HTTP response code for POST when resource already exists

Question

I m building a server that allows clients to store objects   Those objects are fully constructed at client side  complete with object IDs that are permanent for the whole lifetime of the object   I have defined the API so that clients can create or modify objects using PUT   PUT  objects  id  HTTP 1 1       json representation of the object    The  id  is the object ID  so it is part of the Request-URI   Now  I m also considering allowing clients to create the object using POST   POST  objects  HTTP 1 1       json representation of the object  including ID    Since POST is meant as  append  operation  I m not sure what to do in case the object is already there   Should I treat the request as modification request or should I return some error code  which

User · Answer

This is a user side fault and belongs to 4xx group  This is the right answer https   developers rebrandly com docs 403-already-exists-errors

User · Answer

In your case you can use 409 Conflict  And if you want to check another HTTPs status codes from below list   1     Informational  100 Continue 101 Switching Protocols 102 Processing   2     Success  200 OK 201 Created 202 Accepted 203 Non-authoritative Information 204 No Content 205 Reset Content 206 Partial Content 207 Multi-Status 208 Already Reported 226 IM Used   3     Redirection  300 Multiple Choices 301 Moved Permanently 302 Found 303 See Other 304 Not Modified 305 Use Proxy 307 Temporary Redirect 308 Permanent Redirect   4     Client Error  400 Bad Request 401 Unauthorized 402 Payment Required 403 Forbidden 404 Not Found 405 Method Not Allowed 406 Not Acceptable 407 Proxy Authentication Required 408 Request Timeout 409 Conflict 410 Gone 411 Length Required 412 Precondition Failed 413 Payload Too Large 414 Request-URI Too Long 415 Unsupported Media Type 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable 417 Expectation Failed 418 I   m a teapot 421 Misdirected Request 422 Unprocessable Entity 423 Locked 424 Failed Dependency 426 Upgrade Required 428 Precondition Required 429 Too Many Requests 431 Request Header Fields Too Large 444 Connection Closed Without Response 451 Unavailable For Legal Reasons 499 Client Closed Request   5     Server Error  500 Internal Server Error 501 Not Implemented 502 Bad Gateway 503 Service Unavailable 504 Gateway Timeout 505 HTTP Version Not Supported 506 Variant Also Negotiates 507 Insufficient Storage 508 Loop Detected 510 Not Extended 511 Network Authentication Required 599 Network Connect Timeout Error

User · Answer

According to RFC 7231  a 303 See Other MAY be used If the result of processing a POST would be equivalent to a    representation of an existing resource

User · Answer

What about 208 - http   httpstatusdogs com 208-already-reported   Is that a option   In my opinion  if the only thing is a repeat resource no error should be raised  After all  there is no error neither on the client or server sides

User · Answer

Another potential treatment is using PATCH after all  A PATCH is defined as something that changes the internal state and is not restricted to appending   PATCH would solve the problem by allowing you to update already existing items  See  RFC 5789  PATCH

User · Answer

I think for REST  you just have to make a decision on the behavior for that particular system in which case  I think the  right  answer would be one of a couple answers given here  If you want the request to stop and behave as if the client made a mistake that it needs to fix before continuing  then use 409  If the conflict really isn t that important and want to keep the request going  then respond by redirecting the client to the entity that was found  I think proper REST APIs should be redirecting  or at least providing the location header  to the GET endpoint for that resource following a POST anyway  so this behavior would give a consistent experience   EDIT  It s also worth noting that you should consider a PUT since you re providing the ID  Then the behavior is simple   I don t care what s there right now  put this thing there   Meaning  if nothing is there  it ll be created  if something is there it ll be replaced  I think a POST is more appropriate when the server manages that ID  Separating the two concepts basically tells you how to deal with it  i e  PUT is idempotent so it should always work so long as the payload validates  POST always creates  so if there is a collision of IDs  then a 409 would describe that conflict

User · Answer

Stumbled upon this question while checking for correct code for duplicate record   Pardon my ignorance but I don t understand why everyone is ignoring the code  300  which clearly says  multiple choice  or  Ambiguous   In my opinion this would be the perfect code for building a non standard or a particular system for your own use  I could be wrong as well   https   tools ietf org html rfc7231 section-6 4 1

User · Answer

I don t think you should do this    The POST is  as you know  to modify the collection and it s used to CREATE a new item  So  if you send the id  I think it s not a good idea   you should modify the collection  i e   modify the item  but it s confusing    Use it to add an item  without id  It s the best practice    If you want to capture an UNIQUE constraint  not the id  you can response 409  as you can do in PUT requests  But not the ID

User · Answer

Why not a 202 Accepted  It s an OK request  200s   there were no client errors  400s   per se   From 10 Status Code Definitions       202 Accepted  The request has been accepted for processing  but the processing has not been completed         because it didn t need to be completed  because it already existed  The client doesn t know it already existed  they didn t do anything wrong   I m leaning on throwing a 202  and returning similar content to what a GET   resource   id  would have returned

User · Answer

302 Found  sounds logical for me  And the RFC 2616 says that it CAN be answered for other requests than GET and HEAD  and this surely includes POST   But it still keeps the visitor going to this URL to get this  Found  resource  by the RFC  To make it to go directly to the real  Found  URL one should be using  303 See Other   which makes sense  but forces another call to GET its following URL  On the good side  this GET is cacheable   I think that I would use  303 See Other   I dont know if I can respond with the  thing  found in the body  but I would like to do so to save one roundtrip to the server   UPDATE  After re-reading the RFC  I still think that an inexistent  4XX 303 Found  code should be the correct  However  the  409 Conflict  is the best existing answer code  as pointed by  Wrikken   maybe including a Location header pointing to the existing resource

