How to use a variable in the replacement side of the Perl substitution operator

Question

I would like to do the following    find  start      end    replace  foo  1 bar     var    start middle end    var    s  find  replace     I would expect  var to contain  foo middle bar   but it does not work  Neither does    replace  foo  1 bar     Somehow I am missing something regarding the escaping     I fixed the missing  s

User · Answer

I would suggest something like    text    m      find        text    1    replace    2    It is quite readable and seems to be safe  If multiple replace is needed  it is easy   while   text    m      find              text    1    replace    2

User · Answer

perl -de 0  match  hi       sub   1   res  hi1234   res    s  match  sub gee p  res   1234   Be careful  though  This causes two layers of eval to occur  one for each e at the end of the regex     sub --   1  1   --  final value  in the example  1234

User · Answer

Deparse tells us this is what is  being executed     find    start      end    replace    foo  cA bar    var    start middle end    var    s  find  replace     However       find foo  1 bar    Is interpreted as     var    s  find foo  1 bar     Unfortunately it appears there is no  easy way to do this     You can do it with a string eval  but thats dangerous    The most sane solution that works for me was this     find    start      end     replace    foo  1 bar     var    start middle end     sub repl        my  find   shift       my  replace   shift       my  var   shift         Capture first      my  items      var     find          var    s  find  replace        for  reverse 0      items             my  n        1              Many More Rules can go here  ie   g matchers  and                var    s    n   items      g            var    s    n   items      g             return  var      print repl  find   replace   var     A rebuttal against the ee technique   As I said in my answer  I avoid evals for a reason     find  start      end    replace  do  print  I am a dirty little hacker  while 1   foo  1 bar        var    start middle end    var    s  find  replace ee   print  var   var n     this code does exactly what you think it does    If your substitution string is in a web application  you just opened the door to arbitrary code execution    Good Job    Also  it WON T work with taints turned on for this very reason    find  start      end    replace        ARGV 0           var    start middle end    var    s  find  replace ee   print  var   var n      perl  tmp re pl   foo  1 bar  var  foo middle bar   perl -T  tmp re pl  foo  1 bar   Insecure dependency in eval while running with -T switch at  tmp re pl line 10    However  the more careful technique is sane  safe  secure  and doesn t fail taint    Be assured tho  the string it emits is still tainted  so you don t lose any security

User · Answer

Deparse tells us this is what is  being executed     find    start      end    replace    foo  cA bar    var    start middle end    var    s  find  replace     However       find foo  1 bar    Is interpreted as     var    s  find foo  1 bar     Unfortunately it appears there is no  easy way to do this     You can do it with a string eval  but thats dangerous    The most sane solution that works for me was this     find    start      end     replace    foo  1 bar     var    start middle end     sub repl        my  find   shift       my  replace   shift       my  var   shift         Capture first      my  items      var     find          var    s  find  replace        for  reverse 0      items             my  n        1              Many More Rules can go here  ie   g matchers  and                var    s    n   items      g            var    s    n   items      g             return  var      print repl  find   replace   var     A rebuttal against the ee technique   As I said in my answer  I avoid evals for a reason     find  start      end    replace  do  print  I am a dirty little hacker  while 1   foo  1 bar        var    start middle end    var    s  find  replace ee   print  var   var n     this code does exactly what you think it does    If your substitution string is in a web application  you just opened the door to arbitrary code execution    Good Job    Also  it WON T work with taints turned on for this very reason    find  start      end    replace        ARGV 0           var    start middle end    var    s  find  replace ee   print  var   var n      perl  tmp re pl   foo  1 bar  var  foo middle bar   perl -T  tmp re pl  foo  1 bar   Insecure dependency in eval while running with -T switch at  tmp re pl line 10    However  the more careful technique is sane  safe  secure  and doesn t fail taint    Be assured tho  the string it emits is still tainted  so you don t lose any security

User · Answer

I m not certain on what it is you re trying to achieve  But maybe you can use this    var    s  start foo    var    s end  bar     I e  just leave the middle alone and replace the start and end

