[r] Conditional replacement of values in a data.frame

I am trying to understand how to conditional replace values in a dataframe without using a loop. My data frame is structured as follows:

> df
          a b est
1  11.77000 2   0
2  10.90000 3   0
3  10.32000 2   0
4  10.96000 0   0
5   9.90600 0   0
6  10.70000 0   0
7  11.43000 1   0
8  11.41000 2   0
9  10.48512 4   0
10 11.19000 0   0

and the dput output is this:

structure(list(a = c(11.77, 10.9, 10.32, 10.96, 9.906, 10.7, 
11.43, 11.41, 10.48512, 11.19), b = c(2, 3, 2, 0, 0, 0, 1, 2, 
4, 0), est = c(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)), .Names = c("a", 
"b", "est"), row.names = c(NA, -10L), class = "data.frame")

What I want to do, is to check the value of b. If b is 0, I want to set est to a value from a. I understand that df$est[df$b == 0] <- 23 will set all values of est to 23, when b==0. What I don't understand is how to set est to a value of a when that condition is true. For example:

df$est[df$b == 0] <- (df$a - 5)/2.533 

gives the following warning:

Warning message:
In df$est[df$b == 0] <- (df$a - 5)/2.533 :
  number of items to replace is not a multiple of replacement length

Is there a way that I can pass the relevant cell, rather than vector?

This question is related to r dataframe

The answer is


The R-inferno, or the basic R-documentation will explain why using df$* is not the best approach here. From the help page for "[" :

"Indexing by [ is similar to atomic vectors and selects a list of the specified element(s). Both [[ and $ select a single element of the list. The main difference is that $ does not allow computed indices, whereas [[ does. x$name is equivalent to x[["name", exact = FALSE]]. Also, the partial matching behavior of [[ can be controlled using the exact argument. "

I recommend using the [row,col] notation instead. Example:

Rgames: foo   
         x    y z  
   [1,] 1e+00 1 0  
   [2,] 2e+00 2 0  
   [3,] 3e+00 1 0  
   [4,] 4e+00 2 0  
   [5,] 5e+00 1 0  
   [6,] 6e+00 2 0  
   [7,] 7e+00 1 0  
   [8,] 8e+00 2 0  
   [9,] 9e+00 1 0  
   [10,] 1e+01 2 0  
Rgames: foo<-as.data.frame(foo)

Rgames: foo[foo$y==2,3]<-foo[foo$y==2,1]
Rgames: foo
       x y     z
1  1e+00 1 0e+00
2  2e+00 2 2e+00
3  3e+00 1 0e+00
4  4e+00 2 4e+00
5  5e+00 1 0e+00
6  6e+00 2 6e+00
7  7e+00 1 0e+00
8  8e+00 2 8e+00
9  9e+00 1 0e+00
10 1e+01 2 1e+01

Another option would be to use case_when

require(dplyr)

mutate(df, est = case_when(
    b == 0 ~ (a - 5)/2.53, 
    TRUE   ~ est 
))

This solution becomes even more handy if more than 2 cases need to be distinguished, as it allows to avoid nested if_else constructs.


Here is one approach. ifelse is vectorized and it checks all rows for zero values of b and replaces est with (a - 5)/2.53 if that is the case.

df <- transform(df, est = ifelse(b == 0, (a - 5)/2.53, est))

Try data.table's := operator :

DT = as.data.table(df)
DT[b==0, est := (a-5)/2.533]

It's fast and short. See these linked questions for more information on := :

Why has data.table defined :=

When should I use the := operator in data.table

How do you remove columns from a data.frame

R self reference