[algorithm] How to create the most compact mapping n ? isprime(n) up to a limit N?

Naturally, for bool isprime(number) there would be a data structure I could query.
I define the best algorithm, to be the algorithm that produces a data structure with lowest memory consumption for the range (1, N], where N is a constant.
Just an example of what I am looking for: I could represent every odd number with one bit e.g. for the given range of numbers (1, 10], starts at 3: 1110

The following dictionary can be squeezed more, right? I could eliminate multiples of five with some work, but numbers that end with 1, 3, 7 or 9 must be there in the array of bits.

How do I solve the problem?

Python 3:

def is_prime(a):
    return a > 1 and all(a % i for i in range(2, int(a**0.5) + 1))

Similar idea to the AKS algorithm which has been mentioned

public static boolean isPrime(int n) {

    if(n == 2 || n == 3) return true;
    if((n & 1 ) == 0 || n % 3 == 0) return false;
    int limit = (int)Math.sqrt(n) + 1;
    for(int i = 5, w = 2; i <= limit; i += w, w = 6 - w) {
        if(n % i == 0) return false;
        numChecks++;
    }
    return true;
}

For large numbers you cannot simply naively check whether the candidate number N is divisible by none of the numbers less than sqrt(N). There are much more scalable tests available, such as the Miller-Rabin primality test. Below you have implementation in python:

def is_prime(x):
    """Fast implementation fo Miller-Rabin primality test, guaranteed to be correct."""
    import math
    def get_sd(x):
        """Returns (s: int, d: int) for which x = d*2^s """
        if not x: return 0, 0
        s = 0
        while 1:
            if x % 2 == 0:
                x /= 2
                s += 1
            else:
                return s, x
    if x <= 2:
        return x == 2
    # x - 1 = d*2^s
    s, d = get_sd(x - 1)
    if not s:
        return False  # divisible by 2!
    log2x = int(math.log(x) / math.log(2)) + 1
    # As long as Riemann hypothesis holds true, it is impossible
    # that all the numbers below this threshold are strong liars.
    # Hence the number is guaranteed to be a prime if no contradiction is found.
    threshold = min(x, 2*log2x*log2x+1)
    for a in range(2, threshold):
        # From Fermat's little theorem if x is a prime then a^(x-1) % x == 1
        # Hence the below must hold true if x is indeed a prime:
        if pow(a, d, x) != 1:
            for r in range(0, s):
                if -pow(a, d*2**r, x) % x == 1:
                    break
            else:
                # Contradicts Fermat's little theorem, hence not a prime.
                return False
    # No contradiction found, hence x must be a prime.
    return True

You can use it to find huge prime numbers:

x = 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
for e in range(1000):
    if is_prime(x + e):
        print('%d is a prime!' % (x + e))
        break

# 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000133 is a prime!

If you are testing random integers probably you want to first test whether the candidate number is divisible by any of the primes smaller than, say 1000, before you call Miller-Rabin. This will help you filter out obvious non-primes such as 10444344345.

I compared the efficiency of the most popular suggestions to determine if a number is prime. I used python 3.6 on ubuntu 17.10; I tested with numbers up to 100.000 (you can test with bigger numbers using my code below).

This first plot compares the functions (which are explained further down in my answer), showing that the last functions do not grow as fast as the first one when increasing the numbers.

And in the second plot we can see that in case of prime numbers the time grows steadily, but non-prime numbers do not grow so fast in time (because most of them can be eliminated early on).

