Below is the content of my "Dockerfile"
FROM node:boron
# Create app directory
RUN mkdir -p /usr/src/app
# change working dir to /usr/src/app
WORKDIR /usr/src/app
VOLUME . /usr/src/app
RUN npm install
EXPOSE 8080
CMD ["node" , "server" ]
In this file I am expecting "VOLUME . /usr/src/app" instruction to mount contents of present working directory in host to be mounted on /usr/src/app folder of container.
Please let me know if this is the correct way ?
This question is related to
docker
dockerfile
The VOLUME command in a Dockerfile is quite legit, totally conventional, absolutely fine to use and it is not deprecated in anyway. Just need to understand it.
We use it to point to any directories which the app in the container will write to a lot. We don't use VOLUME just because we want to share between host and container like a config file.
The command simply needs one param; a path to a folder, relative to WORKDIR if set, from within the container. Then docker will create a volume in its graph(/var/lib/docker) and mount it to the folder in the container. Now the container will have somewhere to write to with high performance. Without the VOLUME command the write speed to the specified folder will be very slow because now the container is using it's copy on write strategy in the container itself. The copy on write strategy is a main reason why volumes exist.
If you mount over the folder specified by the VOLUME command, the command is never run because VOLUME is only executed when the container starts, kind of like ENV.
Basically with VOLUME command you get performance without externally mounting any volumes. Data will save across container runs too without any external mounts. Then when ready simply mount something over it.
Some good example use cases:
- logs
- temp folders
Some bad use cases:
- static files
- configs
- code
To better understand the volume instruction in dockerfile, let us learn the typical volume usage in mysql official docker file implementation.
VOLUME /var/lib/mysql
Reference: https://github.com/docker-library/mysql/blob/3362baccb4352bcf0022014f67c1ec7e6808b8c5/8.0/Dockerfile
The /var/lib/mysql is the default location of MySQL that store data files.
When you run test container for test purpose only, you may not specify its mounting point,e.g.
docker run mysql:8
then the mysql container instance will use the default mount path which is specified by the volume instruction in dockerfile. the volumes is created with a very long ID-like name inside the Docker root, this is called "unnamed" or "anonymous" volume. In the folder of underlying host system /var/lib/docker/volumes.
/var/lib/docker/volumes/320752e0e70d1590e905b02d484c22689e69adcbd764a69e39b17bc330b984e4
This is very convenient for quick test purposes without the need to specify the mounting point, but still can get best performance by using Volume for data store, not the container layer.
For a formal use, you will need to specify the mount path by using named volume or bind mount, e.g.
docker run -v /my/own/datadir:/var/lib/mysql mysql:8
The command mounts the /my/own/datadir directory from the underlying host system as /var/lib/mysql inside the container.The data directory /my/own/datadir won't be automatically deleted, even the container is deleted.
Usage of the mysql official image (Please check the "Where to Store Data" section):
Reference: https://hub.docker.com/_/mysql/
Specifying a VOLUME line in a Dockerfile configures a bit of metadata on your image, but how that metadata is used is important.
First, what did these two lines do:
WORKDIR /usr/src/app
VOLUME . /usr/src/app
The WORKDIR line there creates the directory if it doesn't exist, and updates some image metadata to specify all relative paths, along with the current directory for commands like RUN will be in that location. The VOLUME line there specifies two volumes, one is the relative path ., and the other is /usr/src/app, both just happen to be the same directory. Most often the VOLUME line only contains a single directory, but it can contain multiple as you've done, or it can be a json formatted array.
You cannot specify a volume source in the Dockerfile: A common source of confusion when specifying volumes in a Dockerfile is trying to match the runtime syntax of a source and destination at image build time, this will not work. The Dockerfile can only specify the destination of the volume. It would be a trivial security exploit if someone could define the source of a volume since they could update a common image on the docker hub to mount the root directory into the container and then launch a background process inside the container as part of an entrypoint that adds logins to /etc/passwd, configures systemd to launch a bitcoin miner on next reboot, or searches the filesystem for credit cards, SSNs, and private keys to send off to a remote site.
What does the VOLUME line do? As mentioned, it sets some image metadata to say a directory inside the image is a volume. How is this metadata used? Every time you create a container from this image, docker will force that directory to be a volume. If you do not provide a volume in your run command, or compose file, the only option for docker is to create an anonymous volume. This is a local named volume with a long unique id for the name and no other indication for why it was created or what data it contains (anonymous volumes are were data goes to get lost). If you override the volume, pointing to a named or host volume, your data will go there instead.
