[performance] CSS performance relative to translateZ(0)

A number of blogs have expressed the performance gain in 'tricking' the GPU to think that an element is 3D by using transform: translateZ(0) to speed up animations and transitions. I was wondering if there are implications to using this transform in the following manner:

* {
    -webkit-transform: translateZ(0);
    -moz-transform: translateZ(0);
    -ms-transform: translateZ(0);
    -o-transform: translateZ(0);
    transform: translateZ(0);
}

This question is related to performance css translate-animation

The answer is


On mobile devices sending everything to the GPU will cause a memory overload and crash the application. I encountered this on an iPad app in Cordova. Best to only send the required items to the GPU, the divs that you're specifically moving around.

Better yet, use the 3d transitions transforms to do the animations like translateX(50px) as opposed to left:50px;


If you want implications, in some scenarios Google Chrome performance is horrible with hardware acceleration enabled. Oddly enough, changing the "trick" to -webkit-transform: rotateZ(360deg); worked just fine.

I don't believe we ever figured out why.


It forces the browser to use hardware acceleration to access the device’s graphical processing unit (GPU) to make pixels fly. Web applications, on the other hand, run in the context of the browser, which lets the software do most (if not all) of the rendering, resulting in less horsepower for transitions. But the Web has been catching up, and most browser vendors now provide graphical hardware acceleration by means of particular CSS rules.

Using -webkit-transform: translate3d(0,0,0); will kick the GPU into action for the CSS transitions, making them smoother (higher FPS).

Note: translate3d(0,0,0) does nothing in terms of what you see. It moves the object by 0px in x,y and z axis. It's only a technique to force the hardware acceleration.

Good read here: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2012/06/21/play-with-hardware-accelerated-css/


I can attest to the fact that -webkit-transform: translate3d(0, 0, 0); will mess with the new position: -webkit-sticky; property. With a left drawer navigation pattern that I was working on, the hardware acceleration I wanted with the transform property was messing with the fixed positioning of my top nav bar. I turned off the transform and the positioning worked fine.

Luckily, I seem to have had hardware acceleration on already, because I had -webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased on the html element. I was testing this behavior in iOS7 and Android.


Examples related to performance

Why is 2 * (i * i) faster than 2 * i * i in Java? What is the difference between spark.sql.shuffle.partitions and spark.default.parallelism? How to check if a key exists in Json Object and get its value Why does C++ code for testing the Collatz conjecture run faster than hand-written assembly? Most efficient way to map function over numpy array The most efficient way to remove first N elements in a list? Fastest way to get the first n elements of a List into an Array Why is "1000000000000000 in range(1000000000000001)" so fast in Python 3? pandas loc vs. iloc vs. at vs. iat? Android Recyclerview vs ListView with Viewholder

Examples related to css

need to add a class to an element Using Lato fonts in my css (@font-face) Please help me convert this script to a simple image slider Why there is this "clear" class before footer? How to set width of mat-table column in angular? Center content vertically on Vuetify bootstrap 4 file input doesn't show the file name Bootstrap 4: responsive sidebar menu to top navbar Stylesheet not loaded because of MIME-type Force flex item to span full row width

Examples related to translate-animation

Android translate animation - permanently move View to new position using AnimationListener CSS transition effect makes image blurry / moves image 1px, in Chrome? rotate image with css CSS performance relative to translateZ(0)