[java] What's the difference between a Future and a Promise?

What's the difference between Future and Promise?
They both act like a placeholder for future results, but where is the main difference?

I am aware that there's already an accepted answer but would like to add my two cents nevertheless:

TLDR: Future and Promise are the two sides of an asynchronous operation: consumer/caller vs. producer/implementor.

As a caller of an asynchronous API method, you will get a Future as a handle to the computation's result. You can e.g. call get() on it to wait for the computation to complete and retrieve the result.

Now think of how this API method is actually implemented: The implementor must return a Future immediately. They are responsible for completing that future as soon as the computation is done (which they will know because it is implementing the dispatch logic ;-)). They will use a Promise/CompletableFuture to do just that: Construct and return the CompletableFuture immediately, and call complete(T result) once the computation is done.

Future and Promise are proxy object for unknown result

Promise completes a Future

• Future - read/consumer of unknown result

• Promise - write/producer of unknown result.

//Future has a reference to Promise
Future -> Promise

As a producer I promise something and responsible for it

As a consumer who retrieved a promise I expect to have a result in future

As for Java CompletableFutures it is a Promise because you can set the result and also it implements Future

I will give an example of what is Promise and how its value could be set at any time, in opposite to Future, which value is only readable.

Suppose you have a mom and you ask her for money.

// Now , you trick your mom into creating you a promise of eventual
// donation, she gives you that promise object, but she is not really
// in rush to fulfill it yet:
Supplier<Integer> momsPurse = ()-> {

        try {
            Thread.sleep(1000);//mom is busy
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            ;
        }

        return 100;

    };


ExecutorService ex = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10);

CompletableFuture<Integer> promise =  
CompletableFuture.supplyAsync(momsPurse, ex);

// You are happy, you run to thank you your mom:
promise.thenAccept(u->System.out.println("Thank you mom for $" + u ));

// But your father interferes and generally aborts mom's plans and 
// completes the promise (sets its value!) with far lesser contribution,
// as fathers do, very resolutely, while mom is slowly opening her purse 
// (remember the Thread.sleep(...)) :
promise.complete(10); 

Output of that is:

Thank you mom for $10

Mom's promise was created , but waited for some "completion" event.

CompletableFuture<Integer> promise...

You created such event, accepting her promise and announcing your plans to thank your mom:

promise.thenAccept...

At this moment mom started open her purse...but very slow...

and father interfered much faster and completed the promise instead of your mom:

promise.complete(10);

Have you noticed an executor that I wrote explicitly?

Interestingly, if you use a default implicit executor instead (commonPool) and father is not at home, but only mom with her "slow purse", then her promise will only complete, if the program lives longer than mom needs to get money from the purse.

The default executor acts kind of like a "daemon" and does not wait for all promises to be fulfilled. I have not found a good description of this fact...

Not sure if this can be an answer but as I see what others have said for someone it may look like you need two separate abstractions for both of these concepts so that one of them (Future) is just a read-only view of the other (Promise) ... but actually this is not needed.

For example take a look at how promises are defined in javascript:

https://promisesaplus.com/

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise

The focus is on the composability using the then method like:

asyncOp1()
.then(function(op1Result){
  // do something
  return asyncOp2();
})
.then(function(op2Result){
  // do something more
  return asyncOp3();
})
.then(function(op3Result){
  // do something even more
  return syncOp4(op3Result);
})
...
.then(function(result){
  console.log(result);
})
.catch(function(error){
  console.log(error);
})

which makes asynchronous computation to look like synchronous:

try {
  op1Result = syncOp1();
  // do something
  op1Result = syncOp2();
  // do something more
  op3Result = syncOp3();
  // do something even more
  syncOp4(op3Result);
  ...
  console.log(result);
} catch(error) {
  console.log(error);
}

which is pretty cool. (Not as cool as async-await but async-await just removes the boilerplate ....then(function(result) {.... from it).

And actually their abstraction is pretty good as the promise constructor

new Promise( function(resolve, reject) { /* do it */ } );

allows you to provide two callbacks which can be used to either complete the Promise successfully or with an error. So that only the code that constructs the Promise can complete it and the code that receives an already constructed Promise object has the read-only view.

With inheritance the above can be achieved if resolve and reject are protected methods.

For client code, Promise is for observing or attaching callback when a result is available, whereas Future is to wait for result and then continue. Theoretically anything which is possible to do with futures what can done with promises, but due to the style difference, the resultant API for promises in different languages make chaining easier.

In this example you can take a look at how Promises can be used in Java for creating asynchronous sequences of calls:

doSomeProcess()
    .whenResult(result -> System.out.println(String.format("Result of some process is '%s'", result)))
    .whenException(e -> System.out.println(String.format("Exception after some process is '%s'", e.getMessage())))
    .map(String::toLowerCase)
    .mapEx((result, e) -> e == null ? String.format("The mapped result is '%s'", result) : e.getMessage())
    .whenResult(s -> System.out.println(s));

No set method in Future interface, only get method, so it is read-only. About CompletableFuture, this article maybe helpful. completablefuture

(I'm not completely happy with the answers so far, so here is my attempt...)

I think that Kevin Wright's comment ("You can make a Promise and it's up to you to keep it. When someone else makes you a promise you must wait to see if they honour it in the Future") summarizes it pretty well, but some explanation can be useful.

Futures and promises are pretty similar concepts, the difference is that a future is a read-only container for a result that does not yet exist, while a promise can be written (normally only once). The Java 8 CompletableFuture and the Guava SettableFuture can be thought of as promises, because their value can be set ("completed"), but they also implement the Future interface, therefore there is no difference for the client.

The result of the future will be set by "someone else" - by the result of an asynchronous computation. Note how FutureTask - a classic future - must be initialized with a Callable or Runnable, there is no no-argument constructor, and both Future and FutureTask are read-only from the outside (the set methods of FutureTask are protected). The value will be set to the result of the computation from the inside.

On the other hand, the result of a promise can be set by "you" (or in fact by anybody) anytime because it has a public setter method. Both CompletableFuture and SettableFuture can be created without any task, and their value can be set at any time. You send a promise to the client code, and fulfill it later as you wish.

Note that CompletableFuture is not a "pure" promise, it can be initialized with a task just like FutureTask, and its most useful feature is the unrelated chaining of processing steps.

Also note that a promise does not have to be a subtype of future and it does not have to be the same object. In Scala a Future object is created by an asynchronous computation or by a different Promise object. In C++ the situation is similar: the promise object is used by the producer and the future object by the consumer. The advantage of this separation is that the client cannot set the value of the future.

Both Spring and EJB 3.1 have an AsyncResult class, which is similar to the Scala/C++ promises. AsyncResult does implement Future but this is not the real future: asynchronous methods in Spring/EJB return a different, read-only Future object through some background magic, and this second "real" future can be used by the client to access the result.