VOLUME breaks things: You cannot disable a volume once defined in a Dockerfile. And more importantly, the RUN command in docker is implemented with temporary containers. Those temporary containers will get a temporary anonymous volume. That anonymous volume will be initialized with the contents of your image. Any writes inside the container from your RUN command will be made to that volume. When the RUN command finishes, changes to the image are saved, and changes to the anonymous volume are discarded. Because of this, I strongly recommend against defining a VOLUME inside the Dockerfile. It results in unexpected behavior for downstream users of your image that wish to extend the image with initial data in volume location.
How should you specify a volume? To specify where you want to include volumes with your image, provide a docker-compose.yml. Users can modify that to adjust the volume location to their local environment, and it captures other runtime settings like publishing ports and networking.
Someone should document this! They have. Docker includes warnings on the VOLUME usage in their documentation on the Dockerfile along with advice to specify the source at runtime:
- Changing the volume from within the Dockerfile: If any build steps change the data within the volume after it has been declared, those changes will be discarded.
...
- The host directory is declared at container run-time: The host directory (the mountpoint) is, by its nature, host-dependent. This is to preserve image portability, since a given host directory can’t be guaranteed to be available on all hosts. For this reason, you can’t mount a host directory from within the Dockerfile. The
VOLUMEinstruction does not support specifying ahost-dirparameter. You must specify the mountpoint when you create or run the container.
I don't consider the use of VOLUME good in any case, except if you are creating an image for yourself and no one else is going to use it.
I was impacted negatively due to VOLUME exposed in base images that I extended and only came up to know about the problem after the image was already running, like wordpress that declares the /var/www/html folder as a VOLUME, and this meant that any files added or changed during the build stage aren't considered, and live changes persist, even if you don't know. There is an ugly workaround to define web directory in another place, but this is just a bad solution to a much simpler one: just remove the VOLUME directive.
You can achieve the intent of volume easily using the -v option, this not only make it clear what will be the volumes of the container (without having to take a look at the Dockerfile and parent Dockerfiles), but this also gives the consumer the option to use the volume or not.
It's also bad to use VOLUMES due to the following reasons, as said by this answer:
However, the VOLUME instruction does come at a cost.
- Users might not be aware of the unnamed volumes being created, and continuing to take up storage space on their Docker host after containers are removed.
- There is no way to remove a volume declared in a Dockerfile. Downstream images cannot add data to paths where volumes exist.
The latter issue results in problems like these.
Having the option to undeclare a volume would help, but only if you know the volumes defined in the dockerfile that generated the image (and the parent dockerfiles!). Furthermore, a VOLUME could be added in newer versions of a Dockerfile and break things unexpectedly for the consumers of the image.
Another good explanation (about the oracle image having VOLUME, which was removed): https://github.com/oracle/docker-images/issues/640#issuecomment-412647328
More cases in which VOLUME broke stuff for people:
A pull request to add options to reset properties the parent image (including VOLUME), was closed and is being discussed here (and you can see several cases of people affected adversely due to volumes defined in dockerfiles), which has a comment with a good explanation against VOLUME:
Using VOLUME in the Dockerfile is worthless. If a user needs persistence, they will be sure to provide a volume mapping when running the specified container. It was very hard to track down that my issue of not being able to set a directory's ownership (/var/lib/influxdb) was due to the VOLUME declaration in InfluxDB's Dockerfile. Without an UNVOLUME type of option, or getting rid of it altogether, I am unable to change anything related to the specified folder. This is less than ideal, especially when you are security-aware and desire to specify a certain UID the image should be ran as, in order to avoid a random user, with more permissions than necessary, running software on your host.
The only good thing I can see about VOLUME is about documentation, and I would consider it good if it only did that (without any side effects).
TL;DR
I consider that the best use of VOLUME is to be deprecated.
In short: No, your VOLUME instruction is not correct.
Dockerfile's VOLUME specify one or more volumes given container-side paths. But it does not allow the image author to specify a host path. On the host-side, the volumes are created with a very long ID-like name inside the Docker root. On my machine this is /var/lib/docker/volumes.
Note: Because the autogenerated name is extremely long and makes no sense from a human's perspective, these volumes are often referred to as "unnamed" or "anonymous".
