[sql] Limit on the WHERE col IN (...) condition

I'm using the following code:

SELECT * FROM table
WHERE Col IN (123,123,222,....)

However, if I put more than ~3000 numbers in the IN clause, SQL throws an error.

Does anyone know if there's a size limit or anything similar?!!

Why not do a where IN a sub-select...

Pre-query into a temp table or something...

CREATE TABLE SomeTempTable AS
    SELECT YourColumn
    FROM SomeTable
    WHERE UserPickedMultipleRecordsFromSomeListOrSomething

then...

SELECT * FROM OtherTable
WHERE YourColumn IN ( SELECT YourColumn FROM SomeTempTable )

There is a limit, but you can split your values into separate blocks of in()

Select * 
From table 
Where Col IN (123,123,222,....)
or Col IN (456,878,888,....)

Parameterize the query and pass the ids in using a Table Valued Parameter.

For example, define the following type:

CREATE TYPE IdTable AS TABLE (Id INT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY)

Along with the following stored procedure:

CREATE PROCEDURE sp__Procedure_Name
    @OrderIDs IdTable READONLY,
AS

    SELECT *
    FROM table
    WHERE Col IN (SELECT Id FROM @OrderIDs)

You did not specify the database engine in question; in Oracle, an option is to use tuples like this:

SELECT * FROM table WHERE (Col, 1) IN ((123,1),(123,1),(222,1),....)

This ugly hack only works in Oracle SQL, see https://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/asktom.search?tag=limit-and-conversion-very-long-in-list-where-x-in#9538075800346844400

However, a much better option is to use stored procedures and pass the values as an array.

You can use tuples like this: SELECT * FROM table WHERE (Col, 1) IN ((123,1),(123,1),(222,1),....)

There are no restrictions on number of these. It compares pairs.

Depending on your version, use a table valued parameter in 2008, or some approach described here:

Arrays and Lists in SQL Server 2005

For MS SQL 2016, passing ints into the in, it looks like it can handle close to 38,000 records.

select * from user where userId in (1,2,3,etc)