What s the best RESTful method to return total number of items in an object

Question

I   m developing a REST API service for a large social networking website I   m involved in  So far  it   s working great  I can issue GET  POST  PUT and DELETE requests to object URLs and affect my data  However  this data is paged  limited to 30 results at a time    However  what would be the best RESTful way to get the total number of say  members  via my API   Currently  I issue requests to a URL structure like the following     api members   Returns a list of members  30 at a time as mentioned above   api members 1   Affects a single member  depending on request method used   My question is  how would I then use a similar URL structure to get the total number of members in my application  Obviously requesting just the id field  similar to Facebook   s Graph API  and counting the results would be ineffective given only a slice of 30 results would only be returned

User · Answer

I would recommend adding headers for the same, like:

HTTP/1.1 200

Pagination-Count: 100
Pagination-Page: 5
Pagination-Limit: 20
Content-Type: application/json

[
  {
    "id": 10,
    "name": "shirt",
    "color": "red",
    "price": "$23"
  },
  {
    "id": 11,
    "name": "shirt",
    "color": "blue",
    "price": "$25"
  }
]

For details refer to:

https://github.com/adnan-kamili/rest-api-response-format

For swagger file:

https://github.com/adnan-kamili/swagger-response-template

User · Answer

While the response to  API users is paged and returns only 30  records  there s nothing preventing you from including in the response also the total number of records  and other relevant info  like the page size  the page number offset  etc   The StackOverflow API is a good example of that same design  Here s the documentation for the Users method - https   api stackexchange com docs users

User · Answer

Alternative when you don t need actual items  Franci Penov s answer is certainly the best way to go so you always return items along with all additional metadata about your entities being requested  That s the way it should be done   but sometimes returning all data doesn t make sense  because you may not need them at all  Maybe all you need is that metadata about your requested resource  Like total count or number of pages or something else  In such case you can always have URL query tell your service not to return items but rather just metadata like    api members metaonly true  api members includeitems 0   or something similar

User · Answer

As of  X- -Prefix was deprecated   see  https   tools ietf org html rfc6648   We found the  Accept-Ranges  as being the best bet to map the pagination ranging  https   tools ietf org html rfc7233 section-2 3 As the  Range Units  may either be  bytes  or  token   Both do not represent a custom data type   see  https   tools ietf org html rfc7233 section-4 2  Still  it is stated that     HTTP 1 1 implementations MAY ignore ranges specified using other   units    Which indicates  using custom Range Units is not against the protocol  but it MAY be ignored   This way  we would have to set the Accept-Ranges to  members  or whatever ranged unit type  we d expect  And in addition  also set the Content-Range to the current range   see  https   www w3 org Protocols rfc2616 rfc2616-sec3 html sec3 12   Either way  I would stick to the recommendation of RFC7233  https   tools ietf org html rfc7233 page-8  to send a 206 instead of 200      If all of the preconditions are true  the server supports the Range   header field for the target resource  and the specified range s  are   valid and satisfiable  as defined in Section 2 1   the server SHOULD   send a 206  Partial Content  response with a payload containing one   or more partial representations that correspond to the satisfiable   ranges requested  as defined in Section 4    So  as a result  we would have the following HTTP header fields   For Partial Content   206 Partial Content Accept-Ranges  members Content-Range  members 0-20 100   For full Content   200 OK Accept-Ranges  members Content-Range  members 0-20 20

User · Answer

Sometimes frameworks  like  resource AngularJS  require an array as a query result  and you can t really have a response like  count 10 items        in this case I store  count  in responseHeaders   P  S  Actually you can do that with  resource AngularJS  but it needs some tweaks

User · Answer

I prefer using HTTP Headers for this kind of contextual information  For the total number of elements  I use the X-total-count header  For links to next  previous page  etc  I use HTTP Link header  http   www w3 org wiki LinkHeader Github does it the same way  https   developer github com v3  pagination In my opinion  it s cleaner since it can be used also when you return content that doesn t support hyperlinks  i e binaries  pictures

