I have a data.frame which I would like to convert to a list by rows, meaning each row would correspond to its own list elements. In other words, I would like a list that is as long as the data.frame has rows.
So far, I've tackled this problem in the following manner, but I was wondering if there's a better way to approach this.
xy.df <- data.frame(x = runif(10), y = runif(10))
# pre-allocate a list and fill it with a loop
xy.list <- vector("list", nrow(xy.df))
for (i in 1:nrow(xy.df)) {
xy.list[[i]] <- xy.df[i,]
}
Seems a current version of the purrr (0.2.2) package is the fastest solution:
by_row(x, function(v) list(v)[[1L]], .collate = "list")$.out
Let's compare the most interesting solutions:
data("Batting", package = "Lahman")
x <- Batting[1:10000, 1:10]
library(benchr)
library(purrr)
benchmark(
split = split(x, seq_len(.row_names_info(x, 2L))),
mapply = .mapply(function(...) structure(list(...), class = "data.frame", row.names = 1L), x, NULL),
purrr = by_row(x, function(v) list(v)[[1L]], .collate = "list")$.out
)
Rsults:
Benchmark summary:
Time units : milliseconds
expr n.eval min lw.qu median mean up.qu max total relative
split 100 983.0 1060.0 1130.0 1130.0 1180.0 1450 113000 34.3
mapply 100 826.0 894.0 963.0 972.0 1030.0 1320 97200 29.3
purrr 100 24.1 28.6 32.9 44.9 40.5 183 4490 1.0
Also we can get the same result with Rcpp:
#include <Rcpp.h>
using namespace Rcpp;
// [[Rcpp::export]]
List df2list(const DataFrame& x) {
std::size_t nrows = x.rows();
std::size_t ncols = x.cols();
CharacterVector nms = x.names();
List res(no_init(nrows));
for (std::size_t i = 0; i < nrows; ++i) {
List tmp(no_init(ncols));
for (std::size_t j = 0; j < ncols; ++j) {
switch(TYPEOF(x[j])) {
case INTSXP: {
if (Rf_isFactor(x[j])) {
IntegerVector t = as<IntegerVector>(x[j]);
RObject t2 = wrap(t[i]);
t2.attr("class") = "factor";
t2.attr("levels") = t.attr("levels");
tmp[j] = t2;
} else {
tmp[j] = as<IntegerVector>(x[j])[i];
}
break;
}
case LGLSXP: {
tmp[j] = as<LogicalVector>(x[j])[i];
break;
}
case CPLXSXP: {
tmp[j] = as<ComplexVector>(x[j])[i];
break;
}
case REALSXP: {
tmp[j] = as<NumericVector>(x[j])[i];
break;
}
case STRSXP: {
tmp[j] = as<std::string>(as<CharacterVector>(x[j])[i]);
break;
}
default: stop("Unsupported type '%s'.", type2name(x));
}
}
tmp.attr("class") = "data.frame";
tmp.attr("row.names") = 1;
tmp.attr("names") = nms;
res[i] = tmp;
}
res.attr("names") = x.attr("row.names");
return res;
}
Now caompare with purrr:
benchmark(
purrr = by_row(x, function(v) list(v)[[1L]], .collate = "list")$.out,
rcpp = df2list(x)
)
Results:
Benchmark summary:
Time units : milliseconds
expr n.eval min lw.qu median mean up.qu max total relative
purrr 100 25.2 29.8 37.5 43.4 44.2 159.0 4340 1.1
rcpp 100 19.0 27.9 34.3 35.8 37.2 93.8 3580 1.0
The best way for me was:
Example data:
Var1<-c("X1",X2","X3")
Var2<-c("X1",X2","X3")
Var3<-c("X1",X2","X3")
Data<-cbind(Var1,Var2,Var3)
ID Var1 Var2 Var3
1 X1 X2 X3
2 X4 X5 X6
3 X7 X8 X9
We call the BBmisc library
library(BBmisc)
data$lists<-convertRowsToList(data[,2:4])
And the result will be:
ID Var1 Var2 Var3 lists
1 X1 X2 X3 list("X1", "X2", X3")
2 X4 X5 X6 list("X4","X5", "X6")
3 X7 X8 X9 list("X7,"X8,"X9)
A couple of more options :
With asplit
asplit(xy.df, 1)
#[[1]]
# x y
#0.1137 0.6936
#[[2]]
# x y
#0.6223 0.5450
#[[3]]
# x y
#0.6093 0.2827
#....