Here are the functions I used:

1. this answer and this answer suggested a construct using all():

   def is_prime_1(n):
       return n > 1 and all(n % i for i in range(2, int(math.sqrt(n)) + 1))
   

2. This answer used some kind of while loop:

   def is_prime_2(n):
       if n <= 1:
           return False
       if n == 2:
           return True
       if n == 3:
           return True
       if n % 2 == 0:
           return False
       if n % 3 == 0:
           return False
   
       i = 5
       w = 2
       while i * i <= n:
           if n % i == 0:
               return False
           i += w
           w = 6 - w
   
       return True
   

3. This answer included a version with a for loop:

   def is_prime_3(n):
       if n <= 1:
           return False
   
       if n % 2 == 0 and n > 2:
           return False
   
       for i in range(3, int(math.sqrt(n)) + 1, 2):
           if n % i == 0:
               return False
   
       return True
   

4. And I mixed a few ideas from the other answers into a new one:

   def is_prime_4(n):
       if n <= 1:          # negative numbers, 0 or 1
           return False
       if n <= 3:          # 2 and 3
           return True
       if n % 2 == 0 or n % 3 == 0:
           return False
   
       for i in range(5, int(math.sqrt(n)) + 1, 2):
           if n % i == 0:
               return False
   
       return True
   

Here is my script to compare the variants:

import math
import pandas as pd
import seaborn as sns
import time
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt


def is_prime_1(n):
    ...
def is_prime_2(n):
    ...
def is_prime_3(n):
    ...
def is_prime_4(n):
    ...

default_func_list = (is_prime_1, is_prime_2, is_prime_3, is_prime_4)

def assert_equal_results(func_list=default_func_list, n):
    for i in range(-2, n):
        r_list = [f(i) for f in func_list]
        if not all(r == r_list[0] for r in r_list):
            print(i, r_list)
            raise ValueError
    print('all functions return the same results for integers up to {}'.format(n))

def compare_functions(func_list=default_func_list, n):
    result_list = []
    n_measurements = 3

    for f in func_list:
        for i in range(1, n + 1):
            ret_list = []
            t_sum = 0
            for _ in range(n_measurements):
                t_start = time.perf_counter()
                is_prime = f(i)
                t_end = time.perf_counter()

                ret_list.append(is_prime)
                t_sum += (t_end - t_start)

            is_prime = ret_list[0]
            assert all(ret == is_prime for ret in ret_list)
            result_list.append((f.__name__, i, is_prime, t_sum / n_measurements))

    df = pd.DataFrame(
        data=result_list,
        columns=['f', 'number', 'is_prime', 't_seconds'])
    df['t_micro_seconds'] = df['t_seconds'].map(lambda x: round(x * 10**6, 2))
    print('df.shape:', df.shape)

    print()
    print('', '-' * 41)
    print('| {:11s} | {:11s} | {:11s} |'.format(
        'is_prime', 'count', 'percent'))
    df_sub1 = df[df['f'] == 'is_prime_1']
    print('| {:11s} | {:11,d} | {:9.1f} % |'.format(
        'all', df_sub1.shape[0], 100))
    for (is_prime, count) in df_sub1['is_prime'].value_counts().iteritems():
        print('| {:11s} | {:11,d} | {:9.1f} % |'.format(
            str(is_prime), count, count * 100 / df_sub1.shape[0]))
    print('', '-' * 41)

    print()
    print('', '-' * 69)
    print('| {:11s} | {:11s} | {:11s} | {:11s} | {:11s} |'.format(
        'f', 'is_prime', 't min (us)', 't mean (us)', 't max (us)'))
    for f, df_sub1 in df.groupby(['f', ]):
        col = df_sub1['t_micro_seconds']
        print('|{0}|{0}|{0}|{0}|{0}|'.format('-' * 13))
        print('| {:11s} | {:11s} | {:11.2f} | {:11.2f} | {:11.2f} |'.format(
            f, 'all', col.min(), col.mean(), col.max()))
        for is_prime, df_sub2 in df_sub1.groupby(['is_prime', ]):
            col = df_sub2['t_micro_seconds']
            print('| {:11s} | {:11s} | {:11.2f} | {:11.2f} | {:11.2f} |'.format(
                f, str(is_prime), col.min(), col.mean(), col.max()))
    print('', '-' * 69)

    return df

Running the function compare_functions(n=10**5) (numbers up to 100.000) I get this output:

df.shape: (400000, 5)

