You can use addresses and pointers using the Unsafe class. However as the name suggests, these methods are UNSAFE and generally a bad idea. Incorrect usage can result in your JVM randomly dying (actually the same problem get using pointers incorrectly in C/C++)
While you may be used to pointers and think you need them (because you don't know how to code any other way), you will find that you don't and you will be better off for it.
Java does not have pointers like C has, but it does allow you to create new objects on the heap which are "referenced" by variables. The lack of pointers is to stop Java programs from referencing memory locations illegally, and also enables Garbage Collection to be automatically carried out by the Java Virtual Machine.
There are pointers in Java, but you cannot manipulate them the way that you can in C++ or C. When you pass an object, you are passing a pointer to that object, but not in the same sense as in C++. That object cannot be dereferenced. If you set its values using its native accessors, it will change because Java knows its memory location through the pointer. But the pointer is immutable. When you attempt to set the pointer to a new location, you instead end up with a new local object with the same name as the other. The original object is unchanged. Here is a brief program to demonstrate the difference.
import java.util.*;
import java.lang.*;
import java.io.*;
class Ideone {
public static void main(String[] args) throws java.lang.Exception {
System.out.println("Expected # = 0 1 2 2 1");
Cat c = new Cat();
c.setClaws(0);
System.out.println("Initial value is " + c.getClaws());
// prints 0 obviously
clawsAreOne(c);
System.out.println("Accessor changes value to " + c.getClaws());
// prints 1 because the value 'referenced' by the 'pointer' is changed using an accessor.
makeNewCat(c);
System.out.println("Final value is " + c.getClaws());
// prints 1 because the pointer is not changed to 'kitten'; that would be a reference pass.
}
public static void clawsAreOne(Cat kitty) {
kitty.setClaws(1);
}
public static void makeNewCat(Cat kitty) {
Cat kitten = new Cat();
kitten.setClaws(2);
kitty = kitten;
System.out.println("Value in makeNewCat scope of kitten " + kitten.getClaws());
//Prints 2. the value pointed to by 'kitten' is 2
System.out.println("Value in makeNewcat scope of kitty " + kitty.getClaws());
//Prints 2. The local copy is being used within the scope of this method.
}
}
class Cat {
private int claws;
public void setClaws(int i) {
claws = i;
}
public int getClaws() {
return claws;
}
}
This can be run at Ideone.com.
As others have said, the short answer is "No".
Sure, you could write JNI code that plays with Java pointers. Depending on what you're trying to accomplish, maybe that would get you somewhere and maybe it wouldn't.
You could always simulate pointes by creating an array and working with indexes into the array. Again, depending on what you're trying to accomplish, that might or might not be useful.
All java objects are pointer because a variable which holds address is called pointer and object hold address.so object is pointer variable.
you can have pointers for literals as well. You have to implement them yourself. It is pretty basic for experts ;). Use an array of int/object/long/byte and voila you have the basics for implementing pointers. Now any int value can be a pointer to that array int[]. You can increment the pointer, you can decrement the pointer, you can multiply the pointer. You indeed have pointer arithmetics! That's the only way to implements 1000 int attributes classes and have a generic method that applies to all attributes. You can also use a byte[] array instead of an int[]
However I do wish Java would let you pass literal values by reference. Something along the lines
//(* telling you it is a pointer)
public void myMethod(int* intValue);
Java does have pointers. Any time you create an object in Java, you're actually creating a pointer to the object; this pointer could then be set to a different object or to null, and the original object will still exist (pending garbage collection).
What you can't do in Java is pointer arithmetic. You can't dereference a specific memory address or increment a pointer.
If you really want to get low-level, the only way to do it is with the Java Native Interface; and even then, the low-level part has to be done in C or C++.
All objects in java are passed to functions by reference copy except primitives.
In effect, this means that you are sending a copy of the pointer to the original object rather than a copy of the object itself.
Please leave a comment if you want an example to understand this.
All objects in Java are references and you can use them like pointers.
abstract class Animal
{...
}
class Lion extends Animal
{...
