Can you mix vb and c# files in the same project for a class library? Is there some setting that makes it possible?
I tried and none of the intellisense works quite right, although the background compiler seems to handle it well enough (aside from the fact that I, then, had 2 classes in the same namespace with the same name and it didn't complain).
We're trying to convert from VB to C# but haven't finished converting all the code. I have some new code I need to write, but didn't really want to make a new project just for it.
Well, actually I inherited a project some years ago from a colleague who had decided to mix VB and C# webforms within the same project. That worked but is far from fun to maintain.
I decided that new code should be C# classes and to get them to work I had to add a subnode to the compilation part of web.config
<codeSubDirectories>
<add directoryName="VB"/>
<add directoryName="CS"/>
</codeSubDirectories>
The all VB code goes into a subfolder in the App_Code called VB and the C# code into the CS subfolder. This will produce two .dll files. It works, but code is compiled in the same order as listed in "codeSubDirectories" and therefore i.e Interfaces should be in the VB folder if used in both C# and VB.
I have both a reference to a VB and a C# compiler in
<system.codedom>
<compilers>
The project is currently updated to framework 3.5 and it still works (but still no fun to maintain..)
Yes its possible.adding c# and vb.net projects into a single solution.
step1: File->Add->Existing Project
Step2: Project->Add reference->dll or exe of project which u added before.
step3: In vb.net form where u want to use c# forms->import namespace of project.
It might be possible with some custom MSBuild development. The supplied .targets force the projects to be single language - but there's no runtime or tooling restriction preventing this.
Both the VB and CS compilers can output to modules - the CLR's version of .obj files. Using the assembly linker, you could take the modules from the VB and CS code and produce a single assembly.
Not that this would be a trival effort, but it probably would work.
You can not mix vb and c# within the same project - if you notice in visual studio the project files are either .vbproj or .csproj. You can within a solution - have 1 proj in vb and 1 in c#.
Looks like according to this you can potentially use them both in a web project in the App_Code directory:
http://pietschsoft.com/post/2006/03/30/ASPNET-20-Use-VBNET-and-C-within-the-App_Code-folder.aspx
As others have said, you can't put both in one project. However, if you just have a small piece of C# or VB code that you want to include in a project in the other language, there are automatic conversion tools. They're not perfect, but they do most things pretty well. Also, SharpDevelop has a conversion utility built in.
For .net 2.0 this works. It DOES compile both in the same project if you create sub directories of in app code with the related language code. As of yet, I am looking for whether this should work in 3.5 or not though.
Yes, You can add both of the file in web site only.If the project is a web application it will not allow different type of file.
Walkthrough: Using Multiple Programming Languages in a Web Site Project http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms366714.aspx
By default, the App_Code folder does not allow multiple programming languages. However, in a Web site project you can modify your folder structure and configuration settings to support multiple programming languages such as Visual Basic and C#. This allows ASP.NET to create multiple assemblies, one for each language. For more information, see Shared Code Folders in ASP.NET Web Projects. Developers commonly include multiple programming languages in Web applications to support multiple development teams that operate independently and prefer different programming languages.
Why don't you just compile your VB code into a library(.dll).Reference it later from your code and that's it. Managed dlls contain MSIL to which both c# and vb are compiled.
Right-click the Project. Choose Add Asp.Net Folder. Under The Folder, create two folders one named VBCodeFiles and the Other CSCodeFiles In Web.Config add a new element under compilation
<compilation debug="true" targetFramework="4.5.1">
<codeSubDirectories>
<add directoryName="VBCodeFiles"/>
<add directoryName="CSCodeFiles"/>
</codeSubDirectories>
</compilation>
Now, Create an cshtml page. Add a reference to the VBCodeFiles.Namespace.MyClassName using
@using DMH.VBCodeFiles.Utils.RCMHD
@model MyClassname
Where MyClassName is an class object found in the namespace above. now write out the object in razor using a cshtml file.
<p>@Model.FirstName</p>
Please note, the directoryName="CSCodeFiles" is redundant if this is a C# Project and the directoryName="VBCodeFiles" is redundant if this is a VB.Net project.
At the risk of echoing every other answer, no, you cannot mix them in the same project.
That aside, if you just finished converting VB to C#, why would you write new code in VB?
I don't see how you can compile a project with the C# compiler (or the VB compiler) and not have it balk at the wrong language for the compiler.
Keep your C# code in a separate project from your VB project. You can include these projects into the same solution.
Although Visual Studio does not support this (you can do some tricks and get MSBuild to compile both, but not from within Visual Studio), SharpDevelop does. You can have both in the same solution (as long as you are running Visual Studio Professional and above), so the easiest solution if you want to keep using Visual Studio is to seperate your VB code into a different project and access it that way.
In our scenario, its a single VB.NET project (Windows Desktop application) in a single solution. However we wanted to take advantage of C# features like signed/unsigned integers and XML literals and string features in VB.NET. So depending on the features, at runtime we build the code file, compile using respective Rosalyn compiler (VB/CS) into DLL and dynamically load into current assembly. Of course we had to work on delinking, unloading, reloading, naming etc of the dynamic DLLs and the memory management were we largely used dynamic GUID for naming to avoid conflict. It works fine where app user may connect to any DB from our desktop app, write SQL query, convert the connection to LINQ connection and write LINQ queries too which all requires dynamic building of source code, compiling into DLL and attaching to current assembly.
No, not in the same project.but you can use them in the same solution. though you need to take care that your code is CLS compliant. That means you must not have used such functionality/feature that is not understand by other language. For example VB does not understand unsigned ints.
You need one project per language. I'm quite confident I saw a tool that merged assemblies, if you find that tool you should be good to go. If you need to use both languages in the same class, you should be able to write half of it in say VB.net and then write the rest in C# by inheriting the VB.net class.
Source: Stackoverflow.com