 -----------------------------------------
| is_prime    | count       | percent     |
| all         |     100,000 |     100.0 % |
| False       |      90,408 |      90.4 % |
| True        |       9,592 |       9.6 % |
 -----------------------------------------

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
| f           | is_prime    | t min (us)  | t mean (us) | t max (us)  |
|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|
| is_prime_1  | all         |        0.57 |        2.50 |      154.35 |
| is_prime_1  | False       |        0.57 |        1.52 |      154.35 |
| is_prime_1  | True        |        0.89 |       11.66 |       55.54 |
|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|
| is_prime_2  | all         |        0.24 |        1.14 |      304.82 |
| is_prime_2  | False       |        0.24 |        0.56 |      304.82 |
| is_prime_2  | True        |        0.25 |        6.67 |       48.49 |
|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|
| is_prime_3  | all         |        0.20 |        0.95 |       50.99 |
| is_prime_3  | False       |        0.20 |        0.60 |       40.62 |
| is_prime_3  | True        |        0.58 |        4.22 |       50.99 |
|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|
| is_prime_4  | all         |        0.20 |        0.89 |       20.09 |
| is_prime_4  | False       |        0.21 |        0.53 |       14.63 |
| is_prime_4  | True        |        0.20 |        4.27 |       20.09 |
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------

Then, running the function compare_functions(n=10**6) (numbers up to 1.000.000) I get this output:

df.shape: (4000000, 5)

 -----------------------------------------
| is_prime    | count       | percent     |
| all         |   1,000,000 |     100.0 % |
| False       |     921,502 |      92.2 % |
| True        |      78,498 |       7.8 % |
 -----------------------------------------

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
| f           | is_prime    | t min (us)  | t mean (us) | t max (us)  |
|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|
| is_prime_1  | all         |        0.51 |        5.39 |     1414.87 |
| is_prime_1  | False       |        0.51 |        2.19 |      413.42 |
| is_prime_1  | True        |        0.87 |       42.98 |     1414.87 |
|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|
| is_prime_2  | all         |        0.24 |        2.65 |      612.69 |
| is_prime_2  | False       |        0.24 |        0.89 |      322.81 |
| is_prime_2  | True        |        0.24 |       23.27 |      612.69 |
|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|
| is_prime_3  | all         |        0.20 |        1.93 |       67.40 |
| is_prime_3  | False       |        0.20 |        0.82 |       61.39 |
| is_prime_3  | True        |        0.59 |       14.97 |       67.40 |
|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|
| is_prime_4  | all         |        0.18 |        1.88 |      332.13 |
| is_prime_4  | False       |        0.20 |        0.74 |      311.94 |
| is_prime_4  | True        |        0.18 |       15.23 |      332.13 |
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------

I used the following script to plot the results:

def plot_1(func_list=default_func_list, n):
    df_orig = compare_functions(func_list=func_list, n=n)
    df_filtered = df_orig[df_orig['t_micro_seconds'] <= 20]
    sns.lmplot(
        data=df_filtered, x='number', y='t_micro_seconds',
        col='f',
        # row='is_prime',
        markers='.',
        ci=None)

    plt.ticklabel_format(style='sci', axis='x', scilimits=(3, 3))
    plt.show()

here is the fastest way to do it:

def divisors(integer):
    result = []
    i = 2 
    j = integer/2
    while(i <= j):
        if integer % i == 0:
            result.append(i)
            if i != integer//i:
                result.append(integer//i)
        i += 1
        j = integer//i
    if len(result) > 0:
        return sorted(result)
    else:
        return f"{integer} is prime"

We can use java streams to implement this in O(sqrt(n)); Consider that noneMatch is a shortCircuiting method that stops the operation when finds it unnecessary for determining the result:

Scanner in = new Scanner(System.in);
int n = in.nextInt();
System.out.println(n == 2 ? "Prime" : IntStream.rangeClosed(2, ((int)(Math.sqrt(n)) + 1)).noneMatch(a -> n % a == 0) ? "Prime" : "Not Prime");

Here's my take on the answer:

def isprime(num):
    return num <= 3 or (num + 1) % 6 == 0 or (num - 1) % 6 == 0

The function will return True if any of the properties below are True. Those properties mathematically define what a prime is.