User · Answer

More likely it is 400 Bad Request     6 5 1   400 Bad Request      The 400  Bad Request  status code indicates that the server cannot or      will not process the request due to something that is perceived to be      a client error  e g   malformed request syntax  invalid request      message framing  or deceptive request routing     As the request contains duplicate value value that already exists   it can be perceived as a client error  Need to change the request before the next try   By considering these facts we can conclude as HTTP STATUS 400 Bad Request

User · Answer

I know it s been ages but I will leave an answer here which I see fit  I think the best will be to use HTTP 306 RESERVED

User · Answer

Personally I go with the WebDAV extension 422 Unprocessable Entity   According to RFC 4918     The 422 Unprocessable Entity status code means the server understands the content type of the request entity  hence a 415 Unsupported Media Type status code is inappropriate   and the syntax of the request entity is correct  thus a 400 Bad Request status code is inappropriate  but was unable to process the contained instructions

User · Answer

It s all about context  and also who is responsible for handling duplicates in requests  server or client or both     If server just point the duplicate  look at 4xx    400 Bad Request - when the server will not process a request because it s obvious client fault 409 Conflict - if the server will not process a request  but the reason for that is not the client s fault        For implicit handling of duplicates  look at 2XX    200 OK 201 Created       if the server is expected to return something  look at 3XX    302 Found 303 See Other       when the server is able to point the existing resource  it implies a redirection     If the above is not enough  it s always a good practice to prepare some error message in the body of the response

User · Answer

Late to the game maybe but I stumbled upon this semantics issue while trying to make a REST API   To expand a little on Wrikken s answer  I think you could use either 409 Conflict or 403 Forbidden depending on the situation - in short  use a 403 error when the user can do absolutely nothing to resolve the conflict and complete the request  e g  they can t send a DELETE request to explicitly remove the resource   or use 409 if something could possibly be done      10 4 4 403 Forbidden      The server understood the request  but is refusing to fulfill it    Authorization will not help and the request SHOULD NOT be repeated  If   the request method was not HEAD and the server wishes to make public   why the request has not been fulfilled  it SHOULD describe the reason   for the refusal in the entity  If the server does not wish to make   this information available to the client  the status code 404  Not   Found  can be used instead    Nowadays  someone says  403  and a permissions or authentication issue comes to mind  but the spec says that it s basically the server telling the client that it s not going to do it  don t ask it again  and here s why the client shouldn t   As for PUT vs  POST    POST should be used to create a new instance of a resource when the user has no means to or shouldn t create an identifier for the resource  PUT is used when the resource s identity is known      9 6 PUT               The fundamental difference between the POST and PUT requests is   reflected in the different meaning of the Request-URI  The URI in a   POST request identifies the resource that will handle the enclosed   entity  That resource might be a data-accepting process  a gateway to   some other protocol  or a separate entity that accepts annotations  In   contrast  the URI in a PUT request identifies the entity enclosed with   the request -- the user agent knows what URI is intended and the   server MUST NOT attempt to apply the request to some other resource    If the server desires that the request be applied to a different URI       it MUST send a 301  Moved Permanently  response  the user agent MAY   then make its own decision regarding whether or not to redirect the   request

User · Answer

I would go with 422 Unprocessable Entity  which is used when a request is invalid but the issue is not in syntax or authentication   As an argument against other answers  to use any non-4xx error code would imply it s not a client error  and it obviously is  To use a non-4xx error code to represent a client error just makes no sense at all   It seems that 409 Conflict is the most common answer here  but  according to the spec  that implies that the resource already exists and the new data you are applying to it is incompatible with its current state  If you are sending a POST request  with  for example  a username that is already taken  it s not actually conflicting with the target resource  as the target resource  the resource you re trying to create  has not yet been posted  It s an error specifically for version control  when there is a conflict between the version of the resource stored and the version of the resource requested  It s very useful for that purpose  for example when the client has cached an old version of the resource and sends a request based on that incorrect version which would no longer be conditionally valid   In this case  the response representation would likely contain information useful for merging the differences based on the revision history   The request to create another user with that username is just unprocessable  having nothing to do with version control   For the record  422 is also the status code GitHub uses when you try to create a repository by a name already in use

User · Answer

My feeling is 409 Conflict is the most appropriate  however  seldom seen in the wild of course   The request could not be completed due to a conflict with the current state of the resource  This code is only allowed in situations where it is expected that the user might be able to resolve the conflict and resubmit the request  The response body SHOULD include enough information for the user to recognize the source of the conflict  Ideally  the response entity would include enough information for the user or user agent to fix the problem  however  that might not be possible and is not required  Conflicts are most likely to occur in response to a PUT request  For example  if versioning were being used and the entity being PUT included changes to a resource which conflict with those made by an earlier  third-party  request  the server might use the 409 response to indicate that it can t complete the request  In this case  the response entity would likely contain a list of the differences between the two versions in a format defined by the response Content-Type

[rest] HTTP response code for POST when resource already exists

Examples related to rest

Examples related to http

Examples related to http-status-codes