What is the difference between HAVING and WHERE in SQL

Question

What is the difference between HAVING and WHERE in an SQL SELECT statement  EDIT  I have marked Steven s answer as the correct one as it contained the key bit of information on the link   When GROUP BY is not used  HAVING behaves like a WHERE clause  The situation I had seen the WHERE in did not have GROUP BY and is where my confusion started  Of course  until you know this you can t specify it in the question

User · Answer

The HAVING clause was added to SQL because the WHERE keyword could not be used with aggregate functions.

Check out this w3schools link for more information

Syntax:

SELECT column_name, aggregate_function(column_name)
FROM table_name
WHERE column_name operator value
GROUP BY column_name
HAVING aggregate_function(column_name) operator value

A query such as this:

SELECT column_name, COUNT( column_name ) AS column_name_tally
  FROM table_name
 WHERE column_name < 3
 GROUP 
    BY column_name
HAVING COUNT( column_name ) >= 3;

...may be rewritten using a derived table (and omitting the HAVING) like this:

SELECT column_name, column_name_tally
  FROM (
        SELECT column_name, COUNT(column_name) AS column_name_tally
          FROM table_name
         WHERE column_name < 3
         GROUP 
            BY column_name
       ) pointless_range_variable_required_here
 WHERE column_name_tally >= 3;

User · Answer

Difference b w WHERE and HAVING clause   The main difference between WHERE and HAVING clause is  WHERE is used for row operations and HAVING is used for column operations   Why we need HAVING clause   As we know  aggregate functions can only be performed on columns  so we can not use aggregate functions in WHERE clause  Therefore  we use aggregate functions in HAVING clause

User · Answer

Where clause is used to filter out rows from all over the database  But Having clause is used to filter out rows from a specific group of database  Having clause can also help in aggregate function like min max average for more detail   what  39 s the difference between WHERE and HAVING what is the difference between WHERE and HAVING

User · Answer

In an Aggregate query   Any query Where an aggregate function is used  Predicates in a where clause are evaluated before the aggregated intermediate result set is generated   Predicates in a Having clause are applied to the aggregate result set AFTER it has been generated   That s why predicate conditions on aggregate values must be placed in Having clause  not in the Where clause  and why you can use aliases defined in the Select clause in a Having Clause  but not in a Where Clause

User · Answer

One way to think of it is that the having clause is an additional filter to the where clause   A WHERE clause is used filters records from a result  The filter occurs before any groupings are made  A HAVING clause is used to filter values from a group

User · Answer

HAVING specifies a search condition for a   group or an aggregate function used in SELECT statement    Source

User · Answer

HAVING is used when you are using an aggregate such as GROUP BY   SELECT edc country  COUNT    FROM Ed Centers GROUP BY edc country HAVING COUNT     gt  1 ORDER BY edc country

User · Answer

HAVING  is used to check conditions after the aggregation takes place  WHERE  is used to check conditions before the aggregation takes place   This code   select City  CNT Count 1  From Address Where State    MA  Group By City   Gives you a table of all cities in MA and the number of addresses in each city   This code   select City  CNT Count 1  From Address Where State    MA  Group By City Having Count 1  gt 5   Gives you a table of cities in MA with more than 5 addresses and the number of addresses in each city

User · Answer

From here      the SQL standard requires that HAVING   must reference only columns in the   GROUP BY  clause or columns used in   aggregate functions   as opposed to the WHERE clause which is applied to database rows

User · Answer

When GROUP BY is not used  the WHERE and HAVING clauses are essentially equivalent   However  when GROUP BY is used    The WHERE clause is used to filter records from a result  The filtering occurs before any groupings are made  The HAVING clause is used to filter values from a group  i e   to check conditions after aggregation into groups has been performed     Resource from Here

User · Answer

WHERE is applied as a limitation on the set returned by SQL  it uses SQL s built-in set oeprations and indexes and therefore is the fastest way to filter result sets   Always use WHERE whenever possible   HAVING is necessary for some aggregate filters   It filters the query AFTER sql has retrieved  assembled  and sorted the results   Therefore  it is much slower than WHERE and should be avoided except in those situations that require it   SQL Server will let you get away with using HAVING even when WHERE would be much faster   Don t do it

User · Answer

Where clause is used to filter out rows from all over the database  But Having clause is used to filter out rows from a specific group of database  Having clause can also help in aggregate function like min max average for more detail   what  39 s the difference between WHERE and HAVING what is the difference between WHERE and HAVING

User · Answer

The HAVING clause was added to SQL because the WHERE keyword could not be used with aggregate functions.

