[c#] Create instance of generic type whose constructor requires a parameter?

If BaseFruit has a constructor that accepts an int weight, can I instantiate a piece of fruit in a generic method like this?

public void AddFruit<T>()where T: BaseFruit{
    BaseFruit fruit = new T(weight); /*new Apple(150);*/
    fruit.Enlist(fruitManager);
}

An example is added behind comments. It seems I can only do this if I give BaseFruit a parameterless constructor and then fill in everything through member variables. In my real code (not about fruit) this is rather impractical.

-Update-
So it seems it can't be solved by constraints in any way then. From the answers there are three candidate solutions:

• Factory Pattern
• Reflection
• Activator

I tend to think reflection is the least clean one, but I can't decide between the other two.

You can use the following command:

 T instance = (T)typeof(T).GetConstructor(new Type[0]).Invoke(new object[0]);

Be sure to see the following reference.

Most simple solution Activator.CreateInstance<T>()

Recently I came across a very similar problem. Just wanted to share our solution with you all. I wanted to I created an instance of a Car<CarA> from a json object using which had an enum:

Dictionary<MyEnum, Type> mapper = new Dictionary<MyEnum, Type>();

mapper.Add(1, typeof(CarA));
mapper.Add(2, typeof(BarB)); 

public class Car<T> where T : class
{       
    public T Detail { get; set; }
    public Car(T data)
    {
       Detail = data;
    }
}
public class CarA
{  
    public int PropA { get; set; }
    public CarA(){}
}
public class CarB
{
    public int PropB { get; set; }
    public CarB(){}
}

var jsonObj = {"Type":"1","PropA":"10"}
MyEnum t = GetTypeOfCar(jsonObj);
Type objectT = mapper[t]
Type genericType = typeof(Car<>);
Type carTypeWithGenerics = genericType.MakeGenericType(objectT);
Activator.CreateInstance(carTypeWithGenerics , new Object[] { JsonConvert.DeserializeObject(jsonObj, objectT) });

I created this method:

public static V ConvertParentObjToChildObj<T,V> (T obj) where V : new()
{
    Type typeT = typeof(T);
    PropertyInfo[] propertiesT = typeT.GetProperties();
    V newV = new V();
    foreach (var propT in propertiesT)
    {
        var nomePropT = propT.Name;
        var valuePropT = propT.GetValue(obj, null);

        Type typeV = typeof(V);
        PropertyInfo[] propertiesV = typeV.GetProperties();
        foreach (var propV in propertiesV)
        {
            var nomePropV = propV.Name;
            if(nomePropT == nomePropV)
            {
                propV.SetValue(newV, valuePropT);
                break;
            }
        }
    }
    return newV;
}

I use that in this way:

public class A 
{
    public int PROP1 {get; set;}
}

public class B : A
{
    public int PROP2 {get; set;}
}

Code:

A instanceA = new A();
instanceA.PROP1 = 1;

B instanceB = new B();
instanceB = ConvertParentObjToChildObj<A,B>(instanceA);

You can't use any parameterised constructor. You can use a parameterless constructor if you have a "where T : new()" constraint.

It's a pain, but such is life :(

This is one of the things I'd like to address with "static interfaces". You'd then be able to constrain T to include static methods, operators and constructors, and then call them.

It is still possible, with high performance, by doing the following:

    //
    public List<R> GetAllItems<R>() where R : IBaseRO, new() {
        var list = new List<R>();
        using ( var wl = new ReaderLock<T>( this ) ) {
            foreach ( var bo in this.items ) {
                T t = bo.Value.Data as T;
                R r = new R();
                r.Initialize( t );
                list.Add( r );
            }
        }
        return list;
    }

and

    //
///<summary>Base class for read-only objects</summary>
public partial interface IBaseRO  {
    void Initialize( IDTO dto );
    void Initialize( object value );
}

The relevant classes then have to derive from this interface and initialize accordingly. Please note, that in my case, this code is part of a surrounding class, which already has <T> as generic parameter. R, in my case, also is a read-only class. IMO, the public availability of Initialize() functions has no negative effect on the immutability. The user of this class could put another object in, but this would not modify the underlying collection.

As Jon pointed out this is life for constraining a non-parameterless constructor. However a different solution is to use a factory pattern. This is easily constrainable

interface IFruitFactory<T> where T : BaseFruit {
  T Create(int weight);
}

public void AddFruit<T>( IFruitFactory<T> factory ) where T: BaseFruit {    
  BaseFruit fruit = factory.Create(weight); /*new Apple(150);*/    
  fruit.Enlist(fruitManager);
}

Yet another option is to use a functional approach. Pass in a factory method.

public void AddFruit<T>(Func<int,T> factoryDel) where T : BaseFruit { 
  BaseFruit fruit = factoryDel(weight); /* new Apple(150); */
  fruit.Enlist(fruitManager);
}

Yes; change your where to be:

where T:BaseFruit, new()

However, this only works with parameterless constructors. You'll have to have some other means of setting your property (setting the property itself or something similar).

As an addition to user1471935's suggestion:

To instantiate a generic class by using a constructor with one or more parameters, you can now use the Activator class.

T instance = Activator.CreateInstance(typeof(T), new object[] {...}) 

The list of objects are the parameters you want to supply. According to Microsoft:

CreateInstance [...] creates an instance of the specified type using the constructor that best matches the specified parameters.

There's also a generic version of CreateInstance (CreateInstance<T>()) but that one also does not allow you to supply constructor parameters.

You can do by using reflection:

public void AddFruit<T>()where T: BaseFruit
{
  ConstructorInfo constructor = typeof(T).GetConstructor(new Type[] { typeof(int) });
  if (constructor == null)
  {
    throw new InvalidOperationException("Type " + typeof(T).Name + " does not contain an appropriate constructor");
  }
  BaseFruit fruit = constructor.Invoke(new object[] { (int)150 }) as BaseFruit;
  fruit.Enlist(fruitManager);
}

EDIT: Added constructor == null check.

EDIT: A faster variant using a cache:

public void AddFruit<T>()where T: BaseFruit
{
  var constructor = FruitCompany<T>.constructor;
  if (constructor == null)
  {
    throw new InvalidOperationException("Type " + typeof(T).Name + " does not contain an appropriate constructor");
  }
  var fruit = constructor.Invoke(new object[] { (int)150 }) as BaseFruit;
  fruit.Enlist(fruitManager);
}
private static class FruitCompany<T>
{
  public static readonly ConstructorInfo constructor = typeof(T).GetConstructor(new Type[] { typeof(int) });
}