Ended up writing this today and seems to be ok. Your usage could be:
await TaskEx.WaitUntil(isExcelInteractive);
public static class TaskEx
{
/// <summary>
/// Blocks while condition is true or timeout occurs.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="condition">The condition that will perpetuate the block.</param>
/// <param name="frequency">The frequency at which the condition will be check, in milliseconds.</param>
/// <param name="timeout">Timeout in milliseconds.</param>
/// <exception cref="TimeoutException"></exception>
/// <returns></returns>
public static async Task WaitWhile(Func<bool> condition, int frequency = 25, int timeout = -1)
{
var waitTask = Task.Run(async () =>
{
while (condition()) await Task.Delay(frequency);
});
if(waitTask != await Task.WhenAny(waitTask, Task.Delay(timeout)))
throw new TimeoutException();
}
/// <summary>
/// Blocks until condition is true or timeout occurs.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="condition">The break condition.</param>
/// <param name="frequency">The frequency at which the condition will be checked.</param>
/// <param name="timeout">The timeout in milliseconds.</param>
/// <returns></returns>
public static async Task WaitUntil(Func<bool> condition, int frequency = 25, int timeout = -1)
{
var waitTask = Task.Run(async () =>
{
while (!condition()) await Task.Delay(frequency);
});
if (waitTask != await Task.WhenAny(waitTask,
Task.Delay(timeout)))
throw new TimeoutException();
}
}
Example usage: https://dotnetfiddle.net/Vy8GbV