User · Answer

Deparse tells us this is what is  being executed     find    start      end    replace    foo  cA bar    var    start middle end    var    s  find  replace     However       find foo  1 bar    Is interpreted as     var    s  find foo  1 bar     Unfortunately it appears there is no  easy way to do this     You can do it with a string eval  but thats dangerous    The most sane solution that works for me was this     find    start      end     replace    foo  1 bar     var    start middle end     sub repl        my  find   shift       my  replace   shift       my  var   shift         Capture first      my  items      var     find          var    s  find  replace        for  reverse 0      items             my  n        1              Many More Rules can go here  ie   g matchers  and                var    s    n   items      g            var    s    n   items      g             return  var      print repl  find   replace   var     A rebuttal against the ee technique   As I said in my answer  I avoid evals for a reason     find  start      end    replace  do  print  I am a dirty little hacker  while 1   foo  1 bar        var    start middle end    var    s  find  replace ee   print  var   var n     this code does exactly what you think it does    If your substitution string is in a web application  you just opened the door to arbitrary code execution    Good Job    Also  it WON T work with taints turned on for this very reason    find  start      end    replace        ARGV 0           var    start middle end    var    s  find  replace ee   print  var   var n      perl  tmp re pl   foo  1 bar  var  foo middle bar   perl -T  tmp re pl  foo  1 bar   Insecure dependency in eval while running with -T switch at  tmp re pl line 10    However  the more careful technique is sane  safe  secure  and doesn t fail taint    Be assured tho  the string it emits is still tainted  so you don t lose any security

User · Answer

On the replacement side  you must use  1  not  1   And you can only do what you want by making replace an evalable expression that gives the result you want and telling s    to eval it with the  ee modifier like so    find  start      end    replace   foo  1 bar      var    start middle end    var    s  find  replace ee   print  var   var n     To see why the    and double  e are needed  see the effect of the double eval here     perl  foo    middle    replace   foo  foo bar    print eval   replace      n   print eval eval   replace       n     END    foo  foo bar  foo middle bar    Though as ikegami notes  a single  e or the first  e of a double e isn t really an eval    rather  it tells the compiler that the substitution is code to compile  not a string   Nonetheless  eval eval       still demonstrates why you need to do what you need to do to get  ee to work as desired

User · Answer

I m not certain on what it is you re trying to achieve  But maybe you can use this    var    s  start foo    var    s end  bar     I e  just leave the middle alone and replace the start and end

User · Answer

perl -de 0  match  hi       sub   1   res  hi1234   res    s  match  sub gee p  res   1234   Be careful  though  This causes two layers of eval to occur  one for each e at the end of the regex     sub --   1  1   --  final value  in the example  1234

User · Answer

As others have suggested  you could use the following   my  find    start      end   my  replace    foo  1 bar        foo  1 bar  is an error  my  var    start middle end    var    s  find  replace ee    The above is short for the following   my  find    start      end   my  replace    foo  1 bar   my  var    start middle end    var    s  find  eval  replace   e    I prefer the second to the first since it doesn t hide the fact that eval EXPR  is used  However  both of the above silence errors  so the following would be better   my  find    start      end   my  replace    foo  1 bar   my  var    start middle end    var    s  find  my  r   eval  replace   die    if      r  e    But as you can see  all of the above allow for the execution of arbitrary Perl code  The following would be far safer   use String  Substitution qw  sub modify     my  find    start      end   my  replace    foo  1 bar   my  var    start middle end   sub modify  var   find   replace

User · Answer

Deparse tells us this is what is  being executed     find    start      end    replace    foo  cA bar    var    start middle end    var    s  find  replace     However       find foo  1 bar    Is interpreted as     var    s  find foo  1 bar     Unfortunately it appears there is no  easy way to do this     You can do it with a string eval  but thats dangerous    The most sane solution that works for me was this     find    start      end     replace    foo  1 bar     var    start middle end     sub repl        my  find   shift       my  replace   shift       my  var   shift         Capture first      my  items      var     find          var    s  find  replace        for  reverse 0      items             my  n        1              Many More Rules can go here  ie   g matchers  and                var    s    n   items      g            var    s    n   items      g             return  var      print repl  find   replace   var     A rebuttal against the ee technique   As I said in my answer  I avoid evals for a reason     find  start      end    replace  do  print  I am a dirty little hacker  while 1   foo  1 bar        var    start middle end    var    s  find  replace ee   print  var   var n     this code does exactly what you think it does    If your substitution string is in a web application  you just opened the door to arbitrary code execution    Good Job    Also  it WON T work with taints turned on for this very reason    find  start      end    replace        ARGV 0           var    start middle end    var    s  find  replace ee   print  var   var n      perl  tmp re pl   foo  1 bar  var  foo middle bar   perl -T  tmp re pl  foo  1 bar   Insecure dependency in eval while running with -T switch at  tmp re pl line 10    However  the more careful technique is sane  safe  secure  and doesn t fail taint    Be assured tho  the string it emits is still tainted  so you don t lose any security

