[c++] Why do we not have a virtual constructor in C++?

Virtual functions basically provide polymorphic behavior. That is, when you work with an object whose dynamic type is different than the static (compile time) type with which it is referred to, it provides behavior that is appropriate for the actual type of object instead of the static type of the object.

Now try to apply that sort of behavior to a constructor. When you construct an object the static type is always the same as the actual object type since:

To construct an object, a constructor needs the exact type of the object it is to create [...] Furthermore [...]you cannot have a pointer to a constructor

(Bjarne Stroustup (P424 The C++ Programming Language SE))

Examples related to c++

Method Call Chaining; returning a pointer vs a reference? How can I tell if an algorithm is efficient? Difference between opening a file in binary vs text How can compare-and-swap be used for a wait-free mutual exclusion for any shared data structure? Install Qt on Ubuntu #include errors detected in vscode Cannot open include file: 'stdio.h' - Visual Studio Community 2017 - C++ Error How to fix the error "Windows SDK version 8.1" was not found? Visual Studio 2017 errors on standard headers How do I check if a Key is pressed on C++

Examples related to constructor

Two constructors Class constructor type in typescript? ReactJS: Warning: setState(...): Cannot update during an existing state transition Inheritance with base class constructor with parameters What is the difference between using constructor vs getInitialState in React / React Native? Getting error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of with no type undefined reference to 'vtable for class' constructor Call asynchronous method in constructor? Purpose of a constructor in Java? __init__() missing 1 required positional argument

Examples related to virtual-functions

Can you write virtual functions / methods in Java? Why do we need virtual functions in C++? Can a class member function template be virtual? Calling virtual functions inside constructors Why do we not have a virtual constructor in C++? Can I call a base class's virtual function if I'm overriding it? Safely override C++ virtual functions What is the difference between an abstract function and a virtual function? Virtual member call in a constructor