1. The number is less than or equal to 3
2. The number + 1 is divisible by 6
3. The number - 1 is divisible by 6

myInp=int(input("Enter a number: "))
if myInp==1:
    print("The number {} is neither a prime not composite no".format(myInp))
elif myInp>1:
    for i in range(2,myInp//2+1):
        if myInp%i==0:
            print("The Number {} is not a prime no".format(myInp))
            print("Because",i,"times",myInp//i,"is",myInp)
            break
    else:
        print("The Number {} is a prime no".format(myInp))
else:
    print("Alas the no {} is a not a prime no".format(myInp))

You could try something like this.

def main():
    try:
        user_in = int(input("Enter a number to determine whether the number is prime or not: "))
    except ValueError:
        print()
        print("You must enter a number!")
        print()
        return
    list_range = list(range(2,user_in+1))
    divisor_list = []
    for number in list_range:
        if user_in%number==0:
            divisor_list.append(number)
    if len(divisor_list) < 2:
        print(user_in, "is a prime number!")
        return
    else:
        print(user_in, "is not a prime number!")
        return
main()

bool isPrime(int n) {
if(n <= 3)
    return (n > 1)==0? false: true;
else if(n%2 == 0 || n%3 == 0)
    return false;

int i = 5;

while(i * i <= n){
    if(n%i == 0 || (n%(i+2) == 0))
        return false;
    i = i + 6;
}

return true;
}

for any number, the minimum iterations to check if the number is prime or not can be from 2 to square root of the number. To reduce the iterations, even more, we can check if the number is divisible by 2 or 3 as maximum numbers can be eliminated by checking if the number is divisible by 2 or 3. Further any prime number greater than 3 can be expressed as 6k+1 or 6k-1. So the iteration can go from 6k+1 to the square root of the number.

Smallest memory? This isn't smallest, but is a step in the right direction.

class PrimeDictionary {
    BitArray bits;

    public PrimeDictionary(int n) {
        bits = new BitArray(n + 1);
        for (int i = 0; 2 * i + 3 <= n; i++) {
            bits.Set(i, CheckPrimality(2 * i + 3));
        }
    }

    public PrimeDictionary(IEnumerable<int> primes) {
        bits = new BitArray(primes.Max());
        foreach(var prime in primes.Where(p => p != 2)) {
            bits.Set((prime - 3) / 2, true);
        }
    }

    public bool IsPrime(int k) {
        if (k == 2) {
            return true;
        }
        if (k % 2 == 0) {
            return false;
        }
        return bits[(k - 3) / 2];
    }
}

Of course, you have to specify the definition of CheckPrimality.

According to wikipedia, the Sieve of Eratosthenes has complexity O(n * (log n) * (log log n)) and requires O(n) memory - so it's a pretty good place to start if you aren't testing for especially large numbers.

The best method, in my opinion, is to use what's gone before.

There are lists of the first N primes on the internet with N stretching up to at least fifty million. Download the files and use them, it's likely to be much faster than any other method you'll come up with.

If you want an actual algorithm for making your own primes, Wikipedia has all sorts of good stuff on primes here, including links to the various methods for doing it, and prime testing here, both probability-based and fast-deterministic methods.