User · Answer

I have been doing some extensive research into this and other REST paging related questions lately and thought it constructive to add some of my findings here  I m expanding the question a bit to include thoughts on paging as well as the count as they are intimitely related   Headers  The paging metadata is included in the response in the form of response headers  The big benefit of this approach is that the response payload itself is just the actual data requestor was asking for  Making processing the response easier for clients that are not interested in the paging information    There are a bunch of  standard and custom  headers used in the wild to return paging related information  including the total count    X-Total-Count  X-Total-Count  234   This is used in some APIs I found in the wild  There are also NPM packages for adding support for this header to e g  Loopback  Some articles recommend setting this header as well    It is often used in combination with the Link header  which is a pretty good solution for paging  but lacks the total count information   Link  Link   lt  TheBook chapter2 gt         rel  previous   title  UTF-8 de letztes 20Kapitel         lt  TheBook chapter4 gt         rel  next   title  UTF-8 de n c3 a4chstes 20Kapitel   I feel  from reading a lot on this subject  that the general consensus is to use the Link header to provide paging links to clients using rel next  rel previous etc  The problem with this is that it lacks the information of how many total records there are  which is why many APIs combine this with the X-Total-Count header   Alternatively  some APIs and e g  the JsonApi standard  use the Link format  but add the information in a response envelope instead of to a header  This simplifies access to the metadata  and creates a place to add the total count information  at the expense of increasing complexity of accessing the actual data itself  by adding an envelope    Content-Range  Content-Range  items 0-49 234   Promoted by a blog article named Range header  I choose you  for pagination    The author makes a strong case for using the Range and Content-Range headers for pagination  When we carefully read the RFC on these headers  we find that extending their meaning beyond ranges of bytes was actually anticipated by the RFC and is explicitly permitted  When used in the context of items instead of bytes  the Range header actually gives us a way to both request a certain range of items and indicate what range of the total result the response items relate to  This header also gives a great way to show the total count  And it is a true standard that mostly maps one-to-one to paging  It is also used in the wild   Envelope  Many APIs  including the one from our favorite Q amp A website use an envelope  a wrapper around the data that is used to add meta information about the data  Also  OData and JsonApi standards both use a response envelope   The big downside to this  imho  is that processing the response data becomes more complex as the actual data has to be found somewhere in the envelope  Also there are many different formats for that envelope and you have to use the right one  It is telling that the response envelopes from OData and JsonApi are wildly different  with OData mixing in metadata at multiple points in the response   Separate endpoint  I think this has been covered enough in the other answers  I did not investigate this much because I agree with the comments that this is confusing as you now have multiple types of endpoints  I think it s nicest if every endpoint represents a  collection of  resource s    Further thoughts  We don t only have to communicate the paging meta information related to the response  but also allow the client to request specific pages ranges  It is interesting to also look at this aspect to end up with a coherent solution  Here too we can use headers  the Range header seems very suitable   or other mechanisms such as query parameters  Some people advocate treating pages of results as separate resources  which may make sense in some use cases  e g   books 231 pages 52  I ended up selecting a wild range of frequently used request parameters such as pagesize  page size  and limit etc in addition to supporting the Range header  and as request parameter as well

User · Answer

You could return the count as a custom HTTP header in response to a HEAD request  This way  if a client only wants the count  you don t need to return the actual list  and there s no need for an additional URL    Or  if you re in a controlled environment from endpoint to endpoint  you could use a custom HTTP verb such as COUNT

User · Answer

When requesting paginated data  you know  by explicit page size parameter value or default page size value  the page size  so you know if you got all data in response or not  When there is less data in response than is a page size  then you got whole data  When a full page is returned  you have to ask again for another page   I prefer have separate endpoint for count  or same endpoint with parameter countOnly   Because you could prepare end user for long time consuming process by showing properly initiated progressbar   If you want to return datasize in each response  there should be pageSize  offset mentionded as well  To be honest the best way is to repeat a request filters too  But the response became very complex  So  I prefer dedicated endpoint to return count     lt data gt     lt originalRequest gt       lt filter  gt       lt filter  gt     lt  originalReqeust gt     lt totalRecordCount  gt     lt pageSize  gt     lt offset  gt     lt list gt        lt item  gt        lt item  gt     lt  list gt   lt  data gt    Couleage of mine  prefer a countOnly parameter to existing endpoint  So  when specified the response contains metadata only   endpoint filter value   lt data gt     lt count  gt     lt list gt       lt item  gt             lt  list gt   lt  data gt    endpoint filter value amp countOnly true   lt data gt     lt count  gt     lt  -- empty list -- gt     lt list  gt   lt  data gt

User · Answer

Interesting discussion regarding Designing REST API for returning count of multiple objects  https   groups google com g api-craft c qbI2QRrpFew m h30DYnrqEwAJ pli 1  As an API consumer  I would expect each count value to be represented either as a subresource to the countable resource  i e  GET  tasks count for a count of tasks   or as a field in a bigger aggregation of metadata related to the concerned resource  i e  GET  tasks metadata   By scoping related endpoints under the same parent resource  i e   tasks   the API becomes intuitive  and the purpose of an endpoint can  usually  be inferred from its path and HTTP method  Additional thoughts   If each individual count is only useful in combination with other counts  for a statistics dashboard  for example   you could possibly expose a single endpoint which aggregates and returns all counts at once  If you have an existing endpoint for listing all resources  i e  GET  tasks for listing all tasks   the count could be included in the response as metadata  either as HTTP headers or in the response body  Doing this will incur unnecessary load on the API  which might be negligible depending on your use case

User · Answer

Seems easiest to just add a   GET  api members count   and return the total count of members

User · Answer

You could consider counts as a resource  The URL would then be    api counts member

User · Answer

What about a new end point    api members count which just calls Members Count   and returns the result

[rest] What’s the best RESTful method to return total number of items in an object?

Examples related to rest

Examples related to restful-url