I have a very simple functional component as follows:
import * as React from 'react';
export interface AuxProps {
children: React.ReactNode
}
const aux = (props: AuxProps) => props.children;
export default aux;
And another component:
import * as React from "react";
export interface LayoutProps {
children: React.ReactNode
}
const layout = (props: LayoutProps) => (
<Aux>
<div>Toolbar, SideDrawer, Backdrop</div>
<main>
{props.children}
</main>
<Aux/>
);
export default layout;
I keep on getting the following error:
[ts] JSX element type 'ReactNode' is not a constructor function for JSX elements. Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'ElementClass'. [2605]
How do I type this correctly?
This question is related to
reactjs
typescript
jsx
typescript2.0
You can use ReactChildren
and ReactChild
:
import React, { ReactChildren, ReactChild } from 'react';
interface AuxProps {
children: ReactChild | ReactChildren;
}
const Aux = ({ children }: AuxProps) => (<div>{children}</div>);
export default Aux;
If you need to pass flat arrays of elements:
interface AuxProps {
children: ReactChild | ReactChild[] | ReactChildren | ReactChildren[];
}
These answers appear to be outdated - React now has a built in type PropsWithChildren<{}>
. It is defined similarly to some of the correct answers on this page:
type PropsWithChildren<P> = P & { children?: ReactNode };
A React Node
is one of the following types:
Boolean
(which is ignored)null
or undefined
(which is ignored)Number
String
React element
(result of JSX
)I'm using the following
type Props = { children: React.ReactNode };
const MyComponent: React.FC<Props> = ({children}) => {
return (
<div>
{ children }
</div>
);
export default MyComponent;
From the TypeScript site: https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/6471
The recommended practice is to write the props type as {children?: any}
That worked for me. The child node can be many different things, so explicit typing can miss cases.
There's a longer discussion on the followup issue here: https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/13618, but the any approach still works.
The general way to find any type is by example. The beauty of typescript is that you have access to all types, so long as you have the correct @types/
files.
To answer this myself I just thought of a component react uses that has the children
prop. The first thing that came to mind? How about a <div />
?
All you need to do is open vscode and create a new .tsx
file in a react project with @types/react
.
import React from 'react';
export default () => (
<div children={'test'} />
);
Hovering over the children
prop shows you the type. And what do you know -- Its type is ReactNode
(no need for ReactNode[]
).
Then if you click into the type definition it brings you straight to the definition of children
coming from DOMAttributes
interface.
// node_modules/@types/react/index.d.ts
interface DOMAttributes<T> {
children?: ReactNode;
...
}
Note: This process should be used to find any unknown type! All of them are there just waiting for you to find them :)
In order to use <Aux>
in your JSX, it needs to be a function that returns ReactElement<any> | null
. That's the definition of a function component.
However, it's currently defined as a function that returns React.ReactNode
, which is a much wider type. As React typings say:
type ReactNode = ReactChild | ReactFragment | ReactPortal | boolean | null | undefined;
Make sure the unwanted types are neutralized by wrapping the returned value into React Fragment (<></>
):
const aux: React.FC<AuxProps> = props =>
<>{props.children}</>;
The function component return type is limited to JSXElement | null
in TypeScript. This is a current type limitation, pure React allows more return types.
You can either use a type assertion or Fragments as workaround:
const Aux = (props: AuxProps) => <>props.children</>;
const Aux2 = (props: AuxProps) => props.children as ReactElement;
ReactNode
children: React.ReactNode
might be suboptimal, if the goal is to have strong types for Aux
.
Almost anything can be assigned to current ReactNode
type, which is equivalent to {} | undefined | null
. A safer type for your case could be:
interface AuxProps {
children: ReactElement | ReactElement[]
}
Example:
Given Aux
needs React elements as children
, we accidently added a string
to it. Then above solution would error in contrast to ReactNode
- take a look at the linked playgrounds.
Typed children
are also useful for non-JSX props, like a Render Prop callback.
As a type that contains children, I'm using:
type ChildrenContainer = Pick<JSX.IntrinsicElements["div"], "children">
This children container type is generic enough to support all the different cases and also aligned with the ReactJS API.
So, for your example it would be something like:
const layout = ({ children }: ChildrenContainer) => (
<Aux>
<div>Toolbar, SideDrawer, Backdrop</div>
<main>
{children}
</main>
<Aux/>
)
you can declare your component like this:
const MyComponent: React.FunctionComponent = (props) => {
return props.children;
}
Just children: React.ReactNode
This has always worked for me:
type Props = {
children: JSX.Element;
};
You can also use React.PropsWithChildren<P>
.
type ComponentWithChildProps = React.PropsWithChildren<{example?: string}>;
React components should have a single wrapper node or return an array of nodes.
Your <Aux>...</Aux>
component has two nodes div
and main
.
Try to wrap your children in a div
in Aux
component.
import * as React from 'react';
export interface AuxProps {
children: React.ReactNode
}
const aux = (props: AuxProps) => (<div>{props.children}</div>);
export default aux;
This is what worked for me:
interface Props {
children: JSX.Element[] | JSX.Element
}
Edit I would recommend using children: React.ReactNode
instead now.
Source: Stackoverflow.com