Always pass weak reference of self into block in ARC

Question

I am a little confused about block usage in Objective-C  I currently use ARC and I have quite a lot of blocks in my app  currently always referring to self instead of its weak reference  May that be the cause of these blocks retaining self and keeping it from being dealloced   The question is  should I always use a weak reference of self in a block     - void handleNewerData  NSArray   arr       ProcessOperation  operation         ProcessOperation alloc  initWithDataToProcess arr                                          completion   NSMutableArray  rows            dispatch async dispatch get main queue                    self updateFeed arr rows rows                            dataProcessQueue addOperation operation       ProcessOperation h   interface ProcessOperation   NSOperation       NSMutableArray  dataArr      NSMutableArray  rowHeightsArr      void   callback  NSMutableArray  rows       ProcessOperation m  - id initWithDataToProcess  NSArray   data completion  void     NSMutableArray  rows  cb       if self   super init            dataArr    NSMutableArray arrayWithArray data           rowHeightsArr    NSMutableArray new           callback   cb            return self     -  void main        autoreleasepool                       callback rowHeightsArr

User · Answer

You don t have to always use a weak reference  If your block is not retained  but executed and then discarded  you can capture self strongly  as it will not create a retain cycle  In some cases  you even want the block to hold the self until the completion of the block so it does not deallocate prematurely  If  however  you capture the block strongly  and inside capture self  it will create a retain cycle

User · Answer

Some explanation ignore a condition about the retain cycle  If a group of objects is connected by a circle of strong relationships  they keep each other alive even if there are no strong references from outside the group   For more information  read the document

User · Answer

As Leo points out  the code you added to your question would not suggest a strong reference cycle  a k a   retain cycle   One operation-related issue that could cause a strong reference cycle would be if the operation is not getting released  While your code snippet suggests that you have not defined your operation to be concurrent  but if you have  it wouldn t be released if you never posted isFinished  or if you had circular dependencies  or something like that  And if the operation isn t released  the view controller wouldn t be released either  I would suggest adding a breakpoint or NSLog in your operation s dealloc method and confirm that s getting called   You said      I understand the notion of retain cycles  but I am not quite sure what happens in blocks  so that confuses me a little bit   The retain cycle  strong reference cycle  issues that occur with blocks are just like the retain cycle issues you re familiar with  A block will maintain strong references to any objects that appear within the block  and it will not release those strong references until the block itself is released  Thus  if block references self  or even just references an instance variable of self  that will maintain strong reference to self  that is not resolved until the block is released  or in this case  until the NSOperation subclass is released   For more information  see the Avoid Strong Reference Cycles when Capturing self section of the Programming with Objective-C  Working with Blocks document   If your view controller is still not getting released  you simply have to identify where the unresolved strong reference resides  assuming you confirmed the NSOperation is getting deallocated   A common example is the use of a repeating NSTimer  Or some custom delegate or other object that is erroneously maintaining a strong reference  You can often use Instruments to track down where objects are getting their strong references  e g      Or in Xcode 5

User · Answer

I totally agree with  jemmons      But this should not be the default pattern you follow when dealing with blocks that call self  This should only be used to break what would otherwise be a retain cycle between self and the block  If you were to adopt this pattern everywhere  you d run the risk of passing a block to something that got executed after self was deallocated         SUSPICIOUS EXAMPLE    weak MyObject  weakSelf   self    SomeOtherObject alloc  initWithCompletion        By the time this gets called   weakSelf  might be nil because it s not  retained     weakSelf doSomething          To overcome this problem one can define a strong reference over the weakSelf inside the block     weak MyObject  weakSelf   self    SomeOtherObject alloc  initWithCompletion      MyObject  strongSelf   weakSelf     strongSelf doSomething

User · Answer

This is how you can use the self inside the block     calling of the block   NSString  returnedText  checkIfOutsideMethodIsCalled self       NSString    checkIfOutsideMethodIsCalled      NSString  id obj                  obj MethodNameYouWantToCall      this is how it will call the object              return   Called

User · Answer

It helps not to focus on the strong or weak part of the discussion  Instead focus on the cycle part   A retain cycle is a loop that happens when Object A retains Object B  and Object B retains Object A  In that situation  if either object is released    Object A won t be deallocated because Object B holds a reference to it   But Object B won t ever be deallocated as long as Object A has a reference to it  But Object A will never be deallocated because Object B holds a reference to it  ad infinitum   Thus  those two objects will just hang around in memory for the life of the program even though they should  if everything were working properly  be deallocated    So  what we re worried about is retain cycles  and there s nothing about blocks in and of themselves that create these cycles  This isn t a problem  for example    myArray enumerateObjectsUsingBlock   id obj  NSUInteger idx  BOOL  stop       self doSomethingWithObject obj         The block retains self  but self doesn t retain the block  If one or the other is released  no cycle is created and everything gets deallocated as it should   Where you get into trouble is something like     In the interface   property  strong  void  myBlock  id obj  NSUInteger idx  BOOL  stop      In the implementation   self setMyBlock   id obj  NSUInteger idx  BOOL  stop       self doSomethingWithObj obj              Now  your object  self  has an explicit strong reference to the block  And the block has an implicit strong reference to self  That s a cycle  and now neither object will be deallocated properly   Because  in a situation like this  self by definition already has a strong reference to the block  it s usually easiest to resolve by making an explicitly weak reference to self for the block to use     weak MyObject  weakSelf   self   self setMyBlock   id obj  NSUInteger idx  BOOL  stop       weakSelf doSomethingWithObj obj              But this should not be the default pattern you follow when dealing with blocks that call self  This should only be used to break what would otherwise be a retain cycle between self and the block  If you were to adopt this pattern everywhere  you d run the risk of passing a block to something that got executed after self was deallocated     SUSPICIOUS EXAMPLE    weak MyObject  weakSelf   self    SomeOtherObject alloc  initWithCompletion        By the time this gets called   weakSelf  might be nil because it s not retained     weakSelf doSomething

[ios] Always pass weak reference of self into block in ARC?

Examples related to ios

Examples related to iphone

Examples related to objective-c

Examples related to automatic-ref-counting

Examples related to weak-references