It's as the error message says "The value violated the integrity constraints for the column" for column "Copy of F2"
Make it so it doesn't violate the value in the target table. What the allowable values are, data types, etc are not provided in your question so we cannot be more specific in answering.
To address the downvote, No, really it's as it says: you are putting something into a column that is not allowed. It could be Faizan points out, that you're putting a NULL into a NOT NULLable column, but it could be a whole host of other things and as the original poster never provided any update, we're left to guess. Was there a foreign key constraint that the insert violated? Maybe there's a check constraint that got blown? Maybe the source column in Excel has a valid date value for Excel that is not valid for the target column's date/time data type.
Thus, baring concrete information, the best possible answer is "don't do the thing that breaks it" In this case, something about "Copy of F2" is bad for the target column. Give us table definitions, supplied values, etc, then you can specific answers.
Telling people to make a NOT NULLable column into a NULLable one might be the right answer. It might also be the most horrific answer known to mankind. If an existing process expects there to always be a value in column "Copy of F2" changing the constraint to NULL can wreak havoc on existing queries. For example
SELECT * FROM ArbitraryTable AS T WHERE T.[Copy of F2] = '';
Currently, that query retrieves everything that was freshly imported because Copy of F2
is a poorly named status indicator. That data needs to get fed into the next system so... bills can get paid. As soon as you make it such that unprocessed rows can have a NULL value, the above query no longer satisfies that. Bills don't get paid, collections repos your building and now you're out of a job, all because you didn't do impact analysis, etc, etc.