Check out this w3schools link for more information

Syntax:

SELECT column_name, aggregate_function(column_name)
FROM table_name
WHERE column_name operator value
GROUP BY column_name
HAVING aggregate_function(column_name) operator value

A query such as this:

SELECT column_name, COUNT( column_name ) AS column_name_tally
  FROM table_name
 WHERE column_name < 3
 GROUP 
    BY column_name
HAVING COUNT( column_name ) >= 3;

...may be rewritten using a derived table (and omitting the HAVING) like this:

SELECT column_name, column_name_tally
  FROM (
        SELECT column_name, COUNT(column_name) AS column_name_tally
          FROM table_name
         WHERE column_name < 3
         GROUP 
            BY column_name
       ) pointless_range_variable_required_here
 WHERE column_name_tally >= 3;

User · Answer

I use HAVING for constraining a query based on the results of an aggregate function  E G  select   in blahblahblah group by SOMETHING having count SOMETHING  0

User · Answer

HAVING specifies a search condition for a   group or an aggregate function used in SELECT statement    Source

User · Answer

In an Aggregate query   Any query Where an aggregate function is used  Predicates in a where clause are evaluated before the aggregated intermediate result set is generated   Predicates in a Having clause are applied to the aggregate result set AFTER it has been generated   That s why predicate conditions on aggregate values must be placed in Having clause  not in the Where clause  and why you can use aliases defined in the Select clause in a Having Clause  but not in a Where Clause

User · Answer

I use HAVING for constraining a query based on the results of an aggregate function  E G  select   in blahblahblah group by SOMETHING having count SOMETHING  0

User · Answer

I had a problem and found out another difference between WHERE and HAVING  It does not act the same way on indexed columns   WHERE my indexed row   123 will show rows and automatically perform a  ORDER ASC  on other indexed rows   HAVING my indexed row   123 shows everything from the oldest  inserted  row to the newest one  no ordering

User · Answer

The difference between the two is in the relationship to the GROUP BY clause    WHERE comes before GROUP BY  SQL evaluates the WHERE clause before it groups records  HAVING comes after GROUP BY  SQL evaluates HAVING after it groups records      References   SQLite SELECT Statement Syntax Railroad Diagram Informix SELECT Statement Syntax Railroad Diagram

User · Answer

WHERE is applied as a limitation on the set returned by SQL  it uses SQL s built-in set oeprations and indexes and therefore is the fastest way to filter result sets   Always use WHERE whenever possible   HAVING is necessary for some aggregate filters   It filters the query AFTER sql has retrieved  assembled  and sorted the results   Therefore  it is much slower than WHERE and should be avoided except in those situations that require it   SQL Server will let you get away with using HAVING even when WHERE would be much faster   Don t do it

User · Answer

WHERE is applied as a limitation on the set returned by SQL  it uses SQL s built-in set oeprations and indexes and therefore is the fastest way to filter result sets   Always use WHERE whenever possible   HAVING is necessary for some aggregate filters   It filters the query AFTER sql has retrieved  assembled  and sorted the results   Therefore  it is much slower than WHERE and should be avoided except in those situations that require it   SQL Server will let you get away with using HAVING even when WHERE would be much faster   Don t do it

User · Answer

In an Aggregate query   Any query Where an aggregate function is used  Predicates in a where clause are evaluated before the aggregated intermediate result set is generated   Predicates in a Having clause are applied to the aggregate result set AFTER it has been generated   That s why predicate conditions on aggregate values must be placed in Having clause  not in the Where clause  and why you can use aliases defined in the Select clause in a Having Clause  but not in a Where Clause

User · Answer

From here      the SQL standard requires that HAVING   must reference only columns in the   GROUP BY  clause or columns used in   aggregate functions   as opposed to the WHERE clause which is applied to database rows

User · Answer

HAVING is used when you are using an aggregate such as GROUP BY   SELECT edc country  COUNT    FROM Ed Centers GROUP BY edc country HAVING COUNT     gt  1 ORDER BY edc country

User · Answer

Difference b w WHERE and HAVING clause   The main difference between WHERE and HAVING clause is  WHERE is used for row operations and HAVING is used for column operations   Why we need HAVING clause   As we know  aggregate functions can only be performed on columns  so we can not use aggregate functions in WHERE clause  Therefore  we use aggregate functions in HAVING clause

User · Answer

HAVING specifies a search condition for a   group or an aggregate function used in SELECT statement    Source

User · Answer

The HAVING clause was added to SQL because the WHERE keyword could not be used with aggregate functions.

