How do you organize the Dockerfiles belonging to a project when you have one Dockerfile for the database, one for the application server, and so on? Do you create some sort of hierachy in the source? A big enterprise project can't consist of only one Dockerfile?
This question is related to
docker
In Intellij, I simple changed the name of the docker files to *.Dockerfile, and associated the file type *.Dockerfile to docker syntax.
When working on a project that requires the use of multiple dockerfiles, simply create each dockerfile in a separate directory. For instance,
app/ db/
Each of the above directories will contain their dockerfile. When an application is being built, docker will search all directories and build all dockerfiles.
docker-compose
and multiple Dockerfile
in separate directoriesDon't rename your
Dockerfile
toDockerfile.db
orDockerfile.web
, it may not be supported by your IDE and you will lose syntax highlighting.
As Kingsley Uchnor said, you can have multiple Dockerfile
, one per directory, which represent something you want to build.
I like to have a docker
folder which holds each applications and their configuration. Here's an example project folder hierarchy for a web application that has a database.
docker-compose.yml
docker
+-- web
¦ +-- Dockerfile
+-- db
+-- Dockerfile
docker-compose.yml
example:
version: '3'
services:
web:
# will build ./docker/web/Dockerfile
build: ./docker/web
ports:
- "5000:5000"
volumes:
- .:/code
db:
# will build ./docker/db/Dockerfile
build: ./docker/db
ports:
- "3306:3306"
redis:
# will use docker hub's redis prebuilt image from here:
# https://hub.docker.com/_/redis/
image: "redis:alpine"
docker-compose
command line usage example:
# The following command will create and start all containers in the background
# using docker-compose.yml from current directory
docker-compose up -d
# get help
docker-compose --help
You can still use the above solution and place your Dockerfile
in a directory such as docker/web/Dockerfile
, all you need is to set the build context
in your docker-compose.yml
like this:
version: '3'
services:
web:
build:
context: .
dockerfile: ./docker/web/Dockerfile
ports:
- "5000:5000"
volumes:
- .:/code
This way, you'll be able to have things like this:
config-on-root.ini
docker-compose.yml
docker
+-- web
+-- Dockerfile
+-- some-other-config.ini
and a ./docker/web/Dockerfile
like this:
FROM alpine:latest
COPY config-on-root.ini /
COPY docker/web/some-other-config.ini /
Here are some quick commands from tldr docker-compose. Make sure you refer to official documentation for more details.
In newer versions(>=1.8.0) of docker, you can do this
docker build -f Dockerfile.db .
docker build -f Dockerfile.web .
A big save.
EDIT: update versions per raksja's comment
EDIT: comment from @vsevolod: it's possible to get syntax highlighting in VS code by giving files .Dockerfile extension(instead of name) e.g. Prod.Dockerfile, Test.Dockerfile etc.
Add an abstraction layer, for example, a YAML file like in this project https://github.com/larytet/dockerfile-generator which looks like
centos7:
base: centos:centos7
packager: rpm
install:
- $build_essential_centos
- rpm-build
run:
- $get_release
env:
- $environment_vars
A short Python script/make can generate all Dockerfiles from the configuration file.
Source: Stackoverflow.com