[javascript] How do you easily create empty matrices javascript?

In python, you can do this:

[([None] * 9) for x in range(9)]

and you'll get this:

[[None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None],
 [None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None],
 [None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None],
 [None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None],
 [None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None],
 [None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None],
 [None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None],
 [None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None],
 [None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None]]

How can I do the equivalent in javascript?

This question is related to javascript

The answer is


With ES6 spread operator: Array(9).fill([...Array(9)])


For a 2-d matrix I'd do the following

var data = Array(9 * 9).fill(0);
var index = (i,j) => 9*i + j;
//any reference to an index, eg. (3,4) can be done as follows
data[index(3,4)]; 

You can replace 9 with any generic ROWS and COLUMNS constants.


Here's one, no looping:

(Math.pow(10, 20)+'').replace((/0/g),'1').split('').map(parseFloat);

Fill the '20' for length, use the (optional) regexp for handy transforms and map to ensure datatype. I added a function to the Array prototype to easily pull the parameters of 'map' into your functions.. bit risky, some people strongly oppose touching native prototypes, but it does come in handy..

    Array.prototype.$args = function(idx) {
        idx || (idx = 0);
        return function() {
            return arguments.length > idx ? arguments[idx] : null;
        };
    };

// Keys
(Math.pow(10, 20)+'').replace((/0/g),'1').split('').map(this.$args(1));
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20]

// Matrix
(Math.pow(10, 9)+'').replace((/0/g),'1').split('').map(this.$args(1)).map(this.$args(2))

If you really like one-liners and there is a use for underscore.js in your project (which is a great library) you can do write-only things like:

_.range(9).map(function(n) {
      return _.range(9).map(function(n) {
            return null;
      });
});

But I would go with standard for-cycle version mentioned above.


Use this function or some like that. :)

function createMatrix(line, col, defaultValue = 0){ 
    return new Array(line).fill(defaultValue).map((x)=>{ return new Array(col).fill(defaultValue); return x; }); 
}
var myMatrix = createMatrix(9,9);

This is an exact fix to your problem, but I would advise against initializing the matrix with a default value that represents '0' or 'undefined', as Arrays in javascript are just regular objects, so you wind up wasting effort. If you want to default the cells to some meaningful value, then this snippet will work well, but if you want an uninitialized matrix, don't use this version:

/**
* Generates a matrix (ie: 2-D Array) with: 
* 'm' columns, 
* 'n' rows, 
* every cell defaulting to 'd';
*/
function Matrix(m, n, d){
    var mat = Array.apply(null, new Array(m)).map(
        Array.prototype.valueOf,
        Array.apply(null, new Array(n)).map(
            function() {
               return d;
            }
        )
    );
    return mat;
}

Usage:

< Matrix(3,2,'dobon');
> Array [ Array['dobon', 'dobon'], Array['dobon', 'dobon'], Array['dobon', 'dobon'] ]

If you would rather just create an uninitialized 2-D Array, then this will be more efficient than unnecessarily initializing every entry:

/**
* Generates a matrix (ie: 2-D Array) with: 
* 'm' columns, 
* 'n' rows, 
* every cell remains 'undefined';
*/
function Matrix(m, n){
    var mat = Array.apply(null, new Array(m)).map(
        Array.prototype.valueOf,
        new Array(n)
    );
    return mat;
}

Usage:

< Matrix(3,2);
> Array [ Array[2], Array[2], Array[2] ]

better. that exactly will work.

let mx = Matrix(9, 9);

function Matrix(w, h){
    let mx = Array(w);
    for(let i of mx.keys())
        mx[i] = Array(h);
    return mx;
}


what was shown

Array(9).fill(Array(9)); // Not correctly working

It does not work, because all cells are fill with one array


The question is slightly ambiguous, since None can translate into either undefined or null. null is a better choice:

var a = [], b;
var i, j;
for (i = 0; i < 9; i++) {
  for (j = 0, b = []; j < 9; j++) {
    b.push(null);
  }
  a.push(b);
}

If undefined, you can be sloppy and just don't bother, everything is undefined anyway. :)


Array.from(new Array(row), () => new Array(col).fill(0));

JavaScript doesn’t have a built-in 2D array concept, but you can certainly create an array of arrays.