User · Answer

I m not certain on what it is you re trying to achieve  But maybe you can use this    var    s  start foo    var    s end  bar     I e  just leave the middle alone and replace the start and end

User · Answer

As others have suggested  you could use the following   my  find    start      end   my  replace    foo  1 bar        foo  1 bar  is an error  my  var    start middle end    var    s  find  replace ee    The above is short for the following   my  find    start      end   my  replace    foo  1 bar   my  var    start middle end    var    s  find  eval  replace   e    I prefer the second to the first since it doesn t hide the fact that eval EXPR  is used  However  both of the above silence errors  so the following would be better   my  find    start      end   my  replace    foo  1 bar   my  var    start middle end    var    s  find  my  r   eval  replace   die    if      r  e    But as you can see  all of the above allow for the execution of arbitrary Perl code  The following would be far safer   use String  Substitution qw  sub modify     my  find    start      end   my  replace    foo  1 bar   my  var    start middle end   sub modify  var   find   replace

User · Answer

usr bin perl   sub      1    str    hi1234    res    str   match    hi        res    s  match  1 g   print  res   This got me the  1234

User · Answer

I did not manage to make the most popular answers work     The ee method complained when my replacement string contained several consecutive backreferences  Kent Fredric s answer only replaced the first match  and I need my search and replace to be global  I did not figure out a way to make it replace all matches that didn t cause other issues  For example  I tried running the method recursively until it no longer caused the string to change  but that causes an infinite loop if the replacement string contains the search string  whereas a regular global replacement does not do that    I attempted to come up with a solution of my own using plain old eval   eval   var    s      find          replace     gsu      Of course  this allows for code injection  But as far as I know  the only way to escape the regex query and inject code is to insert two forward slashes in  find or one in  replace  followed by a semi-colon  after which you can add add code  For example  if I set the variables this way   my  find    foo   my  replace    bar   print  You  ve just been hacked  n         The evaluated code is this    var    s foo bar   print  You ve just been hacked  n     gsu      So what I do is make sure the strings don t contain any unescaped forward slashes   First  I copy the strings into dummy strings   my  findTest    find  my  replaceTest    replace    Then  I remove all escaped backslashes  backslash pairs  from the dummy strings  This allows me to find forward slashes that are not escaped  without falling into the trap of considering a forward slash escaped if it s preceded by an escaped backslash  For example     contains an escaped forward slash  but     contains a literal forward slash  because the backslash is escaped    findTest    s       gmu   replaceTest    s       gmu    Now if any forward slash that is not preceded by a backslash remains in the strings  I throw a fatal error  as that would allow the user to insert arbitrary code   if   findTest        lt             replaceTest        lt              print  String must not contain unescaped slashes  n     exit 1      Then I eval       eval   var    s      find          replace     gsu      I m not an expert at preventing code injection  but I m the only one using my script  so I m content using this solution without fully knowing if it s vulnerable  But as far as I know  it may be  so if anyone knows if there is or isn t any way to inject code into this  please provide your insight in a comment

User · Answer

On the replacement side  you must use  1  not  1   And you can only do what you want by making replace an evalable expression that gives the result you want and telling s    to eval it with the  ee modifier like so    find  start      end    replace   foo  1 bar      var    start middle end    var    s  find  replace ee   print  var   var n     To see why the    and double  e are needed  see the effect of the double eval here     perl  foo    middle    replace   foo  foo bar    print eval   replace      n   print eval eval   replace       n     END    foo  foo bar  foo middle bar    Though as ikegami notes  a single  e or the first  e of a double e isn t really an eval    rather  it tells the compiler that the substitution is code to compile  not a string   Nonetheless  eval eval       still demonstrates why you need to do what you need to do to get  ee to work as desired