Check out this w3schools link for more information

Syntax:

SELECT column_name, aggregate_function(column_name)
FROM table_name
WHERE column_name operator value
GROUP BY column_name
HAVING aggregate_function(column_name) operator value

A query such as this:

SELECT column_name, COUNT( column_name ) AS column_name_tally
  FROM table_name
 WHERE column_name < 3
 GROUP 
    BY column_name
HAVING COUNT( column_name ) >= 3;

...may be rewritten using a derived table (and omitting the HAVING) like this:

SELECT column_name, column_name_tally
  FROM (
        SELECT column_name, COUNT(column_name) AS column_name_tally
          FROM table_name
         WHERE column_name < 3
         GROUP 
            BY column_name
       ) pointless_range_variable_required_here
 WHERE column_name_tally >= 3;

User · Answer

WHERE is applied as a limitation on the set returned by SQL  it uses SQL s built-in set oeprations and indexes and therefore is the fastest way to filter result sets   Always use WHERE whenever possible   HAVING is necessary for some aggregate filters   It filters the query AFTER sql has retrieved  assembled  and sorted the results   Therefore  it is much slower than WHERE and should be avoided except in those situations that require it   SQL Server will let you get away with using HAVING even when WHERE would be much faster   Don t do it

User · Answer

I use HAVING for constraining a query based on the results of an aggregate function  E G  select   in blahblahblah group by SOMETHING having count SOMETHING  0

User · Answer

Number one difference for me  if HAVING was removed from the SQL language then life would go on more or less as before  Certainly  a minority queries would need to be rewritten using a derived table  CTE  etc but they would arguably be easier to understand and maintain as a result  Maybe vendors  optimizer code would need to be rewritten to account for this  again an opportunity for improvement within the industry   Now consider for a moment removing WHERE from the language  This time the majority of queries in existence would need to be rewritten without an obvious alternative construct  Coders would have to get creative e g  inner join to a table known to contain exactly one row  e g  DUAL in Oracle  using the ON clause to simulate the prior WHERE clause  Such constructions would be contrived  it would be obvious there was something was missing from the language and the situation would be worse as a result   TL DR we could lose HAVING tomorrow and things would be no worse  possibly better  but the same cannot be said of WHERE     From the answers here  it seems that many folk don t realize that a HAVING clause may be used without a GROUP BY clause  In this case  the HAVING clause is applied to the entire table expression and requires that only constants appear in the SELECT clause  Typically the HAVING clause will involve aggregates   This is more useful than it sounds  For example  consider this query to test whether the name column is unique for all values in T   SELECT 1 AS result   FROM T HAVING COUNT  DISTINCT name     COUNT  name      There are only two possible results  if the HAVING clause is true then the result with be a single row containing the value 1  otherwise the result will be the empty set

User · Answer

While working on a project  this was also my question  As stated above  the HAVING checks the condition on the query result already found  But WHERE is for checking condition while query runs   Let me give an example to illustrate this  Suppose you have a database table like this      usertable  int userid   date datefield  int dailyincome     Suppose  the following rows are in table      1  2011-05-20  100      1  2011-05-21  50      1  2011-05-30  10      2  2011-05-30  10      2  2011-05-20  20   Now  we want to get the userids and sum dailyincome  whose sum dailyincome  gt 100  If we write      SELECT userid  sum dailyincome  FROM usertable WHERE   sum dailyincome  100 GROUP BY userid   This will be an error  The correct query would be      SELECT userid  sum dailyincome  FROM usertable GROUP BY userid HAVING   sum dailyincome  100

User · Answer

HAVING is used when you are using an aggregate such as GROUP BY   SELECT edc country  COUNT    FROM Ed Centers GROUP BY edc country HAVING COUNT     gt  1 ORDER BY edc country