There should be a concerted effort to find the first billion (or even more) primes and get them published on the net somewhere so people can stop doing this same job over and over and over and ... :-)

I have got a prime function which works until (2^61)-1 Here:

from math import sqrt
def isprime(num): num > 1 and return all(num % x for x in range(2, int(sqrt(num)+1)))

Explanation:

The all() function can be redefined to this:

def all(variables):
    for element in variables:
        if not element: return False
    return True

The all() function just goes through a series of bools / numbers and returns False if it sees 0 or False.

The sqrt() function is just doing the square root of a number.

For example:

>>> from math import sqrt
>>> sqrt(9)
>>> 3
>>> sqrt(100)
>>> 10

The num % x part returns the remainder of num / x.

Finally, range(2, int(sqrt(num))) means that it will create a list that starts at 2 and ends at int(sqrt(num)+1)

For more information about range, have a look at this website!

The num > 1 part is just checking if the variable num is larger than 1, becuase 1 and 0 are not considered prime numbers.

I hope this helped :)

In Python 3:

def is_prime(a):
    if a < 2:
        return False
    elif a!=2 and a % 2 == 0:
        return False
    else:
        return all (a % i for i in range(3, int(a**0.5)+1))

Explanation: A prime number is a number only divisible by itself and 1. Ex: 2,3,5,7...

1) if a<2: if "a" is less than 2 it is not a prime.

2) elif a!=2 and a % 2 == 0: if "a" is divisible by 2 then its definitely not a prime. But if a=2 we don't want to evaluate that as it is a prime number. Hence the condition a!=2

3) return all (a % i for i in range(3, int(a0.5)+1) ):** First look at what all() command does in python. Starting from 3 we divide "a" till its square root (a**0.5). If "a" is divisible the output will be False. Why square root? Let's say a=16. The square root of 16 = 4. We don't need to evaluate till 15. We only need to check till 4 to say that it's not a prime.

Extra: A loop for finding all the prime number within a range.

for i in range(1,100):
    if is_prime(i):
        print("{} is a prime number".format(i))

When I have to do a fast verification, I write this simple code based on the basic division between numbers lower than square root of input.

def isprime(n):
    if n%2==0:
        return n==2
    else:
        cota = int(n**0.5)+1
        for ind in range(3,2,cota):
            if n%ind==0:
                print(ind)
                return False
    is_one = n==1
    return True != is_one

isprime(22783)

• The last True != n==1 is to avoid the case n=1.

To find if the number or numbers in a range is/are prime.

#!usr/bin/python3

def prime_check(*args):
    for arg in args:
        if arg > 1:     # prime numbers are greater than 1
            for i in range(2,arg):   # check for factors
                if(arg % i) == 0:
                    print(arg,"is not Prime")
                    print(i,"times",arg//i,"is",arg)
                    break
            else:
                print(arg,"is Prime")
                
            # if input number is less than
            # or equal to 1, it is not prime
        else:
            print(arg,"is not Prime")
    return
    
# Calling Now
prime_check(*list(range(101)))  # This will check all the numbers in range 0 to 100 
prime_check(#anynumber)         # Put any number while calling it will check.

Most of previous answers are correct but here is one more way to test to see a number is prime number. As refresher, prime numbers are whole number greater than 1 whose only factors are 1 and itself.(source)

Solution:

Typically you can build a loop and start testing your number to see if it's divisible by 1,2,3 ...up to the number you are testing ...etc but to reduce the time to check, you can divide your number by half of the value of your number because a number cannot be exactly divisible by anything above half of it's value. Example if you want to see 100 is a prime number you can loop through up to 50.

Actual code:

def find_prime(number):
    if(number ==1):
        return False
    # we are dividiing and rounding and then adding the remainder to increment !
    # to cover not fully divisible value to go up forexample 23 becomes 11
    stop=number//2+number%2
    #loop through up to the half of the values
    for item in range(2,stop):
        if number%item==0:
           return False
        print(number)
    return True


if(find_prime(3)):
    print("it's a prime number !!")
else:
    print("it's not a prime")  

best algorithm for Primes number javascript

 function isPrime(num) {
      if (num <= 1) return false;
      else if (num <= 3) return true;
      else if (num % 2 == 0 || num % 3 == 0) return false;
      var i = 5;
      while (i * i <= num) {
        if (num % i == 0 || num % (i + 2) == 0) return false;
        i += 6;
      }
      return true
    }

Way too late to the party, but hope this helps. This is relevant if you are looking for big primes:

To test large odd numbers you need to use the Fermat-test and/or Miller-Rabin test.

