S3 limit to objects in a bucket

Question

Does anyone know if there is a limit to the number of objects I can put in an S3 bucket  can I put a million  10 million etc   all in a single bucket

User · Answer

It looks like the limit has changed  You can store 5TB for a single object      The total volume of data and number of objects you can store are unlimited  Individual Amazon S3 objects can range in size from a minimum of 0 bytes to a maximum of 5 terabytes  The largest object that can be uploaded in a single PUT is 5 gigabytes  For objects larger than 100 megabytes  customers should consider using the Multipart Upload capability    http   aws amazon com s3 faqs  How much data can I store

User · Answer

There are no limits to the number of objects you can store in your S3 bucket  AWS claims it to have unlimited storage  However  there are some limitations -   By default  customers can provision up to 100 buckets per AWS account  However  you can increase your Amazon S3 bucket limit by visiting AWS Service Limits  An object can be 0 bytes to 5TB  The largest object that can be uploaded in a single PUT is 5 gigabytes For objects larger than 100 megabytes  customers should consider using the Multipart Upload capability    That being said if you really have a lot of objects to be stored in S3 bucket consider randomizing your object name prefix to improve performance      When your workload is a mix of request types  introduce some randomness to key names by adding a hash string as a prefix to the key name  By introducing randomness to your key names the I O load will be distributed across multiple index partitions  For example  you can compute an MD5 hash of the character sequence that you plan to assign as the key and add 3 or 4 characters from the hash as a prefix to the key name     More details - https   aws amazon com premiumsupport knowledge-center s3-bucket-performance-improve   -- As of June 2018

User · Answer

There is no limit on objects per bucket  There is a limit of 100 buckets per account   you need to request amazon if you need more   There is no performance drop even if you store millions of objects in a single bucket    From docs      There is no limit to the number of objects that can be stored in a   bucket and no difference in performance whether you use many buckets   or just a few  You can store all of your objects in a single bucket    or you can organize them across several buckets    as of Aug 2016

User · Answer

While you can store an unlimited number of files objects in a single bucket  when you go to list a  directory  in a bucket  it will only give you the first 1000 files objects in that bucket by default  To access all the files in a large  directory  like this  you need to make multiple calls to their API

User · Answer

According to Amazon   Write  read  and delete objects containing from 0 bytes to 5 terabytes of data each  The number of objects you can store is unlimited   Source  http   aws amazon com s3 details  as of Sep 3  2015

User · Answer

You can store as many objects as you want within a bucket  and write    read  and delete objects in your bucket  Objects can be up to 5   terabytes in size     from http   aws amazon com s3 details   as of Mar 4th 2015

User · Answer

Acyra- performance of object delivery from a single bucket would depend greatly on the names of the objects in it    If the file names were distanced by random characters then their physical locations would be spread further on the AWS hardware  but if you named everything  common-x jpg    common-y jpg  then those objects will be stored together    This may slow delivery of the files if you request them simultaneously but not by enough to worry you  the greater risk is from data-loss or an outage  since these objects are stored together they will be lost or unavailable together

[amazon-s3] S3 limit to objects in a bucket

Examples related to amazon-s3

Examples related to amazon-web-services