User · Answer

On the replacement side  you must use  1  not  1   And you can only do what you want by making replace an evalable expression that gives the result you want and telling s    to eval it with the  ee modifier like so    find  start      end    replace   foo  1 bar      var    start middle end    var    s  find  replace ee   print  var   var n     To see why the    and double  e are needed  see the effect of the double eval here     perl  foo    middle    replace   foo  foo bar    print eval   replace      n   print eval eval   replace       n     END    foo  foo bar  foo middle bar    Though as ikegami notes  a single  e or the first  e of a double e isn t really an eval    rather  it tells the compiler that the substitution is code to compile  not a string   Nonetheless  eval eval       still demonstrates why you need to do what you need to do to get  ee to work as desired

User · Answer

I m not certain on what it is you re trying to achieve  But maybe you can use this    var    s  start foo    var    s end  bar     I e  just leave the middle alone and replace the start and end

User · Answer

See THIS previous SO post on using a variable on the replacement side of s   in Perl  Look both at the accepted answer and the rebuttal answer    What you are trying to do is possible with the s   ee form that performs a double eval on the right hand string   See perlop quote like operators for more examples    Be warned that there are security impilcations of evaland this will not work in taint mode

User · Answer

I did not manage to make the most popular answers work     The ee method complained when my replacement string contained several consecutive backreferences  Kent Fredric s answer only replaced the first match  and I need my search and replace to be global  I did not figure out a way to make it replace all matches that didn t cause other issues  For example  I tried running the method recursively until it no longer caused the string to change  but that causes an infinite loop if the replacement string contains the search string  whereas a regular global replacement does not do that    I attempted to come up with a solution of my own using plain old eval   eval   var    s      find          replace     gsu      Of course  this allows for code injection  But as far as I know  the only way to escape the regex query and inject code is to insert two forward slashes in  find or one in  replace  followed by a semi-colon  after which you can add add code  For example  if I set the variables this way   my  find    foo   my  replace    bar   print  You  ve just been hacked  n         The evaluated code is this    var    s foo bar   print  You ve just been hacked  n     gsu      So what I do is make sure the strings don t contain any unescaped forward slashes   First  I copy the strings into dummy strings   my  findTest    find  my  replaceTest    replace    Then  I remove all escaped backslashes  backslash pairs  from the dummy strings  This allows me to find forward slashes that are not escaped  without falling into the trap of considering a forward slash escaped if it s preceded by an escaped backslash  For example     contains an escaped forward slash  but     contains a literal forward slash  because the backslash is escaped    findTest    s       gmu   replaceTest    s       gmu    Now if any forward slash that is not preceded by a backslash remains in the strings  I throw a fatal error  as that would allow the user to insert arbitrary code   if   findTest        lt             replaceTest        lt              print  String must not contain unescaped slashes  n     exit 1      Then I eval       eval   var    s      find          replace     gsu      I m not an expert at preventing code injection  but I m the only one using my script  so I m content using this solution without fully knowing if it s vulnerable  But as far as I know  it may be  so if anyone knows if there is or isn t any way to inject code into this  please provide your insight in a comment

User · Answer

On the replacement side  you must use  1  not  1   And you can only do what you want by making replace an evalable expression that gives the result you want and telling s    to eval it with the  ee modifier like so    find  start      end    replace   foo  1 bar      var    start middle end    var    s  find  replace ee   print  var   var n     To see why the    and double  e are needed  see the effect of the double eval here     perl  foo    middle    replace   foo  foo bar    print eval   replace      n   print eval eval   replace       n     END    foo  foo bar  foo middle bar    Though as ikegami notes  a single  e or the first  e of a double e isn t really an eval    rather  it tells the compiler that the substitution is code to compile  not a string   Nonetheless  eval eval       still demonstrates why you need to do what you need to do to get  ee to work as desired

User · Answer

usr bin perl   sub      1    str    hi1234    res    str   match    hi        res    s  match  1 g   print  res   This got me the  1234

User · Answer

See THIS previous SO post on using a variable on the replacement side of s   in Perl  Look both at the accepted answer and the rebuttal answer    What you are trying to do is possible with the s   ee form that performs a double eval on the right hand string   See perlop quote like operators for more examples    Be warned that there are security impilcations of evaland this will not work in taint mode

User · Answer

I would suggest something like    text    m      find        text    1    replace    2    It is quite readable and seems to be safe  If multiple replace is needed  it is easy   while   text    m      find              text    1    replace    2

[regex] How to use a variable in the replacement side of the Perl substitution operator?

Examples related to regex

Examples related to perl

Examples related to substitution