function createMatrix(row, column, isEmpty) {
        let matrix = []
        let array = []
        let rowColumn = row * column
        for (let i = 1; i <= rowColumn; i++) {
            isEmpty ?  array.push([]) :  array.push(i)

            if (i % column === 0) {
                matrix.push(array)
                array = []
            }
        }
        return matrix
    }

createMatrix(5, 3, true)

or

function createMatrix(row, column, from) {

        let [matrix, array] = [[], []],
            total = row * column

        for (let element = from || 1; element <= total; element++) {
            array.push(element)
            if (element % column === 0) {
                matrix.push(array)
                array = []
            }
        }

        return matrix
    }

createMatrix(5, 6, 1)

_x000D_
_x000D_
// initializing depending on i,j:_x000D_
var M=Array.from({length:9}, (_,i) => Array.from({length:9}, (_,j) => i+'x'+j))_x000D_
_x000D_
// Print it:_x000D_
_x000D_
console.table(M)_x000D_
// M.forEach(r => console.log(r))_x000D_
document.body.innerHTML = `<pre>${M.map(r => r.join('\t')).join('\n')}</pre>`_x000D_
// JSON.stringify(M, null, 2) // bad for matrices
_x000D_
_x000D_
_x000D_

Beware that doing this below, is wrong:

// var M=Array(9).fill([]) // since arrays are sparse
// or Array(9).fill(Array(9).fill(0))// initialization

// M[4][4] = 1
// M[3][4] is now 1 too!

Because it creates the same reference of Array 9 times, so modifying an item modifies also items at the same index of other rows (since it's the same reference), so you need an additional call to .slice or .map on the rows to copy them (cf torazaburo's answer which fell in this trap)

note: It may look like this in the future, with slice-notation-literal proposal (stage 1)

const M = [...1:10].map(i => [...1:10].map(j => i+'x'+j))

I'll give it my shot as well

var c = Array;

for( var i = 0, a = c(9); i < 9; a[i] = c(9), i++ );

console.log( a.join(",") );
//",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"

Readable and maintainable !


There is something about Array.fill I need to mention.

If you just use below method to create a 3x3 matrix.

Array(3).fill(Array(3).fill(0));

You will find that the values in the matrix is a reference.

enter image description here


Optimized solution (prevent passing by reference):

If you want to pass by value rather than reference, you can leverage Array.map to create it.

Array(3).fill(null).map(() => Array(3).fill(0));

enter image description here


Array.fill

Consider using fill:

Array(9).fill().map(()=>Array(9).fill())

The idea here is that fill() will fill out the items with undefined, which is enough to get map to work on them.

You could also fill directly:

Array(9).fill(Array(9))

Alternatives to Array(9).fill() include

Array(...Array(9))
[].push(...Array(9))
[].concat(Array(9))
Array.from(Array(9))

We can rewrite the solution a bit more semantically as:

function array9() { return Array(9).fill(); }
array9().map(array9)

or

function array(n) { return Array(n).fill(); }
array(9).map(() => array(9))

Array.from provides us with an optional second mapping argument, so we have the alternative of writing

Array.from(Array(9), () => Array.from(Array(9));

or, if you prefer

function array9(map) { return Array.from(Array(9), map); }
array9(array9);

For verbose description and examples, see Mozilla's Docs on Array.prototype.fill() here.
and for Array.from(), here.

Note that neither Array.prototype.fill() nor Array.from() has support in Internet Explorer. A polyfill for IE is available at the above MDN links.

Partitioning

partition(Array(81), 9)

if you have a partition utility handy. Here's a quick recursive one:

function partition(a, n) {
  return a.length ? [a.splice(0, n)].concat(partition(a, n)) : [];
}  

Looping

We can loop a bit more efficiently with

var a = [], b;
while (a.push(b = []) < 9) while (b.push(null) < 9);

Taking advantage of the fact that push returns the new array length.


Coffeescript to the rescue!

[1..9].map -> [1..9].map -> null


Well, you can create an empty 1-D array using the explicit Array constructor:

a = new Array(9)

To create an array of arrays, I think that you'll have to write a nested loop as Marc described.


You can add functionality to an Array by extending its prototype object.

Array.prototype.nullify = function( n ) {
    n = n >>> 0;
    for( var i = 0; i < n; ++i ) {
        this[ i ] = null;
    }
    return this;
};

Then:

var arr = [].nullify(9);

or:

var arr = [].nullify(9).map(function() { return [].nullify(9); });