itch.

In VB it's:

if not MyNameValueCollection(Key) is Nothing then
.......
end if

In C# should just be:

if (MyNameValueCollection(Key) != null) { }

Not sure if it should be null or "" but this should help.

This could also be a solution without having to introduce a new method:

    item = collection["item"] != null ? collection["item"].ToString() : null;

Use this method:

private static bool ContainsKey(this NameValueCollection collection, string key)
{
    if (collection.Get(key) == null)
    {
        return collection.AllKeys.Contains(key);
    }

    return true;
}

It is the most efficient for NameValueCollection and doesn't depend on does collection contain null values or not.

queryItems.AllKeys.Contains(key)

Be aware that key may not be unique and that the comparison is usually case sensitive. If you want to just get the value of the first matching key and not bothered about case then use this:

        public string GetQueryValue(string queryKey)
        {
            foreach (string key in QueryItems)
            {
                if(queryKey.Equals(key, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase))
                    return QueryItems.GetValues(key).First(); // There might be multiple keys of the same name, but just return the first match
            }
            return null;
        }

If the collection size is small you could go with the solution provided by rich.okelly. However, a large collection means that the generation of the dictionary may be noticeably slower than just searching the keys collection.

Also, if your usage scenario is searching for keys in different points in time, where the NameValueCollection may have been modified, generating the dictionary each time may, again, be slower than just searching the keys collection.

You could use the Get method and check for null as the method will return null if the NameValueCollection does not contain the specified key.

See MSDN.

NameValueCollection n = Request.QueryString;

if (n.HasKeys())
   {
       //something
   }

Return Value Type: System.Boolean true if the NameValueCollection contains keys that are not null; otherwise, false. LINK

I don't think any of these answers are quite right/optimal. NameValueCollection not only doesn't distinguish between null values and missing values, it's also case-insensitive with regards to it's keys. Thus, I think a full solution would be:

public static bool ContainsKey(this NameValueCollection @this, string key)
{
    return @this.Get(key) != null 
        // I'm using Keys instead of AllKeys because AllKeys, being a mutable array,
        // can get out-of-sync if mutated (it weirdly re-syncs when you modify the collection).
        // I'm also not 100% sure that OrdinalIgnoreCase is the right comparer to use here.
        // The MSDN docs only say that the "default" case-insensitive comparer is used
        // but it could be current culture or invariant culture
        || @this.Keys.Cast<string>().Contains(key, StringComparer.OrdinalIgnoreCase);
}

Yes, you can use Linq to check the AllKeys property:

using System.Linq;
...
collection.AllKeys.Contains(key);

However a Dictionary<string, string[]> would be far more suited to this purpose, perhaps created via an extension method:

public static void Dictionary<string, string[]> ToDictionary(this NameValueCollection collection) 
{
    return collection.Cast<string>().ToDictionary(key => key, key => collection.GetValues(key));
}

var dictionary = collection.ToDictionary();
if (dictionary.ContainsKey(key))
{
   ...
}

As you can see in the reference sources, NameValueCollection inherits from NameObjectCollectionBase.

So you take the base-type, get the private hashtable via reflection, and check if it contains a specific key.

For it to work in Mono as well, you need to see what the name of the hashtable is in mono, which is something you can see here (m_ItemsContainer), and get the mono-field, if the initial FieldInfo is null (mono-runtime).

Like this

public static class ParameterExtensions
{

    private static System.Reflection.FieldInfo InitFieldInfo()
    {
        System.Type t = typeof(System.Collections.Specialized.NameObjectCollectionBase);
        System.Reflection.FieldInfo fi = t.GetField("_entriesTable", System.Reflection.BindingFlags.Instance | System.Reflection.BindingFlags.NonPublic);

        if(fi == null) // Mono
            fi = t.GetField("m_ItemsContainer", System.Reflection.BindingFlags.Instance | System.Reflection.BindingFlags.NonPublic);

        return fi;
    }

    private static System.Reflection.FieldInfo m_fi = InitFieldInfo();


    public static bool Contains(this System.Collections.Specialized.NameValueCollection nvc, string key)
    {
        //System.Collections.Specialized.NameValueCollection nvc = new System.Collections.Specialized.NameValueCollection();
        //nvc.Add("hello", "world");
        //nvc.Add("test", "case");

        // The Hashtable is case-INsensitive
        System.Collections.Hashtable ent = (System.Collections.Hashtable)m_fi.GetValue(nvc);
        return ent.ContainsKey(key);
    }
}

for ultra-pure non-reflective .NET 2.0 code, you can loop over the keys, instead of using the hash-table, but that is slow.

private static bool ContainsKey(System.Collections.Specialized.NameValueCollection nvc, string key)
{
    foreach (string str in nvc.AllKeys)
    {
        if (System.StringComparer.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase.Equals(str, key))
            return true;
    }

    return false;
}

I am using this collection, when I worked in small elements collection.

Where elements lot, I think need use "Dictionary". My code:

NameValueCollection ProdIdes;
string prodId = _cfg.ProdIdes[key];
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(prodId))
{
    ......
}

Or may be use this:

 string prodId = _cfg.ProdIdes[key] !=null ? "found" : "not found";