Picasso v s Imageloader v s Fresco vs Glide

Question

Findings    Difference between Picasso v s ImageLoader here     Info about the library GLIDE here     Now recently Facebook released new image library called Fresco     Questions    What is the difference between Picasso v s Imageloader v s Fresco When can we use Glide Which is the best library to use  If each library has its own significance  what are they

User · Answer

Neither Glide nor Picasso is perfect  The way Glide loads an image to memory and do the caching is better than Picasso which let an image loaded far faster  In addition  it also helps preventing an app from popular OutOfMemoryError  GIF Animation loading is a killing feature provided by Glide  Anyway Picasso decodes an image with better quality than Glide   Which one do I prefer  Although I use Picasso for such a very long time  I must admit that I now prefer Glide  But I would recommend you to change Bitmap Format to ARGB 8888 and let Glide cache both full-size image and resized one first  The rest would do your job great    Method count of Picasso and Glide are at 840 and 2678 respectively  Picasso  v2 5 1  s size is around 118KB while Glide  v3 5 2  s is around 430KB  Glide creates cached images per size while Picasso saves the full image and process it  so on load it shows faster with Glide but uses more memory  Glide use less memory by default with RGB 565     1 For Picasso Palette Helper   There is a post that talk a lot about Picasso vs Glide post

User · Answer

Fresco sources   off site  -   Huge size of library No Callback with View  Bitmap parameters SimpleDraweeView doesn t support wrap content Huge size of cache     Pretty fast image loader  for small  amp  amp  medium images  A lot of functionality streaming  drawing tools  memory management  etc  Possibility to setup directly in xml  for example round corners  GIF support WebP and Animated Webp support  Picasso sources   off site  -   Slow loading big images from internet into ListView     Tinny size of library Small size of cache Simple to use UI does not freeze WebP support  Glide sources  -   Big size of library     Tinny size of cache Simple to use GIF support WebP support Fast loading big images from internet into ListView UI does not freeze BitmapPool to re-use memory and thus lesser GC events  Universal Image Loader sources  -   Limited functionality  limited image processing  Project support has stopped since 27 11 2015     Tinny size of library Simple to use   Tested by me on SGS2  Android 4 1   WiFi 8 43 Mbps  Official versions for Java  not for Xamarin  October 19 2015 I prefer to use Glide  Read more here  How to write cache to External Storage  SD Card  with Glide

User · Answer

These answers are totally my opinion  Answers   Picasso is an easy to use image loader  same goes for Imageloader  Fresco uses a different approach to image loading  i haven t used it yet but it looks too me more like a solution for getting image from network and caching them then showing the images  then the other way around like Picasso Imageloader Glide which to me are more Showing image on screen that also does getting images from network and caching them  Glide tries to be somewhat interchangeable with Picasso I think when they were created Picasso s mind set was follow HTTP spec s and let the server decide the caching policies and cache full sized and resize on demand  Glide is the same with following the HTTP spec but tries to have a smaller memory footprint by making some different assumptions like cache the resized images instead of the fullsized images  and show images with RGB 565 instead of RGB 8888  Both libraries offer full customization of the default settings  As to which library is the best to use is really hard to say  Picasso  Glide and Imageloader are well respected and well tested libraries which all are easy to use with the default settings  Both Picasso and Glide require only 1 line of code to load an image and have a placeholder and error image  Customizing the behaviour also doesn t require that much work  Same goes for Imageloader which is also an older library then Picasso and Glide  however I haven t used it so can t say much about performance memory usage customizations but looking at the readme on github gives me the impression that it is also relatively easy to use and setup  So in choosing any of these 3 libraries you can t make the wrong decision  its more a matter of personal taste  For fresco my opinion is that its another facebook library so we have to see how that is going to work out for them  so far there track record isn t that good  Like the facebook SDK is  still isn t officially released on mavenCentral I have not used to facebook sdk since sept 2014 and it seems they have put the first version online on mavenCentral in oct 2014  So it will take some time before we can get any good opinion about it  between the 3 big name libraries I think there are no significant differences  The only one that stand out is fresco but that is because it has a different approach and is new and not battle tested

User · Answer

I am one of the engineers on the Fresco project  So obviously I m biased   But you don t have to take my word for it  We ve released a sample app that allows you to compare the performance of five libraries - Fresco  Picasso  UIL  Glide  and Volley Image Loader - side by side  You can get it at our GitHub repo   I should also point out that Fresco is available on Maven Central  as com facebook fresco fresco   Fresco offers features that Picasso  UIL  and Glide do not yet have    Images aren t stored in the Java heap  but in the ashmem heap  Intermediate byte buffers are also stored in the native heap  This leaves a lot more memory available for applications to use  It reduces the risk of OutOfMemoryErrors  It also reduces the amount of garbage collection apps have to do  leading to better performance  Progressive JPEG images can be streamed  just like in a web browser  Images can be cropped around any point  not just the center  JPEG images can be resized natively  This avoids the problem of OOMing while trying to downsize an image    There are many others  see our documentation   but these are the most important

User · Answer

Mind you that this is a highly opinion based question  so I stopped making fjords and made a quick table     Now library comparison is hard because on many parameters  all the four pretty much do the same thing  except possibly for Fresco because there is a whole bunch of new memory level optimizations in it So let me know if certain parameters you d like to see a comparison for based on my experience   Having used Fresco the least  the answer might evolve as I continue to use and understand it for current exploits  The used personally is having used the library atleast once in a completed app     Note - Fresco now supports GIF as well as WebP animations

User · Answer

I want to share with you a benchmark I have done among Picasso  Universal Image Loader and Glide  https   bit ly 1kQs3QN  Fresco was out of the benchmark because for the project I was running the test  we didn t want to refactor our layouts  because of the Drawee view    What I recommend is Universal Image Loader because of its customization  memory consumption and balance between size and methods   If you have a small project  I would go for Glide  or give Fresco a try

[android] Picasso v/s Imageloader v/s Fresco vs Glide

Examples related to android

Examples related to universal-image-loader

Examples related to picasso

Examples related to fresco

Examples related to android-glide