User · Answer

HAVING is used when you are using an aggregate such as GROUP BY   SELECT edc country  COUNT    FROM Ed Centers GROUP BY edc country HAVING COUNT     gt  1 ORDER BY edc country

User · Answer

I had a problem and found out another difference between WHERE and HAVING  It does not act the same way on indexed columns   WHERE my indexed row   123 will show rows and automatically perform a  ORDER ASC  on other indexed rows   HAVING my indexed row   123 shows everything from the oldest  inserted  row to the newest one  no ordering

User · Answer

I use HAVING for constraining a query based on the results of an aggregate function  E G  select   in blahblahblah group by SOMETHING having count SOMETHING  0

User · Answer

While working on a project  this was also my question  As stated above  the HAVING checks the condition on the query result already found  But WHERE is for checking condition while query runs   Let me give an example to illustrate this  Suppose you have a database table like this      usertable  int userid   date datefield  int dailyincome     Suppose  the following rows are in table      1  2011-05-20  100      1  2011-05-21  50      1  2011-05-30  10      2  2011-05-30  10      2  2011-05-20  20   Now  we want to get the userids and sum dailyincome  whose sum dailyincome  gt 100  If we write      SELECT userid  sum dailyincome  FROM usertable WHERE   sum dailyincome  100 GROUP BY userid   This will be an error  The correct query would be      SELECT userid  sum dailyincome  FROM usertable GROUP BY userid HAVING   sum dailyincome  100

User · Answer

From here      the SQL standard requires that HAVING   must reference only columns in the   GROUP BY  clause or columns used in   aggregate functions   as opposed to the WHERE clause which is applied to database rows

User · Answer

HAVING  is used to check conditions after the aggregation takes place  WHERE  is used to check conditions before the aggregation takes place   This code   select City  CNT Count 1  From Address Where State    MA  Group By City   Gives you a table of all cities in MA and the number of addresses in each city   This code   select City  CNT Count 1  From Address Where State    MA  Group By City Having Count 1  gt 5   Gives you a table of cities in MA with more than 5 addresses and the number of addresses in each city

User · Answer

From here      the SQL standard requires that HAVING   must reference only columns in the   GROUP BY  clause or columns used in   aggregate functions   as opposed to the WHERE clause which is applied to database rows

User · Answer

The difference between the two is in the relationship to the GROUP BY clause    WHERE comes before GROUP BY  SQL evaluates the WHERE clause before it groups records  HAVING comes after GROUP BY  SQL evaluates HAVING after it groups records      References   SQLite SELECT Statement Syntax Railroad Diagram Informix SELECT Statement Syntax Railroad Diagram

User · Answer

The HAVING clause was added to SQL because the WHERE keyword could not be used with aggregate functions.

Check out this w3schools link for more information

Syntax:

SELECT column_name, aggregate_function(column_name)
FROM table_name
WHERE column_name operator value
GROUP BY column_name
HAVING aggregate_function(column_name) operator value

A query such as this:

SELECT column_name, COUNT( column_name ) AS column_name_tally
  FROM table_name
 WHERE column_name < 3
 GROUP 
    BY column_name
HAVING COUNT( column_name ) >= 3;

...may be rewritten using a derived table (and omitting the HAVING) like this:

SELECT column_name, column_name_tally
  FROM (
        SELECT column_name, COUNT(column_name) AS column_name_tally
          FROM table_name
         WHERE column_name < 3
         GROUP 
            BY column_name
       ) pointless_range_variable_required_here
 WHERE column_name_tally >= 3;

User · Answer

WHERE clause does not work for aggregate functions means   you should not use like this  bonus   table name  SELECT name   FROM bonus   GROUP BY name   WHERE sum salary   gt  200     HERE Instead of using WHERE clause you have to use HAVING    without using GROUP BY clause  HAVING clause just works as WHERE clause  SELECT name   FROM bonus   GROUP BY name   HAVING sum salary   gt  200

User · Answer

When GROUP BY is not used  the WHERE and HAVING clauses are essentially equivalent   However  when GROUP BY is used    The WHERE clause is used to filter records from a result  The filtering occurs before any groupings are made  The HAVING clause is used to filter values from a group  i e   to check conditions after aggregation into groups has been performed     Resource from Here

