[javascript] How to check in Javascript if one element is contained within another

How can I check if one DOM element is a child of another DOM element? Are there any built in methods for this? For example, something like:

if (element1.hasDescendant(element2)) 

or

if (element2.hasParent(element1)) 

If not then any ideas how to do this? It also needs to be cross browser. I should also mention that the child could be nested many levels below the parent.

This question is related to javascript dom

The answer is


I just had to share 'mine'.

Although conceptually the same as Asaph's answer (benefiting from the same cross-browser compatibility, even IE6), it is a lot smaller and comes in handy when size is at a premium and/or when it is not needed so often.

function childOf(/*child node*/c, /*parent node*/p){ //returns boolean
  while((c=c.parentNode)&&c!==p); 
  return !!c; 
}

..or as one-liner (just 64 chars!):

function childOf(c,p){while((c=c.parentNode)&&c!==p);return !!c}

and jsfiddle here.


Usage:
childOf(child, parent) returns boolean true|false.

Explanation:
while evaluates as long as the while-condition evaluates to true.
The && (AND) operator returns this boolean true/false after evaluating the left-hand side and the right-hand side, but only if the left-hand side was true (left-hand && right-hand).

The left-hand side (of &&) is: (c=c.parentNode).
This will first assign the parentNode of c to c and then the AND operator will evaluate the resulting c as a boolean.
Since parentNode returns null if there is no parent left and null is converted to false, the while-loop will correctly stop when there are no more parents.

The right-hand side (of &&) is: c!==p.
The !== comparison operator is 'not exactly equal to'. So if the child's parent isn't the parent (you specified) it evaluates to true, but if the child's parent is the parent then it evaluates to false.
So if c!==p evaluates to false, then the && operator returns false as the while-condition and the while-loop stops. (Note there is no need for a while-body and the closing ; semicolon is required.)

So when the while-loop ends, c is either a node (not null) when it found a parent OR it is null (when the loop ran through to the end without finding a match).

Thus we simply return that fact (converted as boolean value, instead of the node) with: return !!c;: the ! (NOT operator) inverts a boolean value (true becomes false and vice-versa).
!c converts c (node or null) to a boolean before it can invert that value. So adding a second ! (!!c) converts this false back to true (which is why a double !! is often used to 'convert anything to boolean').


Extra:
The function's body/payload is so small that, depending on case (like when it is not used often and appears just once in the code), one could even omit the function (wrapping) and just use the while-loop:

var a=document.getElementById('child'),
    b=document.getElementById('parent'),
    c;

c=a; while((c=c.parentNode)&&c!==b); //c=!!c;

if(!!c){ //`if(c)` if `c=!!c;` was used after while-loop above
    //do stuff
}

instead of:

var a=document.getElementById('child'),
    b=document.getElementById('parent'),
    c;

function childOf(c,p){while((c=c.parentNode)&&c!==p);return !!c}

c=childOf(a, b);    

if(c){ 
    //do stuff
}

try this one:

x = document.getElementById("td35");
if (x.childElementCount > 0) {
    x = document.getElementById("LastRow");
    x.style.display = "block";
}
else {
    x = document.getElementById("LastRow");
    x.style.display = "none";
}

Another solution that wasn't mentioned:

Example Here

var parent = document.querySelector('.parent');

if (parent.querySelector('.child') !== null) {
    // .. it's a child
}

It doesn't matter whether the element is a direct child, it will work at any depth.


Alternatively, using the .contains() method:

Example Here

var parent = document.querySelector('.parent'),
    child = document.querySelector('.child');

if (parent.contains(child)) {
    // .. it's a child
}

Take a look at Node#compareDocumentPosition.

function isDescendant(ancestor,descendant){
    return ancestor.compareDocumentPosition(descendant) & 
        Node.DOCUMENT_POSITION_CONTAINS;
}

function isAncestor(descendant,ancestor){
    return descendant.compareDocumentPosition(ancestor) & 
        Node.DOCUMENT_POSITION_CONTAINED_BY;
}

Other relationships include DOCUMENT_POSITION_DISCONNECTED, DOCUMENT_POSITION_PRECEDING, and DOCUMENT_POSITION_FOLLOWING.

Not supported in IE<=8.


You can use the contains method

var result = parent.contains(child);

or you can try to use compareDocumentPosition()

var result = nodeA.compareDocumentPosition(nodeB);

The last one is more powerful: it return a bitmask as result.


I came across a wonderful piece of code to check whether or not an element is a child of another element. I have to use this because IE doesn't support the .contains element method. Hope this will help others as well.

Below is the function:

function isChildOf(childObject, containerObject) {
  var returnValue = false;
  var currentObject;

  if (typeof containerObject === 'string') {
    containerObject = document.getElementById(containerObject);
  }
  if (typeof childObject === 'string') {
    childObject = document.getElementById(childObject);
  }

  currentObject = childObject.parentNode;

  while (currentObject !== undefined) {
    if (currentObject === document.body) {
      break;
    }

    if (currentObject.id == containerObject.id) {
      returnValue = true;
      break;
    }

    // Move up the hierarchy
    currentObject = currentObject.parentNode;
  }

  return returnValue;
}

You should use Node.contains, since it's now standard and available in all browsers.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Node.contains


TL;DR: a library

I advise using something like dom-helpers, written by the react team as a regular JS lib.

In their contains implementation you will see a Node#contains based implementation with a Node#compareDocumentPosition fallback.

Support for very old browsers e.g. IE <9 would not be given, which I find acceptable.

This answer incorporates the above ones, however I would advise against looping yourself.