I have a
public async void Foo() method that I want to call from synchronous method. So far all I have seen from MSDN documentation is calling async methods via async methods, but my whole program is not built with async methods.
Is this even possible?
Here's one example of calling these methods from an asynchronous method: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh300224(v=vs.110).aspx
Now I'm looking into calling these async methods from sync methods.
This question is related to
Asynchronous programming does "grow" through the code base. It has been compared to a zombie virus. The best solution is to allow it to grow, but sometimes that's not possible.
I have written a few types in my Nito.AsyncEx library for dealing with a partially-asynchronous code base. There's no solution that works in every situation, though.
If you have a simple asynchronous method that doesn't need to synchronize back to its context, then you can use
var task = MyAsyncMethod(); var result = task.WaitAndUnwrapException();
You do not want to use
Task.Result because they wrap exceptions in
This solution is only appropriate if
MyAsyncMethod does not synchronize back to its context. In other words, every
MyAsyncMethod should end with
ConfigureAwait(false). This means it can't update any UI elements or access the ASP.NET request context.
MyAsyncMethod does need to synchronize back to its context, then you may be able to use
AsyncContext.RunTask to provide a nested context:
var result = AsyncContext.RunTask(MyAsyncMethod).Result;
*Update 4/14/2014: In more recent versions of the library the API is as follows:
var result = AsyncContext.Run(MyAsyncMethod);
(It's OK to use
Task.Result in this example because
RunTask will propagate
The reason you may need
AsyncContext.RunTask instead of
Task.WaitAndUnwrapException is because of a rather subtle deadlock possibility that happens on WinForms/WPF/SL/ASP.NET:
Taskcannot complete in this situation because it only completes when the
asyncmethod is finished; the
asyncmethod cannot complete because it is attempting to schedule its continuation to the
SynchronizationContext, and WinForms/WPF/SL/ASP.NET will not allow the continuation to run because the synchronous method is already running in that context.
This is one reason why it's a good idea to use
ConfigureAwait(false) within every
async method as much as possible.
AsyncContext.RunTask won't work in every scenario. For example, if the
async method awaits something that requires a UI event to complete, then you'll deadlock even with the nested context. In that case, you could start the
async method on the thread pool:
var task = Task.Run(async () => await MyAsyncMethod()); var result = task.WaitAndUnwrapException();
However, this solution requires a
MyAsyncMethod that will work in the thread pool context. So it can't update UI elements or access the ASP.NET request context. And in that case, you may as well add
ConfigureAwait(false) to its
await statements, and use solution A.
Update, 2019-05-01: The current "least-worst practices" are in an MSDN article here.