I often use this list command in Unix (AIX / KSH):
ls -Artl
It displays the files as this:
-rw-r--r-- 1 myuser mygroup 0 Apr 2 11:59 test1.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 myuser mygroup 0 Apr 2 11:59 test2.txt
I would like to modify the command such a way that the full path of the file is displayed. For example:
-rw-r--r-- 1 myuser mygroup 0 Apr 2 11:59 /usr/test1.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 myuser mygroup 0 Apr 2 11:59 /usr/test2.txt
Any ideas?
I found several resolution methods using pwd
or find
but - as far as I see - this does not work work if I want to keep the ls
options.
This question is related to
shell
unix
command-line
ls
You can combine the find command and the ls command. Use the path (.) and selector (*) to narrow down the files you're after. Surround the find command in back quotes. The argument to -name is doublequote star doublequote in case you can't read it.
ls -lart `find . -type f -name "*" `
I use this command:
ls -1 | xargs readlink -f
Use this command:
ls -ltr /mig/mthome/09/log/*
instead of:
ls -ltr /mig/mthome/09/log
to get the full path in the listing.
I wrote a shell script called fullpath that contains this code, use it everyday:
#!/bin/sh
for i in $* ; do
echo $(pwd)/$i
done
Put it somewhere in your PATH, and make it executable(chmod 755 fullpath) then just use
fullpath file_or_directory
simply use find tool.
find absolute_path
displays full paths on my Linux machine, while
find relative_path
will not.
Try this, works for me: ls -d /a/b/c/*
optimized from spacedrop answer ...
ls $(pwd)/*
and you can use ls options
ls -alrt $(pwd)/*
Source: Stackoverflow.com