Is there a standard sign function signum sgn in C C

Question

I want a function that returns -1 for negative numbers and  1 for positive numbers  http   en wikipedia org wiki Sign function It s easy enough to write my own  but it seems like something that ought to be in a standard library somewhere   Edit  Specifically  I was looking for a function working on floats

User · Answer

int sign float n           union   float f  std  uint32 t i    u   n      return 1 -   u i  gt  gt  31   lt  lt  1       This function assumes    binary32 representation of floating point numbers a compiler that make an exception about the strict aliasing rule when using a named union

User · Answer

You can use boost  math  sign   method from boost math special functions sign hpp if boost is available

User · Answer

The question is old but there is now this kind of desired function  I added a wrapper with not  left shift and dec   You can use a wrapper function based on signbit from C99 in order to get the exact desired behavior  see code further below       Returns whether the sign of x is negative    This can be also applied to infinites  NaNs and zeroes  if zero is unsigned  it is considered positive    include  lt math h gt   int signValue float a        return    signbit a    lt  lt  1  - 1      NB  I use operand not       because the return value of signbit is not specified to be 1  even though the examples let us think it would always be this way  but true for a negative number      Return value   A non-zero value  true  if the sign of x is negative  and zero  false  otherwise    Then I multiply by two with left shift     lt  lt  1   which will give us 2 for a positive number and 0 for a negative one and finally decrement by 1 to obtain 1 and -1 for respectively positive and negative numbers as requested by OP

User · Answer

In general  there is no standard signum function in C C    and the lack of such a fundamental function tells you a lot about these languages   Apart from that  I believe both majority viewpoints about the right approach to define such a function are in a way correct  and the  controversy  about it is actually a non-argument once you take into account two important caveats    A signum function should always return the type of its operand  similarly to an abs   function  because signum is usually used for multiplication with an absolute value after the latter has been processed somehow  Therefore  the major use case of signum is not comparisons but arithmetic  and the latter shouldn t involve any expensive integer-to from-floating-point conversions  Floating point types do not feature a single exact zero value   0 0 can be interpreted as  infinitesimally above zero   and -0 0 as  infinitesimally below zero   That s the reason why comparisons involving zero must internally check against both values  and an expression like x    0 0 can be dangerous    Regarding C  I think the best way forward with integral types is indeed to use the  x  gt  0  -  x  lt  0  expression  as it should be translated in a branch-free fashion  and requires only three basic operations  Best define inline functions that enforce a return type matching the argument type  and add a C11 define  Generic to map these functions to a common name   With floating point values  I think inline functions based on C11 copysignf 1 0f  x   copysign 1 0  x   and copysignl 1 0l  x  are the way to go  simply because they re also highly likely to be branch-free  and additionally do not require casting the result from integer back into a floating point value  You should probably comment prominently that your floating point implementations of signum will not return zero because of the peculiarities of floating point zero values  processing time considerations  and also because it is often very useful in floating point arithmetic to receive the correct -1  1 sign  even for zero values

User · Answer

I don t know of a standard function for it  Here s an interesting way to write it though    x  gt  0  -  x  lt  0    Here s a more readable way to do it   if  x  gt  0  return 1  if  x  lt  0  return -1  return 0    If you like the ternary operator you can do this    x  gt  0    1     x  lt  0    -1   0

User · Answer

Is there a standard sign function  signum  sgn  in C C      Yes  depending on definition   C99 and later has the signbit   macro in  lt math h gt      int signbit real-floating x     The signbit macro returns a nonzero value if and only if the sign of its argument value is negative   C11   7 12 3 6     Yet OP wants something a little different      I want a function that returns -1 for negative numbers and  1 for positive numbers        a function working on floats     define signbit p1 or n1 x     signbit x     -1   1      Deeper   The post is not specific in the following cases  x   0 0  -0 0   NaN  -NaN   A classic signum   returns  1 on x gt 0  -1 on x lt 0 and 0 on x  0   Many answers have already covered that  but do not address x   -0 0   NaN  -NaN   Many are geared for an integer point-of-view that usually lacks Not-a-Numbers  NaN  and -0 0     Typical answers function like signnum typical    On -0 0   NaN  -NaN  they return 0 0  0 0  0 0   int signnum typical double x      if  x  gt  0 0  return 1    if  x  lt  0 0  return -1    return 0      Instead  I propose this functionality  On -0 0   NaN  -NaN  it returns -0 0   NaN  -NaN   double signnum c double x      if  x  gt  0 0  return 1 0    if  x  lt  0 0  return -1 0    return x

User · Answer

There is a C99 math library function called copysign    which takes the sign from one argument and the absolute value from the other   result   copysign 1 0  value     double result   copysignf 1 0  value     float result   copysignl 1 0  value     long double   will give you a result of   - 1 0  depending on the sign of value   Note that floating point zeroes are signed    0  will yield  1  and  -0  will yield -1

User · Answer

While the integer solution in the accepted answer is quite elegant it bothered me that it wouldn t be able to return NAN for double types  so I modified it slightly   template  lt typename T gt  double sgn T val        return double  T 0   lt  val  -  val  lt  T 0     val    val       Note that returning a floating point NAN as opposed to a hard coded NAN causes the sign bit to be set in some implementations  so the output for val   -NAN and val   NAN are going to be identical no matter what  if you prefer a  nan  output over a -nan you can put an abs val  before the return

User · Answer

No  it doesn t exist in c    like in matlab  I use a macro in my programs for this    define sign a       a   lt  0       -1        a   gt  0