With split and row
split(xy.df, row(xy.df)[, 1])
#$`1`
# x y
#1 0.1137 0.6936
#$`2`
# x y
#2 0.6223 0.545
#$`3`
# x y
#3 0.6093 0.2827
#....
data
set.seed(1234)
xy.df <- data.frame(x = runif(10), y = runif(10))
If you want to completely abuse the data.frame (as I do) and like to keep the $ functionality, one way is to split you data.frame into one-line data.frames gathered in a list :
> df = data.frame(x=c('a','b','c'), y=3:1)
> df
x y
1 a 3
2 b 2
3 c 1
# 'convert' into a list of data.frames
ldf = lapply(as.list(1:dim(df)[1]), function(x) df[x[1],])
> ldf
[[1]]
x y
1 a 3
[[2]]
x y
2 b 2
[[3]]
x y
3 c 1
# and the 'coolest'
> ldf[[2]]$y
[1] 2
It is not only intellectual masturbation, but allows to 'transform' the data.frame into a list of its lines, keeping the $ indexation which can be useful for further use with lapply (assuming the function you pass to lapply uses this $ indexation)
Eureka!
xy.list <- as.list(as.data.frame(t(xy.df)))
An alternative way is to convert the df to a matrix then applying the list apply lappy function over it: ldf <- lapply(as.matrix(myDF), function(x)x)
The by_row function from the purrrlyr package will do this for you.
This example demonstrates
myfn <- function(row) {
#row is a tibble with one row, and the same number of columns as the original df
l <- as.list(row)
return(l)
}
list_of_lists <- purrrlyr::by_row(df, myfn, .labels=FALSE)$.out
By default, the returned value from myfn is put into a new list column in the df called .out. The $.out at the end of the above statement immediately selects this column, returning a list of lists.
Like @flodel wrote: This converts your dataframe into a list that has the same number of elements as number of rows in dataframe:
NewList <- split(df, f = seq(nrow(df)))
You can additionaly add a function to select only those columns that are not NA in each element of the list:
NewList2 <- lapply(NewList, function(x) x[,!is.na(x)])
Another alternative using library(purrr) (that seems to be a bit quicker on large data.frames)
flatten(by_row(xy.df, ..f = function(x) flatten_chr(x), .labels = FALSE))
I was working on this today for a data.frame (really a data.table) with millions of observations and 35 columns. My goal was to return a list of data.frames (data.tables) each with a single row. That is, I wanted to split each row into a separate data.frame and store these in a list.
Here are two methods I came up with that were roughly 3 times faster than split(dat, seq_len(nrow(dat))) for that data set. Below, I benchmark the three methods on a 7500 row, 5 column data set (iris repeated 50 times).
library(data.table)
library(microbenchmark)
microbenchmark(
split={dat1 <- split(dat, seq_len(nrow(dat)))},
setDF={dat2 <- lapply(seq_len(nrow(dat)),
function(i) setDF(lapply(dat, "[", i)))},
attrDT={dat3 <- lapply(seq_len(nrow(dat)),
function(i) {
tmp <- lapply(dat, "[", i)
attr(tmp, "class") <- c("data.table", "data.frame")
setDF(tmp)
})},
datList = {datL <- lapply(seq_len(nrow(dat)),
function(i) lapply(dat, "[", i))},
times=20
)
This returns
Unit: milliseconds
expr min lq mean median uq max neval
split 861.8126 889.1849 973.5294 943.2288 1041.7206 1250.6150 20
setDF 459.0577 466.3432 511.2656 482.1943 500.6958 750.6635 20
attrDT 399.1999 409.6316 461.6454 422.5436 490.5620 717.6355 20
datList 192.1175 201.9896 241.4726 208.4535 246.4299 411.2097 20
While the differences are not as large as in my previous test, the straight setDF method is significantly faster at all levels of the distribution of runs with max(setDF) < min(split) and the attr method is typically more than twice as fast.
A fourth method is the extreme champion, which is a simple nested lapply, returning a nested list. This method exemplifies the cost of constructing a data.frame from a list. Moreover, all methods I tried with the data.frame function were roughly an order of magnitude slower than the data.table techniques.
data
dat <- vector("list", 50)
for(i in 1:50) dat[[i]] <- iris
dat <- setDF(rbindlist(dat))
A more modern solution uses only purrr::transpose:
library(purrr)
iris[1:2,] %>% purrr::transpose()
#> [[1]]
#> [[1]]$Sepal.Length
#> [1] 5.1
#>
#> [[1]]$Sepal.Width
#> [1] 3.5
#>
#> [[1]]$Petal.Length
#> [1] 1.4
#>
#> [[1]]$Petal.Width
#> [1] 0.2
#>
#> [[1]]$Species
#> [1] 1
#>
#>
#> [[2]]
#> [[2]]$Sepal.Length
#> [1] 4.9
#>
#> [[2]]$Sepal.Width
#> [1] 3
#>
#> [[2]]$Petal.Length
#> [1] 1.4
#>
#> [[2]]$Petal.Width
#> [1] 0.2
#>
#> [[2]]$Species
#> [1] 1
Source: Stackoverflow.com