Choose Git merge strategy for specific files ours mine theirs

Question

I am in the middle of rebasing after a git pull --rebase   I have a few files that have merge conflicts   How can I accept  their  changes or  my  changes for specific files     git status   Not currently on any branch    You are currently rebasing       fix conflicts and then run  git rebase --continue        use  git rebase --skip  to skip this patch       use  git rebase --abort  to check out the original branch      Changes to be committed       use  git reset HEAD  lt file gt      to unstage            modified   CorrectlyMergedFile     Unmerged paths       use  git reset HEAD  lt file gt      to unstage       use  git add  lt file gt      to mark resolution            both modified  FileWhereIWantToAcceptTheirChanges         both modified  FileWhereIWantToAcceptMyChanges   Normally I just open the file or a merge tool and manually accept all  their  or  my  changes   However  I suspect I m missing a convenient git command   Also  note that I will only be able to choose a merge strategy for each file when I see what files hit conflicts an possibly what the conflicts are

User · Accepted Answer

For each conflicted file you get  you can specify  git checkout --ours --  lt paths gt    or git checkout --theirs --  lt paths gt    From the git checkout docs     git checkout  -f --ours --theirs -m --conflict  lt style gt     lt tree-ish gt    --   lt paths gt            --ours   --theirs   When checking out paths from the index  check out stage  2  ours  or  3  theirs  for unmerged paths       The index may contain unmerged entries because of a previous failed merge  By default  if you try to check out such an entry from the index  the checkout operation will fail and nothing will be checked out  Using -f will ignore these unmerged entries  The contents from a specific side of the merge can be checked out of the index by using --ours or --theirs  With -m  changes made to the working tree file can be discarded to re-create the original conflicted merge result

User · Answer

Note that git checkout --ours --theirs will overwrite the files entirely  by choosing either theirs or ours version  which might be or might not be what you want to do  if you have any non-conflicted changes coming from the other side  they will be lost    If instead  you want to perform a three-way merge on the file  and only resolve the conflicted hunks using --ours --theirs  while keeping non-conflicted hunks from both sides in place  you may want to resort to git merge-file  see details in this answer

User · Answer

Even though this question is answered  providing an example as to what  theirs  and  ours  means in the case of git rebase vs merge  See this link  Git Rebase theirs is actually the current branch in the case of rebase  So the below set of commands are actually accepting your current branch changes over the remote branch     see current branch   git branch        branch-a   rebase preferring current branch changes during conflicts   git rebase -X theirs branch-b   Git Merge For merge  the meaning of theirs and ours is reversed  So  to get the same effect during a merge  i e   keep your current branch changes  ours  over the remote branch being merged  theirs      assuming branch-a is our current version   git merge -X ours branch-b     lt - ours  branch-a  theirs  branch-b

[git] Choose Git merge strategy for specific files ("ours", "mine", "theirs")

Examples related to git

Examples related to git-rebase

Examples related to git-merge-conflict