User · Answer

If all you want is to test the sign  use signbit  returns true if its argument has a negative sign   Not sure why you would particularly want -1 or  1 returned  copysign is more convenient for that  but it sounds like it will return  1 for negative zero on some platforms with only partial support for negative zero  where signbit presumably would return true

User · Answer

Here s a branching-friendly implementation   inline int signum const double x        if x    0  return 0      return  1 -  static cast lt int gt    reinterpret cast lt const uint64 t  gt   amp x    gt  gt  63   lt  lt  1        Unless your data has zeros as half of the numbers  here the branch predictor will choose one of the branches as the most common  Both branches only involve simple operations   Alternatively  on some compilers and CPU architectures a completely branchless version may be faster   inline int signum const double x        return  x    0              1 -  static cast lt int gt    reinterpret cast lt const uint64 t  gt   amp x    gt  gt  63   lt  lt  1        This works for IEEE 754 double-precision binary floating-point format  binary64

User · Answer

Bit off-topic  but I use this   template lt typename T gt  constexpr int sgn const T  amp a  const T  amp b  noexcept      return  a  gt  b  -  a  lt  b      template lt typename T gt  constexpr int sgn const T  amp a  noexcept      return sgn a  T 0        and I found first function - the one with two arguments  to be much more useful from  standard  sgn    because it is most often used in code like this   int comp unsigned a  unsigned b      return sgn  int a  - int b         vs   int comp unsigned a  unsigned b      return sgn a  b       there is no cast for unsigned types and no additional minus   in fact i have this piece of code using sgn    template  lt class T gt  int comp const T  amp a  const T  amp b       log    all        if  a  lt  b          return -1       if  a  gt  b          return  1       return 0     inline int comp int const a  int const b       log    int        return a - b     inline int comp long int const a  long int const b       log    long        return sgn a  b

User · Answer

Apparently  the answer to the original poster s question is no   There is no standard C   sgn function

User · Answer

double signof double a    return  a    0    0    a lt 0   -1   1

User · Answer

Surprised no one has posted the type-safe C   version yet   template  lt typename T gt  int sgn T val        return  T 0   lt  val  -  val  lt  T 0        Benefits    Actually implements signum  -1  0  or 1   Implementations here using copysign only return -1 or 1  which is not signum  Also  some implementations here are returning a float  or T  rather than an int  which seems wasteful  Works for ints  floats  doubles  unsigned shorts  or any custom types constructible from integer 0 and orderable  Fast  copysign is slow  especially if you need to promote and then narrow again  This is branchless and optimizes excellently Standards-compliant  The bitshift hack is neat  but only works for some bit representations  and doesn t work when you have an unsigned type  It could be provided as a manual specialization when appropriate  Accurate  Simple comparisons with zero can maintain the machine s internal high-precision representation  e g  80 bit on x87   and avoid a premature round to zero    Caveats    It s a template so it might take longer to compile in some circumstances  Apparently some people think use of a new  somewhat esoteric  and very slow standard library function that doesn t even really implement signum is more understandable  The  lt  0 part of the check triggers GCC s -Wtype-limits warning when instantiated for an unsigned type  You can avoid this by using some overloads   template  lt typename T gt  inline constexpr int signum T x  std  false type is signed        return T 0   lt  x     template  lt typename T gt  inline constexpr int signum T x  std  true type is signed        return  T 0   lt  x  -  x  lt  T 0       template  lt typename T gt  inline constexpr int signum T x        return signum x  std  is signed lt T gt           Which is a good example of the first caveat

User · Answer

The accepted Answer with the overload below does indeed not trigger -Wtype-limits   template  lt typename T gt  inline constexpr   int signum T x  std  false type      return T 0   lt  x     template  lt typename T gt  inline constexpr   int signum T x  std  true type      return  T 0   lt  x  -  x  lt  T 0       template  lt typename T gt  inline constexpr   int signum T x      return signum x  std  is signed lt T gt          For C  11 an alternative could be   template  lt typename T gt  typename std  enable if lt std  is unsigned lt T gt   value  int gt   type inline constexpr signum T const x        return T 0   lt  x       template  lt typename T gt  typename std  enable if lt std  is signed lt T gt   value  int gt   type inline constexpr signum T const x        return  T 0   lt  x  -  x  lt  T 0          For me it does not trigger any warnings on GCC 5 3 1

User · Answer

Faster than the above solutions  including the highest rated one    x  lt  0    -1    x  gt  0

User · Answer

My copy of C in a Nutshell reveals the existence of a standard function called copysign which might be useful   It looks as if copysign 1 0  -2 0  would return -1 0 and copysign 1 0  2 0  would return  1 0   Pretty close huh

User · Answer

It seems that most of the answers missed the original question      Is there a standard sign function  signum  sgn  in C C      Not in the standard library  however there is copysign which can be used almost the same way via copysign 1 0  arg  and there is a true sign function in boost  which might as well be part of the standard        include  lt boost math special functions sign hpp gt         Returns 1 if x  gt  0  -1 if x  lt  0  and 0 if x is zero      template  lt class T gt      inline int sign  const T amp  z     http   www boost org doc libs 1 47 0 libs math doc sf and dist html math toolkit utils sign functions html

User · Answer

There s a way to do it without branching  but it s not very pretty   sign   - int   unsigned int   int v   gt  gt   sizeof int    CHAR BIT - 1      http   graphics stanford edu  seander bithacks html  Lots of other interesting  overly-clever stuff on that page  too

User · Answer

Why use ternary operators and if-else when you can simply do this   define sgn x  x  0   0   x abs x

[c++] Is there a standard sign function (signum, sgn) in C/C++?

Examples related to c++

Examples related to c

Examples related to math