My team uses an internal team maven repo that is shared from a development server using Apache. We also run the Continuum CI server on the same machine. Maven builds in Continuum are run with the "install" goal, which copies the final artifact directly into the shared directory.
The question is, what is the difference between adding files to the shared repo using mvn install and using the deploy goal (mvn-deploy plugin)?
It seems to me that using mvn deploy creates additional configuration hassles, but I have read somewhere that installing files into a shared repo is a bad idea for some reason related to the internal workings of maven.
update: I get the functional differences between deploy and install; I am actually more interested in the low level details in terms of what files are created in the maven repo.
This question is related to
maven-2
"matt b" has it right, but to be specific, the "install" goal copies your built target to the local repository on your file system; useful for small changes across projects not currently meant for the full group.
The "deploy" goal uploads it to your shared repository for when your work is finished, and then can be shared by other people who require it for their project.
In your case, it seems that "install" is used to make the management of the deployment easier since CI's local repo is the shared repo. If CI was on another box, it would have to use the "deploy" goal.
"matt b" has it right, but to be specific, the "install" goal copies your built target to the local repository on your file system; useful for small changes across projects not currently meant for the full group.
The "deploy" goal uploads it to your shared repository for when your work is finished, and then can be shared by other people who require it for their project.
In your case, it seems that "install" is used to make the management of the deployment easier since CI's local repo is the shared repo. If CI was on another box, it would have to use the "deploy" goal.
From the Maven docs, sounds like it's just a difference in which repository you install the package into:
Maybe there is some confusion in that "install" to the CI server installs it to it's local repository, which then you as a user are sharing?
"matt b" has it right, but to be specific, the "install" goal copies your built target to the local repository on your file system; useful for small changes across projects not currently meant for the full group.
The "deploy" goal uploads it to your shared repository for when your work is finished, and then can be shared by other people who require it for their project.
In your case, it seems that "install" is used to make the management of the deployment easier since CI's local repo is the shared repo. If CI was on another box, it would have to use the "deploy" goal.
From the Maven docs, sounds like it's just a difference in which repository you install the package into:
Maybe there is some confusion in that "install" to the CI server installs it to it's local repository, which then you as a user are sharing?
"matt b" has it right, but to be specific, the "install" goal copies your built target to the local repository on your file system; useful for small changes across projects not currently meant for the full group.
The "deploy" goal uploads it to your shared repository for when your work is finished, and then can be shared by other people who require it for their project.
In your case, it seems that "install" is used to make the management of the deployment easier since CI's local repo is the shared repo. If CI was on another box, it would have to use the "deploy" goal.
From the Maven docs, sounds like it's just a difference in which repository you install the package into:
Maybe there is some confusion in that "install" to the CI server installs it to it's local repository, which then you as a user are sharing?
Source: Stackoverflow.com