Why use Redux over Facebook Flux

Question

I ve read this answer  reducing boilerplate  looked at few GitHub examples and even tried redux a little bit  todo apps     As I understand  official redux doc motivations provide pros comparing to traditional MVC architectures  BUT it doesn t provide an answer to the question    Why you should use Redux over Facebook Flux    Is that only a question of programming styles  functional vs non-functional  Or the question is in abilities dev-tools that follow from redux approach  Maybe scaling  Or testing   Am I right if I say that redux is a flux for people who come from functional languages    To answer this question you may compare the complexity of implementation redux s motivation points on flux vs redux   Here are motivation points from official redux doc motivations    Handling optimistic updates  as I understand  it hardly depends on 5th point  Is it hard to implement it in facebook flux   Rendering on the server  facebook flux also can do this  Any benefits comparing to redux   Fetching data before performing route transitions  Why it can t be achieved in facebook flux  What s the benefits   Hot reload  It s possible with React Hot Reload  Why do we need redux   Undo Redo functionality Any other points  Like persisting state

User · Answer

I m an early adopter and implemented a mid-large single page application using the Facebook Flux library   As I m a little late to the conversation I ll just point out that despite my best hopes Facebook seem to consider their Flux implementation to be a proof of concept and it has never received the attention it deserves   I d encourage you to play with it  as it exposes more of the inner working of the Flux architecture which is quite educational  but at the same time it does not provide many of the benefits that libraries like Redux provide  which aren t that important for small projects  but become very valuable for bigger ones    We have decided that moving forward we will be moving to Redux and I suggest you do the same

User · Answer

In Quora  somebody says       First of all  it is totally possible to write apps with React without   Flux    Also this visual diagram which I ve created to show a quick view of both  probably a quick answer for the people who don t want to read the whole explanation    But if you still interested knowing more  read on      I believe you should start with pure React  then learn Redux and Flux    After you will have some REAL experience with React  you will see   whether Redux is helpful for you or not       Maybe you will feel that Redux is exactly for your app and maybe you   will find out  that Redux is trying to solve a problem you are not   really experiencing       If you start directly with Redux  you may end up with over-engineered   code  code harder to maintain and with even more bugs and than without   Redux    From Redux docs      Motivation  As the requirements for JavaScript single-page applications have become increasingly complicated  our   code must manage more state than ever before  This state can include   server responses and cached data  as well as locally created data that   has not yet been persisted to the server  UI state is also increasing   in complexity  as we need to manage active routes  selected tabs    spinners  pagination controls  and so on       Managing this ever-changing state is hard  If a model can update   another model  then a view can update a model  which updates another   model  and this  in turn  might cause another view to update  At some   point  you no longer understand what happens in your app as you have   lost control over the when  why  and how of its state  When a system   is opaque and non-deterministic  it s hard to reproduce bugs or add   new features       As if this wasn t bad enough  consider the new requirements becoming   common in front-end product development  As developers  we are   expected to handle optimistic updates  server-side rendering  fetching   data before performing route transitions  and so on  We find ourselves   trying to manage a complexity that we have never had to deal with   before  and we inevitably ask the question  Is it time to give up  The   answer is No       This complexity is difficult to handle as we re mixing two concepts   that are very hard for the human mind to reason about  mutation and   asynchronicity  I call them Mentos and Coke  Both can be great when   separated  but together they create a mess  Libraries like React   attempt to solve this problem in the view layer by removing both   asynchrony and direct DOM manipulation  However  managing the state of   your data is left up to you  This is where Redux comes in       Following in the footsteps of Flux  CQRS  and Event Sourcing  Redux   attempts to make state mutations predictable by imposing certain   restrictions on how and when updates can happen  These restrictions   are reflected in the three principles of Redux    Also from Redux docs      Core Concepts Redux itself is very simple       Imagine your app s state is described as a plain object  For example    the state of a todo app might look like this       todos         text   Eat food       completed  true            text   Exercise       completed  false         visibilityFilter   SHOW COMPLETED          This object is like a  model  except that there are no setters  This   is so that different parts of the code can   t change the state   arbitrarily  causing hard-to-reproduce bugs       To change something in the state  you need to dispatch an action  An   action is a plain JavaScript object  notice how we don t introduce any   magic   that describes what happened  Here are a few example actions     type   ADD TODO   text   Go to swimming pool      type   TOGGLE TODO   index  1     type   SET VISIBILITY FILTER   filter   SHOW ALL          Enforcing that every change is described as an action lets us have a   clear understanding of what   s going on in the app  If something   changed  we know why it changed  Actions are like breadcrumbs of what   has happened  Finally  to tie state and actions together  we write a   function called a reducer  Again  nothing magic about it     it s just a   function that takes state and action as arguments  and returns the   next state of the app  It would be hard to write such a function for a   big app  so we write smaller functions managing parts of the state   function visibilityFilter state    SHOW ALL   action      if  action type      SET VISIBILITY FILTER         return action filter      else       return state         function todos state       action      switch  action type      case  ADD TODO       return state concat    text  action text  completed  false        case  TOGGLE TODO       return state map  todo  index    gt        action index     index             text  todo text  completed   todo completed             todo        default      return state              And we write another reducer that manages the complete state of our   app by calling those two reducers for the corresponding state keys   function todoApp state       action      return       todos  todos state todos  action       visibilityFilter  visibilityFilter state visibilityFilter  action               This is basically the whole idea of Redux  Note that we haven t used   any Redux APIs  It comes with a few utilities to facilitate this   pattern  but the main idea is that you describe how your state is   updated over time in response to action objects  and 90  of the code   you write is just plain JavaScript  with no use of Redux itself  its   APIs  or any magic

