My guess is that if there would be edge cases such as extra or missing spaces, this expression with less boundaries might also be an option:
^\s*\[\s*([^\s\r\n:]+)\s*:\s*"([^"]*)"\s*([^\s\r\n:]+)\s*:\s*"([^"]*)"\s*\]\s*$
If you wish to explore/simplify/modify the expression, it's been explained on the top right panel of regex101.com. If you'd like, you can also watch in this link, how it would match against some sample inputs.
const regex = /^\s*\[\s*([^\s\r\n:]+)\s*:\s*"([^"]*)"\s*([^\s\r\n:]+)\s*:\s*"([^"]*)"\s*\]\s*$/gm;_x000D_
const str = `[description:"aoeu" uuid:"123sth"]_x000D_
[description : "aoeu" uuid: "123sth"]_x000D_
[ description : "aoeu" uuid: "123sth" ]_x000D_
[ description : "aoeu" uuid : "123sth" ]_x000D_
[ description : "aoeu"uuid : "123sth" ] `;_x000D_
let m;_x000D_
_x000D_
while ((m = regex.exec(str)) !== null) {_x000D_
// This is necessary to avoid infinite loops with zero-width matches_x000D_
if (m.index === regex.lastIndex) {_x000D_
regex.lastIndex++;_x000D_
}_x000D_
_x000D_
// The result can be accessed through the `m`-variable._x000D_
m.forEach((match, groupIndex) => {_x000D_
console.log(`Found match, group ${groupIndex}: ${match}`);_x000D_
});_x000D_
}
_x000D_
jex.im visualizes regular expressions: