Say I have an image of size 3841 x 7195 pixels. I would like to save the contents of the figure to disk, resulting in an image of the exact size I specify in pixels.
No axis, no titles. Just the image. I don't personally care about DPIs, as I only want to specify the size the image takes in the screen in disk in pixels.
I have read other threads, and they all seem to do conversions to inches and then specify the dimensions of the figure in inches and adjust dpi's in some way. I would like to avoid dealing with the potential loss of accuracy that could result from pixel-to-inches conversions.
I have tried with:
w = 7195
h = 3841
fig = plt.figure(frameon=False)
fig.set_size_inches(w,h)
ax = plt.Axes(fig, [0., 0., 1., 1.])
ax.set_axis_off()
fig.add_axes(ax)
ax.imshow(im_np, aspect='normal')
fig.savefig(some_path, dpi=1)
with no luck (Python complains that width and height must each be below 32768 (?))
From everything I have seen, matplotlib
requires the figure size to be specified in inches
and dpi
, but I am only interested in the pixels the figure takes in disk. How can I do this?
To clarify: I am looking for a way to do this with matplotlib
, and not with other image-saving libraries.
This question is related to
python
matplotlib
scipy
plt.imsave worked for me. You can find the documentation here: https://matplotlib.org/3.2.1/api/_as_gen/matplotlib.pyplot.imsave.html
#file_path = directory address where the image will be stored along with file name and extension
#array = variable where the image is stored. I think for the original post this variable is im_np
plt.imsave(file_path, array)
This solution works for matplotlib versions 3.0.1, 3.0.3 and 3.2.1.
def save_inp_as_output(_img, c_name, dpi=100):
h, w, _ = _img.shape
fig, axes = plt.subplots(figsize=(h/dpi, w/dpi))
fig.subplots_adjust(top=1.0, bottom=0, right=1.0, left=0, hspace=0, wspace=0)
axes.imshow(_img)
axes.axis('off')
plt.savefig(c_name, dpi=dpi, format='jpeg')
Because the subplots_adjust setting makes the axis fill the figure, you don't want to specify a bbox_inches='tight', as it actually creates whitespace padding in this case. This solution works when you have more than 1 subplot also.
This worked for me, based on your code, generating a 93Mb png image with color noise and the desired dimensions:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy
w = 7195
h = 3841
im_np = numpy.random.rand(h, w)
fig = plt.figure(frameon=False)
fig.set_size_inches(w,h)
ax = plt.Axes(fig, [0., 0., 1., 1.])
ax.set_axis_off()
fig.add_axes(ax)
ax.imshow(im_np, aspect='normal')
fig.savefig('figure.png', dpi=1)
I am using the last PIP versions of the Python 2.7 libraries in Linux Mint 13.
Hope that helps!
The OP wants to preserve 1:1 pixel data. As an astronomer working with science images I cannot allow any interpolation of image data as it would introduce unknown and unpredictable noise or errors. For example, here is a snippet from a 480x480 image saved via pyplot.savefig(): Detail of pixels which matplotlib resampled to be roughly 2x2, but notice the column of 1x2 pixels
You can see that most pixels were simply doubled (so a 1x1 pixel becomes 2x2) but some columns and rows became 1x2 or 2x1 per pixel which means the the original science data has been altered.
As hinted at by Alka, plt.imsave() which will achieve what the OP is asking for. Say you have image data stored in image array im, then one can do something like
plt.imsave(fname='my_image.png', arr=im, cmap='gray_r', format='png')
where the filename has the "png" extension in this example (but you must still specify the format with format='png' anyway as far as I can tell), the image array is arr, and we chose the inverted grayscale "gray_r" as the colormap. I usually add vmin and vmax to specify the dynamic range but these are optional.
The end result is a png file of exactly the same pixel dimensions as the im array.
Note: the OP specified no axes, etc. which is what this solution does exactly. If one wants to add axes, ticks, etc. my preferred approach is to do that on a separate plot, saving with transparent=True (PNG or PDF) then overlay the latter on the image. This guarantees you have kept the original pixels intact.
Comparison of different approaches
Here is a quick comparison of some of the approaches I've tried with images showing what the give.
Baseline example without trying to set the image dimensions
Just to have a comparison point:
base.py
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import sys
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib as mpl
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
print('fig.dpi = {}'.format(fig.dpi))
print('fig.get_size_inches() = ' + str(fig.get_size_inches())
t = np.arange(-10., 10., 1.)
plt.plot(t, t, '.')
plt.plot(t, t**2, '.')
ax.text(0., 60., 'Hello', fontdict=dict(size=25))
plt.savefig('base.png', format='png')
run:
./base.py
identify base.png
outputs:
fig.dpi = 100.0
fig.get_size_inches() = [6.4 4.8]
base.png PNG 640x480 640x480+0+0 8-bit sRGB 13064B 0.000u 0:00.000
My best approach so far: plt.savefig(dpi=h/fig.get_size_inches()[1]
height-only control
I think this is what I'll go with most of the time, as it is simple and scales:
get_size.py
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import sys
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib as mpl
height = int(sys.argv[1])
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
t = np.arange(-10., 10., 1.)
plt.plot(t, t, '.')
plt.plot(t, t**2, '.')
ax.text(0., 60., 'Hello', fontdict=dict(size=25))
plt.savefig(
'get_size.png',
format='png',
dpi=height/fig.get_size_inches()[1]
)
run:
./get_size.py 431
outputs:
get_size.png PNG 574x431 574x431+0+0 8-bit sRGB 10058B 0.000u 0:00.000
and
./get_size.py 1293
outputs:
main.png PNG 1724x1293 1724x1293+0+0 8-bit sRGB 46709B 0.000u 0:00.000
I tend to set just the height because I'm usually most concerned about how much vertical space the image is going to take up in the middle of my text.
plt.savefig(bbox_inches='tight'
changes image size
I always feel that there is too much white space around images, and tended to add bbox_inches='tight'
from:
Removing white space around a saved image in matplotlib
However, that works by cropping the image, and you won't get the desired sizes with it.
Instead, this other approach proposed in the same question seems to work well:
plt.tight_layout(pad=1)
plt.savefig(...
which gives the exact desired height for height equals 431:
Fixed height, set_aspect
, automatically sized width and small margins
Ermmm, set_aspect
messes things up again and prevents plt.tight_layout
from actually removing the margins...
plt.savefig(dpi=h/fig.get_size_inches()[1]
+ width control
If you really need a specific width in addition to height, this seems to work OK:
width.py
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import sys
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib as mpl
h = int(sys.argv[1])
w = int(sys.argv[2])
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
wi, hi = fig.get_size_inches()
fig.set_size_inches(hi*(w/h), hi)
t = np.arange(-10., 10., 1.)
plt.plot(t, t, '.')
plt.plot(t, t**2, '.')
ax.text(0., 60., 'Hello', fontdict=dict(size=25))
plt.savefig(
'width.png',
format='png',
dpi=h/hi
)
run:
./width.py 431 869
output:
width.png PNG 869x431 869x431+0+0 8-bit sRGB 10965B 0.000u 0:00.000
and for a small width:
./width.py 431 869
output:
width.png PNG 211x431 211x431+0+0 8-bit sRGB 6949B 0.000u 0:00.000
So it does seem that fonts are scaling correctly, we just get some trouble for very small widths with labels getting cut off, e.g. the 100
on the top left.
I managed to work around those with Removing white space around a saved image in matplotlib
plt.tight_layout(pad=1)
which gives:
width.png PNG 211x431 211x431+0+0 8-bit sRGB 7134B 0.000u 0:00.000
From this, we also see that tight_layout
removes a lot of the empty space at the top of the image, so I just generally always use it.
Fixed magic base height, dpi
on fig.set_size_inches
and plt.savefig(dpi=
scaling
I believe that this is equivalent to the approach mentioned at: https://stackoverflow.com/a/13714720/895245
magic.py
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import sys
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib as mpl
magic_height = 300
w = int(sys.argv[1])
h = int(sys.argv[2])
dpi = 80
fig, ax = plt.subplots(dpi=dpi)
fig.set_size_inches(magic_height*w/(h*dpi), magic_height/dpi)
t = np.arange(-10., 10., 1.)
plt.plot(t, t, '.')
plt.plot(t, t**2, '.')
ax.text(0., 60., 'Hello', fontdict=dict(size=25))
plt.savefig(
'magic.png',
format='png',
dpi=h/magic_height*dpi,
)
run:
./magic.py 431 231
outputs:
magic.png PNG 431x231 431x231+0+0 8-bit sRGB 7923B 0.000u 0:00.000
And to see if it scales nicely:
./magic.py 1291 693
outputs:
magic.png PNG 1291x693 1291x693+0+0 8-bit sRGB 25013B 0.000u 0:00.000
So we see that this approach also does work well. The only problem I have with it is that you have to set that magic_height
parameter or equivalent.
Fixed DPI + set_size_inches
This approach gave a slightly wrong pixel size, and it makes it is hard to scale everything seamlessly.
set_size_inches.py
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import sys
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib as mpl
w = int(sys.argv[1])
h = int(sys.argv[2])
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
fig.set_size_inches(w/fig.dpi, h/fig.dpi)
t = np.arange(-10., 10., 1.)
plt.plot(t, t, '.')
plt.plot(t, t**2, '.')
ax.text(
0,
60.,
'Hello',
# Keep font size fixed independently of DPI.
# https://stackoverflow.com/questions/39395616/matplotlib-change-figsize-but-keep-fontsize-constant
fontdict=dict(size=10*h/fig.dpi),
)
plt.savefig(
'set_size_inches.png',
format='png',
)
run:
./set_size_inches.py 431 231
outputs:
set_size_inches.png PNG 430x231 430x231+0+0 8-bit sRGB 8078B 0.000u 0:00.000
so the height is slightly off, and the image:
The pixel sizes are also correct if I make it 3 times larger:
./set_size_inches.py 1291 693
outputs:
set_size_inches.png PNG 1291x693 1291x693+0+0 8-bit sRGB 19798B 0.000u 0:00.000
We understand from this however that for this approach to scale nicely, you need to make every DPI-dependant setting proportional to the size in inches.
In the previous example, we only made the "Hello" text proportional, and it did retain its height between 60 and 80 as we'd expect. But everything for which we didn't do that, looks tiny, including:
SVG
I could not find how to set it for SVG images, my approaches only worked for PNG e.g.:
get_size_svg.py
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import sys
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib as mpl
height = int(sys.argv[1])
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
t = np.arange(-10., 10., 1.)
plt.plot(t, t, '.')
plt.plot(t, t**2, '.')
ax.text(0., 60., 'Hello', fontdict=dict(size=25))
plt.savefig(
'get_size_svg.svg',
format='svg',
dpi=height/fig.get_size_inches()[1]
)
run:
./get_size_svg.py 431
and the generated output contains:
<svg height="345.6pt" version="1.1" viewBox="0 0 460.8 345.6" width="460.8pt"
and identify says:
get_size_svg.svg SVG 614x461 614x461+0+0 8-bit sRGB 17094B 0.000u 0:00.000
and if I open it in Chromium 86 the browser debug tools mouse image hover confirm that height as 460.79.
But of course, since SVG is a vector format, everything should in theory scale, so you can just convert to any fixed sized format without loss of resolution, e.g.:
inkscape -h 431 get_size_svg.svg -b FFF -e get_size_svg.png
gives the exact height:
TODO regenerate image, messed up the upload somehow.
I use Inkscape instead of Imagemagick's convert
here because you need to mess with -density
as well to get sharp SVG resizes with ImageMagick:
And setting <img height=""
on the HTML should also just work for the browser.
Tested on matplotlib==3.2.2.
I had same issue. I used PIL Image to load the images and converted to a numpy array then patched a rectangle using matplotlib. It was a jpg image, so there was no way for me to get the dpi from PIL img.info['dpi'], so the accepted solution did not work for me. But after some tinkering I figured out way to save the figure with the same size as the original.
I am adding the following solution here thinking that it will help somebody who had the same issue as mine.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from PIL import Image
import numpy as np
img = Image.open('my_image.jpg') #loading the image
image = np.array(img) #converting it to ndarray
dpi = plt.rcParams['figure.dpi'] #get the default dpi value
fig_size = (img.size[0]/dpi, img.size[1]/dpi) #saving the figure size
fig, ax = plt.subplots(1, figsize=fig_size) #applying figure size
#do whatver you want to do with the figure
fig.tight_layout() #just to be sure
fig.savefig('my_updated_image.jpg') #saving the image
This saved the image with the same resolution as the original image.
In case you are not working with a jupyter notebook. you can get the dpi in the following manner.
figure = plt.figure()
dpi = figure.dpi
Based on the accepted response by tiago, here is a small generic function that exports a numpy array to an image having the same resolution as the array:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
def export_figure_matplotlib(arr, f_name, dpi=200, resize_fact=1, plt_show=False):
"""
Export array as figure in original resolution
:param arr: array of image to save in original resolution
:param f_name: name of file where to save figure
:param resize_fact: resize facter wrt shape of arr, in (0, np.infty)
:param dpi: dpi of your screen
:param plt_show: show plot or not
"""
fig = plt.figure(frameon=False)
fig.set_size_inches(arr.shape[1]/dpi, arr.shape[0]/dpi)
ax = plt.Axes(fig, [0., 0., 1., 1.])
ax.set_axis_off()
fig.add_axes(ax)
ax.imshow(arr)
plt.savefig(f_name, dpi=(dpi * resize_fact))
if plt_show:
plt.show()
else:
plt.close()
As said in the previous reply by tiago, the screen DPI needs to be found first, which can be done here for instance: http://dpi.lv
I've added an additional argument resize_fact
in the function which which you can export the image to 50% (0.5) of the original resolution, for instance.
Source: Stackoverflow.com