User · Answer

I worked quite a long time with Flux and now quite a long time using Redux  As Dan pointed out both architectures are not so different  The thing is that Redux makes the things simpler and cleaner  It teaches you a couple of things on top of Flux  Like for example Flux is a perfect example of one-direction data flow  Separation of concerns where we have data  its manipulations and view layer separated  In Redux we have the same things but we also learn about immutability and pure functions

User · Answer

From a new react redux adopter migrating from  a few years of  ExtJS in mid-2018    After sliding backward down the redux learning curve I had the same question and thought pure flux would be simpler like OP    I soon saw the benefits of redux over flux as noted in the answers above  and was working it into my first app    While getting a grip on the boiler plate again  I tried out a few of the other state management libs  the best I found was rematch    It was much more intuitive then vanilla redux  it cuts out 90  of the boilerplate and cut out 75  of the time I was spending on redux  something I think a library should be doing   I was able to get a couple enterprise apps going right away   It also runs with the same redux tooling  This is a good article that covers some of the benefits   So for anyone else who arrived to this SO post searching  simpler redux   I recommend trying it out as a simple alternative to redux with all the benefits and 1 4 of the boilerplate

User · Answer

Here is the simple explanation of Redux over Flux  Redux does not have a dispatcher It relies on pure functions called reducers  It does not need a dispatcher  Each actions are handled by one or more reducers to update the single store  Since data is immutable  reducers returns a new updated state that updates the store  For more information Flux vs Redux

User · Answer

You might be best starting with reading this post by Dan Abramov where he discusses various implementations of Flux and their trade-offs at the time he was writing redux  The Evolution of Flux Frameworks  Secondly that motivations page you link to does not really discuss the motivations of Redux so much as the motivations behind Flux  and React   The Three Principles is more Redux specific though still does not deal with the implementation differences from the standard Flux architecture   Basically  Flux has multiple stores that compute state change in response to UI API interactions with components and broadcast these changes as events that components can subscribe to  In Redux  there is only one store that every component subscribes to  IMO it feels at least like Redux further simplifies and unifies the flow of data by unifying  or reducing  as Redux would say  the flow of data back to the components - whereas Flux concentrates on unifying the other side of the data flow - view to model