These tests use modular exponentiation which is quite expensive, for n bits exponentiation you need at least n big int multiplication and n big int divison. Which means the complexity of modular exponentiation is O(n³).

So before using the big guns, you need to do quite a few trial divisions. But don't do it naively, there is a way to do them fast. First multiply as many primes together as many fits into a the words you use for the big integers. If you use 32 bit words, multiply 3*5*7*11*13*17*19*23*29=3234846615 and compute the greatest common divisor with the number you test using the Euclidean algorithm. After the first step the number is reduced below the word size and continue the algorithm without performing complete big integer divisions. If the GCD != 1, that means one of the primes you multiplied together divides the number, so you have a proof it's not prime. Then continue with 31*37*41*43*47 = 95041567, and so on.

Once you tested several hundred (or thousand) primes this way, you can do 40 rounds of Miller-Rabin test to confirm the number is prime, after 40 rounds you can be certain the number is prime there is only 2^-80 chance it's not (it's more likely your hardware malfunctions...).

import math
import time


def check_prime(n):

    if n == 1:
        return False

    if n == 2:
        return True

    if n % 2 == 0:
        return False

    from_i = 3
    to_i = math.sqrt(n) + 1

    for i in range(from_i, int(to_i), 2):
        if n % i == 0:
            return False
    return True

One can use sympy.

import sympy

sympy.ntheory.primetest.isprime(33393939393929292929292911111111)

True

From sympy docs. The first step is looking for trivial factors, which if found enables a quick return. Next, if the sieve is large enough, use bisection search on the sieve. For small numbers, a set of deterministic Miller-Rabin tests are performed with bases that are known to have no counterexamples in their range. Finally if the number is larger than 2^64, a strong BPSW test is performed. While this is a probable prime test and we believe counterexamples exist, there are no known counterexamples

public static boolean isPrime(int number) {
 if(number < 2)
   return false;
 else if(number == 2 || number == 3)
        return true;
      else {
        for(int i=2;i<=number/2;i++)
           if(number%i == 0)
             return false;
           else if(i==number/2)
                return true;
      }
    return false;
}

In Python:

def is_prime(n):
    return not any(n % p == 0 for p in range(2, int(math.sqrt(n)) + 1))

A more direct conversion from mathematical formalism to Python would use all(n % p != 0... ), but that requires strict evaluation of all values of p. The not any version can terminate early if a True value is found.

bool isPrime(int n)
{
    // Corner cases
    if (n <= 1)  return false;
    if (n <= 3)  return true;

    // This is checked so that we can skip 
    // middle five numbers in below loop
    if (n%2 == 0 || n%3 == 0) return false;

    for (int i=5; i*i<=n; i=i+6)
        if (n%i == 0 || n%(i+2) == 0)
           return false;

    return true;
}

this is just c++ implementation of above AKS algorithm

Let me suggest you the perfect solution for 64 bit integers. Sorry to use C#. You have not already specified it as python in your first post. I hope you can find a simple modPow function and analyze it easily.

public static bool IsPrime(ulong number)
{
    return number == 2 
        ? true 
        : (BigInterger.ModPow(2, number, number) == 2 
            ? (number & 1 != 0 && BinarySearchInA001567(number) == false) 
            : false)
}

public static bool BinarySearchInA001567(ulong number)
{
    // Is number in list?
    // todo: Binary Search in A001567 (https://oeis.org/A001567) below 2 ^ 64
    // Only 2.35 Gigabytes as a text file http://www.cecm.sfu.ca/Pseudoprimes/index-2-to-64.html
}

The fastest algorithm for general prime testing is AKS. The Wikipedia article describes it at lengths and links to the original paper.

