[c++] Why std::cout instead of simply cout?

I get these error messages for all cout and endl:

main.cc:17:5: error: ‘cout’ was not declared in this scope
main.cc:17:5: note: suggested alternative:
/usr/include/c++/4.6/iostream:62:18: note:   ‘std::cout’

After following the suggestion, everything is fine. Now I am curious, why I had to do that. We used C++ in classes before, but I never had to write a std:: before any of those commands. What might be different on this system?

This question is related to c++ iostream

The answer is


Everything in the Standard Template/Iostream Library resides in namespace std. You've probably used:

using namespace std;

In your classes, and that's why it worked.


If you are working in ROOT, you do not even have to write #include<iostream> and using namespace std; simply start from int filename().

This will solve the issue.


In the C++ standard, cout is defined in the std namespace, so you need to either say std::cout or put

using namespace std;

in your code in order to get at it.

However, this was not always the case, and in the past cout was just in the global namespace (or, later on, in both global and std). I would therefore conclude that your classes used an older C++ compiler.



"std" is a namespace used for STL (Standard Template Library). Please refer to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namespace#Use_in_common_languages

You can either write using namespace std; before using any stl functions, variables or just insert std:: before them.


You probably had using namespace std; before in your code you did in class. That explicitly tells the precompiler to look for the symbols in std, which means you don't need to std::. Though it is good practice to std::cout instead of cout so you explicitly invoke std::cout every time. That way if you are using another library that redefines cout, you still have the std::cout behavior instead of some other custom behavior.