What s the difference between commit and apply in SharedPreferences

Question

I am using SharedPreferences in my android app  I am using both commit   and apply   method from shared preference  When I use AVD 2 3 it shows no error  but when I run the code in AVD 2 1  apply   method shows error    So what s the difference between these two  And by using only commit   can I store the preference value without any problem

User · Answer

I m experiencing some problems using apply   instead commit    As stated before in other responses  the apply   is asynchronous  I m getting the problem that the changes formed to a  string set  preference are never written to the persistent memory   It happens if you  force detention  of the program or  in the ROM that I have installed on my device with Android 4 1  when the process is killed by the system due to memory necessities   I recommend to use  commit    instead  apply    if you want your preferences alive

User · Answer

commit   writes the data synchronously and returns a boolean value of success or failure depending on the result immediately  apply   is asynchronous and it won   t return any boolean response  Also if there is an apply   outstanding and we perform another commit    The commit   will be blocked until the apply   is not completed

User · Answer

apply   was added in 2 3  it commits without returning a boolean indicating success or failure   commit   returns true if the save works  false otherwise    apply   was added as the Android dev team noticed that almost no one took notice of the return value  so apply is faster as it is asynchronous   http   developer android com reference android content SharedPreferences Editor html apply

User · Answer

commit   is synchronously  apply   is asynchronous apply   is void function   commit   returns true if the new values were successfully written to persistent storage   apply   guarantees  complete before switching states   you don t need to worry about Android component lifecycles   If you dont use  value returned from commit   and you re using commit   from main thread  use apply   instead of  commit

User · Answer

tl dr    commit   writes the data synchronously  blocking the thread its called from   It then informs you about the success of the operation  apply   schedules the data to be written asynchronously  It does not inform you about the success of the operation  If you save with apply   and immediately read via any getX-method  the new value will be returned  If you called apply   at some point and it s still executing  any calls to commit   will block until all past apply-calls and the current commit-call are finished    More in-depth information from the SharedPreferences Editor Documentation      Unlike commit    which writes its   preferences out to persistent storage   synchronously  apply   commits its   changes to the in-memory   SharedPreferences immediately but   starts an asynchronous commit to disk   and you won t be notified of any   failures  If another editor on this   SharedPreferences does a regular   commit   while a apply   is still   outstanding  the commit   will block   until all async commits are completed   as well as the commit itself       As SharedPreferences instances are   singletons within a process  it s safe   to replace any instance of commit     with apply   if you were already   ignoring the return value       The SharedPreferences Editor interface   isn t expected to be implemented   directly  However  if you previously   did implement it and are now getting   errors about missing apply    you can   simply call commit   from apply

User · Answer

The difference between commit   and apply     We might be confused by those two terms  when we are using SharedPreference  Basically they are probably the same  so let   s clarify the differences of commit   and apply        1 Return value    apply   commits without returning a boolean indicating success or failure  commit   returns true if the save works  false otherwise         Speed       apply   is faster  commit   is slower         Asynchronous v s  Synchronous       apply    Asynchronous commit    Synchronous        Atomic       apply    atomic commit    atomic        Error notification       apply    No commit    Yes

User · Answer

The docs give a pretty good explanation of the difference between apply   and commit        Unlike commit    which writes its preferences out to persistent   storage synchronously  apply   commits its changes to the in-memory   SharedPreferences immediately but starts an asynchronous commit to   disk and you won t be notified of any failures  If another editor on   this SharedPreferences does a regular commit   while a apply   is   still outstanding  the commit   will block until all async commits are   completed as well as the commit itself  As SharedPreferences instances   are singletons within a process  it s safe to replace any instance of   commit   with apply   if you were already ignoring the return value

User · Answer

Use apply      It writes the changes to the RAM immediately and waits and writes it to the internal storage the actual preference file  after  Commit writes the changes synchronously and directly to the file

User · Answer

From javadoc      Unlike commit    which writes its   preferences out to persistent storage   synchronously  apply   commits its   changes to the in-memory   SharedPreferences immediately but   starts an asynchronous commit to disk   and you won t be notified of any   failures  If another editor on this SharedPreferences does a regular commit   while a   apply   is still outstanding  the commit   will block until all async commits are completed as well as the commit itself

[android] What's the difference between commit() and apply() in SharedPreferences

Examples related to android

Examples related to sharedpreferences