If you want to find big numbers, look into primes that have special forms like Mersenne primes.

The algorithm I usually implement (easy to understand and code) is as follows (in Python):

def isprime(n):
    """Returns True if n is prime."""
    if n == 2:
        return True
    if n == 3:
        return True
    if n % 2 == 0:
        return False
    if n % 3 == 0:
        return False

    i = 5
    w = 2

    while i * i <= n:
        if n % i == 0:
            return False

        i += w
        w = 6 - w

    return True

It's a variant of the classic O(sqrt(N)) algorithm. It uses the fact that a prime (except 2 and 3) is of form 6k - 1 or 6k + 1 and looks only at divisors of this form.

Sometimes, If I really want speed and the range is limited, I implement a pseudo-prime test based on Fermat's little theorem. If I really want more speed (i.e. avoid O(sqrt(N)) algorithm altogether), I precompute the false positives (see Carmichael numbers) and do a binary search. This is by far the fastest test I've ever implemented, the only drawback is that the range is limited.

With help of Java-8 streams and lambdas, it can be implemented like this in just few lines:

public static boolean isPrime(int candidate){
        int candidateRoot = (int) Math.sqrt( (double) candidate);
        return IntStream.range(2,candidateRoot)
                .boxed().noneMatch(x -> candidate % x == 0);
    }

Performance should be close to O(sqrt(N)). Maybe someone find it useful.

I think one of the fastest is my method that I made.

void prime(long long int number) {
    // Establishing Variables
    long long int i = 5;
    int w = 2;
    const long long int lim = sqrt(number);

    // Gets 2 and 3 out of the way
    if (number == 1) { cout << number << " is hard to classify. \n";  return; }
    if (number == 2) { cout << number << " is Prime. \n";  return; }
    if (number == 3) { cout << number << " is Prime. \n";  return; }

    // Tests Odd Ball Factors
    if (number % 2 == 0) { cout << number << " is not Prime. \n";  return; }
    if (number % 3 == 0) { cout << number << " is not Prime. \n";  return; }

    while (i <= lim) {
        if (number % i == 0) { cout << number << " is not Prime. \n";  return; }
        // Tests Number
        i = i + w; // Increments number
        w = 6 - i; // We already tested 2 and 3
        // So this removes testing multepules of this
    }
    cout << number << " is Prime. \n"; return;
}

A prime number is any number that is only divisible by 1 and itself. All other numbers are called composite.

The simplest way, of finding a prime number, is to check if the input number is a composite number:

    function isPrime(number) {
        // Check if a number is composite
        for (let i = 2; i < number; i++) {
            if (number % i === 0) {
                return false;
            }
        }
        // Return true for prime numbers
        return true;
    }

The program has to divide the value of number by all the whole numbers from 1 and up to the its value. If this number can be divided evenly not only by one and itself it is a composite number.

The initial value of the variable i has to be 2 because both prime and composite numbers can be evenly divided by 1.

    for (let i = 2; i < number; i++)

Then i is less than number for the same reason. Both prime and composite numbers can be evenly divided by themselves. Therefore there is no reason to check it.

Then we check whether the variable can be divided evenly by using the remainder operator.

    if (number % i === 0) {
        return false;
    }

If the remainder is zero it means that number can be divided evenly, hence being a composite number and returning false.

If the entered number didn't meet the condition, it means it's a prime number and the function returns true.

First Rule of a Prime: If divided by 2 equals a whole number or integer No its not prime.

Fastest method to Know using any computer language is type matching using strings not math. Match the DOT in a stringed Float.

• Divide it by 2,,, n = n / 2
• Convert this to a string,,, n = string(n)
• if "." in n: { printf "Yes I Am Prime !"
  }