User · Answer

Redux author here     Redux is not that different from Flux  Overall it has same architecture  but Redux is able to cut some complexity corners by using functional composition where Flux uses callback registration   There is not a fundamental difference in Redux  but I find it makes certain abstractions easier  or at least possible to implement  that would be hard or impossible to implement in Flux   Reducer Composition  Take  for example  pagination  My Flux   React Router example handles pagination  but the code for that is awful  One of the reasons it s awful is that Flux makes it unnatural to reuse functionality across stores  If two stores need to handle pagination in response to different actions  they either need to inherit from a common base store  bad  you re locking yourself into a particular design when you use inheritance   or call an externally defined function from within the event handler  which will need to somehow operate on the Flux store s private state  The whole thing is messy  although definitely in the realm of possible    On the other hand  with Redux pagination is natural thanks to reducer composition  It s reducers all the way down  so you can write a reducer factory that generates pagination reducers and then use it in your reducer tree  The key to why it s so easy is because in Flux  stores are flat  but in Redux  reducers can be nested via functional composition  just like React components can be nested   This pattern also enables wonderful features like no-user-code undo redo  Can you imagine plugging Undo Redo into a Flux app being two lines of code  Hardly  With Redux  it is   again  thanks to reducer composition pattern  I need to highlight there s nothing new about it   this is the pattern pioneered and described in detail in Elm Architecture which was itself influenced by Flux   Server Rendering  People have been rendering on the server fine with Flux  but seeing that we have 20 Flux libraries each attempting to make server rendering    easier     perhaps Flux has some rough edges on the server  The truth is Facebook doesn t do much server rendering  so they haven t been very concerned about it  and rely on the ecosystem to make it easier   In traditional Flux  stores are singletons  This means it s hard to separate the data for different requests on the server  Not impossible  but hard  This is why most Flux libraries  as well as the new Flux Utils  now suggest you use classes instead of singletons  so you can instantiate stores per request   There are still the following problems that you need to solve in Flux  either yourself or with the help of your favorite Flux library such as Flummox or Alt     If stores are classes  how do I create and destroy them with dispatcher per request  When do I register stores  How do I hydrate the data from the stores and later rehydrate it on the client  Do I need to implement special methods for this    Admittedly Flux frameworks  not vanilla Flux  have solutions to these problems  but I find them overcomplicated  For example  Flummox asks you to implement serialize   and deserialize   in your stores  Alt solves this nicer by providing takeSnapshot   that automatically serializes your state in a JSON tree   Redux just goes further  since there is just a single store  managed by many reducers   you don t need any special API to manage the  re hydration  You don t need to    flush    or    hydrate    stores   there s just a single store  and you can read its current state  or create a new store with a new state  Each request gets a separate store instance  Read more about server rendering with Redux   Again  this is a case of something possible both in Flux and Redux  but Flux libraries solve this problem by introducing a ton of API and conventions  and Redux doesn t even have to solve it because it doesn t have that problem in the first place thanks to conceptual simplicity   Developer Experience  I didn t actually intend Redux to become a popular Flux library   I wrote it as I was working on my ReactEurope talk on hot reloading with time travel  I had one main objective  make it possible to change reducer code on the fly or even    change the past    by crossing out actions  and see the state being recalculated     I haven t seen a single Flux library that is able to do this  React Hot Loader also doesn t let you do this   in fact it breaks if you edit Flux stores because it doesn t know what to do with them   When Redux needs to reload the reducer code  it calls replaceReducer    and the app runs with the new code  In Flux  data and functions are entangled in Flux stores  so you can t    just replace the functions     Moreover  you d have to somehow re-register the new versions with the Dispatcher   something Redux doesn t even have   Ecosystem  Redux has a rich and fast-growing ecosystem  This is because it provides a few extension points such as middleware  It was designed with use cases such as logging  support for Promises  Observables  routing  immutability dev checks  persistence  etc  in mind  Not all of these will turn out to be useful  but it s nice to have access to a set of tools that can be easily combined to work together   Simplicity  Redux preserves all the benefits of Flux  recording and replaying of actions  unidirectional data flow  dependent mutations  and adds new benefits  easy undo-redo  hot reloading  without introducing Dispatcher and store registration   Keeping it simple is important because it keeps you sane while you implement higher-level abstractions   Unlike most Flux libraries  Redux API surface is tiny  If you remove the developer warnings  comments  and sanity checks  it s 99 lines  There is no tricky async code to debug   You can actually read it and understand all of Redux     See also my answer on downsides of using Redux compared to Flux

User · Answer

According to this article  https   medium freecodecamp org a-realworld-comparison-of-front-end-frameworks-with-benchmarks-2019-update-4be0d3c78075  You better use MobX to manage the data in your app to get better performance  not Redux

[javascript] Why use Redux over Facebook Flux?

Examples related to javascript

Examples related to reactjs

Examples related to reactjs-flux

Examples related to flux

Examples related to redux