A case when process get SIGABRT from itself: Hrvoje mentioned about a buried pure virtual being called from ctor generating an abort, i recreated an example for this. Here when d is to be constructed, it first calls its base class A ctor, and passes inside pointer to itself. the A ctor calls pure virtual method before table was filled with valid pointer, because d is not constructed yet.
#include<iostream>
using namespace std;
class A {
public:
A(A *pa){pa->f();}
virtual void f()=0;
};
class D : public A {
public:
D():A(this){}
virtual void f() {cout<<"D::f\n";}
};
int main(){
D d;
A *pa = &d;
pa->f();
return 0;
}
compile: g++ -o aa aa.cpp
ulimit -c unlimited
run: ./aa
pure virtual method called
terminate called without an active exception
Aborted (core dumped)
now lets quickly see the core file, and validate that SIGABRT was indeed called:
gdb aa core
see regs:
i r
rdx 0x6 6
rsi 0x69a 1690
rdi 0x69a 1690
rip 0x7feae3170c37
check code:
disas 0x7feae3170c37
mov $0xea,%eax = 234 <- this is the kill syscall, sends signal to process
syscall <-----
http://blog.rchapman.org/posts/Linux_System_Call_Table_for_x86_64/
234 sys_tgkill pid_t tgid pid_t pid int sig = 6 = SIGABRT
:)
I will give my answer from a competitive programming(cp) perspective, but it applies to other domains as well.
Many a times while doing cp, constraints are quite large.
For example : I had a question with a variables N, M, Q such that 1 = N, M, Q < 10^5.
The mistake I was making was I declared a 2D integer array of size 10000 x 10000 in C++ and struggled with the SIGABRT error at Codechef for almost 2 days.
Now, if we calculate :
Typical size of an integer : 4 bytes
No. of cells in our array : 10000 x 10000
Total size (in bytes) : 400000000 bytes = 4*10^8 ˜ 400 MB
Your solutions to such questions will work on your PC(not always) as it can afford this size.
But the resources at coding sites(online judges) is limited to few KBs.
Hence, the SIGABRT error and other such errors.
Conclusion:
In such questions, we ought not to declare an array or vector or any other DS of this size, but our task is to make our algorithm such efficient that it works without them(DS) or with less memory.
PS : There might be other reasons for this error; above was one of them.
There's another simple cause in case of c++.
std::thread::~thread{
if((joinable ())
std::terminate ();
}
i.e. scope of thread ended but you forgot to call either
thread::join();
or
thread::detach();
Regarding the first question: What are the scenarios where a process gets a SIGABRT in C++?
I can think of two special cases where a C++ program is aborted automatically -- not by directly calling std::abort() or std::terminate():
One: Throw an exception while an exception is being handled.
try {
throw "abc";
}
catch (...) {
throw "def"; // abort here
}
Two: An uncaught exception that attempts to propagates outside main().
int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
throw "abc"; // abort here
}
C++ experts could probably name more special cases.
There is also a lot of good info on these reference pages:
The GNU libc will print out information to /dev/tty regarding some fatal conditions before it calls abort() (which then triggers SIGABRT), but if you are running your program as a service or otherwise not in a real terminal window, these message can get lost, because there is no tty to display the messages.
See my post on redirecting libc to write to stderr instead of /dev/tty:
It usually happens when there is a problem with memory allocation.
It happened to me when my program was trying to allocate an array with negative size.
You can send any signal to any process using the kill(2) interface:
kill -SIGABRT 30823
30823 was a dash process I started, so I could easily find the process I wanted to kill.
$ /bin/dash
$ Aborted
The Aborted output is apparently how dash reports a SIGABRT.
It can be sent directly to any process using kill(2), or a process can send the signal to itself via assert(3), abort(3), or raise(3).
In my case, it was due to an input in an array at an index equal to the length of the array.
string x[5];
for(int i=1; i<=5; i++){
cin>>x[i];
}
x[5] is being accessed which is not present.
SIGABRT is commonly used by libc and other libraries to abort the program in case of critical errors. For example, glibc sends an SIGABRT in case of a detected double-free or other heap corruptions.
Also, most assert implementations make use of SIGABRT in case of a failed assert.
Furthermore, SIGABRT can be sent from any other process like any other signal. Of course, the sending process needs to run as same user or root.
As "@sarnold", aptly pointed out, any process can send signal to any other process, hence, one process can send SIGABORT to other process & in that case the receiving process is unable to distinguish whether its coming because of its own tweaking of memory etc, or someone else has "unicastly", send to it.
In one of the systems I worked there is one deadlock detector which actually detects if process is coming out of some task by giving heart beat or not. If not, then it declares the process is in deadlock state and sends SIGABORT to it.
I just wanted to share this prospective with reference to question asked.
Source: Stackoverflow.com