Your example that uses a '.' character will not even run on my machine, no matter if I make the dot the first or second argument. I get this error message:
docker: Error response from daemon: oci runtime error: container_linux.go:265: starting container process caused "process_linux.go:368: container init caused "open /dev/ptmx: no such file or directory"".
I know that what has been said to this point is probably not very valuable to someone trying to understand VOLUME and -v and it certainly does not provide a solution for what you try to accomplish. So, hopefully, the following examples will shed some more light on these issues.
Given this Dockerfile:
FROM openjdk:8u131-jdk-alpine
VOLUME vol1 vol2
(For the outcome of this minitutorial, it makes no difference if we specify vol1 vol2 or /vol1 /vol2 — this is because the default working directory within a Dockerfile is /)
Build it:
docker build -t my-openjdk
Run:
docker run --rm -it my-openjdk
Inside the container, run ls in the command line and you'll notice two directories exist; /vol1 and /vol2.
Running the container also creates two directories, or "volumes", on the host-side.
While having the container running, execute docker volume ls on the host machine and you'll see something like this (I have replaced the middle part of the name with three dots for brevity):
DRIVER VOLUME NAME
local c984...e4fc
local f670...49f0
Back in the container, execute touch /vol1/weird-ass-file (creates a blank file at said location).
This file is now available on the host machine, in one of the unnamed volumes lol. It took me two tries because I first tried the first listed volume, but eventually I did find my file in the second listed volume, using this command on the host machine:
sudo ls /var/lib/docker/volumes/f670...49f0/_data
Similarly, you can try to delete this file on the host and it will be deleted in the container as well.
Note: The _data folder is also referred to as a "mount point".
Exit out from the container and list the volumes on the host. They are gone. We used the --rm flag when running the container and this option effectively wipes out not just the container on exit, but also the volumes.
Run a new container, but specify a volume using -v:
docker run --rm -it -v /vol3 my-openjdk
This adds a third volume and the whole system ends up having three unnamed volumes. The command would have crashed had we specified only -v vol3. The argument must be an absolute path inside the container. On the host-side, the new third volume is anonymous and resides together with the other two volumes in /var/lib/docker/volumes/.
It was stated earlier that the Dockerfile can not map to a host path which sort of pose a problem for us when trying to bring files in from the host to the container during runtime. A different -v syntax solves this problem.
Imagine I have a subfolder in my project directory ./src that I wish to sync to /src inside the container. This command does the trick:
docker run -it -v $(pwd)/src:/src my-openjdk
Both sides of the : character expects an absolute path. Left side being an absolute path on the host machine, right side being an absolute path inside the container. pwd is a command that "print current/working directory". Putting the command in $() takes the command within parenthesis, runs it in a subshell and yields back the absolute path to our project directory.
Putting it all together, assume we have ./src/Hello.java in our project folder on the host machine with the following contents:
public class Hello {
public static void main(String... ignored) {
System.out.println("Hello, World!");
}
}
We build this Dockerfile:
FROM openjdk:8u131-jdk-alpine
WORKDIR /src
ENTRYPOINT javac Hello.java && java Hello
We run this command:
docker run -v $(pwd)/src:/src my-openjdk
This prints "Hello, World!".
The best part is that we're completely free to modify the .java file with a new message for another output on a second run - without having to rebuild the image =)
I am quite new to Docker, and the aforementioned "tutorial" reflects information I gathered from a 3-day command line hackathon. I am almost ashamed I haven't been able to provide links to clear English-like documentation backing up my statements, but I honestly think this is due to a lack of documentation and not personal effort. I do know the examples work as advertised using my current setup which is "Windows 10 -> Vagrant 2.0.0 -> Docker 17.09.0-ce".
The tutorial does not solve the problem "how do we specify the container's path in the Dockerfile and let the run command only specify the host path". There might be a way, I just haven't found it.
Finally, I have a gut feeling that specifying VOLUME in the Dockerfile is not just uncommon, but it's probably a best practice to never use VOLUME. For two reasons. The first reason we have already identified: We can not specify the host path - which is a good thing because Dockerfiles should be very agnostic to the specifics of a host machine. But the second reason is people might forget to use the --rm option when running the container. One might remember to remove the container but forget to remove the volume. Plus, even with the best of human memory, it might be a daunting task to figure out which of all anonymous volumes are safe to remove.
Source: Stackoverflow.com