User · Answer

HAVING  is used to check conditions after the aggregation takes place  WHERE  is used to check conditions before the aggregation takes place   This code   select City  CNT Count 1  From Address Where State    MA  Group By City   Gives you a table of all cities in MA and the number of addresses in each city   This code   select City  CNT Count 1  From Address Where State    MA  Group By City Having Count 1  gt 5   Gives you a table of cities in MA with more than 5 addresses and the number of addresses in each city

User · Answer

In an Aggregate query   Any query Where an aggregate function is used  Predicates in a where clause are evaluated before the aggregated intermediate result set is generated   Predicates in a Having clause are applied to the aggregate result set AFTER it has been generated   That s why predicate conditions on aggregate values must be placed in Having clause  not in the Where clause  and why you can use aliases defined in the Select clause in a Having Clause  but not in a Where Clause

User · Answer

Number one difference for me  if HAVING was removed from the SQL language then life would go on more or less as before  Certainly  a minority queries would need to be rewritten using a derived table  CTE  etc but they would arguably be easier to understand and maintain as a result  Maybe vendors  optimizer code would need to be rewritten to account for this  again an opportunity for improvement within the industry   Now consider for a moment removing WHERE from the language  This time the majority of queries in existence would need to be rewritten without an obvious alternative construct  Coders would have to get creative e g  inner join to a table known to contain exactly one row  e g  DUAL in Oracle  using the ON clause to simulate the prior WHERE clause  Such constructions would be contrived  it would be obvious there was something was missing from the language and the situation would be worse as a result   TL DR we could lose HAVING tomorrow and things would be no worse  possibly better  but the same cannot be said of WHERE     From the answers here  it seems that many folk don t realize that a HAVING clause may be used without a GROUP BY clause  In this case  the HAVING clause is applied to the entire table expression and requires that only constants appear in the SELECT clause  Typically the HAVING clause will involve aggregates   This is more useful than it sounds  For example  consider this query to test whether the name column is unique for all values in T   SELECT 1 AS result   FROM T HAVING COUNT  DISTINCT name     COUNT  name      There are only two possible results  if the HAVING clause is true then the result with be a single row containing the value 1  otherwise the result will be the empty set

User · Answer

WHERE clause does not work for aggregate functions means   you should not use like this  bonus   table name  SELECT name   FROM bonus   GROUP BY name   WHERE sum salary   gt  200     HERE Instead of using WHERE clause you have to use HAVING    without using GROUP BY clause  HAVING clause just works as WHERE clause  SELECT name   FROM bonus   GROUP BY name   HAVING sum salary   gt  200

User · Answer

HAVING  is used to check conditions after the aggregation takes place  WHERE  is used to check conditions before the aggregation takes place   This code   select City  CNT Count 1  From Address Where State    MA  Group By City   Gives you a table of all cities in MA and the number of addresses in each city   This code   select City  CNT Count 1  From Address Where State    MA  Group By City Having Count 1  gt 5   Gives you a table of cities in MA with more than 5 addresses and the number of addresses in each city

User · Answer

WHERE clause is used for comparing values in the base table  whereas the HAVING clause can be used for filtering the results of aggregate functions in the result set of the query Click here

User · Answer

WHERE clause is used for comparing values in the base table  whereas the HAVING clause can be used for filtering the results of aggregate functions in the result set of the query Click here

User · Answer

When GROUP BY is not used  the WHERE and HAVING clauses are essentially equivalent  However  when GROUP BY is used   The WHERE clause is used to filter records from a result  The filtering occurs before any groupings are made  The HAVING clause is used to filter values from a group  i e   to check conditions after aggregation into groups has been performed

User · Answer

When GROUP BY is not used  the WHERE and HAVING clauses are essentially equivalent  However  when GROUP BY is used   The WHERE clause is used to filter records from a result  The filtering occurs before any groupings are made  The HAVING clause is used to filter values from a group  i e   to check conditions after aggregation into groups has been performed

User · Answer

One way to think of it is that the having clause is an additional filter to the where clause   A WHERE clause is used filters records from a result  The filter occurs before any groupings are made  A HAVING clause is used to filter values from a group

User · Answer

HAVING specifies a search condition for a   group or an aggregate function used in SELECT statement    Source

[sql] What is the difference between HAVING and WHERE in SQL?

Examples related to sql

Examples related to where-clause

Examples related to having