I'm using Entity Framework 4 with the Model First approach.
I started the project, designed the entities and generated the database. Everything worked fine.
Then I needed to go back and add another entity to my model. However, as I drag an entity to the EDMX I get this error:
Alright! I just need to map Entity1 to a table.. But hey! I'm using Model First approach, I expect it to create the table for me when I generate the DDL.
How do I work around this error?
This question is related to
.net
entity-framework
entity-framework-4
If you are not using model-first; Double click 'edmx' file ->select all and delete all entity models -> save -> right click 'update model from database ->select required tables ->finish and save.
Had this error when I had deleted a table from the database. Solved it by right clicking on EDMX diagram, going to Properties, selecting the table from the list in the Properties window, and deleting it (using delete key) from the diagram.
A quicker way for me was to delete the tables and re-add them. It Auto-mapped them. :)
I think I got this from not explicitly deleting some tables from the edmx before renaming and re-adding them. Instead, I just renamed the tables and then did an Update Model from Database, thinking it would see them gone, and delete them from model. I then did another Update Model from Database and added the renamed tables.
The site was working with the new tables, but I had the error. Eventually, I noticed the original tables were still in the model. I deleted them from the model (click them in edmx screen, delete key), and then the error went away.
I ran into the same error, but I was not using model-first. It turned out that somehow my EDMX file contained a reference to a table even though it did not show up in the designer. Interestingly, when I did a text search for the table name in Visual Studio (2013) the table was not found.
To solve the issue, I used an external editor (Notepad++) to find the reference to the offending table in the EDMX file, and then (carefully) removed all references to the table. I am sorry to say that I do not know how the EDMX file got into this state in the first place.
Sharing this for other people. In my case, we were working on a shared MVC solution, and using a common module for tables that we use for dropdowns. I got the error when I updated the Entity model by adding a new table. It turns out that when I updated the the EDMX, it probably updated my rights access on the database, which resulted to not having access to that certain table giving me no mapping specified
.
Just re-adding and giving access to my user solved the problem.
I found I was getting the same error because I had forgot to create referential constraint after creating an association between two entities.
In my case, another developer had removed some of the tables from the underlying database. When I realised this, and removed these tables from the entity, the problem was solved. Wasn't as obvious as it sounds.
I had set everything correctly (cardinalities and dependent properties) but could not figure out why I keep receiving error. Finally figured out that, EF generated a column in dependent table on its own (table_tablecolumn) and it does not have any relation to the table, so no mapping was specified. I had to delete the column in EDMX file and rebuild the solution which fixed the issue. I am using DB approach.
Search within file content
and Search External Files
remove all lines of codes referencing the missing entity. They will look like this:
public virtual DbSet< Entity1> Entity1 { get; set; }
This error is common to tables deleted from the database.
When one drops a table in the database, or one just changes the web.config.connectionStrings
for the EF Mapped database, to point to a new one and not the one used to generate the original mappings is the problem.
It is this new db these entities with the 3027 error aren't present.
Update Model from Database doesn't works for me.
I had to remove the conflicted entity, then execute Update Model from Database, lastly rebuild the solution. After that, everything works fine.
I had a table change and it created another entity with a number 1 at the end (such as MyEntity1
and a MyEntity
) as confirmed by the edmx model browser. Something about the two entities together confused the processing.
Removal of the table and re-adding it fixed it.
Note that if TFS is hooked up, then do a check-in of the edmx in after the delete. Then and only then get the latest and re-add it in a definite two step process. Otherwise TFS gets confused with the delete and re-add of same named entity(ies) which seems to cause problems.
Error 3027: No mapping specified for the following EntitySet/AssociationSet ..." - Entity Framework headaches
If you are developing model with Entities Framework then you may run into this annoying error at times:
Error 3027: No mapping specified for the following EntitySet/AssociationSet [Entity or Association Name]
This may make no sense when everything looks fine on the EDM, but that's because this error has nothing to do with the EDM usually. What it should say is "regenerate your database files".
You see, Entities checks against the SSDL and MSL during build, so if you just changed your EDM but doesn't use Generate Database Model... then it complains that there's stuff missing in your sql scripts.
so, in short, the solution is: "Don't forget to Generate Database Model every time after you update your EDM if you are doing model first development. I hope your problem is solved".
For those who are using Database First
approach all you have to do after inserting a new entity is to Generate Database From Model
again by right click on your .edmx
file and select Generate Database From Model...
I had the error when I was trying to make a custom result for a stored procedure and assumed it had to be an entity.
The solution was that I just made a complex type in the Model browser and assigned that as a result to the "Edit function imports".
I will add it here since it looks like this question is where google takes you when you get this error.
Source: Stackoverflow.com