}
class Tiger extends Animal
{
public Tiger() {...}
public void growl(){...}
}
Tiger first = null;
Tiger second = new Tiger();
Tiger third;
Dereferencing a null:
first.growl(); // ERROR, first is null.
third.growl(); // ERROR, third has not been initialized.
Aliasing Problem:
third = new Tiger();
first = third;
Losing Cells:
second = third; // Possible ERROR. The old value of second is lost.
You can make this safe by first assuring that there is no further need of the old value of second or assigning another pointer the value of second.
first = second;
second = third; //OK
Note that giving second a value in other ways (NULL, new...) is just as much a potential error and may result in losing the object that it points to.
The Java system will throw an exception (OutOfMemoryError) when you call new and the allocator cannot allocate the requested cell. This is very rare and usually results from run-away recursion.
Note that, from a language point of view, abandoning objects to the garbage collector are not errors at all. It is just something that the programmer needs to be aware of. The same variable can point to different objects at different times and old values will be reclaimed when no pointer references them. But if the logic of the program requires maintaining at least one reference to the object, It will cause an error.
Novices often make the following error.
Tiger tony = new Tiger();
tony = third; // Error, the new object allocated above is reclaimed.
What you probably meant to say was:
Tiger tony = null;
tony = third; // OK.
Improper Casting:
Lion leo = new Lion();
Tiger tony = (Tiger)leo; // Always illegal and caught by compiler.
Animal whatever = new Lion(); // Legal.
Tiger tony = (Tiger)whatever; // Illegal, just as in previous example.
Lion leo = (Lion)whatever; // Legal, object whatever really is a Lion.
Pointers in C:
void main() {
int* x; // Allocate the pointers x and y
int* y; // (but not the pointees)
x = malloc(sizeof(int)); // Allocate an int pointee,
// and set x to point to it
*x = 42; // Dereference x to store 42 in its pointee
*y = 13; // CRASH -- y does not have a pointee yet
y = x; // Pointer assignment sets y to point to x's pointee
*y = 13; // Dereference y to store 13 in its (shared) pointee
}
Pointers in Java:
class IntObj {
public int value;
}
public class Binky() {
public static void main(String[] args) {
IntObj x; // Allocate the pointers x and y
IntObj y; // (but not the IntObj pointees)
x = new IntObj(); // Allocate an IntObj pointee
// and set x to point to it
x.value = 42; // Dereference x to store 42 in its pointee
y.value = 13; // CRASH -- y does not have a pointee yet
y = x; // Pointer assignment sets y to point to x's pointee
y.value = 13; // Deference y to store 13 in its (shared) pointee
}
}
UPDATE: as suggested in the comments one must note that C has pointer arithmetic. However, we do not have that in Java.
As Java has no pointer data types, it is impossible to use pointers in Java. Even the few experts will not be able to use pointers in java.
See also the last point in: The Java Language Environment
from the book named Decompiling Android by Godfrey Nolan
Security dictates that pointers aren’t used in Java so hackers can’t break out of an application and into the operating system. No pointers means that something else----in this case, the JVM----has to take care of the allocating and freeing memory. Memory leaks should also become a thing of the past, or so the theory goes. Some applications written in C and C++ are notorious for leaking memory like a sieve because programmers don’t pay attention to freeing up unwanted memory at the appropriate time----not that anybody reading this would be guilty of such a sin. Garbage collection should also make programmers more productive, with less time spent on debugging memory problems.
Not really, no.
Java doesn't have pointers. If you really wanted you could try to emulate them by building around something like reflection, but it would have all of the complexity of pointers with none of the benefits.
Java doesn't have pointers because it doesn't need them. What kind of answers were you hoping for from this question, i.e. deep down did you hope you could use them for something or was this just curiousity?
Java reference types are not the same as C pointers as you can't have a pointer to a pointer in Java.
Technically, all Java objects are pointers. All primitive types are values though. There is no way to take manual control of those pointers. Java just internally uses pass-by-reference.
Source: Stackoverflow.com