must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used in an aggregate function

Question

I have a table that looks like this caller  makerar    cname    wmname            avg            -------- ------------- ------------------------  canada   zoro         2 0000000000000000  spain    luffy    1 00000000000000000000  spain    usopp        5 0000000000000000   And I want to select the maximum avg for each cname    SELECT cname  wmname  MAX avg   FROM makerar GROUP BY cname    but I will get an error    ERROR   column  makerar wmname  must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used in an   aggregate function  LINE 1  SELECT cname  wmname  MAX avg   FROM makerar GROUP BY cname    so i do this  SELECT cname  wmname  MAX avg   FROM makerar GROUP BY cname  wmname    however this will not give the intented results  and the incorrect output below is shown    cname    wmname            max            -------- -------- ------------------------  canada   zoro         2 0000000000000000  spain    luffy    1 00000000000000000000  spain    usopp        5 0000000000000000   Actual Results should be   cname    wmname            max            -------- -------- ------------------------  canada   zoro         2 0000000000000000  spain    usopp        5 0000000000000000   How can I go about fixing this issue   Note  This table is a VIEW created from  a previous operation

User · Answer

This seems to work as well  SELECT   FROM makerar m1 WHERE m1 avg    SELECT MAX avg                  FROM makerar m2                 WHERE m1 cname   m2 cname

User · Answer

The problem with specifying non-grouped and non-aggregate fields in group by selects is that engine has no way of knowing which record s field it should return in this case  Is it first  Is it last  There is usually no record that naturally corresponds to aggregated result  min and max are exceptions    However  there is a workaround  make the required field aggregated as well  In posgres  this should work   SELECT cname   array agg wmname ORDER BY avg DESC   1   MAX avg  FROM makerar GROUP BY cname    Note that this creates an array of all wnames  ordered by avg  and returns the first element  arrays in postgres are 1-based

User · Answer

Yes  this is a common aggregation problem  Before SQL3  1999   the selected fields must appear in the GROUP BY clause       To workaround this issue  you must calculate the aggregate in a sub-query and then join it with itself to get the additional columns you d need to show   SELECT m cname  m wmname  t mx FROM       SELECT cname  MAX avg  AS mx     FROM makerar     GROUP BY cname       t JOIN makerar m ON m cname   t cname AND t mx   m avg     cname    wmname            mx            -------- -------- ------------------------  canada   zoro         2 0000000000000000  spain    usopp        5 0000000000000000     But you may also use window functions  which looks simpler   SELECT cname  wmname  MAX avg  OVER  PARTITION BY cname  AS mx FROM makerar     The only thing with this method is that it will show all records  window functions do not group   But it will show the correct  i e  maxed at cname level  MAX for the country in each row  so it s up to you    cname    wmname            mx            -------- -------- ------------------------  canada   zoro         2 0000000000000000  spain    luffy        5 0000000000000000  spain    usopp        5 0000000000000000   The solution  arguably less elegant  to show the only  cname  wmname  tuples matching the max value  is   SELECT DISTINCT    distinct here matters  because maybe there are various tuples for the same max value        m cname  m wmname  t avg AS mx FROM       SELECT cname  wmname  avg  ROW NUMBER   OVER  PARTITION BY avg DESC  AS rn      FROM makerar   t JOIN makerar m ON m cname   t cname AND m wmname   t wmname AND t rn   1      cname    wmname            mx            -------- -------- ------------------------  canada   zoro         2 0000000000000000  spain    usopp        5 0000000000000000          Interestingly enough  even though the spec sort of allows to select non-grouped fields  major engines seem to not really like it  Oracle and SQLServer just don t allow this at all  Mysql used to allow it by default  but now since 5 7 the administrator needs to enable this option  ONLY FULL GROUP BY  manually in the server configuration for this feature to be supported

User · Answer

SELECT t1 cname  t1 wmname  t2 max FROM makerar t1 JOIN       SELECT cname  MAX avg  max     FROM makerar     GROUP BY cname   t2 ON t1 cname   t2 cname AND t1 avg   t2 max    Using rank   window function   SELECT cname  wmname  avg FROM       SELECT cname  wmname  avg  rank        OVER  PARTITION BY cname ORDER BY avg DESC      FROM makerar  t WHERE rank   1    Note  Either one will preserve multiple max values per group  If you want only single record per group even if there is more than one record with avg equal to max you should check  ypercube s answer

User · Answer

I recently run into this problem  when trying to count using case when  and found that changing the order of the which and count statements fixes the problem   SELECT date dateday  as pick day  COUNT CASE WHEN  apples    TRUE  OR oranges  TRUE   THEN fruit END   AS fruit counter  FROM pickings  GROUP BY 1   Instead of using - in the latter  where I got errors that apples and oranges should appear in aggregate functions  CASE WHEN   apples    TRUE  OR oranges  TRUE   THEN COUNT    END  END AS fruit counter

User · Answer

In Postgres  you can also use the special DISTINCT ON  expression  syntax   SELECT DISTINCT ON  cname       cname  wmname  avg FROM      makerar  ORDER BY      cname  avg DESC

User · Answer

For me  it is not about a  common aggregation problem   but just about an incorrect SQL query  The single correct answer for  select the maximum avg for each cname     is  SELECT cname  MAX avg  FROM makerar GROUP BY cname    The result will be    cname         MAX avg  -------- ---------------------  canada   2 0000000000000000  spain    5 0000000000000000   This result in general answers the question  What is the best result for each group    We see that the best result for spain is 5 and for canada the best result is 2  It is true  and there is no error   If we need to display wmname also  we have to answer the question   What is the RULE to choose wmname from resulting set   Let s change the input data a bit to clarify the mistake     cname   wmname          avg            -------- -------- -----------------------  spain    zoro      1 0000000000000000  spain    luffy     5 0000000000000000  spain    usopp     5 0000000000000000   Which result do you expect on runnig this query  SELECT cname  wmname  MAX avg   FROM makerar GROUP BY cname   Should  it be spain luffy or spain usopp  Why  It is not determined in the query how to choose  better  wmname if several are suitable  so the result is also not determined  That s why SQL interpreter returns an error - the query is not correct   In the other word  there is no correct answer to the question  Who is the best in spain group    Luffy is not better than usopp  because usopp has the same  score

[sql] must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used in an aggregate function

Examples related to sql

Examples related to group-by

Examples related to aggregate-functions

Examples related to postgresql-9.1